In cybersecurity, artificial intelligence is becoming more and more significant, both for good and bad. The most recent AI-based tools can help organizations better identify threats and safeguard their systems and data resources. However, hackers can also employ the technology to carry out more complex attacks.
Hackers have a big advantage over most businesses because they can innovate more quickly than even the most productive enterprise, they can hire talent to develop new malware and test attack techniques, and they can use AI to change attack strategies in real time.
The market for AI-based security products has also helped malicious hackers to target businesses frequently. According to a report published in July 2022 by Acumen Research and Consulting, the global market had a value of $14.9 billion in 2021 and was expected to grow to $133.8 billion by 2030.
Nation-states and hackers: A lethal combination
Weaponized AI attacks are inevitable, according to 88% of CISOs and security executives, and for good reason. A recent Gartner survey showed that only 24% of cybersecurity teams are fully equipped to handle an AI-related attack. Nation-states and hackers are aware that many businesses are understaffed and lack the knowledge and resources necessary to defend against such attacks in the form of AI and machine learning. Only 1% of 53,760 cybersecurity applicants in Q3 2022 had AI skills.
Major corporations are aware of the cybersecurity skills shortage and are working to address it. Microsoft, for example, is currently running a campaign to assist community colleges in expanding the industry's workforce.
The ability of businesses to recruit and keep cybersecurity experts with AI and ML skills contrasts sharply with how quickly nation-state actors and cybercriminal gangs are expanding their AI and ML teams. According to the New York Times, the Department 121 cyberwarfare unit of the elite Reconnaissance General Bureau of the North Korean Army has about 6,800 members total, including 1,700 hackers spread across seven different units and 5,100 technical support staff.
According to South Korea's spy agency, North Korea's elite team stole an estimated $1.2 billion in cryptocurrency and other virtual assets over the last five years, with more than half of it stolen this year alone. Since June 2022, North Korea has also weaponized open-source software in its social engineering campaigns aimed at businesses all over the world.
North Korea's active AI and ML recruitment and training programs aim to develop new techniques and technologies that weaponize AI and ML in order to fund the country's nuclear weapons programs.
In a recent Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) survey, nearly half of respondents (48.9%) named AI and machine learning as emerging technologies that would be most effective in countering nation-state cyberattacks on private organizations.
Cybercriminal gangs pursue their enterprise targets with the same zeal as the North Korean Army's Department 121. Automated phishing email campaigns, malware distribution, AI-powered bots that continuously scan an enterprise's endpoints for vulnerabilities and unprotected servers, credit card fraud, insurance fraud, and generating deepfake identities are all current tools, techniques, and technologies in cybercriminal gangs' AI and ML arsenals.
Hackers and nation-states are increasingly using this tactic to target the flaws in AI and ML models built to detect and prevent breach attempts. One of the methods used to lessen the effectiveness of AI models created to predict and prevent data exfiltration, malware delivery, and other things is data poisoning.
How to safeguard your AI
What can the company do to safeguard itself? The three essential actions to take right away, in the opinion of Great Learning's Akriti Galav and SEO expert Saket Gupta, are:
- Maintain the most stringent security procedures possible throughout the entire data environment.
- Make sure an audit trail is created with a log of every record related to every AI operation.
- Implement reliable authentication and access control.
Additionally, businesses should pursue longer-term strategic objectives, such as creating a data protection policy specifically for AI training, educating their staff about the dangers of AI and how to spot flawed results, and continuing to operate a dynamic, forward-looking risk assessment mechanism.
No digital system, no matter how intelligent, can be 100% secure. The enterprise needs to update its security policies to reflect this new reality now rather than waiting until the damage is done because the risks associated with compromised AI are more subtle but no less serious than those associated with traditional platforms.
