Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label CyberWar. Show all posts
Ukrainian Soldiers
Cyber Intelligence Cyber Security CyberWar Russian Military Ukrainian Soldiers

Russian Military Hackers Take Aim at Ukrainian Soldiers’ Battle Plans

 

On Thursday, the United States and its allies issued a warning, revealing that Russian military hackers have been actively pursuing Ukrainian soldiers' mobile devices. Their objective is to pilfer critical battlefield data, which could potentially bolster the Kremlin's efforts in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. 

The recent advisory released by the United States and its intelligence-sharing partners, known as the "Five Eyes" alliance (comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom), aligns with a report issued by Ukraine's SBU security service. This report highlights the Russian hackers' concerted efforts to infiltrate the Android tablets utilized by the Ukrainian military for both strategic planning and executing combat missions. 

According to Ukraine's SBU, the malicious code employed by the Russian hackers was specifically crafted to pilfer data transmitted from soldiers' mobile devices to the Starlink satellite system, a creation of billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk's company. It is worth noting that the press has previously reported on the pivotal role of Starlink satellites in facilitating Ukraine's battlefield communications. 

This news underscores the significance of the battle for control over sensitive military information in the realm of cyberspace, which has emerged as a prominent front in Russia's comprehensive war against Ukraine. The extent of the hacking campaign's success remains uncertain. Ukraine's SBU security service has reported successfully thwarting certain hacking attempts. 

Still, they have also acknowledged that Russian forces managed to acquire tablets on the battlefield and subsequently infected them with malicious software. This hacking campaign coincides with an ongoing Ukrainian counteroffensive, marked by a protracted and challenging struggle to repel Russian forces. 

Privately, U.S. officials have voiced apprehension over Ukraine's inability to achieve significant breakthroughs despite months of relentless combat. US officials and independent experts have reported that Russian intelligence services have been launching a barrage of cyberattacks against Ukrainian infrastructure since the commencement of Moscow's extensive invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. 

These cyberattacks have encompassed a range of tactics, including destructive hacks designed to compromise Ukrainian energy and transportation systems, among other targets. Although certain cyber incidents have compelled Ukrainian government entities and businesses to engage in recovery efforts, Kyiv's digital defenses have exhibited notable resilience throughout this period.
Read more »
Machine learning
AI Cyber Security CyberWar Cyberwarfare Data Safety Machine learning

Cyberwarfare Threat Looming Large on Firms Worldwide

 

Over the past ten years or so, the environment for cyber threats has undergone a significant transformation, which has accelerated in recent years. The term "cyberwar" didn't even exist until 30 years ago, and it's still somewhat debatable today. 

Once upon a time (that time being just a few years ago), the majority of private businesses had no reason for immediate concern. However, the distinctions between nation-state adversaries, cybercrime organisations, and rogue threat actors continue to become more and more hazy, making practically any company and any device fair game for cyberwarfare. The Armis State of Cyberwarfare and Trends Report: 2022-2023 examines the situation more closely and offers information on whether or not organisations are sufficiently equipped to defend themselves. 

The report focuses on the opinions of IT and security experts from around the world regarding the state of cyberwarfare today and market trends. It offers insightful information on the opportunities and challenges faced by businesses as they work to safeguard their assets and secure their networks. The study was conducted by surveying more than 6,000 IT and security professionals worldwide from all major industry verticals. 

Technology: A double-edged sword 

Technology is frequently a mixed blessing, which is one of the report's most notable findings. Anything that makes your life simpler or more convenient for you can, in theory, be used against you by attackers or expose you to a higher risk in some other way.

Technology is increasingly reliant on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). These technological advancements are being used to automate the detection and response to cyber threats, which is assisting businesses in better protecting their assets and networks. The report does point out, however, that there are worries about how these technologies might be misused for bad, and that more oversight and regulation are required in this area. Concerns about the potential use of generative AI tools like ChatGPT to create malicious code and exploits have recently grown. 

The Armis report highlights the growing threat that cyberattacks that target critical infrastructure pose to businesses. This includes attacks on systems that are crucial to the operation of contemporary society, such as medical equipment and industrial control systems. While these attacks don't specifically target organisations (aside from the provider of critical infrastructure), any attack that affects the critical infrastructure that businesses depend on can have disastrous effects on those businesses. In accordance with the report, these attacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and are frequently carried out by advanced persistent threat (APT) groups, which are outfitted with the resources and technical know-how necessary to get around conventional security measures.

In the report's introduction, Nadir Izrael, CTO and co-founder of Armis, mentions that experts believe threat actors will be able to weaponize OT (operational technology) environments by 2025 in order to hurt or kill people. The shift from reconnaissance and espionage to kinetic application with tangible effects is a trend in cyberwarfare, he observes. 

“These kinetic cyberweapons have already been discovered in the wild, although none specifically have been deployed to lethal effect. For example, the Triton malware discovered in 2017 targeted and disabled safety instrumented system (SIS) controllers of a Saudi Arabian petrochemical plant which could have contributed to a plant-wide disaster had the problem not been identified. And in February 2021, a hacker attempted to poison the water supply facility of a small U.S. city in the state of Florida via remote access. We have already seen ransomware attacks against the healthcare sector result in human deaths, so the potential impact of cyberattacks—whether intentional or unintentional—is clear.” 

Can we survive cyber warfare? 

Many organisations have been caught off guard by the threat landscape's quick change. The scope of the threat is difficult for businesses of all sizes and in all sectors to comprehend, and many do not have the necessary cyber defences in place.

In a press release, Armis summarised some of the report's most important findings. These results highlight some of the major obstacles that organisations must overcome in order to adjust to the new reality. 

  • The threat of cyberwarfare is not being taken seriously by one-third (33%) of international organisations, who report being unconcerned or indifferent about how it will affect their organisation as a whole, creating security gaps. 
  • Nearly a quarter (24%) of international organisations believe they are unprepared to handle cyberwarfare. Nevertheless, preventing nation-state attacks comes in last on the IT professionals' list of security concerns (22%). 
  • The statement that "The war in Ukraine has created a greater threat of cyberwarfare" is accepted by more than three out of five (64%) IT and security professionals polled.
  • Between May 2022 and October 2022, compared to the six months before, more threat activity was reported on networks by over half (54%) of professionals who are the sole decision-makers for IT security. 
  • The majority (55%) of IT professionals polled concurred with the statement that "My organisation has stalled or stopped digital transformation projects due to the threat of cyberwarfare." In some nations, like Australia (79%), the U.S. (67%), Singapore (63%), the UK (57%), and Denmark (56%), this percentage is even higher. 
  • IT professionals around the world responded differently when asked about their company's policy on paying ransoms in the event of a ransomware attack. Twenty-four percent of respondents said their organisation always pays, 31% said their organisation only pays when customer data is at risk, 26% said their organisation never pays, and 19% said it depends. 
  • A little more than seven in ten (76%) of the IT professionals polled concur that, in response to the threat of cyberwarfare, the boards of directors are changing the organisational culture with regard to cybersecurity. 
  • Nearly 2 in 5 (37%) of the IT professionals surveyed believe it is extremely likely that their company will increase its investment in cybersecurity in light of recent and ongoing unexpected global events (such as the pandemic, the conflict in the Ukraine, etc.) 

Combating future cyberwars 

The report emphasises how crucial asset visibility is to maintaining business network security. Businesses must have a thorough understanding of the hardware and software that connect to their networks in order to identify threats quickly and take appropriate action. With the goal of becoming the "Google Maps" of the IT environment or attack surface, Armis is committed to giving its users the visibility they require. To assist them in overcoming these obstacles, they collaborate with clients like the City of Las Vegas, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and an increasing number of governmental bodies.

Yevgeny Dibrov, the CEO of Armis, and Nadir Izrael, the CTO, were interviewed by Tony Bradley, Editor-in-Chief at TechSpective. Regarding the visibility of assets, Dibrov stated, "Every client should ask themselves, 'What are my assets? What are my assets, exactly?

In a data centre environment, a manufacturing environment, a hospital, a critical infrastructure facility, or a government facility, the most fundamental question is, "What do I have?" he continued. 

“I think cyberwarfare in general has become kind of an above board thing that nation-states do, as opposed to maybe a decade or two ago where everything was hush-hush and under the covers—like these covert attacks that were never attributable. That change is huge in our overall industry. It's huge for countries. In fact, from our perspective it paints cyberwarfare as the new terrorism,” Izrael stated. “It is the most cost-effective way of waging war on multiple levels and something that we're seeing more and more examples of as we progress.”  

Since it is unlikely that we will be able to put the genie back in the bottle in the future, it will be crucial for organisations to understand the answers to the questions Dibrov posed and have that "Google Map" of their environment to work with.
Read more »
state-backed cyberattacks
APT Cyber Attacks CyberWar state-backed cyberattacks

How Cybercrime and Cyberwar are Interlinked?


Cybersecurity experts have long debated that future conflicts will no longer be confronted just on a physical battlefield, but in a digital sphere as well. Although it is clear that the physical battlefield will not be mitigated sooner, considering the recent conflicts, we are also witnessing a rise in state-sponsored attacks like never before. It is therefore important that businesses, individuals, and governments ensure that they are prepared in combating an attack. Since, in a digital battleground, it is not just the soldiers being targeted, but everyone is in the line of fire. 

Broadly speaking, an act of cyberwar is any state-backed malicious online activity that targets foreign networks. However, as with most geopolitical phenomena, real-world examples of cyber warfare are far more complex. In the world of state-sponsored cybercrime, it is not just the government intelligence agencies that are directly carrying out attacks, but these days one can witness attacks from organized cybercriminal organizations that have ties to a nation-state. 

These organizations are known as advanced persistent threat (APT) groups. The infamous APT-28, also known as Fancy Bear, which hacked the Democratic National Committee in the year 2016 is an excellent example of this type of espionage operation. In a way, this serves as the ideal cover for malicious state actors who want to attack and disrupt vital infrastructure while lowering the potential for generating a geopolitical crisis or military conflict. 

If the Enemy Is in Range, So Are You 

Whether a cyberattack is directly linked to a foreign government agency, attacks on critical infrastructure can have devastating repercussions. Critical infrastructure does not just refer to state-owned and operated infrastructures such as power grids and government organizations - banks, large corporations, and Internet service providers all fall under the umbrella of critical infrastructure targets. 

As governments and private organizations continue to adopt advanced and connected IT networks, the risks and potential consequences will only increase. Recent research by the University of Michigan found security vulnerabilities in local traffic light systems. Although the flaw has subsequently been patched, this emphasizes the significance of robust, up-to-date inbuilt security systems to protect infrastructure against cyberattacks. 

Defend Now or Be Conquered Later 

With the rise in advancement and complexity in networks, the chance that vulnerabilities can be exploited as well increases exponentially. Every single endpoint on the network must be constantly monitored and secured if organizations are to have any chance of surviving a sophisticated state-backed attack. 

Some organizations are seen learning this lesson the hard way. For instance, in 2017, US food giant Mondelez was denied a $100 million insurance payout after suffering a Russian ATP cyberattack, since the attack was assumed to be “an act of war” and was not included in the firm’s cybersecurity policy. The conglomerate and Zurich Insurance recently rectified this issue on undisclosed terms.

Endpoint security has never been more critical than it is today. The use of personal mobile devices as a work tool has become pervasive across almost every single industry. This rise in the bring-your-own-devices policy has in part been driven by the false assumption that mobile devices are inherently more secure than desktops. 

However, for over 10 years, various governments and ATP groups with potential cyber capabilities have adapted to and exploited the mobile threat landscape with extremely low detection rates. Attacks on the state and public mobile networks can take down large parts of the workforce, impacting productivity and disrupting everything from the government’s decision-making to the state’s economy. 

IT and security managing experts may not be the ones preventing the inevitable cyberattacks or cyber war, but they can defend themselves against major setbacks. If a device is connected to the infrastructure, physically or virtually, it has become a potential back door for cybercriminals to access the data and disrupt operations. Thus, if organizations want to avoid being victims of potential cyberwarfare, endpoint security should be a priority in conducting operations, from mobiles to desktops.

Read more »
Russia
Cyber Security CyberWar DDoS DNS domains Internet Runet Russia

Experts Estimated the Probability of Disconnecting Russia From the Internet

 

On 5th March, a telegram signed by Deputy Head of the Ministry of Digital Andrei Chernenko was sent to federal executive authorities and subjects of the Russian Federation with a number of recommendations for the protection of information infrastructure of the country. It does not contain direct instructions on disconnecting Russian users from the global network, but a number of experts saw in it indirect preconditions for the isolation of Runet. 

According to the document, by March 11, state websites and services must switch to using DNS servers located in the Russian Federation; remove from HTML page templates all JavaScript code downloaded from foreign resources (banners, counters, and so on); in case of using foreign hosting, switch to Russian; move to the domain zone.ru; complicate the "password policy". 

The Ministry of Finance stated that the sending of telegrams is connected with cyberattacks on Russian websites from abroad. The proposed "set of the simplest recommendations on cyber hygiene" is designed to ensure the availability of web resources of the Russian Federation. "There are no plans to turn off the Internet from the inside," the ministry assured. 
 
Mikhail Klimarev, executive director of the Internet Protection Society, said that the items listed in the telegram are absolutely banal rules of information security, but they may also indicate the preparation of state agencies for any force majeure. He found it difficult to say why the document appeared only now but suggested that this was due to the ongoing cyberwar between Russia and other states. 

"Anonymous hackers, DDoS attacks, attacks on DNS servers - it's really serious, and the Russian authorities really need to worry about how it should work," Klimarev explained. "There's really nothing to worry about, but it's all terrifying. From the outside, it looks like preparation for a sovereign Runet," he added.  

The norm on DNS servers may also indicate preparation for possible shutdowns of the Runet. However, the main logic of the document works to reduce cyberattacks and switch to local root servers to provide access to sites in the Russian domain zone. 

According to experts, disconnecting Russia from the Internet is extremely dangerous for the state, as it carries unpredictable social and financial consequences. 


Read more »
Ukraine
America Anonymous Cyber Security CyberWar Government websites hacked Killnet Russia Russian Hackers russian media Ukraine

The Russian Hacker Group Killnet Took Down the Anonymous Website

 

The Russian hacker group Killnet said that they took down the Anonymous website "anonymoushackers[.]net" and called on Russians not to believe the Internet fakes and to stay calm. Killnet's appeal was published on one of its Telegram channels on Tuesday, March 1. 

According to the hacker group, "the Internet is full of fake information about hacking Russian banks, attacks on the servers of Russian media and much more. All this has no danger to people. This "information bomb" carries only text. And no more harm. Don't give in to fake information on the Internet. Do not doubt your country". 

Hackers blamed the events in Ukraine on the country's President, Vladimir Zelensky, as well as American leader Joe Biden. The leaders of the EU countries, as they say in the appeal, are following the lead of the United States. 

 According to independent verification done by CySecurity News, there is no official website for Anonymous Group. 

Russian hackers said that they had already disabled the website of the Anonymous group, along with the website of the Right Sector banned in the Russian Federation. The Anonymous hacker group declared a cyberwar on Russia and claimed responsibility for a hacker attack, for example, on the RT website. 

On February 28, the websites of Izvestia, TASS, Kommersant, Forbes, Fontanka, Mela, E1, Buro 24/7, RBC, Znak.Com and other Russian media were hacked. On the same day, massive DDoS attacks were launched against websites of the Crimean government and authorities. Hackers used a botnet with IP addresses mostly located in North and South America, Taiwan, and a number of other countries. 

On February 26, the Ministry of Information reported that users of the public services portal may face difficulties when working with the services of the site due to cyberattacks. At the same time, the department clarified that the personal data and information of citizens are reliably protected. On the same day, the administration of the President of the Russian Federation reported regular cyberattacks on the Kremlin's website. Moreover, Russian Railways reported that the company's website is subject to regular serious DDoS attacks. 

Earlier, Information security expert Nenakhov told what danger Anonymous hackers pose to Russia. According to him, DDoS attacks are the easiest thing that can happen. Government websites, government online services such as Gosuslugi, email, social media accounts of politicians, websites, and the IT infrastructure of state banks and defense companies are relatively more vulnerable to attacks.


Read more »
Ukraine
Anonymous Cyber Security CyberWar DDOS Attack Government Sites Group-IB Hacker group Russia Ukraine

Expert Opinion: The Consequences of the War of the Hacker Group Anonymous against Russia

 

Anonymous hacktivists announced on Twitter about the beginning of the war with Russia because of the special operation in Ukraine. The group is known for its massive DDoS attacks, declassification of government documents, and hacking of politicians' accounts. Information security experts told how Anonymous can harm Russia. 


Information security experts are confident that a real threat may be hiding behind the Anonymous statement. "Government websites, government online services such as Gosuslugi, email, social media accounts of politicians, websites and IT infrastructure of state banks and defense companies can be attacked", said Sergey Nenakhov, head of the information security audit department of Infosecurity a Softline Company. 

According to him, this community has repeatedly manifested itself earlier in hacktivism, hacking government websites, e-mails of politicians from different countries. They also manifested themselves in the online fight against the Islamic State organization (it is banned in Russia), obtaining and publishing information about members of the terrorist organization. 

Group-IB noted that the danger lies in the fact that other groups, including pro-state hacker groups targeting critical infrastructure facilities, may operate under the guise of Anonymous. 
"As for Anonymous, they act as follows: first, in public communities, for example, on Twitter, they call for attacks on certain organizations as part of a particular campaign. In order for users to easily identify these attacks, they usually use special hashtags for each event and the hashtag Anonymous. These campaigns can be joined by young hackers without professional skills and abilities. However, the strength of such actions lies precisely in the mass character of hacktivists," the company explained.

Fedor Dbar, commercial director of Security Code, believes that much will depend on whom the group will carry out the attacks. "The most serious consequences could be caused by attacks on critical information infrastructure (CII) facilities, but it cannot be said that tomorrow we will be left without electricity or electricity."
Read more »
United States
Cyber Attacks CyberWar DDOS Attack Fancy Bear NATO Russia Ukraine Ukraine Websites Ukrainian Cyber Security United States

Ukraine: DDoS Attacks on State Websites Continue

 

Since February 23, some Ukrainian government websites have been subjected to DDoS attacks: web resources of the Ministry of Defense, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and others have suffered interruptions. 

The Insider publication (the organization is included in the list of foreign agents by the Ministry of Justice of Russia), referring to the data of the independent cyber analyst Snorre Fagerland, stated that the hacker group ART23 (Fancy Bear), which is attributed to links with the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian Federation, was behind the attacks. 

However, Igor Bederov, head of the Information and Analytical Research Department at T.Hunter, called this statement a provocation. "The investigation of a cyberattack (attribution) is a long and complex process that cannot be carried out from beginning to end in hours. Analysis of hacker software and malicious code is always a long and painstaking process," Mr. Bederov said. 

According to him, even if traces leading to Fancy Bear were indeed found, it's still impossible to say that this particular group was behind the attack. Mr. Bederov thinks that other hackers could have also taken advantage of the malware previously used by Fancy Bear. It's possible because hacker tools are openly resold on the Darknet. 

"Primary attribution is based on matching the hacker code used in today's attack with the code used in yesterday's attack, as well as special characters specific to a language group. This approach is fundamentally wrong, because the code can be stolen or bought, and the linguistic features can be imitated," said the expert. 

Mr. Bederov also noted that within the framework of pro-state activity, mainly Chinese groups like to engage in substitution of attribution. In addition, according to him, the NATO cyber intelligence center located in Tallinn was previously noticed for the substitution of attribution. 

Earlier it was reported that DDoS attacks on the website of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine could have been deliberately set up by the United States. Earlier, Viktor Zhora, Deputy Chairman of the State Service for Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine, said that the government of Ukraine is ready for the scenario of forced destruction of secret data on servers. According to him, the authorities do not want to take risks and are not going to leave documentation and detailed information about the population of Ukraine to the enemy. 

He also said that if Russia gets access to government passwords, Ukrainian specialists "will quickly block access to hacked accounts."
Read more »
West
America CNN Cyber Security CyberWar Government Information Security Poland Russia Ukraine US West

The United States and the West are Afraid of Possible Cyber Attacks by Russian Hackers

 

According to CNN, the FBI has warned American businessmen about the growth of possible cyberattacks using ransomware by Russian hackers against the background of sanctions that US President Joe Biden imposed against Russia in connection with the situation around Ukraine. 

Earlier, Jen Easterly, head of the U.S. Agency for Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection, said that Russia might consider taking measures that could affect critical U.S. infrastructure in response to U.S. sanctions. She urged all organizations to familiarize themselves with the steps the agency has developed to mitigate cybersecurity risks. In addition, David Ring, head of cybersecurity at the FBI, said that Russia is allegedly a favorable environment for cybercriminals, which will not become less against the background of the confrontation between Russia and the West over the situation around Ukraine. According to CNN, briefings on such topics have been held by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security for the past two months. 

It is important to note that Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki decided to introduce a special high-level security regime for telecommunications and information technology in the country. 

On February 21, he signed a decree introducing the third level of the Charlie– CRP warning throughout the country. This level is introduced if there is an event confirming the probable purpose of a terrorist attack in cyberspace or if there is reliable information about a planned event. 

The Polish Law on Anti-terrorist actions provides that in the event of a terrorist attack or its threat, the head of government may introduce one of four threat levels: Alfa, Bravo, Charlie, and Delta. The highest level, Delta, can be announced if a terrorist attack occurs or incoming information indicates its high probability in Poland. 

Similar levels marked with CRP relate to threats in cyberspace. They are introduced to strengthen the control of the security level of information systems in order to monitor the possible occurrence of violations in their work. 

The Russian Federation has repeatedly rejected the accusations of Western countries in cyberattacks, calling them unfounded, and also stated that it is ready to cooperate on cybersecurity. 

Earlier, CySecurity News reported that CNN reported citing US administration sources that representatives of the White House, US intelligence, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and other agencies have discussed preparations to repel cyber attacks that could be carried out in the United States and Ukraine.
Read more »
Ukraine Websites
Cyber Attacks CyberWar Russian Hackers Ukraine Websites

Ukraine Government Websites Targeted in a Suspected Russian Cyber Attack

 

Threat actors targeted multiple Ukrainian government websites on Friday, temporarily disabling sites and leaving messages warning readers to “be afraid and expect the worse.”

According to Ukrainian officials said, it is too early to draw any conclusions but they pointed to a “long record” of Russian cyber-attacks against Ukraine as tensions between Russia and the West over Ukraine escalate following several rounds of unsuccessful talks. 

Ukraine’s foreign ministry described the incident as a “massive cyberattack,” but noted that no content on the sites had been altered and no personal details had been leaked.

Websites for the government’s cabinet, security and defense councils, and ministry for education were among those affected. “Our specialists are already working on restoring the work of IT systems, and the cyber police opened an investigation,” said the spokesperson. 

The foreign ministry website temporarily displayed a message in Ukrainian, Russian, and Polish that appeared to suggest the attack was in response to Ukraine's pro-Western stance. "Ukrainians! All of your personal data .. have been deleted and are impossible to restore. All information about you has become public, be afraid and expect the worst. This is for your past, present and future. For Volyn, OUN, UPA, Galitsia, Polesye and for historical lands," it said, referring to ultra-nationalist organizations and regions of Ukraine. 

The authorities including the SBU security service and Cyberpolice are working to address the issue. The education ministry said that the attack comes as tensions between Russia and the West soar over Ukraine, a strategic ex-Soviet country. The Western intelligence has blamed Russia for deploying tanks, artillery, and about 100,000 soldiers on Ukraine's war-torn eastern border in recent weeks, in what NATO says is preparation for an invasion. Meanwhile, Moscow says it has no plans to invade Ukraine. 

Earlier this week the United States and its NATO allies held talks with Russian officials in an attempt to ease tensions, but all three rounds of negotiations -- in Geneva, Brussels, and Vienna -- proved unsuccessful. 

Ukraine has suffered a series of cyber-attacks since 2014, which have knocked out power supplies, frozen supermarket tills, and forced the authorities to prop up the hryvnia currency after banks' IT systems crashed.
Read more »
website hacked and defaced
Bangladeshi hackers CyberWar Pakistani Hackers Security News Shadow008 website hacked and defaced

Punjab Assembly website hacked by Bangladesh Hackers

A Bangladeshi hacker group has hacked into the Punjab Assembly website and defaced them. The hacker claims that the defacement is payback to Pakistani Hacker Shadow008.

"This Is PayBak To Shadow008 For Hacking Our Bangladeshi Sites!”The defacement message reads. "Dear site Admin, One Pakistani so called hacker, Shadow008 is responsible for this defacement .  "

They threatened that there will be more attack unless the FIA catch the hacker shadow008.


"It was proved earlier that,FIA was unable to arrest this cyber criminal."the defacement message continues. " This criminal was responsible for the defacement of Google Pakistan Pressurize your law enforcement agency to make this criminal busted and let us live in peace and also let us leave u in peace,"

Few minutes after the Bangladeshi hacker defaced the site,a Pakistani hacker 'Prime Shadow' re-defaced the site with a message "“Shan Ahmed waz here, Site Restored, Dont mess with us BanglaDesh…Admin Secure your Site…You can get Access of It from me on my fb ID".

The website has been re-stored and working properly. However, this is not the first time the site is being hacked. Few months back, Indian hacker group IndiShell has defaced the site.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)