Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Latest News

Play Gang Claims Responsibility for MyPillow Hack, Company CEO Denies the Breach

The US military has always known that threat actors could use location data to spy on troops’ devices. The military also knows the easy solu...

All the recent news you need to know
USB C
Android Connectors Ethernet Hardware HDMI SD USB C

Why a USB-C Hub Is Becoming an Essential Accessory for Modern Phones and Laptops

 





The push toward thinner smartphones and lightweight laptops has transformed device design over the last decade. While manufacturers have succeeded in reducing size and weight, the transformation has often come at the cost of connectivity. Many modern devices now rely on a single USB-C port for charging, data transfer, and external accessories, leaving users without many of the ports that were once standard.

As a result, consumers frequently turn to individual adapters whenever they need to connect older hardware. A separate adapter may be required for an external monitor, another for a USB flash drive, and yet another for reading camera memory cards. What begins as a simple attempt to restore missing functionality can quickly turn into a collection of small accessories that must be carried, organized, and replaced when lost.

Technology users who work across multiple locations often encounter this challenge. A forgotten HDMI adapter can prevent a presentation from being displayed on a monitor. Leaving behind a memory card reader can delay the transfer of photos and videos. Even a missing USB adapter may stop a user from connecting a keyboard, mouse, or storage device when it is needed most.

Multi-port USB-C hubs have emerged as one solution to this growing connectivity problem. Instead of requiring separate accessories for different tasks, these devices combine multiple ports into a single unit that connects through a USB-C interface. Depending on the model, a hub may include HDMI output, USB-A ports, SD and microSD card readers, Ethernet connectivity, and pass-through charging support.

The primary advantage is convenience. Rather than managing several individual adapters, users only need to carry one accessory capable of supporting a wide range of devices. For people who frequently travel or work remotely, reducing the number of cables and connectors can simplify setup and minimize the chances of leaving behind a critical component.

Many hubs also allow smartphones to support more advanced desktop-style workflows. Certain Android devices can connect to external displays through HDMI, enabling users to work on a larger screen while simultaneously using a keyboard and mouse. This approach can create a workstation-like environment without requiring a traditional computer for basic productivity tasks.

However, not all USB-C hubs deliver the same level of performance. Buyers should examine specifications carefully before making a purchase. Factors such as transfer speeds, display resolution support, charging capacity, and the total number of available ports can vary considerably between products.

Power management is another important consideration. When multiple accessories are connected simultaneously, a hub may draw power from the host device. For this reason, many manufacturers offer pass-through charging capabilities that allow a charger to supply power to both the hub and the connected phone or laptop. Some models advertise support for charging rates up to 100 watts, although part of that power is consumed internally to operate the hub and connected peripherals.

Despite the industry's migration toward USB-C, many commonly used accessories continue to rely on older USB-A connections. Flash drives, printers, wireless mouse receivers, gaming controllers, and other peripherals still use the legacy standard. A hub can serve as a bridge between newer devices and existing hardware without requiring users to replace all of their accessories.

Memory card support remains particularly useful for photographers, videographers, and drone operators. Integrated SD and microSD slots allow media files to be transferred directly from cameras and storage cards without requiring dedicated readers. Some higher-end hubs can access both card formats simultaneously, reducing the need to repeatedly swap storage media during large file transfers.

Display connectivity is another frequently used feature. Many USB-C hubs provide HDMI output capable of supporting high-resolution external monitors. When paired with compatible devices, this allows users to extend their workspace, view content on larger screens, and improve multitasking capabilities.

Cost considerations may also influence purchasing decisions. While individual adapters often appear inexpensive when purchased separately, the combined cost of HDMI adapters, memory card readers, USB converters, and Ethernet accessories can exceed the price of a single multi-port hub. Consolidating these functions into one device may also reduce the need for repeated replacement purchases caused by misplaced or damaged adapters.

As manufacturers continue to streamline hardware designs and reduce the number of built-in ports, USB-C hubs are increasingly being used to restore connectivity options that many users still depend on. For individuals who regularly connect external displays, storage devices, memory cards, or older peripherals, a multi-port hub can provide a practical way to expand the capabilities of both smartphones and laptops through a single connection.

Read more »
Private Data
Data Breach Data Leak MyPillow Play Ransomware Private Data

MyPillow Private Data Leaked Online After Mike Lindell Denies Hack

 

Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow, insists his company was never hacked, but a ransomware group leaked nearly 12,000 internal files online just two days after his public denial. The Play ransomware gang published a 9.8-gigabyte data cache containing sensitive financial, payroll, and personal information from the pillow manufacturer, directly contradicting Lindell’s claim that MyPillow was “the most secure company” in the country. 

The attack began when Play announced on its dark web blog last week that it had stolen data from MyPillow, threatening to publish everything on Friday if ransom demands were not met. In a Wednesday telephone interview with Straight Arrow News, Lindell said he never received any ransom demand and asserted no data was taken, calling the allegations “another hit job by outside sources because I’m running for governor”. He is currently seeking the Republican nomination for Minnesota governor. 

Straight Arrow’s initial analysis of the leaked data revealed nearly 1,000 vendor invoices, including payments to high-profile figures like Trump Media & Technology Group (owner of Truth Social), conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and Lara Trump. Documents show MyPillow paid Lara Trump $2,156.33 for advertising services in December 2023 and wired $4,023.16 to Jones’ Free Speech Systems the same month for running a company promo. Bank statements, audit files, wire transfers from 2026, and American Express statements for Lindell’s businesses including FrankSpeech (now LindellTV) are also present. 

The data breach exposes severely sensitive personal information, including payroll records with employees’ full names and phone numbers, plus tax forms like 1099s and W-9s containing names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. A folder titled “Aviation” contains private jet expenses and flight logs from 2018 to 2024. The files span from before 2011 through 2026, covering over a decade of internal company operations. 

Lindell claimed his company stores no sensitive data internally and relies on external third parties, but the leaked cache proves otherwise. When Straight Arrow shared photos of the data with Lindell via text, he did not immediately respond. This incident follows MyPillow’s 2019 Magecart credit card hack, raising serious questions about the company’s cybersecurity posture as Lindell campaigns for governor.
Read more »
European Bookseller
AI Advancements AI governance AI technology Cloud Computing Cyber Security Energy sector European Bookseller

Europe Must Balance Water and Energy Demands to Sustain AI Datacenter Growth

 

Europe’s ambitions to expand artificial intelligence and cloud computing infrastructure could be constrained by growing pressure on energy and water resources, according to a new report that calls for stronger policies linking both areas. The study argues that future datacenter growth will depend not only on access to advanced technology but also on how efficiently facilities manage power consumption and water use. 

The report, titled Scale and Secure: Powering Europe’s Digital Sovereignty, was published by Grundfos, a Danish provider of water and energy-efficiency solutions. It highlights how datacenters have evolved into critical infrastructure supporting Europe’s digital economy while also creating challenges related to resource management, environmental sustainability, and technological independence. 

According to the report, datacenters across Europe currently operate with an estimated IT load of around 10 gigawatts. That figure is expected to rise sharply to approximately 35 gigawatts by 2030 as demand for AI services, cloud platforms, and digital applications continues to increase. As a result, datacenters could account for between 7% and 9% of Europe’s total electricity consumption by the end of the decade, up from roughly 3% today. Cooling systems represent one of the largest resource demands within modern datacenters. 

The report estimates that cooling infrastructure accounts for nearly 38% of electricity use in an average facility. Water consumption is also substantial, particularly in hyperscale datacenters, where daily usage can reach between 11,356 and 18,927 cubic meters. Such volumes are comparable to the daily water needs of as many as 155,000 households across the European Union. Researchers warn that rapid datacenter expansion could place increasing strain on local energy grids, water supplies, and municipal infrastructure if growth is not carefully managed. 

Poorly planned developments may also trigger resistance from local communities concerned about environmental impacts and resource availability. To address these challenges, the report recommends integrating water and energy efficiency requirements directly into datacenter governance and planning frameworks. Standardized environmental reporting, improved oversight, and incentives for adopting efficient cooling technologies are among the proposed measures. 

The report also suggests governments introduce tax incentives, grants, and green financing programs to encourage investment in technologies that reduce resource consumption. Another recommendation focuses on improving collaboration between datacenters and district heating networks. Excess heat generated by server facilities could be reused to support local heating systems, although the report notes that regulatory, contractual, and organizational barriers currently limit wider adoption. The findings come as European policymakers increasingly balance digital transformation goals with environmental sustainability commitments. 

As AI adoption accelerates, experts argue that future datacenter expansion must prioritize efficiency and resource conservation to ensure long-term growth without placing excessive pressure on local communities and natural resources.
Read more »
Privacy
Adtech Industry Browser Fingerprinting Commercial Surveillance Data Brokers Digital Tracking Risks Location data Military Cybersecurity National Security Privacy

Digital Tracking Threats Extend Beyond Governments to Everyday Users


 

Technology policy challenges are increasingly being exposed in the debate over digital safety: measures that are intended to address one online risk are often used to raise another set of security and privacy concerns. Critics have warned that the collection of additional personal information could broaden surveillance capabilities and create new targets for abuse as governments push for stricter age-verification requirements and expanded identity checks. 

Separately, a pervasive wave of security threats is emerging at the level of the consumer, where mobile phone theft operations are exploiting weaknesses in the systems for accessing devices and recovering accounts. Whether regulating oversight, privacy, or physical device security is a concern, these developments represent the growing reality of the digital ecosystem. 

Cybersecurity experts, governments, corporations, and cybersecurity professionals are no longer the only ones facing the risks associated with digital tracking and identity information. Increasingly, it is becoming a concern for technology providers, policymakers, and everyday users alike. Digital tracking has become a topic of debate that has moved beyond privacy advocacy into the national security arena. 

Recent disclosures from US lawmakers suggest that the same commercial data ecosystem used for profiling consumers and targeting advertisements may also pose operational risks to military personnel. As reported by Senator Ron Wyden, the US Central Command has been informed that it has received several threat reports regarding the exploitation of commercially available location data in order to monitor or potentially target American personnel deployed in active theaters of operation. 

In spite of the fact that military officials did not identify the responsible actors or particular locations involved, this revelation represents a significant escalation in concern regarding the market for commercial surveillance. Researchers have long warned that location metadata obtained from smartphones, applications, and connected devices can reveal patterns, routes, and recurring gathering points through the collection of location metadata. 

Congress warns that this intelligence can be used to support kinetic threats, including drone strikes, missile attacks, and other forms of battlefield targeting, in addition to surveillance and counterintelligence activities. Increasing scrutiny has been focused on the adtech and data brokerage sectors, where large volumes of geolocation data are routinely collected, aggregated, and resold. Previously considered primarily a consumer privacy issue, this issue is now being examined as a strategic security vulnerability, particularly in light of historical incidents. 

The reports that have been reported that commercially acquired location data was used to track the movements of US Special Operations personnel toward a covert staging facility in Syria demonstrate how seemingly routine smartphone data can reveal sensitive military activities that go beyond their original purpose in revealing sensitive information. There is a fundamental concern among lawmakers and security officials about not only isolated incidents, but also the architecture of the modern data economy itself.

Through GPS, Wi-Fi and cellular network interactions, as well as advertising identifiers embedded throughout countless applications, smartphones continually generate streams of location intelligence. Upon collecting user activity records, brokers often aggregate, package, and resell them to advertisers, analytics firms, and other third parties via a sprawling commercial marketplace. Security specialists have repeatedly warned against the possibility of using such datasets to reconstruct highly sensitive behavior patterns, including visits to military facilities, operational hubs, and transit routes for deployments.

Legislators are calling for stronger safeguards, including disabling advertising identifiers on military-issued devices, limiting the use of data-hungry applications, and reevaluating software ecosystems heavily dependent upon user tracking, in response to these risks. However, lawmakers have renewed criticism of the Defense Department's approach to digital exposure. Increasingly, it is being acknowledged that commercial surveillance infrastructure can inadvertently provide access to intelligence assets that are not intended for the purposes for which they were intended.

In previous years, concerns were raised when publicly available fitness-tracking data revealed military installations and patrol activities. This demonstrated how seemingly benign consumer technologies may reveal operationally important information. Considering the ongoing military activity of the United States in the Middle East as well as the threat posed by hostile state-backed and proxy entities, the strategic value of location intelligence can no longer be ignored. 

While many large technology companies maintain that their advertising and data-handling systems have security controls, pressure is mounting for stronger federal privacy protections as policymakers reassess the national security implications of data collection on a large scale. Ultimately, the Pentagon's acknowledgement underscores a shift in the threat landscapes of modern civilisations, where intelligence gathering no longer relies solely on satellites, reconnaissance assets, or classified operations, but can also be gained from vast commercial networks, which silently track the digital movements of millions of connected devices every day. 

Moreover, the Pentagon's concerns highlight a fundamental weakness in the digital advertising ecosystem: the same infrastructure, designed to deliver personalised marketing, now serves as an effective surveillance network capable of tracking individuals with remarkable accuracy. Military officials have expressed concern that commercially available data, including advertising identifiers, default location-sharing mechanisms, and browser fingerprinting techniques associated with widely used platforms such as Google Chrome, may be accessed by individuals operating in active conflict environments, according to reports cited by Reuters. 

Rather than focusing on the collection of data itself, the issue is the ease with which detailed behavioral intelligence can be acquired through commercial channels with little or no oversight of who purchases the information and for what purposes.

The Pentagon has been criticised for failing to take sufficient actions to educate and protect its service members from these digital exposure risks; however, lawmakers have also highlighted the large amount of sensitive user information that is monetised by the largely unregulated data brokerage market. Officials argue that, without comprehensive federal privacy safeguards, there are limited practical mechanisms for preventing potentially hostile actors from gaining access to data that can reveal operationally valuable insights. This ecosystem presents an array of threats that go beyond national security concerns.

The recent disclosure of an offshore call tracking and analytics company's role in facilitating large-scale fraud operations relating to tech support has highlighted the potential criminal misuse of trusted commercial technology.

A court-ordered investigation revealed that the former CEO and Chief Security Officer knowingly provided telephone numbers and communications infrastructure to scammers impersonating Microsoft representatives in order to assist them in evading law enforcement scrutiny, identifying new fraudulent opportunities, and expanding their operations in the process. In addition, investigators allege that the individuals went beyond providing services by participating in similar scam networks and even operating their own fraudulent call centers. 

A common challenge that confronts the modern digital economy is illustrated by these developments: systems designed to assist advertisers, analytics analysts, and customers can, when inadequately regulated or maliciously abused, become useful tools for surveillance, deception, and exploitation that go far beyond their intended use. 

Digital tracking poses a number of risks that are becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish from everyday life as the boundaries between commercial technology, personal privacy, and national security continue to blur. As illustrated by the examples presented in both military and consumer environments, data collected for convenience, advertising, or analytics can be exposed, misused, or inadequately managed, causing a variety of consequences beyond their original purpose.

In today's world, organisations, policymakers, and individuals alike face greater challenges than simply addressing cyber threats after they have already arisen. However, it is also important to understand how seemingly routine digital practices can result in unintended security exposures long before an attack occurs. In light of the increasing importance of personal and operational data, strengthening data governance, limiting unnecessary collection, and improving transparency throughout the digital ecosystem are essential.
Read more »
technology
Cloud Provider data centres Hardware Nutanix technology

Nutanix CEO Says Cloud Providers Are Gaining an Edge as Hardware Costs Touch Great Heights

 



Large cloud operators may be becoming a more attractive option for organizations seeking new infrastructure, according to Nutanix CEO Rajiv Ramaswami, who argues that hyperscale providers can often secure servers and components faster than traditional enterprise buyers.

Speaking about current market conditions, Ramaswami said cloud providers benefit from purchasing hardware in enormous volumes. Their buying scale allows them to negotiate directly with manufacturers and secure priority access to components such as memory and solid-state drives. As a result, some enterprises evaluating new infrastructure projects are finding that cloud-hosted bare-metal servers can be available sooner, and in certain cases at lower cost, than purchasing and deploying equipment in their own data centers.

The comments come at a time when organizations continue to face elevated hardware expenses. Memory modules and flash storage remain among the most expensive components in modern server deployments, contributing to overall infrastructure costs. According to Ramaswami, these pricing pressures are unlikely to ease in the near term, meaning enterprises may need to factor longer-term budget impacts into future technology investments.

For infrastructure teams, procurement decisions are increasingly shaped by two practical considerations: acquisition cost and deployment timelines. If a cloud provider can supply computing resources immediately while physical server orders require extended delivery periods, organizations may choose cloud deployment even when they have traditionally preferred on-premises environments.

However, Nutanix is observing a different pattern when artificial intelligence projects are involved. While some conventional workloads are moving toward cloud infrastructure, many businesses continue to deploy AI systems inside their own facilities. Ramaswami said predictable operating costs remain one of the primary reasons for this approach.

Many organizations are still attempting to determine whether AI initiatives generate measurable financial returns. While interest in AI remains high across industries, businesses are increasingly scrutinizing infrastructure spending associated with model training, inference workloads, and data processing. Operating AI infrastructure internally can provide greater visibility into hardware utilization and long-term costs.

According to Nutanix, practical AI applications currently dominate enterprise deployments. Document retrieval systems, knowledge search tools, automated summaries, and internal productivity assistants remain among the most common implementations. Ramaswami said Nutanix has recorded approximately a 10 percent improvement in service response times through AI-assisted operations, while software development teams have accelerated feature delivery by roughly 50 percent after incorporating AI-supported workflows.

The discussion also touched on evolving server architectures. Enterprise customers are increasingly evaluating smaller hardware footprints as they seek to reduce power consumption, rack space requirements, and operational expenses. Some organizations are also exploring Arm-based processors, which have attracted attention because of their energy-efficiency characteristics.

Despite growing industry interest in Arm, Nutanix does not currently see sufficient customer demand to justify a full migration of its software platform. Ramaswami noted that many open-source technologies used throughout the Nutanix ecosystem, including Kubernetes and the KVM hypervisor, already support Arm processors, potentially simplifying future development efforts if adoption accelerates.

The CEO's comments coincided with Nutanix's third-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings announcement. During the quarter, the company added 730 new customers and reported continued demand for its virtualization and hybrid-cloud offerings. Ramaswami stated that many of those customers migrated from legacy infrastructure platforms, although he did not identify specific vendors.

Nutanix also reported growing interest in its support for external storage systems. Historically, the company emphasized its own software-defined storage capabilities. More recently, it has expanded support for third-party storage platforms, giving customers additional flexibility when modernizing infrastructure. According to Ramaswami, the strategy contributed to two separate seven-figure agreements involving organizations that retained storage systems supplied by Pure Storage and Dell.

For the quarter, Nutanix reported revenue of $703 million, representing a 10 percent increase compared with the same period last year. Annual recurring revenue reached $2.43 billion, reflecting a 15 percent year-over-year increase and providing another indication of continued enterprise spending on hybrid-cloud and virtualization technologies.

Read more »
Root Access Exploit
Container Escape CVE-2026-23111 Cyber Threats Kernel Exploit Linux Kernel Vulnerability Linux Security Local Privilege Escalation nf_tables Vulnerability Root Access Exploit

Linux Systems Exposed as Public Exploits Target One-Character Kernel Flaw


 

Several researchers have recently published fully functional exploit code demonstrating reliable privilege escalation from an unprivileged local account to root access following the discovery of a newly disclosed Linux kernel vulnerability. As CVE-2026-23111 has been assigned, the vulnerability can result in a use-after-free condition in critical security-critical code that is triggered by a logic error in the kernel's nf_tables subsystem. 

An attacker may gain elevated privileges and potentially escape containerised environments due to a single character misplacement within a complex kernel component. Several independent exploit reproductions have been made publicly available and the vulnerable code can be accessed by widely deployed configurations using nf_tables and unprivileged user namespaces. This issue serves to emphasise the potential for high-impact security threats in Linux systems even when small coding errors are made in low-level infrastructure. 

Moreover, the newly published research provides insight into the exact code path that transforms a seemingly trivial logic error into a practical privilege-escalation primitive. This vulnerability was identified by both FuzzingLabs and Exodus Intelligence during the abort handling stage of nf_tables transactions, during which the kernel attempts to roll back changes when a transaction fails. 

Rollback routine ignores elements requiring reactivation when a reversed condition occurs within the catchall-element restoration logic, while processing elements already in a valid state. The result is that critical reference counts associated with NFT_GOTO verdict chains are not properly restored, which leads to the chain's usage counter decreasing with every transaction that is aborted. 

In the event that the counter reaches zero, the kernel permits the associated chain to be deleted and freed, even though active catchall verdict elements continue to refer to the memory that has been released, resulting in a use-after-free issue.

According to the researchers, unprivileged users can exploit the flaw when user namespaces and nf_tables are enabled in environments where these features are enabled, by first obtaining kernel address disclosures, revealing heap memory locations, and eventually obtaining root privileges by executing a return-oriented programming chain. As part of the exploitation process, a carefully orchestrated sequence of batches of transactions is performed in order to manipulate reference counts repeatedly in order to release the target chain. 

Although multiple use-after-free triggers were required to leak kernel and heap addresses and ultimately hijack control flow, Exodus reported a success rate exceeding 99 percent on idle computers. When tested under heavier workloads, including sustained Apache benchmark activity, 80 percent reliability was maintained, demonstrating the maturity of the exploit technique as well as the practical risks associated with unpatched computers. 

While CVE-2026-23111 does not offer a standalone remote attack path, its impact becomes significant once an adversary acquires even limited access to a target system. In practical intrusion scenarios, the vulnerability may act as an escalation mechanism following a compromise, allowing attackers to gain complete root-level control of the underlying host from a restricted shell, compromised service account, or containerised foothold. 

A researcher in the field of security identified the flaw in early 2025, Oliver Sieber, demonstrated how to exploit the issue by triggering both the underlying use-after-free condition as well as by bypassing kernel memory protections by redirecting execution flow for root privileges and escaping container isolation barriers. 

A number of mainstream Linux environments have been successfully validated with the exploit, including Debian Bookworm, Debian Trixie, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. In a research study conducted by FuzzingLabs ahead of Pwn2Own Berlin 2026, the vulnerability was demonstrated to be practical across distributions by achieving similar results using a different exploitation path, further demonstrating its practicality. Several disclosures occurred rapidly, including the release of the upstream patch on February 5, FuzzingLabs' analysis published on April 16, and the publication of an extensive technical breakdown by Exodus Intelligence on June 8. 

As the vulnerable code is included in the mainline kernel, any distribution shipping affected versions with both nf_tables and unprivileged user namespaces enabled may be exposed unless additional hardening measures prevent the vulnerable functionality from being accessed. As part of the disclosure, Linux local privilege escalation research has also increased significantly.

Recent findings, such as Copy Fail, Dirty Frag, Fragnesia, DirtyDecrypt, and a longstanding ptrace-related flaw resulting in sensitive files being exposed and allowing privileged commands to be executed, have highlighted recurring security problems. It is becoming increasingly difficult for attackers to compromise a system beyond a low-privileged foothold. 

Administrators are advised to install patched kernel packages and reboot affected systems as soon as possible. They should prioritise environments where untrusted users, containers, or workloads have the potential to create unprivileged user namespaces. 

The Ubuntu 22.04, 24.04, and 25.10 distributions currently offer security updates. Debian has addressed the issue in Bookworm and Trixie, and issued 6.1-series backports for Bullseye LTS. Several distributions have also published tracking advisories, although the fixed package versions vary by distribution. It is noteworthy that an upstream correction only involved a single line of code change. 

Among other things, researchers have observed that exploit development is accelerating rapidly due to the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted vulnerability analysis and patch-diffing techniques that can enhance weaponisation before patches are widely used. While there has been no in-the-wild exploit confirmed and no threat actors have been connected to the vulnerability, the availability of public exploit code since April significantly increases the urgency for organisations who have not yet implemented the February patch. 

Security vulnerabilities such as CVE-2026-23111 often do not result from sophisticated attack chains, but from subtle flaws deep within trusted infrastructure, which can have the greatest impact on a business. The availability of reliable exploit techniques across multiple Linux distributions indicates that organisations should treat this issue as more than simply a theoretical kernel bug, but as a practical privilege-escalation threat. 

Although no active exploitation has been reported, the narrowing gap between vulnerability disclosure, exploit development, and real-world weaponisation continues to increase the pressure on defenders to act quickly. In addition to patching promptly, reviewing namespace configurations carefully, and continuously monitoring privileged workloads, critical safeguards remain.

Due to Linux environments becoming increasingly important in enterprise, cloud, and containerised operations, limiting the opportunities available to low-privileged attackers can often make the difference between whether or not an isolated compromise remains contained or grows into a full-scale attack.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Featured