Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Christopher Wray. Show all posts

FBI Director Christopher Wray Highlights Unprecedented Threat Landscape and Importance of Law Enforcement Partnerships

 

FBI Director Christopher Wray emphasized the unprecedented level of diverse threats facing the nation, describing it as a time when multiple threats are simultaneously elevated, a situation he finds unparalleled in his career. In an exclusive interview during his visit to the FBI’s Minneapolis field office, Wray highlighted the importance of partnerships among law enforcement agencies and other entities as they navigate challenges ranging from domestic and international terrorism to Chinese espionage, intellectual property theft, and foreign election interference.

Wray expressed concern about the cumulative impact of these threats and the burden they place on law enforcement, noting that collaboration across agencies is crucial for overcoming these challenges. His concerns have been consistent, particularly following the October 7th Hamas attack in Israel, which he warned could inspire extremist activities similar to those seen during ISIS's rise.

The FBI is also grappling with security issues related to the southern U.S. border, where individuals with alleged ties to the Islamic State were detained in June for immigration violations. Additionally, the agency is addressing foreign interference in U.S. elections, with recent incidents involving Iranian cyberattacks on political campaigns.

While Wray refrained from discussing specific investigations, he underscored the necessity of public-private partnerships in combating cyber threats, particularly those targeting election systems. He stressed the importance of information sharing to effectively connect the dots and address these complex challenges.

Wray also noted the rising violence against law enforcement officers, pointing out the troubling statistic of an officer being killed every five days, with four such deaths occurring in Minnesota alone in 2024. The FBI itself has not been immune to such violence, as demonstrated by a fatal encounter at its Cincinnati office following the Mar-a-Lago search.

In response to these growing threats, the FBI has strengthened its traditional partnerships with state and local law enforcement while also forging new collaborations with businesses and academic institutions. These efforts aim to bolster cybersecurity and protect intellectual property, with a particular focus on leveraging artificial intelligence to counter AI-enabled threats. Wray emphasized that AI, when used effectively, could be a powerful tool in defending against the misuse of technology by adversaries.

FBI Admits to Have Gained US Citizens’ Location Data, Unwarranted


According to a Wired report, FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed for the first time at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing yesterday that the organization has previously acquired the location data of US citizens without obtaining a warrant. 

Despite the practice becoming more frequent and widespread since the US Supreme Court restricted the government’s ability to track Americans’ phones warrantlessly, around five years ago, the FBI did not previously acknowledge ever making purchases of such kind. 

The revelation comes after Sen. Ron Wyden [D-Ore] questioned Wray “Does the FBI purchase US phone-geolocation information?” The response to which alarmed privacy experts. 

“To my knowledge, we do not currently purchase commercial database information that includes location data derived from Internet advertising[…]I understand that we previously—as in the past—purchased some such information for a specific national security pilot project. But that’s not been active for some time,” said Wray. 

The response, while being vague and revolving around the question asked, gave a clear insight into the way the FBI made use of location data to monitor US individuals with no court oversight. 

It is not immediately clear whether Wray was talking to a warrant—a court order that states that a crime has been committed—or another legal device. Wray also did not explain why the FBI decided to stop the practice. 

The Supreme Court ruled in the infamous Carpenter v. United States decision, that when government organizations accessed historical location data without a warrant, they were in violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unjustified searches. But the decision was interpreted very strictly. Privacy groups claim that the judgment left an obvious gap that enables the government to just buy anything it is unable to legally obtain. The Military Intelligence Agency and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are two federal organizations that are known to have exploited this loophole. 

On being asked during the Senate hearing whether the FBI is planning to adhere to the practice of buying location data again, Wray said “We have no plans to change that, at the current time.” 

According to Seam Vitka, a policy lawyer at Demand Progress, a nonprofit firm based on national security and private reforms, the FBI needs to be more forthcoming about the purchase, dubbing Wray’s revelation as “horrifying” in its implications. “The public needs to know who gave the go-ahead for this purchase, why, and what other agencies have done or are trying to do the same,” says Vitka. 

US lawmakers have historically failed to enact a comprehensive privacy law, and the majority of the proposed bills have purposely ignored the government's own acquisition of US citizens' private data. For example, all law enforcement organizations and any business "gathering, processing, or transferring" data on their behalf are excluded from the provisions of the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (ADPPA), which was presented last year. Wyden and other senators have attempted to tackle the problem head-on with a number of proposals. For instance, the Geolocation Privacy and Surveillance Act has been reintroduced multiple times in Congress since 2011, but it has never been put to a vote.