She was issued an arrest order under the guise of a 'national security danger' and a 'Supreme Court case', and she was informed that disclosing her ordeal would result in the arrest of her children and seizure of their assets.
The 67-year-old woman from Kothrud filed a First Information Report in the case at Pune's Cyber Crime Police Station earlier this week. In the first week of May, she received a call from a man posing as a Tilak Nagar police officer in Mumbai. While the individual presented himself as a sub-inspector, he used the identity of an IPS officer now stationed in Pune.
He informed her that vulgar messages had been sent from her phone number and requested her personal, financial, and Aadhar information for further clarity. He then stated that a 'FIR' had been registered in the 'Supreme Court' and that the charges included money laundering. The man said a CBI officer would call her and help.
The next day, she received a video call from a man pretending as a 'CBI officer' and providing the name of another working IPS officer. The officer informed her that to ensure that the money in her account was real and not used for money laundering, all funds from her account would have to be transferred to 'beneficiary accounts owned by the Reserve Bank of India.'
The officer informed her that the case against her was classified as 'national secrets' and that the account had been used to commit major crimes. Fearing legal repercussions, the victim made substantial transactions of Rs one crore and Rs 29 lakh from two separate accounts.
During these transfers, the complainant was forced to remain on messenger calls, alleging she was under observation. The 'CBI official' informed her that if she shared the case with anyone in the family, her children would be detained and their possessions seized by the government. She was also instructed to make remittances of Rs 50 lakh to the 'Supreme Court.' The woman transferred more than Rs 30 lakh.
As the internet thieves increased their demands, the mother eventually confided in her daughter, who informed her that she had been duped by cybercriminals. She filed a complaint with the Cyber Crime Portal, and the case was then referred to the Cyber Crime Police Station in Pune City.
According to an officer from the Cybercrime Police Station, the crime's modus operandi is the same as that of drugs in parcel scams, but the grounds for threatening the victim differ. In a similar case recorded at Wakad police station in Pimpri Chinchwad, a software engineer in his 40s was duped of Rs 40 lakh after he was told that his number was being 'used to mistreat a woman' and threatened action under "national secret rule."
In these types of schemes, fraudsters mimic IPS personnel to defraud people. They pressure victims into transferring money for a variety of reasons, including customs taxes or legal expenses, as well as by saying that their bank accounts are under threat from hackers. Callers frequently threaten victims, stating they are under monitoring by the government.
According to an analysis of frauds recorded across banks, the number of fraud cases filed in FY24 increased by approximately 300 percent from 9,046 in FY22. However, the sum involved has decreased from Rs 45,358 crore to Rs 13,930 crore, according to the central bank's annual report for fiscal year 24 released on Thursday.
Every year, the amount involved in total frauds reported decreased by 46.7% during fiscal year 24.
The RBI stated that, while private sector banks reported the most frauds in the recent three years, public sector banks contributed the most to the fraud total. According to the RBI, digital payments (card payments and internet) were the most common source of fraud.
According to the RBI, digital payments (card payments and internet) were the most common source of fraud. However, in terms of value, the frauds were concentrated in the loan portfolio.
While small value card/internet frauds accounted for the majority of frauds recorded by private sector banks, RBI investigation revealed that frauds in public sector banks were primarily in loan portfolios.
The number of scams involving card and internet payments jumped from 3,596 in FY22 to 29,082 in FY24. In terms of value, it rose from Rs 155 crore in FY22 to Rs 1,457 crore.
In an assessment of cases reported in FY23 and FY24, the RBI discovered a significant time lag between the date a fraud occurred and its identification.
According to the RBI, the amount engaged in frauds from prior fiscal years accounted for 94.0 percent of the frauds reported in FY23 in terms of value. Approximately 89% of the frauds recorded in FY24 by value occurred in previous fiscal years.
In a recent report by FICO on Fraud, Identity, and Digital Banking, it was revealed that nearly two million Brits may have fallen victim to identity theft last year. The analytics firm found that 4.3% of respondents experienced fraudsters using their identity to open financial accounts. This percentage, when extrapolated to the adult UK population, equates to approximately 1.9 million people. While this marks a decrease from 2022 when 7.7% reported such incidents, there's a concern that the actual numbers could be higher.
According to Sarah Rutherford, senior director of fraud marketing at FICO, the data only represents those who are aware of their stolen identity being used for financial fraud. Many individuals might not immediately discover such fraudulent activities, and perpetrators often exploit stolen identities multiple times, amplifying the overall impact.
The report identifies this type of fraud as the most worrisome financial crime for UK citizens, with 30% expressing concern. Following closely are fears of credit card theft and bank account takeovers by fraudsters, at 24% and 20%, respectively.
Consumer Preferences and Concerns Drive Financial Organisations' Strategies
FICO's research emphasises the significant impact that robust fraud protection measures can have on financial organisations. Approximately 34% of respondents prioritise good fraud protection when selecting a new account provider, and an overwhelming 73% include it in their top three considerations. However, 18% stated they would abandon opening a bank account if identity checks were too challenging or time-consuming, highlighting the importance of achieving a balance between security and user convenience.
Biometric authentication emerged as a favoured choice among respondents, with 87% acknowledging its excellent security features. Fingerprint scanning ranked highest among biometric methods, preferred by 38% of participants, followed by face scans (34%) and iris scans (25%). In contrast, only 17% believed that the traditional combination of username and password provides excellent protection.
Sarah Rutherford expressed optimism about the shift in attitudes towards new verification tools such as iris, face, and fingerprint scans, as individuals increasingly recognise the benefits they offer in enhancing security.
Commercial Impact
The study suggests that financial institutions incorporating strong fraud protection measures may reap significant commercial benefits. With consumer preferences indicating a growing emphasis on security, financial organisations must navigate the challenge of implementing effective identity checks without compromising the ease of service. Striking this balance becomes crucial, especially as 20% of respondents indicated they would abandon the account opening process if identity checks were deemed too cumbersome.
Amidst growing concerns surrounding identity fraud affecting a significant portion of the British population, there is a discernible shift towards the acceptance of advanced biometric authentication methods. Financial organizations are urged to prioritise formidable fraud protection measures, not only to enhance consumer appeal but also to reinforce security protocols for sensitive information. This imperative reflects the industry's transformation, shedding light on the growing importance of heightened security measures address the increasing challenges of identity theft.
Hackers stole personal data: addresses and account numbers of home mortgage holders at KeyBank, social security numbers, the bank reports, in the compromise of the third party vendor that serves multiple corporate clients.
The hackers stole the information on July 5 after hacking into computers at the insurance service provider Overby Seawell Company.
KeyBank has its operations across 15 states, and has around $200 Billion in assets, the bank hasn't disclosed how many customers were affected or to respond to any other queries related to the breach.
In statement, KeyBank told that it came to know about the data theft on 4th August, and KeyBank systems and operations weren't compromised. Overby Seawell Company hasn't replied to any phone messages and emails that were sent to executives for comment.
It sent a statement to the Associated Press, KeyBank mentions Kennesaw, Georgia based Overby Seawell was hit by a cybersecurity incident that breached data of its corporate clients. It refused to comment further.
As per the website, Overby Seawell's customers are banks, credit unions, finance companies and property investors, and mortgage servicers. The products consist a tracking system for real-time insurance monitoring that can be combined with other financial industry software forums.
In an August 26 letter sent to Associated Press by an impacted mortgage holder, KeyBank said the information included in the Overby-Seawell breach linked to their mortgage consists their name, mortgage account number, address, and the first eight digits of their nine digits social security number.
That is enough information for identity theft which the hackers can use while carrying out a serious fraud.
Fraudsters encourage Bank customers to withdraw funds at a branch or ATM on their own and then transfer money to the account of the attackers
"There are cases when fraudsters, through psychological influence on the client, ask to transfer funds through an ATM and/or withdraw funds through the cashier, while providing fake documents from the Bank," said Mikhail Ivanov, Director of the Information Security Department of RosBank.
Stanislav Pavlunin, Vice President and Security Director of Pochta Bank, noted that this is one of the latest schemes of cybercriminals, which is a kind of the most common method of fraud - social engineering.
The vast majority of fraudulent operations are carried out using social engineering methods, explained Ilya Suloev, Director of the Information Security Department of Otkritie Bank. This was confirmed by Sberbank, which since the beginning of 2020 has recorded almost 2.9 million customer requests about fraudulent attempts. In comparison with 2019, the number of such requests has more than doubled.
The most popular way to influence potential victims is still phone calls. According to OTP Bank, fraudsters can be represented by employees of the security service of the Bank or government agencies.
The number of telephone fraud attempts has increased this year, confirmed Oleg Kuserov, Managing Director of Absolut Bank.
"The growth of such attacks is associated, in our opinion, both with an increase in the number of fraudulent call centers and with major data leaks in 2020 from various enterprises, including online stores," said Vyacheslav Kasimov, Director of the Information Security Department of Credit Bank of Moscow.
Sergey Afanasyev, Executive Director and Head of the Statistical Analysis Department of Renaissance Credit Bank, also noted that another common type of Bankcard fraud, in addition to social engineering, is phishing — stealing money through fraudulent duplicate sites.