Governor Gavin Newsom has enacted the California Delete Act, marking a historic step for data privacy. This law represented a big step towards giving people more control over their personal information and was passed with resounding support from the state government.
The CA Delete Act, also known as Assembly Bill 375, is set to revolutionize the way businesses handle consumer data. It grants Californians the right to request the deletion of their personal information from company databases, putting the power back in the hands of the individual.
The bill's passage is being hailed as a major win for privacy advocates. It signals a shift towards a more consumer-centric approach to data handling. According to Governor Newsom, this legislation represents a critical move towards "putting consumers in the driver’s seat when it comes to their own data."
One of the key provisions of the CA Delete Act is the requirement for businesses to conspicuously display an opt-out option on their websites, allowing users to easily request the deletion of their data. This transparency ensures that consumers are fully aware of their rights and can exercise them effortlessly.
Furthermore, the legislation includes penalties for non-compliance. Businesses that fail to comply with deletion requests within the stipulated timeframe may face fines and other legal consequences. This aspect of the bill emphasizes the seriousness with which California is approaching data privacy.
Industry experts predict that the CA Delete Act could set a precedent for similar legislation on a national and even international scale. As businesses increasingly operate in a globalized digital landscape, the demand for comprehensive data protection measures is becoming paramount.
The significance of the CA Delete Act extends far beyond California's borders. It sends a clear message about the importance of prioritizing individual privacy in the digital age. As Joseph Jerome, a privacy expert, stated, "This law will likely serve as a catalyst for other states to take a harder look at consumer privacy."
Data privacy has advanced significantly thanks to the California Delete Act. Individuals now have the power to manage their personal information, which puts more responsibility and accountability on businesses to be open and honest about how they handle customer data. This historic law is a ray of hope for those defending privacy rights in the digital age since it could influence laws comparable to those around the world.
Recent events in the United States have shown that the tech giants do not care about the constitution, this is a cause for concern.
There are situations when half a dozen people who have created their own technological empires do not even want to know what rights they have in their state. They determine their own rights on the basis of so-called "corporate norms" and do not respect the constitution of their states. We have seen this clearly in the United States. This, of course, a matter of serious concern.
In general, we are talking about the fact that several major multinational corporations - IT, media, pharmaceuticals, banks - plan to do what they want with people. As you know, the emergence of giant monopolies is a classic feature of any large-scale crisis of capitalism. Lenin wrote about this fascinatingly.
An excellent example of this was when Twitch, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram previously blocked Trump's accounts for various periods of time due to his statements about the riots in Washington on January 6.
According to Vladimir Shapovalov, a member of the board of the Russian Association of Political Science, Trump and his supporters were deprived of the freedom to vote, the right to receive and disseminate information. But such a right is fundamental.
Another example is how the largest American airline Delta blacklisted almost nine hundred passengers for their "Trumpism". In November, the same company denied its services for life to a passenger who shouted slogans in support of Trump.
It's interesting to note that on one decision to ban Trump, Zuckerberg's company lost 5% of its value. However, they don't seem to care at all about profit. Uber, Snapchat, and Tesla record losses year after year. All they are interested in is the most severe control of their consumers.
It is worth noting that on January 17, Naavi, a veteran Cyber Law specialist in India, became a victim of the injustice of the monopolies. He published an interesting article Union Bank and RSA Fiasco, where he shared his experience and expressed his opinion about what is happening. It all started with the fact that his site was groundlessly accused of hosting a phishing script. The article about Union bank, published on January 14, 2021, received a complaint from the RSA security service. This resulted in the Service provider M / S Square brothers has disabled not only the article page but the entire website www.naavi.org.
Readers in the comments advise Naavi to send a legal notice to RSA and UBI for defamation, DoS (disruption of legal rights) and various sections of the IT Act. The consensus among readers is that RSA and UBI consider themselves above the law and that they need to be made aware of their limits.
Moreover, even our E Hacking news portal has faced similar issue. The Cyber Security Company Comodo mistakenly marked the E Hacking news site as phishing. We even sent a false positive request from their website and also tried to contact them on their Twitter account. There was no reaction on their part.
Earlier, E Hacking news reported that a Russian IT company reportedly lost the contract in the USA because of serving sites with content from Trump supporters.