The incident was confirmed by Polish Digital Affairs Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski, who said security teams had responded immediately after identifying the attack. In a social media statement, Gawkowski said the cyberattack against the state-run ePUAP system had been detected and halted, while technical teams were working to restore its full functionality.
The ePUAP platform is a central part of Poland's digital government infrastructure. It allows individuals and businesses to submit official documents, communicate with government departments and complete various administrative procedures online. Its temporary closure has therefore affected an important channel through which people interact with public authorities.
Gawkowski also confirmed that the infrastructure of the Central Information Technology Center, the government agency responsible for maintaining ePUAP and other essential digital services, remained secure. Officials stressed that the platform was taken offline as a precautionary measure rather than because the cyberattack had caused damage or disrupted its operations.
Marek Gieorgica, spokesperson for Poland's Digital Affairs Ministry, told the Polish news agency PAP that the system had not been compromised by the incident. He explained that authorities had deliberately disabled the platform to reduce potential risks while security teams assessed the situation.
However, the government has not disclosed technical details about the attack, including the methods used by the attackers or the identity of those responsible. There is also no public confirmation that hackers gained unauthorized access to government systems or managed to steal sensitive information.
According to a notice published on the government's website, ePUAP electronic mailboxes are currently unavailable to both citizens and public institutions. The disruption could also temporarily affect Poland's Trusted Profile digital identity service, which enables users to access online government services and electronically sign official documents.
Authorities have not announced a specific timeline for restoring the platform. Services are expected to resume after cybersecurity specialists complete their investigations and necessary technical checks.
The incident comes amid a series of cyberattacks targeting Polish government institutions, critical infrastructure and private organizations in recent months. In October, online invoicing provider Fakturownia reported a data breach that potentially exposed information belonging to its users, customers and business partners.
Earlier, in September, hackers stole data from Qbusoft, a Polish healthcare software provider, following a separate security incident involving medical technology company MyDr. Polish authorities said the MyDr breach could have affected information associated with approximately 19 million individuals and around 12,000 healthcare organizations.
According to a report published by The Economic Times, the attacks have primarily targeted smaller NBFCs with annual turnovers of approximately ₹1,000 crore or less. Several financial institutions have experienced repeated attacks, exposing weaknesses in their cybersecurity infrastructure and payment systems.
In one reported incident, a Delhi-based NBFC allegedly lost ₹7.5 crore in an initial cyberattack, followed by another loss of ₹7.25 crore just days later. Investigators believe that inadequate security controls and insufficient monitoring have made smaller lenders attractive targets for cybercriminals.
Investigations into some of the incidents have identified a Chinese hacking platform known as CyberStrike. Security experts have also raised concerns about the growing use of artificial intelligence-powered toolkits, including ARTEX and CyberStrike, alongside open-source large language models.
These tools are lowering the technical barriers for cybercriminals by automating reconnaissance, vulnerability identification and other stages of cyberattacks. Attackers can use AI-assisted frameworks to analyse targeted systems and identify weaknesses more efficiently.
According to officials familiar with the investigations, attackers typically spend around 10 to 12 days studying an NBFC's payment infrastructure, including transaction processes, whitelisted identification details and application code, before attempting to steal funds.
Experts have also warned that stolen customer information could be exploited for targeted phishing and social engineering campaigns. Scammers equipped with borrowers' names, loan details and lender information may impersonate financial representatives to deceive customers into sharing sensitive information.
India's national cybersecurity agency, the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), along with CSIRT-Fin, issued a critical advisory on October 9, highlighting cyber threats targeting NBFCs, digital lenders, fintech companies and payment service providers.
The advisory identified vulnerabilities in applications and payment Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that could allow attackers to steal banking credentials and initiate unauthorised fund transfers through trusted financial infrastructure.
CERT-In also warned that AI-driven attack frameworks have significantly reduced the time between initial system compromise and financial damage, allowing attackers to execute operations within hours rather than days.
The attackers reportedly gained access to the bank's network through the platform of an external service provider.
The incident came to light on November 2, when blockchain investigator ZachXBT reported suspicious withdrawals involving several cryptocurrency exchange accounts. According to the investigator, the attackers had potentially stolen around €118 million and moved the funds through cryptocurrency platforms.
Crédit Mutuel Arkéa, one of France's major cooperative banking groups, officially acknowledged the cyberattack on November 4. The bank confirmed that attackers had gained unauthorized access to its systems and used an account belonging to the institution to initiate fraudulent transactions involving other banking organizations.
In a frequently asked questions section published after the incident, the bank explained that the attackers accessed its network directly through the platform of one of its service providers. However, the financial institution did not disclose the identity of the provider. It also clarified that its online banking subsidiary, Fortuneo, was not involved in the attack.
The attackers reportedly used the bank's own account rather than individual customer accounts to transfer the money. Blockchain investigators also tracked the movement of the stolen funds through cryptocurrency exchanges, where some of the money was reportedly converted into stablecoins such as USDC and USDT.
ZachXBT stated that approximately $30 million had already been laundered by November 3. Some of the stolen funds were reportedly blocked, although the complete amount recovered remains unclear. The bank has not independently confirmed the reported $133 million loss, describing the amount involved as significant while acknowledging that the final figure was still being assessed.
After the discovery, Crédit Mutuel Arkéa temporarily suspended certain operations as a precautionary measure while investigating the incident. The bank subsequently announced that the attack had been contained and that its operations were gradually returning to normal.
The financial institution reassured customers that their deposits and personal assets were not affected by the incident. However, some transfer transactions experienced delays because of the security measures introduced in response to the attack.
Arkéa also ruled out human error as the cause, describing the incident as a sophisticated external attack. It is now working with law enforcement agencies and judicial authorities to determine how the attackers gained access and carried out the fraudulent transactions.
The exposed information included customers' names, business email addresses, phone numbers and business addresses. In some cases, the records also contained personal identification documents, including driver's licences, passports and utility bills.
DigiCert has started notifying affected customers about the incident. The company is also reviewing archived identification documents to identify the individuals whose personal documents may have been accessed.
According to an incident report published on Mozilla's Bugzilla platform, the security issue originated in February 2025, when DigiCert migrated an internal business system to a different availability zone. The migration inadvertently made the system accessible from the public internet, although it was previously restricted to users connected through a virtual private network (VPN).
The exposed system contained a self-registration feature designed for other applications. This feature allowed external users to create accounts without requiring the usual internal authorization.
Although these newly created accounts were not assigned to any particular application, an authorization vulnerability allowed them to access archived customer information in read-only mode.
DigiCert discovered unauthorized accounts on the exposed system in June 2026. However, the company initially believed that these accounts could not access customer records because they had not been assigned to an application.
The company received a report through its managed security research program highlighting the possibility of external users creating accounts on the system.
DigiCert implemented security measures to restrict access and address the authorization issue. However, it did not immediately recognize that customer information had already been accessed.
An investigation confirmed that an unauthorized account had accessed archived customer records between June 27 and July 2, 2026. DigiCert confirmed the data breach on October 19, 2026.
The company acknowledged that the incident was initially treated as an account-creation issue rather than a potential data-access incident.
The compromised records primarily contained business contact information shared with DigiCert during customer verification and other business processes.
However, some archived records also included sensitive identification documents submitted by customers. These documents could include government-issued identification, such as passports and driver's licences, as well as utility bills containing personal information.
DigiCert stated that the unauthorized account had read-only access and could not modify customer records, approve certificate validations or issue digital certificates.
After the investigation, DigiCert disabled the self-registration feature, restricted access to the affected system and introduced additional access controls to prevent unauthorized users from accessing archived information.
The company also confirmed that its core certificate authority services, including CertCentral and DigiCert ONE, were not compromised. Customer login credentials and previously issued digital certificates also remain secure.
In an update published recently, the company disclosed that an unidentified attacker had gained unauthorized access to its systems and internal tools, exposing customer information that included names, usernames, password hashes and active authentication tokens.
Chainalysis initially reported the security incident on October 30 but said at the time that it had found no evidence of unauthorized access to authentication credentials or session tokens.
Chainalysis has not identified the attacker or provided technical details about how the intrusion was carried out. The company previously said it detected an external actor using “offensive agentic techniques” to access its infrastructure.
Such techniques generally involve AI-powered systems capable of carrying out multiple tasks with limited human intervention, potentially helping attackers automate different stages of a cyber intrusion.
The latest disclosure indicates that the impact of the breach was more extensive than initially understood. Chainalysis did not clarify whether every category of information was exposed for every user or disclose the total number of affected accounts.
The company serves more than 1,500 customers, including law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, cryptocurrency businesses, regulators and national security organizations.
Chainanalysis also confirmed that some customer accounts associated with its Know Your Transaction (KYT) service appeared to have been accessed without authorization. The platform is used by organizations to monitor cryptocurrency transactions and identify suspicious financial activities.
In addition to the exposure of password hashes and authentication tokens, Chainalysis disclosed a separate security issue involving an on-path attack.
In this type of attack, a malicious actor intercepts communications between users and an online service, potentially capturing sensitive information.
The company said the interception method had been contained and remediated, while affected accounts were being locked. However, it remains unclear whether these incidents were connected to the original intrusion or involved the same attacker.
The breach has also impacted several Chainalysis services. The company temporarily took its KYT user interface and application programming interface (API), Address Screening products and login page offline after detecting abnormal activity. Its Reactor investigation platform and Data Solutions product had also been taken offline earlier as a precaution.
The operation has been linked to APT29, a cyberespionage group associated with Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). According to cybersecurity researchers, the attackers abused a third-party web analytics service to reach visitors of legitimate websites without requiring them to download suspicious applications or files.
According to Sekoia researchers Amaury-Jacques Garçon and Félix Aime, the campaign relied on three main methods to infect devices. These included compromising legitimate websites, creating fake websites that impersonated well-known organisations, and conducting a supply-chain attack against Plerdy SEO Tracker.
The supply-chain compromise took place between August 27 and September 3, 2026. During this period, attackers injected malicious code into the JavaScript file hosted on Plerdy's infrastructure. Since the analytics script was used by thousands of websites, the compromise potentially exposed a large number of visitors to the malicious code.
The researchers discovered that the attackers also created lookalike websites impersonating organisations in the United States, Ukraine, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria. Some compromised websites were associated with the chemical industry, political organisations and military-related activities.
Once the malicious JavaScript executes, it collects information about the visitor's browser, operating system and device configuration.
For Apple devices, the attackers used the DarkSword exploit kit to target vulnerable iOS versions. Depending on the device, the malware could steal Safari cookies or extract more extensive information, including text messages, WhatsApp and Telegram databases, contacts, call history, photographs, Wi-Fi passwords and iCloud Keychain data.
Android users were targeted through a separate malware payload called AndroSnitch. The attack exploited vulnerabilities in Google Chrome to gain access to the device and collect browser information, including cookies, saved login details and Wi-Fi passwords.
Researchers identified several security vulnerabilities used in the campaign, including CVE-2025-43529, CVE-2026-20700 and CVE-2026-3910. These vulnerabilities allowed attackers to execute malicious code and bypass security protections on vulnerable devices.
Sekoia said the campaign appeared to focus on websites likely to attract strategically important visitors, particularly those connected to military organisations and defence-related industries.
Through Microsoft Teams, cybercriminals are impersonating IT support personnel in order to gain access to corporate systems and exploit vulnerabilities in Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS).
Data Magecart, a Brazilian group of hackers, compromised the analytics script used by e-commerce platform Convertr, potentially revealing payment information provided by customers to dozens of Brazilian fashion brands. During the attack, which was detected by cybersecurity firm Sansec on October 24, 2026, malicious code was injected into Convertr's Plausible analytics tracker.
By modifying a JavaScript file loaded into Convertr's merchant checkouts, the attackers allowed the card skimmer to collect sensitive information during online purchases by modifying the JavaScript file. The data obtained was comprised of card numbers, expiration dates, CVV security codes, cardholder names, and Brazilian CPF taxpayer identification numbers.
The information was transmitted to a server controlled by the attacker at 1x0.is. Online shopping and checkout services are provided by Convertr to dozens of Brazilian fashion retailers. According to the platform, its merchants have processed more than R$2 billion in sales. Due to the fact that the affected analytics tracker was distributed throughout its merchant network, compromising one file created a potential supply chain risk that extends beyond one individual online store.
The malicious script was detected by Sansec after a clean version was captured earlier on October 24th. In October, the attackers modified the skimmer in order to target Convertr's payment API field names, making it more effective in capturing payment information. Researchers also reported that the compromised tracker continued to serve on October 26, despite efforts to notify Convertr.
As Sansec has been tracking the Brazilian Magecart group since July 2024, the incident represents a significant development in its activities. The group has previously targeted individual online stores using Magento, OpenCart and WooCommerce, mainly in Brazil. With the Convertr compromise, Sansec has shifted from infecting individual stores to compromising a service shared by multiple businesses, resulting in the first supply chain attack attributed to the group.
An unpatched installation of Plausible Community Edition, an open-source web analytics platform, is believed to have been the source of the attack. Versions 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 were affected by CVE-2026-8467, a critical vulnerability that could allow unauthenticated command execution through an exposed component of the /storybook component.
Convertr reported installing version 3.0 in 2025 and not updating it prior to the incident. On May 15, 2026, Plausible released version 3.2.1 which fixed the vulnerability. Since researchers were not able to access the platform’s server logs, Sansec has not confirmed that the vulnerability was exploited to gain access. Therefore, it remains unclear what specific method was used to compromise the analytics server. Furthermore, the group has consistently targeted Brazilian payment systems as a focus for their methods.
According to Sansec, its skimmers exhibit recurring characteristics, including the use of short-lived domains as recipients of stolen information, and endpoints containing Portuguese names related to card payments. Other variants have also been developed to attack payment services, including e.Rede, PagSeguro, Pagar.me and Mercado Pago.
Another version is reported to replace genuine PIX payment QR codes with malicious codes. Convertr confirmed on October 27 that Plausible had been updated with a patched version following the discovery of the malicious script. In addition to notifying affected merchants, payment providers, and relevant authorities, the company also verified that the tracker hosted on Convertr's analytics server was free of infection.
While it is important to remove malicious code, it does not necessarily eliminate all immediate risks for all shoppers. Sansec stated that browsers may retain cached copies of infected scripts for up to 24 hours following the server-side cleanup, potentially allowing the malicious code to remain active during that period.
Payments made by Brazilian customers through checkout addresses containing checkout.convertr from October 24 onward should be blocked and replaced by their banks. It is also recommended to monitor transactions for suspicious activity involving CPF identification numbers in order to identify suspicious activity.
A Sansec recommendation for organizations using Plausible Community Edition is to update the version to 3.2.1 or later and to review server access logs for requests to the exposed path of /storybook. Upon detecting evidence of exploitation, the affected server should be rebuilt, secrets rotated, tracker files checked against the official release, and a more thorough investigation conducted. The incident emphasizes the wider risks associated with shared web infrastructure.
Multiple businesses can be affected by compromised analytics scripts without the attacker having to breach each merchant individually. To reduce the risk of similar attacks, it is vital that software be updated, scripts loaded on payment pages are monitored, and unauthorized outbound connections are restricted.
This incident illustrates the dangers posed by compromised third-party scripts used on checkout pages. Preventing digital skimming attacks requires timely software updates, continuous script monitoring, and stronger protection of payment infrastructure.