Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label CrowdStrike. Show all posts

Ransomware Attack and Software Glitches Reveal Fragility in U.S. Car Dealerships and Global Systems

 

A surprising situation unfolded this summer when buying a car in the U.S. became nearly impossible. In June, a ransomware attack targeted CDK Global, a Chicago-based software company with a market value of about $6.4 billion, halting operations at thousands of dealerships for almost three weeks. Approximately half of the U.S. auto industry depends on CDK Global’s software for daily operations.

Shortly after, a malfunctioning software update from cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike caused disruptions worldwide, affecting millions of computers running Microsoft Windows. This glitch impacted critical infrastructure, including airports, banks, hospitals, and government services.

Cybersecurity experts are now concerned as these events signal a more unstable future. The consolidation of software providers and lack of competition in industries offering essential services create risks. A single software failure could bring entire industries to a standstill, and experts warn the next incident could be even worse.

Previously, cyberattacks and outages were either brief or focused on individual targets. However, the attacks on CDK Global and CrowdStrike were different. Rory Mir, associate director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, emphasized that these events highlight the severe risks linked to reliance on a single software provider, affecting not just individuals but entire industries.

The financial toll from these outages has been significant. The CDK Global attack cost nearly 15,000 car dealerships in the U.S. an estimated $1 billion and led to around 56,200 lost car sales over three weeks, according to Anderson Economic Group. The CrowdStrike incident is believed to have caused even greater economic damage, with some estimates putting the loss in the tens of billions of dollars globally.

As a result, the cyber insurance industry now faces increasingly complex risks. Insurance premiums are likely to rise as insurers struggle to assess the unpredictable nature of future cyber threats. Dr. Keri Pearlson of MIT Sloan School of Management remarked that insurers are grappling with pricing models because they cannot foresee the likelihood or nature of the next major cyber incident.

The CrowdStrike failure demonstrated how a single software issue could affect various industries. The CDK Global attack, on the other hand, underscored how entire sectors—such as car dealerships—can be heavily dependent on a few dominant software providers. This situation is not unique to the automotive industry; the banking and airline sectors also rely on a handful of key software vendors, creating potential choke points for disruption.

For instance, in the banking industry, three payment processors—FIS, Fiserv, and Jack Henry—control approximately 70% of the market. In the airline industry, three major booking platforms—Travelport, Amadeus, and Sabre—dominate the market. These consolidations create vulnerabilities, much like the Suez Canal blockage that paralyzed global shipping for days, according to Brad Hibbert of Prevalent.

Healthcare, long a prime target for cyberattacks, faces even greater risks. Dominant software providers such as Epic Systems and Oracle-owned Cerner control the U.S. digital medical records market, making healthcare IT a weak link in the chain, says Andrew Southall of SkySiege.

To address these vulnerabilities, experts recommend diversifying critical systems and adopting multi-vendor strategies. John Price of SubRosa suggests that businesses should explore redundancy and backup solutions across multiple vendors to minimize the impact of potential outages.

However, diversifying is easier said than done. Federal Trade Commissioner Lina Khan’s antitrust efforts have focused on Big Tech, but niche software providers have largely escaped scrutiny, contributing to the growing risk of market concentration.

As Rory Mir notes, limited choices in software markets may harm consumers and businesses by allowing monopolies to lower security standards. In cybersecurity, this consolidation creates a “digital monoculture,” leaving fewer targets but higher stakes for malicious actors.

CDK Global’s dominance in the auto industry exemplifies the dangers of unchecked market power. The company faced an antitrust case by industry disruptor Authenticom, which accused CDK and Reynolds and Reynolds of forming a cartel. The case ultimately ended with a settlement, but the issue underscores the risks posed by monopolies in the digital age.

Brazilian Hacker Behind Major Data Leaks



In a recent turn of events, cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has identified the hacker known as USDoD, who has been linked to numerous data breaches, as a 33-year-old Brazilian man. This hacker, also known by the alias "EquationCorp," has been behind several high-profile cyber attacks targeting prominent organisations, including Airbus, the FBI's InfraGard portal, National Public Data, and TransUnion.

A report obtained by the Brazilian news site TecMundo, from an anonymous source within CrowdStrike, reveals that the individual behind USDoD is Luan BG, a resident of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The report states that CrowdStrike has shared this information with the authorities, which includes details such as his tax registration, email addresses, domains he registered, IP addresses, social media accounts, and his phone number. While personal information about Luan has been uncovered, specific details that could fully reveal his identity have been kept confidential by CrowdStrike, respecting privacy concerns despite his criminal activities.

According to the investigation, Luan BG has been involved in hacking activities since at least 2017, originally engaging in hacktivism. However, by 2022, his activities had escalated into more serious cybercrimes. His operational security mistakes played a crucial role in his identification. For instance, he repeatedly used the same email address and similar phrases across various social media platforms and forums, allowing investigators to track his activities. This email was also linked to personal accounts, domain registrations, GitHub contributions, and social media profiles, which collectively led to his identification. Additionally, early gaps in his technical abilities made it easier for investigators to compile a detailed profile of him, including photos and emails tied to his aliases.

Robert Baptiste, a well-known cybersecurity expert and CEO of Predicta Lab, has confirmed CrowdStrike's findings through an independent investigation. Baptiste’s work corroborates the evidence pointing to Luan BG as the individual behind the USDoD alias.

The report also highlights that Luan BG inadvertently exposed his identity during a 2023 interview with DataBreaches.net, where he falsely claimed to be around 30 years old with dual Brazilian and Portuguese citizenship, residing in Spain. However, further investigation into his online activities, including emails and social media posts, traced his location back to Brazil. Despite his attempts to mislead by claiming U.S. citizenship, CrowdStrike was able to connect him to Brazil using financial records and other digital traces.

Although authorities have been informed about Luan BG’s identity, there is concern that he may continue his cybercriminal activities. Despite the exposure, experts fear that Luan might deny the revelations or downplay them and persist in his illicit endeavours.

The exposure of USDoD’s identity by CrowdStrike is a crucial step in the ongoing battle against cybercrime. It highlights the complex challenges cybersecurity professionals face in tracking down and exposing individuals involved in high-level cyberattacks. As the case unfolds, the impact of this discovery on the broader cybercriminal community will be closely watched.


Lessons from the CrowdStrike Falcon Sensor Defect: Enhancing Ransomware Recovery and Business Continuity

 


In recent times, a significant IT disruption was caused by a defect in a content update for CrowdStrike’s Falcon sensor, affecting approximately 8.5 million PCs across diverse sectors. This issue, which disrupted organizations ranging from small businesses and global conglomerates to government agencies and hospitals, highlighted severe vulnerabilities in how entities handle large-scale IT failures. The impact was widespread, leading to delayed flights, transaction failures at gas stations and grocery stores, and significant delays in emergency services such as police and fire departments. 

The scale of this disruption serves as a critical reminder of the importance of robust ransomware recovery and business continuity plans (BCPs). Although the immediate cause of the disruption was not a ransomware attack, the parallels between handling this IT issue and responding to ransomware are striking. This event underscores the need for organizations to evaluate and improve their preparedness for various types of cyber threats. One of the key lessons from this incident is the importance of efficient detection. The mean time to detect (MTTD) is a crucial metric that measures how swiftly an organization can identify a security breach. 

The quick identification of the Falcon sensor defect was vital in managing its effects and preventing further damage. Organizations should focus on strengthening their detection systems to ensure they can quickly identify and respond to potential threats. This includes implementing advanced monitoring tools and refining alert mechanisms to reduce response times during a real cyber incident. Recovery and restoration processes are equally critical. After the Falcon sensor issue, organizations had to mobilize their BCPs to recover systems and restore normal operations from backups. This situation emphasizes the need for well-documented, regularly updated, and thoroughly tested recovery plans. 

Businesses must ensure their backup strategies are reliable and that they can quickly restore operations with minimal disruption. Effective recovery plans should include clear procedures for data restoration, system repairs, and communication with stakeholders during a crisis. The incident also highlights the importance of continuous assessment and improvement of an organization’s cybersecurity posture. By analyzing their response to the Falcon sensor defect, organizations can identify gaps in their strategies and address any weaknesses. This involves reviewing incident response plans, updating communication protocols, and enhancing overall resilience to cyber threats. 

Furthermore, the disruption reinforces the need for comprehensive risk management strategies. Organizations should regularly evaluate their exposure to various types of cyber threats, including ransomware, and implement measures to mitigate these risks. This includes investing in cybersecurity training for employees, conducting regular security audits, and staying informed about the latest threat intelligence. 

In conclusion, the CrowdStrike Falcon sensor defect offers valuable lessons for enhancing ransomware recovery and business continuity planning. By learning from this event, organizations can improve their ability to respond to and recover from cyberattacks, ensuring they are better prepared for future threats. Regular updates to BCPs, enhanced detection capabilities, and robust recovery processes are essential for safeguarding against disruptions and maintaining operational resilience in today’s increasingly complex digital landscape.

The Rise of Manual Techniques in Ransomware Attacks: A Growing Threat

The Rise of Manual Techniques in Ransomware Attacks: A Growing Threat

A recent report by CrowdStrike observes on a disturbing trend: the increasing use of manual techniques in ransomware attacks. This shift towards hands-on-keyboard activities is not only making these attacks more sophisticated but also more challenging to detect and mitigate.

The Surge in Interactive Intrusions

According to CrowdStrike’s findings, there has been a staggering 55% increase in interactive intrusions over the past year. These intrusions, characterized by direct human involvement rather than automated scripts, account for nearly 90% of e-crime activities. This trend underscores a critical shift in the tactics employed by cybercriminals, who are now leveraging manual techniques to bypass traditional security measures and achieve their malicious objectives.

Why Manual Techniques?

The adoption of manual techniques in ransomware attacks offers several advantages to cybercriminals. Firstly, these techniques allow attackers to adapt and respond in real-time to the defenses they encounter. Unlike automated attacks, which follow predefined scripts, manual intrusions enable attackers to think on their feet, making it harder for security systems to predict and counter their moves.

Secondly, manual techniques often involve the use of legitimate tools and credentials, making it difficult for security teams to distinguish between malicious and benign activities. This tactic, known as “living off the land,” involves using tools that are already present in the target environment, such as PowerShell or Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). By blending in with normal network traffic, attackers can evade detection for extended periods, increasing the likelihood of a successful attack.

The Impact on the Technology Sector

The technology sector has been particularly hard-hit by this surge in manual ransomware attacks. CrowdStrike’s report indicates a 60% rise in such attacks targeting tech companies. This sector is an attractive target for cybercriminals due to its vast repositories of sensitive data and intellectual property. Additionally, technology companies often have complex and interconnected systems, providing multiple entry points for attackers to exploit.

The consequences of a successful ransomware attack on a tech company can be devastating. Beyond the immediate financial losses from ransom payments, these attacks can lead to prolonged downtime, loss of customer trust, and significant reputational damage. In some cases, the recovery process can take months, further compounding the financial and operational impact.

What to do?

Enhanced Monitoring and Detection: Implement advanced monitoring tools that can detect anomalous behavior indicative of manual intrusions. Behavioural analytics and machine learning can help identify patterns that deviate from the norm, providing early warning signs of an attack.

Regular Security Training: Educate employees about the latest phishing techniques and social engineering tactics used by cybercriminals. Regular training sessions can help staff recognize and report suspicious activities, reducing the risk of initial compromise.

Zero Trust Architecture: Adopt a Zero Trust approach to security, where no user or device is trusted by default. Implement strict access controls and continuously verify the identity and integrity of users and devices accessing the network.

Incident Response Planning: Develop and regularly update an incident response plan that outlines the steps to take in the event of a ransomware attack. Conduct regular drills to ensure that all team members are familiar with their roles and responsibilities during an incident.

Backup and Recovery: Maintain regular backups of critical data and ensure that these backups are stored securely and inaccessible from the main network. Regularly test the recovery process to ensure that data can be restored quickly in the event of an attack.

CrowdStrike's Recovery Efforts in Focus After Global IT Outage


 

On July 19, cybersecurity leader CrowdStrike found itself at the centre of a crisis after a faulty software update caused a widespread IT outage, affecting millions of computers worldwide. The aftermath of this incident was evident at the Black Hat cybersecurity conference in Las Vegas, where CrowdStrike had a contributing presence. The company, known for its expertise in stopping cyber threats, faced the challenge of reassuring its customers and partners while dealing with the repercussions of the outage.

CrowdStrike's Response to the Crisis

In the weeks following the outage, CrowdStrike provided regular updates on its investigation into the issue. As part of its apology to affected partners, the company distributed $10 Uber Eats gift cards, though this gesture quickly backfired. Many recipients found their gift cards flagged as fraudulent due to high usage rates, exacerbating the company's already strained relationship with some partners.

Despite the challenges, CrowdStrike maintained a strong presence at the Black Hat conference, where it showcased its products and engaged with attendees. The company's booth, one of the largest at the event, drew attention, not just for the promotional items like T-shirts and action figures but also for the opportunity to discuss the incident with CrowdStrike representatives.

The response from cybersecurity professionals at Black Hat was mixed. Some attendees remained loyal to CrowdStrike, viewing the outage as an unfortunate but not defining moment for the company. A U.S. government employee who uses CrowdStrike regularly expressed confidence in the company's ability to maintain its position as a leading cybersecurity provider. Similarly, a security engineer noted that while his company was affected by the outage, CrowdStrike's prompt and effective remediation efforts helped restore normal operations within a day.

However, not all feedback was positive. Some attendees voiced concerns about the reliability of CrowdStrike's services following the incident. Seth Faeder, an engineer at ClearChoice Dental Implants Centers, noted that while his company wasn't directly impacted, he had to assist in restoring affected systems for his parent company, which uses CrowdStrike. This experience led him to suggest exploring alternatives like Sophos.

Another cybersecurity professional emphasised the importance of having backup plans in place, stating that while it might be difficult to move away from CrowdStrike entirely, the outage is an indicator of the risks involved in relying too heavily on a single provider.

CrowdStrike's Efforts to Rebuild Trust

Throughout the conference, CrowdStrike sought to reassure attendees of its commitment to resilience and customer support. The action figures distributed at the booth came with a message acknowledging the outage and emphasising the company's dedication to preventing similar incidents in the future. This message was also prominently displayed on screens throughout the conference venue, reinforcing CrowdStrike's focus on transparency and accountability.

Kevin Benacci, CrowdStrike's senior director of corporate communications, highlighted that the company's presence at Black Hat was not just about addressing the incident but also about expressing gratitude to the cybersecurity community for its continued support. Technical experts were on hand to discuss the incident in detail and provide insights into the company's response.

Despite the challenges posed by the outage, CrowdStrike's booth remained busy throughout the conference, suggesting that the company's reputation, while damaged, may not be beyond repair. The resilience and loyalty of some cybersecurity professionals indicate that CrowdStrike still holds a crucial place in the industry.

However, the incident has sparked a broader discussion about the reliability of cybersecurity tools and the need for contingency planning. As the industry reflects on the lessons learned from CrowdStrike's outage, the focus will likely shift to ensuring that even the most trusted systems are equipped to handle unforeseen challenges.


CrowdStrike Explains Root Cause of Globat IT Outage

CrowdStrike Explains Root Cause of Globat IT Outage

In July 2023, we witnessed a large-scale global breakdown impacting over 8.5 million Microsoft users. The reason? A software update that turned into chaos. Leading cybersecurity company CrowdStrike recently published its root cause analysis, providing insights on the incident. Let's understand what happened.

The Global IT Outage

The incident started with a routine software update. Microsoft users worldwide were waiting for new features and security updates. But an update had a secret landmine- a hidden sensor within CrowdStrike's Falcon software.

The Repercussions

The damage was sudden and severe. Organizations stopped working, government agencies had problems, and important services were hindered. The breakdown underscored our reliance on tech and the downside of interconnected systems.

The Root Problem

Sensor Defect

CrowdStrike's Falcon software overlooks network security, identifying threats and anomalies. The fault sensor was in the update and triggered a chain reaction. It misunderstood genuine traffic as suspicious, which led to worldwide chaos.

Lack of Testing

Experts have underscored the need for rigorous testing, questions were raised about the presence of critical bugs. The answers lie in the hasty development cycles and rush to meet the deadlines. Quality control was ignored, resulting in dangerous consequences.

Preventive Measures

  • CrowdStrike has acknowledged the mistake and is taking preventive measures to avoid such incidents in future:
  • It now conducts exhaustive testing, simulating various scenarios before deploying updates. Rigorous checks ensure no hidden surprises.
  • The company commits to transparency. Users will receive detailed release notes, highlighting changes and potential risks.
  • CrowdStrike collaborates with other cybersecurity firms and Microsoft itself. Sharing insights and best practices strengthens the ecosystem.

Takeaways

For Users

  • Vigilance: Stay informed about software updates. Read release notes and understand changes.
  • Backup Plans: Prepare for outages. Regular backups and redundancy can save the day.

For Developers

  • Quality Over Speed: Rushed releases lead to disasters. Prioritize quality assurance.
  • Test Thoroughly: Test, retest, and then test some more. Remember to consider the impact of a single line of code.

The CrowdStrike-Microsoft debacle serves as a wake-up call. The hyper-connected reality has weaknesses too,  a minor glitch can turn into global turmoil.

Navigating the Impact of Major IT Outages: Lessons from the CrowdStrike Incident

 

On Friday, a critical software update by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike led to a massive outage, affecting around 8.5 million Windows machines globally. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of preparedness for IT disruptions. Experts from CIO Journal have shared their insights on how organizations can better prepare for similar scenarios in the future. Understanding vendor practices is crucial. 

IT leaders should hold vendors, like CrowdStrike, to high standards regarding development and testing. Neil MacDonald, a Gartner vice president, emphasizes the need for thorough regression testing of all Windows versions before any update is released. IT managers must ensure that vendors are transparent about their software development processes and offer options for phased updates. With automatic software updates becoming standard practice, the CrowdStrike incident highlights the need for caution. Paul Davis from JFrog suggests prioritizing testing for updates based on their potential impact. 

Although testing every update may not be feasible, automation and AI tools can assist in managing this process efficiently. Jack Hidary from SandboxAQ advocates for AI-driven error detection to enhance software reliability. Developing a robust disaster recovery plan is also essential. Gartner’s MacDonald likens a major IT outage to a natural disaster, advising businesses to prepare similar recovery strategies. Establishing a “clean room” environment for restoring critical systems and conducting regular tabletop exercises can help maintain operational resilience. Regular data backups also mitigate the impact of such outages, as noted by Victor Zyamzin from Qrator Labs. Reviewing vendor contracts and insurance coverage is another vital step. Companies should scrutinize their agreements for clauses that ensure vendor reliability and explore compensation options for outages. 

Peter Halprin from Haynes Boone underscores the importance of cyber insurance, which can provide financial protection against business income losses due to IT disruptions. Finally, organizations may need to reassess their reliance on specific platforms. The CrowdStrike update, which primarily affected Windows-based systems, raises questions about whether businesses should consider alternative operating systems like macOS or Linux. As Chirag Mehta of Constellation Research points out, evaluating the necessity of deeper access provided by Windows might lead some to adopt simpler systems like Chromebooks.

The CrowdStrike outage underscores the importance of rigorous testing, effective disaster recovery plans, careful vendor and insurance management, and a thoughtful approach to platform selection. By addressing these areas, businesses can better prepare for future IT challenges and safeguard their operations.

How an IT Team Used Windows 3.1 to Mitigate a Massive CrowdStrike Outage

 

In an unprecedented event, a single update from anti-virus company CrowdStrike caused global havoc, affecting millions of Windows computers. This incident, described as the largest outage ever, disrupted numerous services and companies worldwide. As reports of the “Blue Screen of Death” (BSOD) flooded in, Microsoft was quick to clarify that this was a “third-party issue,” placing the blame squarely on CrowdStrike’s update to its Falcon virus scanner. 

The repercussions of this update were immediate and far-reaching. Millions of computers running Windows software experienced critical failures, bringing operations to a halt. Apple and Linux users were unaffected, which only highlighted the extent of the disruption within the Windows ecosystem. CrowdStrike’s response included a fix for the issue, but this solution required manual reboots in safe mode for affected machines. This task was easier said than done, especially for organizations with numerous devices, many of which were not easily accessible. 

Interestingly, an IT team found an unconventional solution to the problem. By leveraging the long-outdated Windows 3.1 operating system, they managed to navigate the crisis effectively. The story of this team’s ingenuity quickly became a focal point amid the chaos. Their ability to use such an old operating system to circumvent the issues posed by the update provided a glimmer of hope and a unique narrative twist to the otherwise grim situation. The CrowdStrike incident underscores the vulnerability of our modern, interconnected systems. 

With so much reliance on digital infrastructure, a single flawed update can ripple outwards, causing substantial disruption. It also serves as a poignant reminder of the resilience and resourcefulness often required in IT management. While it might seem archaic, the use of Windows 3.1 in this scenario was a testament to the enduring utility of older technologies, particularly in crisis situations where conventional solutions fail.  
CrowdStrike’s official statement, which notably lacked an apology, fueled frustration among users. However, CEO George Kurtz later expressed deep regret for the impact caused, acknowledging the disruption to customers, travelers, and affected companies. This incident has inevitably led to questions about the robustness of update deployment processes, especially given the scale of this outage. The timing of the update also came under scrutiny. 

As one computer scientist noted, pushing an update on a Friday is risky. Fewer staff are typically available over the weekend to address potential issues, leading to prolonged resolution times. Many large firms, therefore, prefer to schedule updates mid-week to mitigate such risks. For those impacted, CrowdStrike provided detailed instructions on its support website for fixing the issue. 
Organizations with dedicated IT teams coordinated widespread responses to manage the situation effectively. Unlike typical outages that might resolve themselves quickly, this event required significant manual intervention, highlighting the critical importance of preparedness and robust contingency planning. In conclusion, the CrowdStrike update debacle not only disrupted global operations but also showcased the adaptability and ingenuity of IT professionals. It reinforced the critical need for careful planning and the sometimes surprising utility of legacy systems in modern IT environments. 

As the world recovers from this incident, it serves as a stark reminder of our dependence on digital tools and the importance of rigorous update management.

Global IT Outage Disrupts Airlines, Hospitals, and Financial Institutions

 



A major IT outage has affected a wide array of global institutions, including hospitals, major banks, media outlets, and airlines. The disruption has hindered their ability to offer services, causing widespread inconvenience and operational challenges.

International airports across India, Hong Kong, the UK, and the US have reported significant issues, with numerous airlines grounding flights and experiencing delays. In the US, major airlines such as United, Delta, and American Airlines implemented a "global ground stop" on all flights, while Australian carriers Virgin and Jetstar faced delays and cancellations. According to aviation analytics firm Cirium, over 1,000 flights worldwide have been cancelled due to the outages.

At Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi, passengers experienced "absolute chaos," with manual processes replacing automated systems. Similar situations were reported in airports in Tokyo, Berlin, Prague, and Zurich, where operations were significantly hampered.

Emergency services and hospitals have also been severely impacted. In the US state of Alaska, officials warned that the 911 system might be unavailable, and some hospitals have had to cancel surgeries. In Australia, however, authorities confirmed that triple-0 call centres were unaffected.

Hospitals in Germany and Israel reported service disruptions, while GP services in the UK were also affected. These interruptions have raised concerns about the ability of medical facilities to provide timely care.

The media sector did not escape the impact, with many broadcast networks in Australia experiencing on-air difficulties. Sky News UK went off air for a period but has since resumed broadcasting. Retail operations were also disrupted, with supermarkets like Coles in Australia facing payment system failures, forcing the closure of self-checkout tills.

Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has confirmed that a defective software update for its Microsoft Windows hosts caused the outage. In a statement, CrowdStrike assured that the issue had been identified, isolated, and a fix deployed, emphasising that the incident was not a cyberattack. They advised organisations to communicate with CrowdStrike representatives through official channels to ensure proper coordination.

Earlier in the day, a Microsoft 365 service update had noted an issue impacting users' ability to access various Microsoft 365 apps and services. Microsoft later reported that most services were restored within a few hours.

The outage has highlighted the vulnerabilities of global IT systems and the widespread reliance on third-party software. A spokesperson for Australia's home affairs ministry attributed the issues to a technical problem with a third-party software platform used by the affected companies. The country's cybersecurity watchdog confirmed that there was no evidence of a malicious attack.

As companies scramble to resolve the issues, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the critical need for robust IT infrastructure and effective crisis management strategies. The global scale of the disruption underscores the interconnected nature of modern technology and the potential for widespread impact when systems fail.

This incident will likely prompt a reevaluation of cybersecurity measures and disaster recovery plans across various sectors, emphasising the importance of resilience and preparedness in the digital age.


Recent IT Meltdown: CrowdStrike Update Causes Global Chaos, Predicted Hours Earlier on Reddit

 

Only a few times in history has a single piece of code instantly wreaked havoc on computer systems globally. Examples include the Slammer worm of 2003, Russia’s NotPetya cyberattack targeting Ukraine, and North Korea’s WannaCry ransomware. However, the recent digital catastrophe over the past 12 hours wasn't caused by hackers, but by the software meant to protect against them.

Two major internet infrastructure issues converged on Friday, causing widespread disruptions across airports, train systems, banks, healthcare organizations, hotels, and television stations. The trouble began on Thursday night with a widespread outage on Microsoft's cloud platform, Azure. By Friday morning, things worsened when CrowdStrike released a flawed software update, causing Windows computers to reboot repeatedly. Microsoft stated that the two failures are unrelated.

The cause of one disaster was identified: a faulty update to CrowdStrike’s Falcon monitoring product. This antivirus platform, which requires deep system access, aims to detect malware and suspicious activity. However, the update inadvertently caused the system to crash. Mikko Hyppönen of WithSecure noted that this is unprecedented in its global impact, although similar issues were more common in the past due to worms or trojans.

CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz explained that the problem was due to a defect in the code released for Windows, leaving Mac and Linux systems unaffected. A fix has been deployed, and Kurtz apologized for the disruption. CrowdStrike’s blog revealed that the crash was caused by a configuration file update aimed at improving Falcon’s malware detection capabilities, which triggered a logic error leading to system crashes.

Security analysts initially believed the issue was due to a kernel driver update, as the file causing the crash ended in .sys, the extension for kernel drivers. Despite CrowdStrike clarifying that it wasn’t a kernel driver, the file altered the driver’s functionality, causing the crash. Matthieu Suiche of Magnet Forensics compared the risk of running security software at the kernel level to “open-heart surgery.”

Microsoft requires approval for kernel driver updates but not for configuration files. CrowdStrike is not the first to cause such crashes; similar issues have occurred with updates from Kaspersky and Windows Defender. CrowdStrike’s global market share likely contributed to the widespread impact, potentially causing a chain reaction across web infrastructure.

The outages had severe consequences worldwide. In the UK, Israel, and Germany, healthcare services and hospitals faced disruptions, while emergency services in the US experienced issues with 911 lines. TV stations, including Sky News in the UK, had to stop live broadcasts. Air travel was significantly affected, with airports using handwritten boarding passes and airlines grounding flights temporarily.

The incident highlights the fragility and interconnectedness of global digital infrastructure. Security practitioners have long anticipated such vulnerabilities. Ciaran Martin of the University of Oxford noted the event’s powerful illustration of global digital vulnerabilities.

The update’s extensive impact puzzled experts. CrowdStrike’s significant market share suggests the update triggered crashes in various parts of the web infrastructure. Hyppönen speculated that human error might have played a role in the update process.

As system administrators work to fix the issue, the larger question of preventing similar crises looms. Jake Williams of Hunter Strategy suggested that CrowdStrike’s incident might prompt demands for changes in how updates are managed, emphasizing the unsustainability of pushing updates without IT intervention.

Redditor Predicted CrowdStrike Outage Hours Before Global IT Chaos

A Reddit user, u/King_Kunta_, predicted vulnerabilities in CrowdStrike's systems just hours before the company caused a massive global IT outage. The user called CrowdStrike a "threat vector," suggesting it was susceptible to exploits that could lead to widespread damage. Initially, users dismissed the claims, but their tune changed dramatically after the outage occurred.

One commenter noted, "He tells us that CrowdStrike is a threat vector. A few hours later, every computer in the world with the CrowdStrike client installed goes blue screen. The single biggest global PC system collapse in history. Just uncanny."

Amidst the chaos, CrowdStrike's CEO George Kurtz reassured the public via X (formerly Twitter), stating, "Today was not a security or cyber incident. Our customers remain fully protected," and confirming that the issue was due to an update error, not a cyberattack.

Despite reassurances, many were left suspicious and impressed by the timing and accuracy of the Reddit post. One user aptly summed up the sentiment: "There’s no way the timing of this crazy post aligns so perfectly."

Global Outage Caused by Anti-Virus Update from Crowdstrike

 

A recent update from the anti-virus firm Crowdstrike has led to a global outage affecting millions of Windows users. The incident is being termed one of the most extensive outages ever, impacting numerous services and companies worldwide. Crowdstrike, a company many may not have heard of before, inadvertently caused this disruption with a problematic update to its Falcon virus scanner. The update led to widespread reports of the infamous Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) on computers running Windows. 

Microsoft quickly clarified that the issue was due to a third-party problem, absolving itself of direct responsibility. Users of Apple and Linux systems were unaffected, which brought some relief to those communities. Crowdstrike has since released a fix for the issue, but the recovery process remains cumbersome. IT professionals have noted that each affected machine requires a manual reboot in safe mode to restore normal operations. This task is complicated by the physical accessibility of the devices, making the resolution process even more challenging. There is currently no indication that the issue was caused by malicious intent or that any data has been compromised. 

Nonetheless, this incident highlights the crucial importance of staying updated with software patches, albeit with a note of caution. The cybersecurity community continues to stress the necessity of regular updates while acknowledging the occasional risks involved. Crowdstrike’s initial response fell short of an apology, which drew significant criticism online. However, CEO George Kurtz later issued a public apology via NBC News, expressing deep regret for the disruption caused to customers, travelers, and affected companies. This gesture, while somewhat late, was an important step in addressing the public’s concerns. This episode serves as a stark reminder of our heavy reliance on remotely managed devices and the vulnerability that comes with it. 

Despite robust systems in place to catch most issues, some problems, like this one, slip through the cracks. The timing of the update, which was pushed out on a Friday, compounded the difficulties, as fewer staff are typically available over the weekend to address such crises. For Crowdstrike customers, detailed instructions for the fix are available on the company’s support website. Many companies with dedicated IT teams are likely coordinating their responses to ensure a swift resolution. 

Unlike many outages that resolve themselves quickly, this incident will take days, if not longer, to fully mend, illustrating the significant impact of a single flawed update in our interconnected digital world.

Protecting Your Business from Snowflake Platform Exploitation by UNC5537

 

A recent report from Mandiant, a subsidiary of Google Cloud, has uncovered a significant cyber threat involving the exploitation of the Snowflake platform. A financially motivated threat actor, identified as UNC5537, targeted around 165 organizations' Snowflake customer instances, aiming to steal and exfiltrate data for extortion and sale. Snowflake, a widely-used cloud data platform, enables the storage and analysis of vast amounts of data. The threat actor gained access to this data by using compromised credentials, which were obtained either through infostealer malware or purchased from other cybercriminals. 

UNC5537 is known for advertising stolen data on cybercrime forums and attempting to extort victims. The sold data can be used for various malicious purposes, including cyber espionage, competitive intelligence, and financial fraud. The joint statement from Snowflake, Mandiant, and cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike clarifies that there is no evidence of a vulnerability, misconfiguration, or breach within Snowflake’s platform itself. 

Additionally, there is no indication that current or former Snowflake employees' credentials were compromised. Instead, the attackers acquired credentials from infostealer malware campaigns that infected systems not owned by Snowflake. This allowed them to access and exfiltrate data from the affected Snowflake customer accounts. Mandiant's research revealed that UNC5537 primarily used credentials stolen by various infostealer malware families, such as Vidar, Risepro, Redline, Racoon Stealer, Lumma, and Metastealer. Many of these credentials dated back to November 2020 but remained usable. The majority of credentials exploited by UNC5537 were exposed through previous infostealer malware incidents. 

The initial compromise often occurred on contractor systems used for personal activities like gaming and downloading pirated software, which are common vectors for spreading infostealers. Once obtained, the threat actor used these credentials to access Snowflake accounts and extract valuable customer data. UNC5537 also purchased credentials from cybercriminal marketplaces, often through Initial Access Brokers who specialize in selling stolen corporate access. The underground market for infostealer-obtained credentials is robust, with large lists of stolen credentials available for free or for purchase on the dark web and other platforms. 

According to Mandiant, 10% of overall intrusions in 2023 began with stolen credentials, making it the fourth most common initial intrusion vector. To protect your business from similar threats, it is crucial to implement robust cybersecurity measures. This includes regular monitoring and updating of all systems to protect against infostealer malware, enforcing strong password policies, and ensuring that all software is kept up to date with the latest security patches. Employee training on cybersecurity best practices, especially regarding the dangers of downloading pirated software and engaging in risky online behavior, is also essential. 

Moreover, consider using multi-factor authentication (MFA) to add an extra layer of security to your accounts. Regularly audit your systems for any unusual activity or unauthorized access attempts. Engage with reputable cybersecurity firms to conduct thorough security assessments and implement advanced threat detection solutions. By staying vigilant and proactive, businesses can better protect themselves from the threats posed by cybercriminals like UNC5537 and ensure the security and integrity of their data.

Safeguarding Your Employee Data From Identity Theft

 

In today's digital age, where data breaches and cyberattacks are increasingly common, safeguarding against identity-based attacks has become paramount for organizations worldwide. Identity-based attacks, which involve the unauthorized access to sensitive information through compromised user credentials, pose significant risks to businesses of all sizes and industries. 

As CrowdStrike reported, 80% of attacks involve identity and compromised credentials, highlighting the widespread nature of this threat. Additionally, an IBM report found that identity-related attacks are now the top vector impacting global cybercrime, with a staggering 71% yearly increase. 

Cybercriminals employ various tactics to carry out identity-based attacks, targeting organizations through phishing campaigns, credential stuffing, password spraying, pass-the-hash techniques, man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks, and more. Phishing campaigns, for example, involve the mass distribution of deceptive emails designed to trick recipients into divulging their login credentials or other sensitive information. Spear-phishing campaigns, on the other hand, are highly targeted attacks that leverage personal information to tailor phishing messages to specific individuals, increasing their likelihood of success.  

Credential stuffing attacks exploit the widespread practice of password reuse, where individuals use the same passwords across multiple accounts. Cybercriminals obtain credentials from previous data breaches or password dump sites and use automated tools to test these credentials across various websites, exploiting the vulnerabilities of users who reuse passwords. Password spraying attacks capitalize on human behavior by targeting commonly used passwords that match the complexity policies of targeted domains. 

Instead of trying multiple passwords for one user, attackers use the same common password across many different accounts, making it more difficult for organizations to detect and mitigate these attacks. Pass-the-hash techniques involve obtaining hashed versions of user passwords from compromised systems and using them to authenticate into other systems without needing to crack the actual password. This method allows attackers to move laterally within a network, accessing sensitive data and executing further attacks. MitM attacks occur when attackers intercept network connections, often by setting up malicious Wi-Fi access points. 

By doing so, attackers can monitor users' inputs, including login credentials, and steal sensitive information to gain unauthorized access to accounts and networks. To mitigate the risk of identity-based attacks, organizations must adopt a multi-layered approach to security. This includes implementing strong password policies to prevent the use of weak or easily guessable passwords and regularly auditing user accounts for vulnerabilities. 

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) should be implemented across all applications to add an extra layer of security by requiring users to provide a second form of authentication, such as a one-time password or biometric data, in addition to their passwords. Furthermore, organizations should protect against social engineering attacks, which often target service desk staff to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. Automated solutions can help verify user identification and reduce the risk of social engineering vulnerabilities. 

 Identity-based attacks pose significant risks to organizations, but by implementing robust security measures and remaining vigilant against evolving threats, businesses can effectively mitigate these risks and safeguard their sensitive information from cybercriminals.

Cloudflare Faces Cybersecurity Breach in Okta Supply-Chain Attack



Cloudflare, a prominent Internet security and DDoS protection company, recently fell victim to a cyberattack linked to the widespread Okta supply-chain campaign last fall. The breach, affecting Cloudflare's Atlassian Bitbucket, Confluence, and Jira platforms, commenced on Thanksgiving Day.

Cloudflare, in collaboration with industry and government partners, determined that a nation-state attacker aimed to gain persistent and widespread access to its global network. Working with CrowdStrike, the company found that cyber attackers initially accessed the internal wiki (Confluence) and bug database (Jira). They later established persistence on the Atlassian server and proceeded to explore potential points of entry. The assailants successfully breached Cloudflare's source code management system (Bitbucket) and an AWS instance.

The analysis revealed the attackers sought information about the configuration and management of Cloudflare's global network. They accessed various Jira tickets related to vulnerability management, secret rotation, MFA bypass, network access, and the company's response to the Okta incident. Fortunately, due to network segmentation and a zero-trust authentication approach limiting lateral movement, the attackers were largely prevented from accessing critical systems.

Despite minimal access, Cloudflare took comprehensive measures, rotating over 5,000 production credentials, segmenting test and staging systems, and conducting forensic triages on nearly 5,000 systems. The company also reimaged and rebooted every machine in its global network and all Atlassian products.

Experts emphasise the severity of supply chain attacks, highlighting the risk of non-human access being exploited by attackers to gain high-privilege access to internal systems. This breach underscores the importance of monitoring both cloud-based and on-premises solutions.

Notably, Cloudflare identified the compromise's connection to a prior Okta breach in October. Okta, an identity and access management services provider, disclosed a compromise in its customer support case management system, exposing sensitive customer data. The attackers leveraged access tokens and service account credentials obtained during the Okta compromise. All threat actor access was terminated on November 24, according to CrowdStrike.

In response, Cloudflare conducted a thorough security remediation, emphasising the need for credential rotation after a security incident. Okta confirmed its prior notification to customers about the October security incident, urging them to rotate credentials and providing indicators of compromise.

This incident draws attention to the ongoing challenges posed by sophisticated cyber threats, making it clear that the importance of continuous vigilance and proactive security measures is substantial. The collaboration between companies and security experts remains crucial in mitigating the impact of such attacks.

As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, it is imperative for organisations to stay informed, implement robust security practices, and prioritise swift responses to potential breaches.


North Korea-Backed Hackers Breach US Tech Company to Target Crypto Firms


A North Korean state-sponsored hacking group has recently breached a US IT management company, in a bid to further target several cryptocurrency companies, cybersecurity experts confirmed on Thursday. 

The software company – JumpCloud – based in Louisville, Colorado reported its first hack late in June, where the threat actors used their company’s systems to target “fewer than 5” of their clients. 

While the IT company did not reveal the identity of its affected customers, cybersecurity firms CrowdStrike Holding and Alphabet-owned Mandiant – managing JumpCloud and its client respectively – claims that the perpetrators are known for executing heists targeting cryptocurrency. 

Moreover, two individuals that were directly connected to the issue further confirmed the claim that the JumpCloud clients affected by the cyberattack were in fact cryptocurrency companies. 

According to experts, these North Korea-backed threat actors, who once targeted firms piecemeal are now making efforts in strengthening their approach, using tactics like a “supply chain attack,” targeting companies that could provide them wider access to a number of victims at once.

However, Pyongyang’s mission to the UN did not respond to the issue. North Korea has previously denied claims of it being involved in cryptocurrency heists, despite surplus evidence claiming otherwise.

CrowdStrike has identified the threat actors as “Labyrinth Collima,” one of the popular North Korea-based operators. The group, according to Mandiant, works for North Korea’s Reconnaissance General Bureau (RGB), its primary foreign intelligence agency.

However, the U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA and the FBI did not confirm the claim. 

Labyrinth Chollima is one of North Korea’s most active hackers, claiming responsibility for some of the most notorious and disruptive cyber threats in the country. A staggering amount of funds has been compromised as a result of its cryptocurrency theft: An estimated $1.7 billion in digital currency was stolen by North Korean-affiliated entities, according to data from blockchain analytics company Chainalysis last year.

JumpCloud hack first came to light earlier this month when an email from the firm reached its customers, mentioning how their credentials would be changed “out of an abundance of caution relating to an ongoing incident.”

Adam Meyers, CrowdStrike’s Senior Vice President for Intelligence further warns against Pyongyang’s hacking squads, saying they should not be underestimated. "I don't think this is the last we'll see of North Korean supply chain attacks this year," he says.  

Cloud Data Theft is Booming According to CrowdStrike

 

An industry-leading cybersecurity company known as CrowdStrike reported that it had seen the largest increase in adversaries in one year. This was in comparison with what it had observed in the past. There was an increase in cloud attacks by 95% according to the study, which identified 33 re-new threat actors, approximately three times as many cases from 2021 involving cloud-conscious actors as they did in 2022. 

As a result of these trends, CrowdStrike believes that it will become more common for e-currency and nation-state actors to use their tradecraft and knowledge to greatly exploit cloud environments in the future, it stated in its global threat report for 2023. 

There has been a shift among bad actors away from deactivating antivirus and firewall technologies, and away from efforts to tamper with logs. Instead, they have turned toward modifications to authentication processes and attacks on identities, according to the report. 

There has been a dramatic rise in identity theft as a result of a wide range of threats. Identifying and privileged access credentials are among the most common targets targeted by hackers. Why? On the dark web, attackers want to sell compromised information to third parties for high prices to become access brokers and make money off the stolen information. 

As attackers reinvent themselves as access brokers, CrowdStrike's report provides a sobering look at their emergence. There is a 20% increase in adversaries engaging in extortion campaigns and theft of data related to the cloud as per the report. 

A broader analysis revealed an increase of 33 new adversaries in just one year. This was the biggest increase in the number of adversaries ever! Recent telecommunications, BPO, tech, and BPO companies have been the victims of sophisticated attacks carried out by both Scattered Spider and Slippery Spider malware. 

Cloud Security is Hampered by Overcast Skies

In addition to the multitude of new and unknown threat actors that CrowdStrike's report uncovered, CrowdStrike's report also noted a surge in identity-based threats, cloud exploits, national intelligence services, and attacks that re-pointed to previously patched vulnerabilities as weapons of mass destruction.

CrowdStrikeFalcon OverWatch measures the break-through time of adversaries according to the report by determining how far a compromised host is from a second host within the victim environment or how long the adversaries have to move laterally within the victim environment to gain access to the compromised host. This report from the National Institute on Crime and Law Enforcement suggests that for interactive eCrime intrusions, the average breakthrough time has decreased from 98 minutes in 2021 to 84 minutes in 2022. 

To minimize costs and ancillary damages caused by attackers, CISOs and their teams must respond more quickly as the breach window shrinks, and as attack windows become shorter. The 1-10-60 rule is one that CrowdStrikes recommends security teams follow: detect threats within the first minute, understand them within the first 10 minutes, and respond within the first 60 minutes.

It is well known that hackers, nation-states, and cybercriminals are growing at an exponential rate around the world. 

In an announcement made by Meyers, CrowdStrike has added Syria, Turkey, and Columbia to its list of malicious host countries it has already identified. As a result of interactive intrusions, Meyers reported there was a 50% increase compared to last year. Human adversaries try to bypass the computer's and antivirus defenses, contributing to the rise in human-computer crime. 

The Microsoft company published 28 zero days and 1,200 patches; however, only two out of 28 of those patches and zero days were exploited by nation-nexus and cybercriminal adversaries, who circumvented patches and bypassed mitigations, exploiting legacy vulnerabilities such as Log4Shell and keeping up with ProxyNotShell and Follina vulnerabilities. 

Engineers and Cloud Defenders Must be Versatile 

A variety of techniques are used by attackers to inject themselves into cloud environments and move laterally once they have entered them. There’s no doubt that CrowdStrike’s data shows an increase in both the number of valid cloud accounts used for initial cloud access and the number of public-facing applications being deployed. Also, according to the company, there has been an increase in the number of actors who are attempting to discover cloud accounts as opposed to cloud infrastructures and using legitimate higher-privileged accounts when looking for cloud accounts. 

To be successful in the cloud computing field, engineers need to be more versatile than ever before. For a business or enterprise to succeed, they need to be able to manage, plan, architect, monitor, and anticipate issues regarding cloud security and manage them as part of a continuous process.

CrowdSrike: Cybercriminals Are Choosing Data Extortion Over Ransomware Attacks


CrowdStrike’s threat intelligence recently reported that cybercriminals have been learning how data extortion attacks are more profitable than ransomware attacks, leading to a drastic shift in the behavior of cyber activities throughout 2022. 

The cybersecurity vendor's "2023 Global Threat Report," which summarizes CrowdStrike's research on cybercrime (or "e-Crime") from the previous year, was released this week. The report's major sections address ongoing geopolitical disputes, cloud-related attacks, and extortion attacks without the use of software. 

One of the major findings from the CrowdStrike research is that the number of malicious actors who conducted data theft and extortion attacks without the use of ransomware increased by 20% in 2022 compared to the previous year. Data extortion is the practice of obtaining confidential information from target companies and then threatening to post the information online if the victim does not provide the ransom demanded by the attacker. 

Data extortion has frequently been a part of ransomware operations, with the fear of data exposure intended to provide additional incentive for the victim to pay the demanded ransom. However, as per the CrowdStrike findings, more attackers are now inclining toward data extortion, while abandoning the ransomware element altogether. 

Adam Meyers, head of intelligence at CrowdStrike says that “We’re seeing more and more threat actors moving away from ransomware[…]Ransomware is noisy. It attracts attention. It’s detectable. Encryption is complex.” 

According to Meyers, the rise in extortion addresses the adaptability of cyber adversaries. He further adds that while ransom payments were down slightly in 2022, both extortion and ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) have witnessed a significant boost. 

CrowdStrike observed and noted the overall waning interest in malware. The firm reported that in 2022, up from 62% in 2021, malware-free activity accounted for 71% of its threat detections. 

"This was partly related to adversaries' prolific abuse of valid credentials to facilitate access and persistence in victim environments[…]Another contributing factor was the rate at which new vulnerabilities were disclosed and the speed with which adversaries were able to operationalize exploits," the report said. 

While also noting the improved resilience of the RaaS network, CrowdStrike stated that affiliated hackers will continue to be a major concern as they move from one network to another despite the move away from conventional ransomware deployment.  

To Get Around Security, Hackers Use This Old Trick

 


An old vulnerability in Intel drivers is being exploited by cybercriminals in an attempt to gain access to networks. This is in the form of a security flaw that enables them to get around cybersecurity measures and bypass security systems.  

According to cybersecurity researchers at CrowdStrike, one of the groups tracking the attack is Scattered Spider, also known as Roasted 0ktapus and UNC3944. This group is responsible for the attack on Windows PCs. The campaign has been identified as the work of a cybercriminal group. 

As a financially motivated cybercrime operation, Scattered Spider is described by researchers as especially interested in targeting business outsourcing companies and telecom companies. Obtaining access to the mobile carrier network is the project's main objective.  

Attackers may have initially used phishing attacks using SMS messages to gain access to networks by stealing usernames and passwords. This is to get into them. Several instances have been recorded where attackers have hacked into devices and exploited this access to gain access to other credentials. The group appears to be engaged in SIM-swapping attacks as well.   

As soon as Scattered Spider has gained access to a network, it makes use of a technique called "Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver" (BYOD), which is designed to exploit security loopholes within the Windows platform.  Microsoft tries to limit the ability of malware to gain access to systems by preventing unsigned kernel-mode drivers from being run by default, but hackers can get around this by installing a legitimately signed but malicious driver, enabling them to carry out attacks despite this. The BYOVD system allows attackers to use unsigned kernel-mode drivers to carry out attacks.   

An attacker may find a way to hack legitimately signed certificates while taking advantage of workarounds to be able to self-sign their own certificates or obtain certificates through deception. Regardless of how they were obtained, the malware may then secretly run on computers, install their own drivers, and disable the security products on them. This is so that their activity can easily be hidden.  

They do not use any malware for this purpose to operate as discreetly as possible. They instead install a large number of legitimate remote access tools that will ensure persistence on the compromised system after they have been compromised. 

There is a vulnerability in the Intel Ethernet diagnostics driver for Windows, which has been identified by CrowdStrike as one of how attackers can deliver malicious kernel drivers.

This vulnerability has been known for a long time, as the ID number suggests. If the security update that closes the vulnerability has not been applied to the system, cybercriminals will still be able to exploit it on the system.  

To combat this and other attacks involving abused signed drivers in the future, researchers urge users to patch vulnerable drivers as a priority.  

There have been several tools that have been compromised by attackers. These include Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, and SentinelOne, as well as CrowdStrike's own Falcon security product that attackers have attempted to bypass. Researchers at CrowdStrike claim that Falcon can detect and prevent malicious activity that is being performed by cybercriminals when trying to install and run their own code.  

It has been warned previously by Microsoft that attacks are increasingly targeting legitimate drivers in the ecosystem and infecting computers through their vulnerabilities. Despite Microsoft's efforts to prevent abuse, this attack technique is still successfully used today. 

Scattered Spider seems to be targeting a specific set of industries with this campaign. In contrast, CrowdStrike recommends that security professionals in every industry develop a strategy to ensure the security of their networks against attack, irrespective of their industry type. As an example, this can be achieved by applying the old security patch that has been installed.  

Microsoft also provides advice on how you can help harden services by blocking drivers according to the recommended rules. As with any software or hardware, removing drivers from a device may lead to the malfunctioning of the device or software, and, in some cases, a blue screen of death. A vulnerable driver blocklist cannot guarantee that all drivers found to have vulnerabilities will be identified and eliminated from the list.  

Callback Malware Campaign Imitates CrowdStrike and Other Big Cybersecurity Organizations


About the Attack

Earlier this month, CrowdStrike Intelligence found a callback phishing campaign copying big cybersecurity companies, including CrowdStrike. The phishing emails say that the receiver's (e-mail) company has been compromised and that the victim should contact the given phone number. The campaign incorporates similar social-engineering techniques that were used in the recent callback campaigns like WIZARD SPIDER'S 2021 Bazaar all campaign. 

The campaign is likely to include common genuine remote administration tools (RATs) for access in initial stage, off the shelf penetration testing tools for lateral movement, and execution of ransomware or extorting data. The callback campaign incorporates emails that look like it originates from big security companies, the message says that the security company found a potential issue in the receiver's network. As we have noticed in the earlier campaigns, the threat actor gives the recipient a phone number to call. 

In the past, callback campaign operators have tried to convince victims to install commercial RAT software to get an early foothold on the network. "For example, CrowdStrike Intelligence identified a similar callback campaign in March 2022 in which threat actors installed AteraRMM followed by Cobalt Strike to assist with lateral movement and deploy additional malware," says CrowdStrike. 

Current Situation 

Currently, CrowdStrike intelligence can't confirm the version in use, the callback operators will most probably use ransomware to monetize their operations. "This assessment is made with moderate confidence, as 2021 BazarCall campaigns would eventually lead to Conti ransomware — though this ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) recently ceased operations. This is the first identified callback campaign impersonating cybersecurity entities and has higher potential success given the urgent nature of cyber breaches," says CrowdStrike.

On Microsoft Exchange Servers, a New IceApple Exploit Toolkit was Launched

 

Security analysts discovered a new post-exploitation framework that could enable Microsoft Exchange servers to be compromised. This framework, known as IceApple, was created by threat actors who wanted to preserve a low profile while launching long-term attacks to assist reconnaissance and data exfiltration. 

"As of May 2022, IceApple is under active development, with 18 modules seen in operation across several enterprise contexts," CrowdStrike reported. The complex virus was identified in various victim networks and in geographically separate areas, which were detected in late 2021. Victims come from a variety of fields, including technology, academia, and government.

IceApple is unique for being an in-memory framework, implying a threat actor's desire to keep a low forensic footprint and avoid detection, which bears all the signs of a long-term algorithmic mission by creating files that appear to come from Microsoft's IIS web server. While most of the malware has been found on Microsoft Exchange servers, IceApple can function under any Internet Information Services (IIS) web app, making it a dangerous threat.

IceApple activity, as per CrowdStrike researchers, could be linked to nation-state attacks. Although IceApple has not been linked to any single threat actor, many believe it was developed by China. 

The actual number of victims of the attack has not been determined by CrowdStrike, but they do not rule out the possibility that the threat will expand in the following weeks. In this regard, the experts suggested updating any apps used by public and commercial businesses to strengthen the system's protection against this framework. 

The malware can locate and erase files and directories, write data, collect credentials, search Active Directory, and transfer sensitive data due to the framework's various components. These components' build timestamps date back to May 2021.