Nvidia has strongly denied accusations from China that its computer chips include secret ways to track users or shut down devices remotely. The company also warned that proposals to add such features, known as backdoors or kill switches would create major security risks.
The dispute began when the Cyberspace Administration of China said it met with Nvidia over what it called “serious security issues” in the company’s products. Chinese officials claimed US experts had revealed that Nvidia’s H20 chip, made for the Chinese market under US export rules, could be tracked and remotely disabled.
Nvidia responded in a blog post from its Chief Security Officer, David Reber Jr., stating: “There are no back doors in NVIDIA chips. No kill switches. No spyware. That’s not how trustworthy systems are built and never will be.” The company has consistently denied that such controls exist.
Concerns Over Proposed US Law
While dismissing China’s claims, Nvidia also appeared to be addressing US lawmakers. A proposed “Chip Security Act” in the United States would require exported chips to have location verification and possibly a way to stop unauthorized use. Critics argue this could open the door to government-controlled kill switches, something Nvidia says is dangerous.
Senator Tom Cotton’s office says the bill is meant to keep advanced American chips out of the hands of “adversaries like Communist China.” The White House’s AI Action Plan also suggests exploring location tracking for high-end computing hardware.
Why Nvidia Says Kill Switches Are a Bad Idea
Reber argued that adding kill switches or hidden access points would be a gift to hackers and foreign threats, creating weaknesses in global technology infrastructure. He compared it to buying a car where the dealer could apply the parking brake remotely without your consent.
“There is no such thing as a ‘good’ secret backdoor,” he said. “They only create dangerous vulnerabilities.” Instead, Nvidia says security should rely on rigorous testing, independent verification, and compliance with global cybersecurity standards.
Reber pointed to the 1990s “Clipper Chip” project, when the US government tried to create a form of encryption with a built-in backdoor for law enforcement. Researchers quickly found flaws, proving it was unsafe. That project was abandoned, and many experts now see it as a warning against similar ideas.
According to Reber, Nvidia’s chips are built with layered security to avoid any single point of failure. Adding a kill switch, he says, would break that design and harm both innovation and trust in US technology.
A major Chinese telecom company has launched what it claims is the first commercial security system that can protect digital communication from even the most powerful future hackers — including those using quantum computers.
China Telecom Quantum, a state-owned firm, recently introduced a new kind of encryption system that combines two advanced technologies to create strong protection for data, phone calls, and user identity. This system was successfully used to make a secure phone call between Beijing and Hefei a distance of more than 1,000 kilometers — without risking any data leaks or breaches.
The Problem: Quantum Computers Could Break Today’s Encryption
As quantum computing continues to develop, it is expected to pose a serious threat to current cybersecurity systems. These new types of computers are extremely fast and powerful, and experts believe they could one day crack the encryption used to protect sensitive information like passwords, bank data, and government records.
To stay ahead of these threats, China Telecom has built a new system that combines:
1. A quantum-based method that sends encryption keys using the principles of quantum physics, making them nearly impossible to steal or intercept.
2. A mathematics-based method that protects data using very difficult equations that even quantum computers would find hard to solve.
This two-layer approach forms a highly secure framework to protect digital communication.
Tested in Real Conditions and Ready to Use
China Telecom says the system has been tested successfully and is ready to be used on a large scale. The company has already created secure quantum networks in 16 cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Hefei.
These networks now make up a nationwide secure communication system. Among them, Hefei’s network is the largest and most advanced in the world, with eight main hubs and over 150 connection points spread across 1,147 kilometers. It is already being used by around 500 government departments and nearly 400 publicly owned companies.
Extra Tools for Safe Messaging and Document Management
The company has also introduced two new secure tools:
• Quantum Secret — a messaging and teamwork app designed to keep communication safe from even advanced hackers.
• Quantum Cloud Seal — a platform made for secure digital approvals, auditing, and managing documents for businesses and government offices.
Both tools are already being used across different industries in China.
With this launch, China has taken a major step toward building a future-ready cybersecurity system — one that can stay strong even as quantum computing technology continues to grow.
A newly discovered security hole in SAP’s NetWeaver platform is now being misused by cybercriminals, including ransomware gangs. This flaw allows attackers to run harmful commands on vulnerable systems from a distance—without even needing to log in.
SAP issued urgent software updates on April 24 after learning about the flaw, found in NetWeaver’s Visual Composer tool. The weakness, labeled CVE-2025-31324, makes it possible for attackers to upload files containing malware. Once inside, they can take full control of the affected system.
ReliaQuest, a cybersecurity firm that tracked this issue, now says that two known ransomware groups, RansomEXX and BianLian have joined in. Although they haven’t yet successfully launched any ransomware in these cases, their involvement shows that multiple criminal groups are watching this flaw closely.
Investigators linked BianLian to at least one incident using an IP address tied to their past operations. In another case, RansomEXX attackers used a backdoor tool called PipeMagic and also took advantage of a previously known bug in Microsoft’s Windows system (CVE-2025-29824).
Even though their first effort didn’t succeed, the attackers made another attempt using a powerful hacking framework called Brute Ratel. They delivered it using a built-in Microsoft function called MSBuild, which helped them run the attack in a sneaky way.
More recently, security teams from Forescout and EclecticIQ connected this activity to hackers linked to China. These groups, tracked under various names, were also found to be exploiting the same SAP vulnerability. In fact, they managed to secretly install backdoors on at least 581 SAP systems, including some tied to national infrastructure in the US, UK, and Saudi Arabia. Their plans may also include targeting nearly 2,000 more systems soon.
Experts believe these hidden access points could help foreign state-sponsored hackers gather intelligence, interfere with operations, or even achieve military or economic goals. Since SAP systems are often connected to important internal networks, the damage could spread quickly within affected organizations.
SAP has also fixed another weakness (CVE-2025-42999), which had been silently misused since March. To stay safe, system administrators are advised to apply the patches immediately. If they can’t update right away, disabling the Visual Composer tool can help. They should also restrict access to certain features and monitor their systems closely for anything unusual.
The US government’s cyber agency CISA has officially listed this flaw as a known risk. Federal departments were told to patch their systems by May 20 to avoid falling victim.
TikTok’s lead regulator in Europe, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) said that TikTok accepted during the probe about hosting European user data in China. DPC’s deputy commissioner Graham Doyle said that “TikTok failed to verify, guarantee, and demonstrate that the personal data of (European) users, remotely accessed by staff in China, was afforded a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU,”
Besides this, Doyle said that TikTok’s failure to address the dangers of possible access to Europeans’s private data by Chinese authorities under China’s anti-terrorism, counter-espionage, and other regulations, which TikTok itself found different than EU’s data protection standards.
TikTok has declared to contest the heavy EU fine, despite the findings. TikTok Europe’s Christine Grahn stressed that the company has “never received a request” from authorities in China for European users’ data and that “TikTok” has never given EU users’ data to Chinese authorities. “We disagree with this decision and intend to appeal it in full,” Christine said.
TikTok boasts a massive 1.5 billion users worldwide. In recent years, the social media platform has been under tough pressure from Western governments due to worries about the misuse of data by Chinese actors for surveillance and propaganda aims.
In 2023, the Ireland DPC fined TikTok 354 million euros for violating EU rules related to the processing of children’s information. The DPC’s recent judgment also revealed that TikTok violated requirements under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by sending user data to China. The decision includes a 530 million euro administrative penalty plus a mandate that TikTok aligns its data processing rules with EU practices within 6 months.
The latest "Qwen2.5-Omni-7B" is a multimodal model- it can process inputs like audio/video, text, and images- while also creating real-time text and natural speech responses, Alibaba’s cloud website reports. It also said that the model can be used on edge devices such as smartphones, providing higher efficiency without giving up on performance.
According to Alibaba, the “unique combination makes it the perfect foundation for developing agile, cost-effective AI agents that deliver tangible value, especially intelligent voice applications.” For instance, the AI can be used to assist visually impaired individuals to navigate their environment via real-time audio description.
The latest model is open-sourced on forums GitHub and Hugging Face, after a rising trend in China post DeepSeek breakthrough R1 model open-source. Open-source means a software in which the source code is created freely on web for potential modification and redistribution.
In recent years, Alibaba claims it has open-sourced more that 200 generative AI models. In the noise of China’s AI dominance intensified by DeepSeek due to its shoe string budget and capabilities, Alibaba and genAI competitors are also releasing new, cost-cutting models and services an exceptional case.
Last week, Chinese tech mammoth Baidu launched a new multimodal foundational model and its first reasoning-based model. Likewise, Alibaba introduced its updated Qwen 2.5 AI model in January and also launched a new variant of its AI assistant tool Quark this month.
Alibaba has also made strong commitments to its AI plan, recently, it announced a plan to put $53 billion in its cloud computing and AI infrastructure over the next three years, even surpassing its spending in the space over the past decade.
CNBC talked with Kai Wang, Asia Senior equity analyst at Morningstar, Mr Kai told CNBC that “large Chinese tech players such as Alibaba, which build data centers to meet the computing needs of AI in addition to building their own LLMs, are well positioned to benefit from China's post-DeepSeek AI boom.” According to CNBC, “Alibaba secured a major win for its AI business last month when it confirmed that the company was partnering with Apple to roll out AI integration for iPhones sold in China.”
Italy’s data protection authority, Garante, has ordered Chinese AI chatbot DeepSeek to halt its operations in the country. The decision comes after the company failed to provide clear answers about how it collects and handles user data. Authorities fear that the chatbot’s data practices could pose security risks, leading to its removal from Italian app stores.
Why Did Italy Ban DeepSeek?
The main reason behind the ban is DeepSeek’s lack of transparency regarding its data collection policies. Italian regulators reached out to the company with concerns over whether it was handling user information in a way that aligns with European privacy laws. However, DeepSeek’s response was deemed “totally insufficient,” raising even more doubts about its operations.
Garante stated that DeepSeek denied having a presence in Italy and claimed that European regulations did not apply to it. Despite this, authorities believe that the company’s AI assistant has been accessible to Italian users, making it subject to the region’s data protection rules. To address these concerns, Italy has launched an official investigation into DeepSeek’s activities.
Growing Concerns Over AI and Data Security
DeepSeek is an advanced AI chatbot developed by a Chinese startup, positioned as a competitor to OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. With over 10 million downloads worldwide, it is considered a strong contender in the AI market. However, its expansion into Western countries has sparked concerns about how user data might be used.
Italy is not the only country scrutinizing DeepSeek’s data practices. Authorities in France, South Korea, and Ireland have also launched investigations, highlighting global concerns about AI-driven data collection. Many governments fear that personal data gathered by AI chatbots could be misused for surveillance or other security threats.
This is not the first time Italy has taken action against an AI company. In 2023, Garante temporarily blocked OpenAI’s ChatGPT over privacy issues. OpenAI was later fined €15 million after being accused of using personal data to train its AI without proper consent.
Impact on the AI and Tech Industry
The crackdown on DeepSeek comes at a time when AI technology is shaping global markets. Just this week, concerns over China’s growing influence in AI led to a significant drop in the U.S. stock market. The NASDAQ 100 index lost $1 trillion in value, with AI chipmaker Nvidia alone suffering a $600 million loss.
While DeepSeek has been removed from Italian app stores, users who downloaded it before the ban can still access the chatbot. Additionally, its web-based version remains functional, raising questions about how regulators will enforce the restriction effectively.
As AI continues to make new advancements, countries are becoming more cautious about companies that fail to meet privacy and security standards. With multiple nations now investigating DeepSeek, its future in Western markets remains uncertain.
Experts found that the devices had a hidden backdoor with a hard-coded IP address, enabling transmission of patient data. This is doable as the devices will start a link to a central monitoring system through a wireless or wired network, as per the product description.
The agency disclosed the codes that send data to a select IP address. The decoded data includes detailed information- patients, hospital department, doctor’s name, date of birth, admission date, and other details about the device users.
The flaw is filed under “CVE-2025-0626 with a CVSS v4 score of 7.7 out of 10” says Tom’s Hardware, while also talking about two other vulnerabilities “filed under CVE-2024- 12248, which indicates that it could allow an attacker to write data remotely to execute a code” and “CVE-2025-0683, which relates to privacy vulnerability.”
The three cybersecurity flaws can allow threat actors to dodge cybersecurity checks, get access, and also manipulate the device, the FDA says, not being “aware of any cybersecurity incidents, injuries, or deaths related to these cybersecurity vulnerabilities at this time."
FDA said that Contec Medical Systems is a device manufacturer in China, its products are used in the healthcare industry- clinics, hospitals, etc., in the US and European Union. However, experts found that these can also be bought from eBay for $599.
These devices are also rebranded as Epsimed MN-120, the FDA believes. Contec products are FDA-approved and sold in more than 130 countries. As part of its vulnerability disclosure process, the CISA research team discovered uncovered this flaw.
The agency has also mentioned that the IP address is not linked with any medical device manufacturer, “Still, it is a third-party university, though it doesn't mention the university, the IP address, or the country it is sending data to,” reports Tom Hardware.
The CISA has also assessed that the coding was meant to be a substitute update system because it doesn’t include standard update techniques like doing integrity checks or tracking updated versions. Instead, it offers a remote file sent to the IP address. To solve this, the FDA suggests removing the monitoring device from its network and tracking the patient’s physical condition and vital stats.
The Transportation Security Administration recently unveiled a proposed rule that would permanently codify cybersecurity reporting requirements in certain segments of U.S. transportation, including pipelines and railroads. This change is set to be permanent after the agency introduced temporary reporting requirements for certain segments last year after a ransomware attack hit Colonial Pipeline, causing fuel shortages along the U.S. East Coast.
Locked In Securely
Since the Colonial Pipeline incident, the Transportation Security Administration has issued a number of temporary rules regarding cybersecurity risks in critical infrastructure. The new proposed rule would bring these temporary rules into permanence and codify a consistent approach throughout transportation on cybersecurity matters. As Administrator Pekoske pointed out, "TSA has been working extremely closely with industry partners to assist in enhancing the cybersecurity resilience of our nation's critical infrastructure."
Key Components of the Proposed Rule
This new law applies to a large scope of pipeline and railroad operators and places restrictions only on some bus companies. Its main emphasis is put on the implementation of cyber risk management plans that shall encompass:
Under these proposed regulations, operators would have to report cybersecurity incidents to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to receive faster response to and support of a threat.
Impact and Cost
The TSA estimated that the rulemaking would affect about 300 transportation operators-from pipelines, freight railroads, to public transportation agencies. These include 73 freight railroads, 34 public transportation systems, 71 over-the-road bus companies, and 115 pipeline facilities. Compliance and TSA oversight are estimated to cost the industry $2.1 billion over the next ten years.
The TSA attributed the regulations to the emerging threats of cyber attacks posed by nation-state actors and cybercriminals, who often target U.S. infrastructure in efforts to disrupt it and further inflict economic damage. Countries, according to the TSA, "such as Russia and China" were cited as frequent sources of cyberattacks on American critical infrastructure.
The agency's proposal underlines the need for uniform cybersecurity measures to be taken as soon as possible as cyber threats are becoming more advanced: they are now set to use artificial intelligence to deliver faster, undetectable attacks.
Industry Reaction and Flexibility
The proposal takes place on the grounds that the earlier directions were considered too elaborative by the transporters who had imparted them. The TSA will be more agile and results-driven now, allowing the companies to engage themselves in security solutions pertaining to the specific needs of each one.
The proposed rule will be open to comments from the industry until February 5 while reviewing all the responses the TSA will have before finalising the rule. The agency looks forward to providing enhanced cybersecurity and resilience within U.S. surface transportation systems by defeating the increasing cyber threats.
Advanced hacking toolkit Winos4.0 spreads across the globe, security experts warn. Originally reported by Trend Micro, this new toolkit-just like known kits Cobalt Strike and Sliver-was connected to a string of recent cyber attacks in China, having initially spread through fake software downloads. This year, Fortinet reported that the toolkit is also disseminated through game-themed files, which now tends to expand and might pose a risk to a larger user base.
Attack Framework
Winso4.0 is a post-exploitation toolkit: after successfully gaining initial access to a system, the attackers use it for further invasion and domination. First, it was discovered inside the applications downloaded by users who considered it software in their interest, including VPNs or Google Chrome downloads for the Chinese market. Under the aliases Void Arachne or Silver Fox, the attackers entice users with these very popular applications full of malicious components designed to compromise their systems.
New strategies involve attackers using game applications, via which they have broadcasted Winos4.0, again targeting Chinese users mainly. This way, hackers change and utilise attractive downloads to penetrate devices.
Infection Stages
When one of such benign-looking files is downloaded by a victim, the Winos4.0 toolkit initiates a four-phase infection:
1. Stage 1: After installation, a DLL file you.dll, was retrieved from a remote domain. This file installed persistence on the device by setting values in the Windows Registry such that the malware would persist after the system restarts:.
2. Stage 2: At this step, the injected shellcode is loaded to download necessary APIs and communicate with a C2 server, which enables hackers to send commands and retrieve files from the infected device.
3. Stage 3: It fetches more encoded data from the C2 server in a second DLL file named上线模块.dll which saves to the Windows Registry to be used later, apart from updating server addresses to maintain an active link between the malware and its operators.
4. Final Stage: The last stage (login module.dll) will activate all main functions of the toolkit, including detailed system data gathering (like IP address and type of OS), detection of security tools, searching for crypto-wallets, and keeping a hidden backdoor. Through this backdoor connection, hackers can exfiltrate data, execute commands, and sustain their activity monitoring.
Evasion Techniques
Winos4.0 already has an inbuilt scanner for the detection of security products, including commercial products by Kaspersky, Avast, Bitdefender, and Malwarebytes. It will then change its behaviour to avoid detection or even quit if the toolkit finds itself running in an environment that is under surveillance. This versatility makes the tool very dangerous when it gets into cybercriminals' hands.
Emerging Menace
The fact that the toolkit Winos4.0 is still being used and fine-tuned points towards the growing importance of this toolkit in cyberattack strategies. As explained by Fortinet, it is a versatile and powerful framework "designed for remote control of compromised systems." Ongoing activity like this indicates that Winos4.0 is becoming a tool hackers like to use to gain control over Windows machines.
Preventive Actions
Always ready for downloading is a constant warning from the security experts to users, especially when it comes to free softwares or games which seem popular.
Avoid downloading applications and other forms of files from unknown sources. Even verifying if the software or file is coming from a legitimate source may also save it from infection. Moreover, one's security software must be updated frequently.
Knowing the threats of Winos4.0 would prevent many users from this malicious software by making them aware of this sophisticated malware.
Dutch security authorities have recorded growing cyber threats from state-affiliated Russian and Chinese hackers targeting organisations in the country. The attacks, mostly to gain access to the critical infrastructure, are seen as preparations for future sabotage and for gathering sensitive information, according to a recent report by the Dutch National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV).
Rise of Non-State Hackers in Support of Government Agendas
The report says cyber attacks can no longer be considered the preserve of state actors: in fact, it turns out that non-state hackers in Russia and China increasingly are joining in. Of course, Russia: for some of the past year's cyber espionage and sabotage, hacktivists--independent hacking groups not officially communicating with the government are said to have conducted parts of this past year. At times, Russian state cyber actors work in conjunction with them, sometimes using their cover for their own operations, sometimes directing them to fit state goals.
China's cyber operations often combine state intelligence resources with academic and corporate collaborations. Sometimes, persons are performing dual roles: conducting research or scientific duties coupled with pushing forward China's intelligence goals. Such close cooperation treads the fine line between private and state operations, introducing an element of complexity to China's cyber strategy.
China's Advancing Sabotage Capabilities
For some years now, Chinese cyber campaigns focused on espionage, particularly those targeting the Netherlands and other allies, have been well known. Recent developments over the past year, however, have found China's cyber strategies getting broader in scope and quite sophisticated. The recent "Volt Typhoon" campaign, attributed to China, was an example of shifting toward actual sabotage, where critical U.S. infrastructure is the chief target. Although Europe is not currently under such threats from Volt Typhoon, the Netherlands remains vigilant based on China's rapid advancements in its cyber capabilities, which will potentially be implemented globally at a later stage.
Cyber/Disinformation Combined Threat
In the Netherlands, there is a national coordinator for security and counterterrorism, Pieter-Jaap Aalbersberg, who underscored that cyber threats frequently act as part of an integrated approach, which includes information operations. Coordinated actions are riskier because the cyber attack and digital influence operation come together to compromise security. Aalbersberg indicated that risks need to be balanced collectively, both from direct cyber threats and other consequences.
Recent Breach in Dutch Police Forces Concerns
Earlier this month, the Dutch national police announced a breach into officers' personal contact details with thousands of officers being involved, including names, telephone numbers, and email. The attackers behind this breach are unknown, although it is believed that this incident is "very likely" to be carried out by a state-sponsored group. Still, no country was indicated.
The Dutch government views such heightened cyber hostility as pushing a stronger defensive response from its measures about the cybersecurity fields, particularly since the threats from Russians and Chinese are still multiplying. This scenario now presents strong appeal in asking for added fortifications at international cooperation and greater action in stopping these mounting operations of said aggressive expansions through cyber warfare.