Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label CISOs. Show all posts

Here's Why Attackers Have a Upper Hand Against CISOs

 

Security experts have an in-depth knowledge of the technical tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that attackers employ to launch cyberattacks. They are also knowledgeable about critical defensive methods, such as prioritising patching based on risk and creating a zero-trust policy. 

However, the world for business security appears to be one step behind hackers, who successfully launch an increasing number of attacks year after year. Here's one reason: many CISOs underappreciate, overlook, and sometimes underestimate all of the knowledge that hackers bring to the table — the nontechnical insights that they use to gain an advantage. 

“Hackers know that the average CISO has a lot on their plates and they don’t have enough [resources] to get everything done. So CISOs really have to pay attention to what hackers are doing and what they know so they can best defend against them,” stated Stephanie “Snow” Carruthers, chief people hacker at IBM.

So, what do hackers know that may not be credible? According to security researchers, these are three main hacking tactics that may go unnoticed by CISOs. 

Hackers know business schedule 

It's not a coincidence that many attacks occur during the most challenging times. Hackers do boost their attacks on weekends and holidays when security teams are understaffed. They're also more likely to strike just before lunchtime and at the end of the day, when employees are rushed thereby less aware of red indicators indicating a phishing attack or fraudulent behaviour.

“Hackers typically deploy their attacks during those times because they’re less likely to be noticed,” stated Melissa DeOrio, global threat intelligence lead at S-RM, a global intelligence and cybersecurity consultancy.

DeOrio agrees that many hackers are based in regions where daytime working hours overlap with non working hours in the Americas and Western Europe. However, she claims that research suggests that hackers exploit this disparity by timing their attacks. 

Furthermore, Tomer Bar, vice president of security research at SafeBreach, adds that threat actors seek out moments of organisational upheaval (e.g., mergers, acquisitions, layoffs, etc.) to exploit. "Threat actors will try to launch an attack at the most difficult time for the CISO and the blue team.” 

To counter this hacking technique, long-time security leaders encourage CISOs to include it into their own defence strategies. They should use third-party services during off-business hours to supplement the security team's work schedule, increase automation to improve staff efficiency at all hours, add extra layers of security such as more monitoring or tighter filters at times of increased risk, ensure priority security work is completed before busy times such as holidays, and educate all employees about the heightened risks that exist during such times. 

Gathering insights on organisations 

The attackers actively gather open-source intelligence (OSINT) in order to plan attacks. It's hardly unexpected that hackers seek out information on transformative events such as large layoffs, mergers, and the like, she says. However, CISOs, their teams, and other executives may be astonished to hear that hackers hunt for news about seemingly innocuous activities such as technology installations, new alliances, hiring sprees, and CEO schedules that show when they are away from the office. 

To counter this, CISOs can monitor OSINT about their organisations, collaborate with other executives on announcements and their timing, and run simulations on how such announcements play out from a business perspective. All of this allows CISOs and their teams to see what hackers see, better understand their thinking, and prepare for potential targeted attacks. 

Ignorant corporate culture 

Security awareness training typically demands employees to take time to review emails or think through requests to help determine whether a request is legitimate or suspicious. Yet workplace culture today generally works against that approach, Huffman notes. “We praise ourselves for putting ourselves in an emotional hot state,” he says, pointing to job postings that use phrases such as “fast-paced,” “dynamic” and “high-intensity” to describe the workplace culture as evidence. 

According to Huffman, Employees do not have — nor are they encouraged to take — extra time to review incoming messages (whether via email, phone, video, text, or other means). "And that's why hackers are successful: they catch us in constant emotional hot states when you're clicking through 1,000 emails.”

Dark Web Intel Underutilized by CISOs, Diminishing Healthcare Industry

 

The healthcare industry faces challenges in keeping up with the rapidly evolving healthcare cybersecurity landscape. This is due in part to CISOs failing to take use of dark web intelligence, which leaves the industry with a weaker cyber posture than other sectors. Only 57% of healthcare CISOs have included dark web intelligence in their plans, according to a Searchlight Cyber Report. 

Researchers highlighted that the dark web acts as a hub for cybercriminal activity, with marketplaces for buying and selling malware, exploits, and stolen data. It also provides a forum for threat actors to share skills and discuss strategies. Furthermore, criminals use the dark web to host ransomware leak sites, threatening to reveal stolen data unless a ransom is paid. 

Collecting threat intelligence, pre-attack intelligence, and data from the dark web can help many organisations enhance their cybersecurity posture. This method, known as the "pre-attack phase," allows businesses to detect and mitigate cybersecurity risks before they enter their network. 

A poll titled "Proactive Defence: How Enterprises Are Using Dark Web Intelligence," performed between November 18, 2022, and January 16, 2023, gathered responses from 1,008 CISOs representing large enterprises with revenue in excess of $200 million and more than 2,000 employees. 

While the financial sector leads in the adoption of dark web intelligence, with 85 percent of organisations acquiring it, the healthcare industry lags behind. According to survey results, healthcare CISOs are 20 percentage points behind other industries in gathering data from the dark web, which is harming their cybersecurity posture. Most CISOs in the United States are confident in their ability to comprehend their adversaries' profiles. 

Specifically, 85 percent of US CISOs expressed confidence, while 80 percent of US firms reported acquiring threat intelligence. While researchers see this high level of dark web data awareness and uptake as promising, significant sector differences persist. The healthcare sector has demonstrated a lack of confidence in knowing the profiles of potential adversaries.

Researchers identified that, compared to the industry average of 77 percent, just 60 percent of healthcare CISOs feel confident in understanding their adversaries’ characteristics. A lack of awareness of data intelligence can limit their ability to detect and neutralise legitimate threats before they enter the network. 

In contrast, industries such as manufacturing, financial services, and professional services report higher security postures. Because of increased use of threat intelligence and dark web monitoring, these industries are more confident in recognising and responding to possible threats. 

Every week, millions of dollars in ransoms and protected health information (PHI) are stolen from secure systems and made available on the dark web. This regrettable pattern reveals the tragic fate of many exfiltrated patient data records, emphasising the critical need for the healthcare industry to address its security vulnerabilities and knowledge gaps.

AI Brings A New Era of Cyber Threats – Are We Ready?

 



Cyberattacks are becoming alarmingly frequent, with a new attack occurring approximately every 39 seconds. These attacks, ranging from phishing schemes to ransomware, have devastating impacts on businesses worldwide. The cost of cybercrime is projected to hit $9.5 trillion in 2024, and with AI being leveraged by cybercriminals, this figure is likely to rise.

According to a recent RiverSafe report surveying Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) in the UK, one in five CISOs identifies AI as the biggest cyber threat. The increasing availability and sophistication of AI tools are empowering cybercriminals to launch more complex and large-scale attacks. The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) warns that AI will significantly increase the volume and impact of cyberattacks, including ransomware, in the near future.

AI is enhancing traditional cyberattacks, making them more difficult to detect. For example, AI can modify malware to evade antivirus software. Once detected, AI can generate new variants of the malware, allowing it to persist undetected, steal data, and spread within networks. Additionally, AI can bypass firewalls by creating legitimate-looking traffic and generating convincing phishing emails and deepfakes to deceive victims into revealing sensitive information.

Policies to Mitigate AI Misuse

AI misuse is not only a threat from external cybercriminals but also from employees unknowingly putting company data at risk. One in five security leaders reported experiencing data breaches due to employees sharing company data with AI tools like ChatGPT. These tools are popular for their efficiency, but employees often do not consider the security risks when inputting sensitive information.

In 2023, ChatGPT experienced an extreme data breach, highlighting the risks associated with generative AI tools. While some companies have banned the use of such tools, this is a short-term solution. The long-term approach should focus on education and implementing carefully managed policies to balance the benefits of AI with security risks.

The Growing Threat of Insider Risks

Insider threats are a significant concern, with 75% of respondents believing they pose a greater risk than external threats. Human error, often due to ignorance or unintentional mistakes, is a leading cause of data breaches. These threats are challenging to defend against because they can originate from employees, contractors, third parties, and anyone with legitimate access to systems.

Despite the known risks, 64% of CISOs stated their organizations lack sufficient technology to protect against insider threats. The rise in digital transformation and cloud infrastructure has expanded the attack surface, making it difficult to maintain appropriate security measures. Additionally, the complexity of digital supply chains introduces new vulnerabilities, with trusted business partners responsible for up to 25% of insider threat incidents.

Preparing for AI-Driven Cyber Threats

The evolution of AI in cyber threats necessitates a revamp of cybersecurity strategies. Businesses must update their policies, best practices, and employee training to mitigate the potential damages of AI-powered attacks. With both internal and external threats on the rise, organisations need to adapt to the new age of cyber threats to protect their valuable digital assets effectively.




Adapting Cybersecurity Policies to Combat AI-Driven Threats

 

Over the last few years, the landscape of cyber threats has significantly evolved. The once-common traditional phishing emails, marked by obvious language errors, clear malicious intent, and unbelievable narratives, have seen a decline. Modern email security systems can easily detect these rudimentary attacks, and recipients have grown savvy enough to recognize and ignore them. Consequently, this basic form of phishing is quickly becoming obsolete. 

However, as traditional phishing diminishes, a more sophisticated and troubling threat has emerged. Cybercriminals are now leveraging advanced generative AI (GenAI) tools to execute complex social engineering attacks. These include spear-phishing, VIP impersonation, and business email compromise (BEC). In light of these developments, Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) must adapt their cybersecurity strategies and implement new, robust policies to address these advanced threats. One critical measure is implementing segregation of duties (SoD) in handling sensitive data and assets. 

For example, any changes to bank account information for invoices or payroll should require approval from multiple individuals. This multi-step verification process ensures that even if one employee falls victim to a social engineering attack, others can intercept and prevent fraudulent actions. Regular and comprehensive security training is also crucial. Employees, especially those handling sensitive information and executives who are prime targets for BEC, should undergo continuous security education. 

This training should include live sessions, security awareness videos, and phishing simulations based on real-world scenarios. By investing in such training, employees can become the first line of defense against sophisticated cyber threats. Additionally, gamifying the training process—such as rewarding employees for reporting phishing attempts—can boost engagement and effectiveness. Encouraging a culture of reporting suspicious emails is another essential policy. 

Employees should be urged to report all potentially malicious emails rather than simply deleting or ignoring them. This practice allows the Security Operations Center (SOC) team to stay informed about ongoing threats and enhances organizational security awareness. Clear policies should emphasize that it's better to report false positives than to overlook potential threats, fostering a vigilant and cautious organizational culture. To mitigate social engineering risks, organizations should restrict access to sensitive information on a need-to-know basis. 

Simple policy changes, like keeping company names private in public job listings, can significantly reduce the risk of social engineering attacks. Limiting the availability of organizational details helps prevent cybercriminals from gathering the information needed to craft convincing attacks. Given the rapid advancements in generative AI, it's imperative for organizations to adopt adaptive security systems. Shifting from static to dynamic security measures, supported by AI-enabled defensive tools, ensures that security capabilities remain effective against evolving threats. 

This proactive approach helps organizations stay ahead of the latest attack vectors. The rise of generative AI has fundamentally changed the field of cybersecurity. In a short time, these technologies have reshaped the threat landscape, making it essential for CISOs to continuously update their strategies. Effective, current policies are vital for maintaining a strong security posture. 

This serves as a starting point for CISOs to refine and enhance their cybersecurity policies, ensuring they are prepared for the challenges posed by AI-driven threats. In this ever-changing environment, staying ahead of cybercriminals requires constant vigilance and adaptation.

What Are The Risks of Generative AI?

 




We are all drowning in information in this digital world and the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly commonplace within various spheres of business. However, this technological evolution has brought about the emergence of generative AI, presenting a myriad of cybersecurity concerns that weigh heavily on the minds of Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs). Let's synthesise this issue and see the intricacies from a microscopic light.

Model Training and Attack Surface Vulnerabilities:

Generative AI collects and stores data from various sources within an organisation, often in insecure environments. This poses a significant risk of data access and manipulation, as well as potential biases in AI-generated content.


Data Privacy Concerns:

The lack of robust frameworks around data collection and input into generative AI models raises concerns about data privacy. Without enforceable policies, there's a risk of models inadvertently replicating and exposing sensitive corporate information, leading to data breaches.


Corporate Intellectual Property (IP) Exposure:

The absence of strategic policies around generative AI and corporate data privacy can result in models being trained on proprietary codebases. This exposes valuable corporate IP, including API keys and other confidential information, to potential threats.


Generative AI Jailbreaks and Backdoors:

Despite the implementation of guardrails to prevent AI models from producing harmful or biased content, researchers have found ways to circumvent these safeguards. Known as "jailbreaks," these exploits enable attackers to manipulate AI models for malicious purposes, such as generating deceptive content or launching targeted attacks.


Cybersecurity Best Practices:

To mitigate these risks, organisations must adopt cybersecurity best practices tailored to generative AI usage:

1. Implement AI Governance: Establishing governance frameworks to regulate the deployment and usage of AI tools within the organisation is crucial. This includes transparency, accountability, and ongoing monitoring to ensure responsible AI practices.

2. Employee Training: Educating employees on the nuances of generative AI and the importance of data privacy is essential. Creating a culture of AI knowledge and providing continuous learning opportunities can help mitigate risks associated with misuse.

3. Data Discovery and Classification: Properly classifying data helps control access and minimise the risk of unauthorised exposure. Organisations should prioritise data discovery and classification processes to effectively manage sensitive information.

4. Utilise Data Governance and Security Tools: Employing data governance and security tools, such as Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and threat intelligence platforms, can enhance data security and enforcement of AI governance policies.


Various cybersecurity vendors provide solutions tailored to address the unique challenges associated with generative AI. Here's a closer look at some of these promising offerings:

1. Google Cloud Security AI Workbench: This solution, powered by advanced AI capabilities, assesses, summarizes, and prioritizes threat data from both proprietary and public sources. It incorporates threat intelligence from reputable sources like Google, Mandiant, and VirusTotal, offering enterprise-grade security and compliance support.

2. Microsoft Copilot for Security: Integrated with Microsoft's robust security ecosystem, Copilot leverages AI to proactively detect cyber threats, enhance threat intelligence, and automate incident response. It simplifies security operations and empowers users with step-by-step guidance, making it accessible even to junior staff members.

3. CrowdStrike Charlotte AI: Built on the Falcon platform, Charlotte AI utilizes conversational AI and natural language processing (NLP) capabilities to help security teams respond swiftly to threats. It enables users to ask questions, receive answers, and take action efficiently, reducing workload and improving overall efficiency.

4. Howso (formerly Diveplane): Howso focuses on advancing trustworthy AI by providing AI solutions that prioritize transparency, auditability, and accountability. Their Howso Engine offers exact data attribution, ensuring traceability and accountability of influence, while the Howso Synthesizer generates synthetic data that can be trusted for various use cases.

5. Cisco Security Cloud: Built on zero-trust principles, Cisco Security Cloud is an open and integrated security platform designed for multicloud environments. It integrates generative AI to enhance threat detection, streamline policy management, and simplify security operations with advanced AI analytics.

6. SecurityScorecard: SecurityScorecard offers solutions for supply chain cyber risk, external security, and risk operations, along with forward-looking threat intelligence. Their AI-driven platform provides detailed security ratings that offer actionable insights to organizations, aiding in understanding and improving their overall security posture.

7. Synthesis AI: Synthesis AI offers Synthesis Humans and Synthesis Scenarios, leveraging a combination of generative AI and cinematic digital general intelligence (DGI) pipelines. Their platform programmatically generates labelled images for machine learning models and provides realistic security simulation for cybersecurity training purposes.

These solutions represent a diverse array of offerings aimed at addressing the complex cybersecurity challenges posed by generative AI, providing organizations with the tools needed to safeguard their digital assets effectively.

While the adoption of generative AI presents immense opportunities for innovation, it also brings forth significant cybersecurity challenges. By implementing robust governance frameworks, educating employees, and leveraging advanced security solutions, organisations can navigate these risks and harness the transformative power of AI responsibly.

The Convergence of CIO and CISO Roles in the Digital Age

 


As businesses embrace the cloud, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and remote work, a million-dollar question arises: How will these roles evolve? The answer seems as complex as the myriad factors influencing it – company size, industry, culture, existing organizational charts, and future digital transformation plans, to name a few. Some advocate maintaining the status quo, while others propose a more specialized split between a business-oriented executive focused on risk management and compliance, and a technical executive honing in on threat prevention and response.

Regardless of the path chosen, the crux of the matter remains – the imperative need for collaboration and alignment between CIOs and CISOs. In a world where successful digital transformation is contingent upon the delicate relation between innovation and security, these IT leaders find themselves at the forefront, shaping the future of businesses large and small. The article will delve into the intricacies of this new development, shedding light on the collaborative journey of CIOs and CISOs as they navigate the ever-changing currents of technology and cybersecurity.

About two decades ago, CIOs primarily focused on managing an organization's IT infrastructure and applications. However, with the rise of digital transformation, cloud computing, and remote work, their role has shifted. Today, CIOs act as brokers of IT services, concentrating on how technology can drive innovation and effectively managing resources.

Concurrently, the profile of CISOs has been on the rise, fueled by compliance mandates, data breaches, and emerging cybersecurity threats. Compliance requirements such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and SOC 2 have played a dual role – increasing the visibility and budgets for cybersecurity teams but often falling short in addressing sophisticated threats like phishing and ransomware.

The growing importance of digital security at the board level has prompted CIOs, traditionally the voice of digital matters, to delve deeper into understanding cybersecurity. This trend blurs the lines between the roles of CIOs and CISOs.

Enter digital transformation, offering an opportunity to enhance cybersecurity. Despite some skepticism about its promises, digital transformation has necessitated closer collaboration between CIOs and CISOs. While CIOs continue to guide the ship, CISOs have become proactive partners, deeply involved in operational decision-making from the outset.

As companies embrace the cloud, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and remote work, the question arises – how will these roles evolve? The answer is not straightforward and depends on various factors like company size, industry, culture, and existing IT setup. Some suggest maintaining the status quo, while others propose splitting the roles into a business-oriented executive focusing on risk management and compliance, and a more technical executive concentrating on threat prevention and response.

Regardless of the direction these roles take, the overarching theme is the critical need for collaboration and alignment between CIOs and CISOs for successful digital transformation. This synergy is essential not only during the transformation process but also for navigating the evolving cybersecurity landscape.

In essence, the traditional boundaries between CIOs and CISOs are fading, giving way to a collaborative approach that acknowledges the intertwined nature of technology and cybersecurity. As companies navigate this evolution, the success of their digital transformation hinges on the ability of these IT leaders to work hand-in-hand, ensuring a secure and innovative future for businesses of all sizes.

This transformative shift emphasises the importance of simplifying and strengthening the relationship between CIOs and CISOs, creating a united front against the ever-growing challenges of the digital age.


UAE CISOs Highlights their Rampant Gaps in Cybersecurity


A majority of security leader based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are convinced that their firms require improvements – in terms of how their teams, processes and technology operates – to mitigate any potential cyberattack.

To provide insight into the challenges faced by CISOs following a breach, cybersecurity firm Trellix surveyed over 500 security executives globally, revealing strategic analysis, eye-opening data, and practical viewpoints. 

In their analysis, the Trellix researchers revealed that 96% of CISOs (who have suffered at least one security incident) believe in the need for improvements. However, 52% of the respondents claim that their organizations have meagre to no technical knowledge on how to tackle challenging security incidents. 

Reliance on Manual Processes

According to the aforementioned survey, 48% of security leaders believe that their organizations are majorly based on manual processes, which eventually makes it more difficult to identify and fix cyberattacks quickly.

Moreover, 44% of respondents attribute the inability to tackle cybercrime to inadequately documented and executed procedures, while 44% caution that disjointed security controls result in a deficiency of context.

According to Jake Moore, global cybersecurity adviser at ESET, better investment in security is significantly crucial for companies, taking into account the increased sophistication in cyber activities.

"Furthermore, now with the introduction of AI threats we are seeing cyberattacks become even more relentless and powerful[…]Companies need to bear in mind that the cost of recovery from an attack usually outweighs the cost of preventive security measures,” he says.

Mind the Gaps

Organizations find it challenging to identify and address cybersecurity problems due to a lack of technological resources, but it can also be challenging when security professionals are overworked or underequipped. More than half of those surveyed (52%) said that their organization's security problems were caused by vulnerabilities in their security capabilities.

However, nearly half of the respondents that they had not properly enabled their detection policies or configured their IT stacks. Forty percent more claimed that their security and IT systems do not provide "adequate visibility" of occurrences.

Moore further warns, "Neglecting cybersecurity in terms of the people and process can leave a business dangerously exposed to preventable or mitigable attacks with potentially severe consequences."  

CISOs in the Firing Line as Cybercriminals Continue to Target Firms

 

Businesses are feeling the effects of cyberattacks hard; a staggering 90% of CISOs report that their organisation has experienced one during the past year. 

In the latest research from Splunk, 83% of CISOs who responded to a poll stated they have paid out, with more than half paying more than $100,000. 

They fear that generative AI will become more prevalent and provide attackers an advantage. However, companies are testing out such tools in their cyber defences, with 93% of their processes utilising automation either moderately or intensively. 

Splunk claims that the so-called "tool sprawl" issue, which is "likely compounding existing visibility issues," is another issue that is now emerging. A whopping 88% of CISOs seek to stop the expansion using tools like security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) and security information and event management (SIEM). 

By using solutions like these, they seek to reduce the number of tools required and simplify defence through automation.

Nearly half of the CISOs who responded to the survey also stated that they now directly report to their CEO, with CISOs being increasingly in charge of directing cybersecurity strategy. They frequently take part in board meetings across all sectors. Additionally, 90% of CISOs reported that their board is now more concerned about cybersecurity than it was two years ago. 

As a result, 93% of CISOs anticipate an increase in their cybersecurity budget over the next year, whereas 83% anticipate decreases in other areas of the organisation. 80% of CISOs say their organisation has encountered additional dangers as the economy has deteriorated. 

Greater collaboration has also happened across the organisation, with 92% of CISOs reporting that cybersecurity collaboration between teams has increased moderately or significantly as a result of digital transformation projects and cloud native adoption. Although 42% of respondents felt there was room for improvement in terms of results, 77% reported that IT and development teams worked together to identify the underlying causes of issues. 

Splunk CISO Jason Lee stated that, "the C-Suite and board of directors are increasingly relying on CISOs for guidance across a sophisticated threat landscape and changing market conditions," further stating, "these relationships provide CISOs the opportunity to become champions who strengthen an organization's security culture and lead teams to become more cross-collaborative and resilient." 

"By communicating key security metrics, CISOs can also guide boards on adopting emerging technologies, such as generative AI, to help improve cyber defense management and prepare for the future," Lee concluded.

The Power of Security Data lakes: How CISOs can drive accountability


How CISOs can use security data lakes to drive accountability

In today’s digital age, data is the new oil. It is the lifeblood of businesses and organizations, and its protection is paramount. Cybersecurity threats are rising, and CISOs are under immense pressure to ensure their organization’s security posture is robust. Security data lakes are emerging as a powerful tool that can help CISOs and other security leaders drive accountability.

What are security data lakes?

Security data lakes are an architecture that lets security leaders consolidate security data regardless of quantity and variety, making it possible to drive real accountability across their organization. Security data lakes help achieve this in two ways:

Separate storage from computing, which makes it cost-effective to store security data at scale and for longer periods.

Make security data part of a company’s general-purpose analytics platform, which allows for additional context and delivering insights via standard reporting tools.

How can CISOs use security data lakes to drive accountability?

CISOs employing security data lakes should think about accountability, a powerful way to improve their overall security posture. Here are three examples of how security data lakes help CISOs and other security leaders drive accountability:

Evaluate vendors with cold, hard data

Most companies select and evaluate security vendors based on simple criteria, like whether they support certain data sources and applications. A lack of information keeps decision-makers from evaluating vendors on more meaningful factors like threat detection performance or vulnerability prioritization accuracy. 

Security data lakes let teams identify gaps between the insights vendors provide and what an organization actually experiences. Analyzing data from a ticketing system, for instance, lets the team see how many threats detected by a vendor were false positives or how many vulnerability findings are irrelevant. 

A security product may work great in one company’s environment but less well at another firm. If the team can measure performance across the metrics that matter to the company, it can work with the vendor to help them improve — or determine that the company needs a better tool.

Illuminate flawed processes

If remediation teams don’t address vulnerabilities quickly enough on a consistent basis, access to historical data helps uncover those problems and identify processes that may need updating to help them work more effectively.

Identify the root cause of incidents

Security data lakes can hold teams more accountable by consolidating security data regardless of quantity and variety, making it possible to drive real accountability across an organization. 

By analyzing historical incident response data, teams can identify patterns in attack vectors or vulnerabilities that led to incidents. This information can be used to improve incident response processes or identify areas where additional training is needed.