As artificial intelligence becomes embedded in daily business functions, concerns are growing over whether the workforce is adequately prepared to manage its risks and responsibilities. EC-Council has announced the launch of four new AI-focused certifications along with an updated Certified CISO v4 program, marking the largest single expansion in the organization’s 25-year history.
The rollout comes amid projections that unmanaged AI-related vulnerabilities could expose the global economy to as much as $5.5 trillion in risk, according to industry estimates attributed to IDC. At the same time, analysis from Bain & Company suggests that approximately 700,000 workers in the United States will require reskilling in AI and cybersecurity disciplines to meet rising demand.
Global institutions including the International Monetary Fund and the World Economic Forum have identified workforce capability as a primary constraint on AI-driven productivity, arguing that the barrier is no longer access to technology but access to trained professionals.
Security threats are escalating in parallel with adoption. Reports indicate that 87 percent of organizations have encountered AI-enabled cyberattacks. Additionally, generative AI-related network traffic has increased by 890 percent, significantly expanding potential attack surfaces. Emerging risks include prompt injection attacks, data poisoning, manipulation of machine learning models, and compromise of AI supply chains.
The new Enterprise AI Credential Suite is structured around EC-Council’s operational framework described as Adopt, Defend, and Govern. The “Adopt” pillar emphasizes structured and safeguarded AI deployment. “Defend” focuses on protecting AI systems from evolving threats. “Govern” integrates oversight, accountability, and risk management mechanisms into AI systems from the design stage.
Artificial Intelligence Essentials serves as the foundational certification, aimed at building practical literacy and responsible AI usage across professional roles. The Certified AI Program Manager credential prepares professionals to convert AI strategy into coordinated implementation, ensuring governance alignment and measurable return on investment.
The Certified Offensive AI Security Professional program trains specialists to identify vulnerabilities in large language models, simulate adversarial techniques, and strengthen AI infrastructure. The Certified Responsible AI Governance and Ethics certification centers on enterprise-scale oversight and compliance, referencing established standards such as those developed by NIST and ISO.
Certified CISO v4 has also been updated to prepare executive leaders for AI-integrated risk environments, where intelligent systems influence operational and strategic decisions. According to EC-Council leadership, security executives must now manage adaptive systems that evolve rapidly and require clear governance accountability.
The initiative aligns with U.S. federal priorities outlined in Executive Order 14179, the July 2025 AI Action Plan’s workforce development pillar, and Executive Orders 14277 and 14278, all of which emphasize expanding AI education pathways and strengthening job-ready skills across professional and skilled trade sectors.
AI expertise remains geographically concentrated, with 67 percent of U.S. AI talent located in just 15 cities, while women account for 28 percent of the workforce, underlining ongoing participation disparities.
Founded in 2001, EC-Council is known for its Certified Ethical Hacker credential. The organization holds ISO/IEC 17024 accreditation and reports certifying more than 350,000 professionals globally, including personnel within government agencies, the Department of Defense under DoD 8140 baseline recognition, and Fortune 100 companies.
As AI transitions from experimentation to infrastructure, workforce readiness and governance capability are increasingly central to secure and sustainable deployment.
A promotional campaign at South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb turned into a large scale operational incident after a data entry mistake resulted in users receiving bitcoin instead of a small cash-equivalent reward.
Initial reports suggested that certain customers were meant to receive 2,000 Korean won as part of a routine promotional payout. Instead, those accounts were credited with 2,000 bitcoin each. At current market valuations, 2,000 bitcoin represents roughly $140 million per account, transforming what should have been a minor incentive into an extraordinary allocation.
Bithumb later confirmed that the scope of the error was larger than early estimates. According to the exchange, a total of 620,000 bitcoin was mistakenly credited to 695 user accounts. Based on prevailing prices at the time of the incident, that amount corresponded to approximately $43 billion in value. The exchange stated that the issue stemmed from an internal processing mistake and was not connected to external hacking activity or a breach of its security infrastructure. It emphasized that customer asset custody systems were not compromised.
The sudden appearance of large bitcoin balances had an immediate effect on trading activity within the platform. Bithumb reported that the incident contributed to a temporary decline of about 10 percent in bitcoin’s price on its exchange, as some affected users rapidly sold the credited assets. To contain further disruption, the company restricted withdrawals and suspended certain transactions linked to the impacted accounts. It stated that 99.7 percent of the mistakenly issued bitcoin has since been recovered.
The event has revived discussion around the concept often described as “paper bitcoin.” On centralized exchanges, user balances are reflected in internal ledgers rather than always corresponding to coins held in individual blockchain wallets. In practice, exchanges may not maintain a one-to-one on-chain reserve for every displayed balance at every moment. This structural model has previously drawn criticism, most notably during the collapse of Mt. Gox in 2014, which was then the largest bitcoin exchange globally. Its failure exposed major discrepancies between reported and actual holdings.
Data from blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence indicates that Bithumb currently controls digital assets worth approximately $5.3 billion. That figure is substantially lower than the $43 billion temporarily reflected in the erroneous credits, underscoring that the allocation existed within internal accounting records rather than as newly transferred blockchain assets.
Observers on social media platform X questioned how such a large discrepancy could occur without automated safeguards preventing the issuance. Bithumb has faced security challenges in the past. In 2017, an employee’s device was compromised, exposing customer data later used in phishing attempts. In 2018, around $30 million in cryptocurrency was stolen in an attack attributed to the Lazarus Group, an organization widely linked to North Korea. A further breach in 2019 resulted in losses of roughly $20 million and was initially suspected to involve insider participation. In each instance, Bithumb stated that it compensated affected users for lost funds, though earlier incidents included exposure of personal information.
Beyond cybersecurity events, the exchange has also been subject to regulatory scrutiny, including investigations related to alleged fraud, embezzlement, and promotional practices. Reports indicate it was again raided this week over concerns involving misleading advertising.
Bithumb maintains that no customer ultimately suffered a net financial loss from the recent error, though the price movement raised concerns about potential liquidations for leveraged traders. A comparable situation occurred at decentralized exchange Paradex, which reversed trades following a pricing malfunction.
The incident unfolds amid broader market strain, with digital asset prices astronomically below their October peaks and political debate intensifying around cryptocurrency-linked business interests connected to U.S. public figures. Recent disclosures from the U.S. Department of Justice concerning Jeffrey Epstein’s early involvement in cryptocurrency ventures have further fueled online speculation and conspiracy narratives across social platforms.