Microsoft and Japan's National Police Agency have jointly dismantled a phishing operation that sent more than 1 billion fraudulent ema...
According to a complaint filed by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Digital Forensics Corporation (DFC), its owner Dmitry Belkin, and associated businesses allegedly misled victims who were already experiencing fear, emotional distress, and threats of having private images exposed.
According to the FTC complaint, DFC collected at least $60 million between February 2023 and July 2026. The company allegedly charged customers between $1,499 and $20,000 for services advertised as helping identify blackmailers, stop threats, and support investigations.
The complaint claims that the company misrepresented its investigative capabilities and the results it could achieve. Among the allegations is that DFC used fabricated investigative chat transcripts to make customers believe its investigators were actively communicating with suspected criminals.
The FTC also alleges that the company reused location information to create the impression that it had successfully tracked down perpetrators. Such tactic could lead customers to believe that meaningful investigative work was being conducted when the evidence presented to them did not support those claims.
Besides this, the complaint argues that customers were pressured into purchasing extra services. The company reportedly used positive reviews that were not genuine to strengthen its reputation and made obtaining refunds difficult for dissatisfied customers.
“Instead of communicating with the sextortionist through the victim's account, defendants routinely change the victim's account settings simply to block the sextortionist's communications. Instead of obtaining investigative information, defendants fabricate chat transcripts,” the complaint said.
According to the complaint, “Defendants falsely portray themselves as digital forensics experts, claiming they can track and identify sextortionists, prevent the spread of explicit material and coordinate with law enforcement to bring criminals to justice."
The FTC filed a lawsuit against DFC, Belkin, and several affiliated companies, accusing violations of consumer protection laws. A federal court temporarily halted the company's operations while the legal case proceeds. The agency is seeking action against the alleged deceptive practices.
The FTC also reported that the company advertised its services through search engines, video-sharing websites, and social media platforms, potentially reaching people actively searching for urgent help.
Remote access trojan (RAT) XWorm has developed into an advanced surveillance threat whose capabilities extend beyond data theft and remote system control. According to cyber security researchers at Netskope Threat Labs, recent versions of this malware contain plugins for tracking the location of victims, capturing live audio, controlling webcams, and controlling active browser sessions.
It was discovered in 2022 that XWorm facilitated the control of compromised systems by logging keystrokes, capturing screenshots, and executing remote payloads. The malware has been modified by its developers since its discovery, adding new features and releasing updated versions. According to Netskope, 1,236 detection events were recorded across 100 customer organisations during the third quarter of 2026, representing a fourfold increase from the same period in 2025.
The malware's expansion has been accompanied by an expansion of its plugin collection. In July 2025, 35 plugins were supported, but by October 2026, 46 plugins were supported, which provided increased capabilities for monitoring and interacting with victims' devices.
A cracking of the XWorm builder and subsequent release of the source code for version 6.4 in August 2025 resulted in the wider dissemination of the malware. Since then, researchers have identified multiple versions operating in the wild, including V6.4, V6.5, V7.2, and V7.4 The malware has been modified in several ways, including code protection, delivery methods, and the ability to evade security analysis.
There are approximately 35% of affected customers that are affiliated with financial services companies, according to Netskope. The majority of reported incidents have occurred in the United States, India, Brazil, Italy, Panama, and Brazil. HBrowser plugins pose a significant security risk due to their ability to operate within existing browser sessions rather than relying on stolen passwords.
Command-and-control channels of the malware are encrypted using AES, allowing for remote mouse clicks, keyboard inputs, and other interactions with the active browser. By continuously taking screenshots, attackers can gain access to accounts already logged in and potentially gain access to sensitive information. By collecting device location data without a visible consent request, the Maps plugin adds another layer of surveillance.
Netskope's analysis shows that it attempts to retrieve GPS coordinates, but when GPS coordinates are not available, it switches to IP-based geolocation. Microphone plugins allow for recording audio from selected recording devices and transmission to operators in encrypted, compressed data chunks. In addition to webcam recording, attackers may also monitor compromised devices without displaying obvious warnings to the user using these functions.
Continued Development Raises Security Concerns
As the malware has evolved, it has also undergone changes to make analysis and detection more challenging. Recent variants have introduced stronger code protection techniques, techniques for avoiding virtual analysis environments, and modifications to payload delivery and command-and-control communication.
By expanding the plugin collection, operators have increased the range of options they have for tailoring attacks to meet their objectives. NetSkope anticipates continued development of XWorm following the public release of its builder and source code, with further development likely following that. The increasing surveillance capabilities of malware also highlight the limitations associated with multi-factor authentication alone.
An attacker who controls an already authenticated browser session on an infected device may not be able to prevent access to open accounts even when additional login verification is performed. It is recommended that security teams strengthen endpoint monitoring, investigate unusual process and network activity, and restrict unauthorised outbound communications.
Network segmentation will also allow you to limit the spread of malware across other connected systems. Detecting endpoints, monitoring traffic, and responding to incidents in a timely manner remain crucial for identifying suspicious activity and containing compromised devices before they can be exploited further by attackers.
Norway's data protection authority has issued its largest fine to date, hitting Microsoft-owned advertising company Xandr with a NOK 92 million ($9.6 million) penalty for passing sensitive personal data belonging to Norwegian Grindr users through automated advertising auctions without a legal basis. The decision, signed October 2 by Datatilsynet Director General Line Coll and Head of International Tobias Judin, targets one of the most contested privacy questions in digital advertising: whether ad intermediaries can claim ignorance of how consent was collected by the apps they serve.
Grindr is a location-based dating app primarily used by gay, bisexual, trans, and queer people. For nearly two years, from July 2018 to April 2020, Xandr sat at the center of the app's advertising infrastructure, operating on both the buying and selling sides of real-time bidding. The process works fast and invisibly. The moment a user opened Grindr, the app passed their data through Xandr to a pool of companies competing in a split-second auction for the right to show that person an ad. Datatilsynet found that this relay included at minimum each user's advertising ID, IP address, and the fact of their Grindr use. Under GDPR, that last detail matters enormously. The authority concluded that being identifiable as a Grindr user is itself information that indicates sexual orientation, a category that European data law places under strict protection and requires explicit consent to process.
Xandr's defense rested on the argument that it believed Grindr had already collected consent from its users. Datatilsynet rejected that reasoning on a straightforward legal basis: Xandr was not a passive conduit but a joint controller alongside Grindr. Under GDPR's joint controller framework, both parties carry independent obligations to confirm a lawful basis exists before processing sensitive data. Xandr never verified that any such basis was in place, and the authority ruled that the company had no right to treat consent as someone else's responsibility. "Xandr omitted to verify that the consents from Grindr were valid, and did not do anything to ensure they had a legal basis for their own processing," Coll stated in the decision.
The investigation turned up a complicating detail. Xandr had been notified of the probe by Datatilsynet in February 2020. Despite that, the company deleted documentation about its processing of Grindr users' data between July 2020 and February 2023, when the authority sent a second information order. Xandr told investigators the deletion had occurred as part of its routine data retention policies. Datatilsynet refused to let that explanation close the gap, noting that the company knew an active investigation was underway when the records were removed.
In setting the penalty at NOK 92 million, Datatilsynet cited the duration of the violations, the direct financial benefit Xandr drew from the unlawful sharing, and the fact that thousands of Norwegian users had their sensitive data exposed to potentially thousands of companies without their knowledge. Crucially, the fine was calculated against Xandr's own annual turnover and not Microsoft's. The authority noted that the violations took place before Microsoft completed its acquisition of Xandr in June 2022, after AT&T sold the unit it had rebranded from AppNexus in 2019.
A Microsoft spokesperson mentioned that the investigation "focused on conduct that predates Microsoft's acquisition of Xandr," adding that interpretations and applications of legal standards have continued to evolve since then. The company said it is reviewing the decision and assessing its options. Xandr, which now operates as Microsoft Advertising, has three weeks to appeal to Norway's Privacy Appeals Board.
The case has roots in January 2020, when the Norwegian Consumer Council filed complaints against Grindr and five ad tech companies: AppNexus, MoPub, OpenX, AdColony, and Smaato. Austrian privacy rights organization noyb joined the action and celebrated the outcome, calling the decision "a major blow to the online adtech industry." This week's fine against Xandr is the downstream enforcement of a broader probe that, on the Grindr side, produced a NOK 65 million penalty against the app itself in 2021. Norway's Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld that fine against Grindr in October 2025 after the company challenged it through two rounds of litigation.
Grindr's data-sharing history has had consequences beyond Norwegian borders as well. In September 2026, the dating app agreed to pay £26 million to settle a UK class action brought by roughly 12,000 users who alleged the platform had shared information including HIV status, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and location with third-party advertising firms before 2020. The London lawsuit, filed in April 2024 by law firm Austen Hays, alleged violations of UK data protection law during roughly the same period covered by the Norwegian proceedings.
The Datatilsynet decision marks one of the more pointed statements yet from a European privacy regulator on how far down an ad supply chain accountability can reach. By treating Xandr as a joint controller rather than an infrastructure provider, the authority made clear that operating the pipes through which sensitive data flows carries its own legal obligations, regardless of which company collected the data in the first place.