Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Cybersecurity. Show all posts

Security Researcher Outsmarts Hackers with Fake Ransomware Tool

 

The debate surrounding the ethics and practicality of "hacking back" remains a heated topic within the cybersecurity community. When organizations face cyberattacks, is retaliating against the attacker a viable option? While opinions differ, one fact remains clear: breaking the law is breaking the law, regardless of intent.

However, in a fascinating case of strategic ingenuity rather than retaliation, a security researcher and penetration tester successfully infiltrated a notorious dark web criminal marketplace. This was less an act of hacking back and more a bold example of preemptive defense.

Quoting American philosopher Robert Maynard Pirsig, Cristian Cornea, the researcher at the heart of this operation, opened his riveting Medium post with, “Boredom always precedes a period of great creativity.” Inspired by these words, Cornea devised a clever honeypot strategy to target potential ransomware hackers frequenting the BreachForums marketplace on the dark web.

His plan revolved around creating a fake ransomware tool called the "Jinn Ransomware Builder," designed to lure cybercriminals. This supposed tool offered features to help bad actors deploy ransomware attacks. In reality, it was a honeypot—an elaborate trap with some real functionalities but embedded with hardcoded and backdoored command-and-control callbacks.

“Jinn Ransomware Builder is actually a honeypot,” Cornea explained, “but some of the features presented above are real.” For instance, the tool could initiate a remote connection and open a process with a server-hosted “CmD.eXE” executable. Other features, such as multi-language support and AES encryption, were merely designed to make the tool appear more authentic and appealing to malicious actors.

Cornea emphasized that his actions were performed within a controlled and simulated environment, ensuring no laws were broken. “I strictly discourage anyone else from executing such actions themselves,” he warned. He stressed the importance of staying on the ethical side of hacking, noting that the line between good and bad hacking is dangerously thin.

This operation highlights the creativity and strategic thinking ethical hackers use to combat cybercrime, reinforcing that innovation and legality must go hand in hand.

The Hidden Dangers of Compromised Wi-Fi Routers

 


Cybercriminals who attack routers are swift and precise, spending countless hours studying network vulnerabilities to compromise sensitive data and then taking advantage of those vulnerabilities to compromise the router. The term "router hacking" refers to taking control of a user's router without their consent by a cybercriminals.

The Wi-Fi hacker, like other types of hackers, relies on security measures that a user may have implemented to protect themselves against the hack - often the administrator password for their router or an unpatched vulnerability in their system. The hacker has a variety of tricks that he can use if he wants to hack into a router successfully. 

There is a risk that a hacker will be able to gain access to a router in minutes if the user has not set a strong password for their router. The hacker can take control of users' router after they have gained access, and even change the settings or install malicious software on users' router after they have gained control. These are all signature signs that users have been hit by a black-hat hacker, as opposed to their more altruistic white-hat cousins. 

Approximately one in 16 internet-connected home Wi-Fi routers can be remotely accessed by attackers using the manufacturer's default admin password. Getting continually kicked off users' home networks can be super annoying, but that's what some hackers will do. A hacker may use a de-authentication attack to target network devices. To do so, a hacker does not even need administrative access to the user router; they only need to find the router and device users' using. They can do this by using a tool such as Aircrack-ng. After doing so, they craft a command that uses the users' router's authentication protocol to deauthenticate users, thus kicking them off the network. 

A Forbes study found that 86% of users never change their default credentials. As default credentials are easily found online, all hackers must do a perfunctory Google search to find the information they need to log into users' routers. If they do, they can change things like the password and SSID. Changing the password will kick users off their network, and changing the SSID will change their network name. They could also hide users' networks entirely after kicking them off and changing the name, making it difficult to get back online. Scammers employ various methods to hack into Wi-Fi networks, exploiting vulnerabilities and poor security practices.

One common technique is brute-forcing Wi-Fi passwords, where hackers systematically attempt numerous password combinations to gain access. Once successful, they can lock users out by changing the password and taking control of the router. Another method involves using the router’s default credentials, often left unchanged by users. Cybercriminals can exploit these factory-set admin passwords to alter router settings, emphasizing the importance of creating a unique password and SSID (wireless network name) for enhanced security. 

Unpatched firmware vulnerabilities also present significant risks. Attackers can exploit outdated software to infiltrate a router's internal systems. For instance, in June 2023, Asus issued critical firmware updates to protect against remote code execution attacks. One of the most severe vulnerabilities, CVE-2018-1160, dating back to 2018, carried a high severity rating of 9.8 on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). 

Furthermore, cybercriminals can execute Domain Name Server (DNS) hijacking by altering a router’s DNS settings and redirecting users to malicious phishing websites. These examples underscore the importance of updating router firmware regularly, using strong passwords, and proactively securing Wi-Fi networks. Understanding the signs of a hacked router is essential for safeguarding users' networks. Altered DNS settings are a major indicator of a breach, as hackers may manipulate these settings to redirect users' internet traffic without their knowledge, potentially launching devastating pharming attacks. 

Users can check their router’s DNS settings in the admin menu to ensure they have not been tampered with. Another red flag is an inability to access the router using the user's admin password. If the credentials no longer work, it could mean a hacker has changed them. In such cases, perform a factory reset immediately and create a new, strong password. Unexpectedly slow internet can also hint at a router hack, especially when accompanied by other suspicious activities. Hackers may exploit users' bandwidth, causing noticeable performance drops. Additionally, strange software or malware on users' devices can result from a router breach, as hackers often use this method to infiltrate connected devices. While malware can spread through various means, its presence alongside other signs of hacking is a cause for concern. 

Monitoring users' networks for unrecognized devices is another critical security measure. Tools like AVG AntiVirus FREE can detect when unfamiliar devices join users' Wi-Fi, issuing alerts that prompt further investigation. While unauthorized devices don’t always indicate a router hack, their presence could lead to one, emphasizing the need for continuous network monitoring. Using reliable security software is vital to protecting users' devices and networks. AVG AntiVirus FREE offers comprehensive cybersecurity features, including real-time malware detection, phishing defence, ransomware protection, and tools to secure users' Wi-Fi networks from potential router hackers. Staying vigilant and equipped with robust security measures ensures a safe online experience.

Hackers can easily carry out this kind of attack even if they do not have administrative access to the user's router; they only need to identify the router and the device that users use to do so. An aircraft-ng tool, which is available online, can be used to accomplish this task. As a result, they craft a command that uses the authentication protocol of the users' router to deauthenticate them, which means they are kicked off of the network once more. The study by Forbes found that 86% of users do not change their default credentials despite being notified about it. 

The default credentials for routers can readily be found online, so it is only a matter of a quick Google search before hackers can discover the credentials they need to access the routers of their targeted victims. In that case, they can change things such as the password and the SSID of the network. By changing a user's password, they will be kicked off their network, and by changing their SSID, their network name will be changed. It's possible that they could also hide the users' networks entirely after they have been kicked off and changed their names, which would make it difficult for them to return to the network. Using a variety of methods, scammers can hack into Wi-Fi networks by exploiting the vulnerabilities and unfavourable security practices that exist. 

There is no doubt that the most common method of hacking Wi-Fi passwords in today's world is through brute-force attacks, which involve scanning many different combinations of passwords too to discover someone's password by scanning all of the combinations simultaneously. When they are successful in taking control of the router, they can lock users out of their accounts by changing their passwords. A second method involves the use of the router's default credentials, often left unchanged by users when they set up the router. These factory-provided admin passwords can be vulnerable to abuse by cybercriminals, highlighting the importance of using a unique password and SSID (wireless network name) for enhanced security when setting up users' routers. 

As a result of firmware vulnerabilities that remain unpatched, there are significant risks involved. There are several ways in which attackers can compromise the internal operating systems of a router by exploiting outdated software. Asus's most recent firmware upgrade for its laptops was released in June 2023, preventing remote code execution attacks against the device. On the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), which calculates the severity of vulnerabilities based on their association with security incidents and their impact, CVE-2018-1160, dated back to 2018, had a severity rating of 9.8. A further method of executing Domain Name Server (DNS) hijacking is to alter a router's DNS settings, redirecting the user to malicious phishing sites by altering the DNS settings of a router. 

As a result of these examples, router firmware must be updated regularly, strong passwords are used, and wi-fi networks are carefully secured proactively. Recognizing the signs of a hacked router is crucial for protecting users' networks. Altered DNS settings often indicate a breach, as hackers can manipulate these to redirect users' internet traffic and launch phishing or pharming attacks. Regularly reviewing users' routers' DNS settings in the admin menu can help prevent such risks. Similarly, being unable to access the router with their admin password may mean hackers have taken control. In such cases, a factory reset followed by setting a strong new password is essential. 

A sudden drop in internet speed, especially when combined with other suspicious activity, could point to unauthorized bandwidth usage by hackers. Additionally, unexpected malware or unfamiliar software on users' devices might result from a router breach. Monitoring for unrecognized devices on users' networks is equally important, as these can indicate unauthorized access and potential hacking attempts. 

Investing in robust security tools is a key step in safeguarding users' digital environments. Comprehensive solutions like AVG AntiVirus FREE provide 24/7 protection against malware, phishing, ransomware, and other threats while keeping users' network secure from unauthorized access. Staying proactive with these measures is the best defense for ensuing their online safety.

Improving GPS Technology with Insights from Android Phones

 


The effect of navigation apps drifting off course may be caused by a region 50-200 miles overhead called the ionosphere, which is a region of the Earth’s atmosphere that is responsible for such drifts. There are various levels of free electrons in this layer that, under certain conditions, can be extremely concentrated, thereby slowing down the processing of GPS signals when they are travelling between satellites and devices. 

A delay, like a delay that would occur from navigating through a crowded city street without being able to get to your place of work on time, is a major contributor to navigation system errors. As reported in Nature this week, a team of Google researchers demonstrated they had been able to use GPS signal measurements collected from millions of anonymous Android mobile devices to map the ionosphere by using GPS data from those devices. 

There are several reasons why a single mobile device signal cannot tell researchers so much about the ionosphere with only one device, but this problem is minimized when there are many other devices to compare with. Finally, the researchers have been able to use the vast network of Android phones to map out the ionosphere in an extremely precise way, matching or exceeding the accuracy of monitoring stations, using the huge network of Android phones. This technique was far more accurate in areas like India and Central Africa, compared to the accuracy of listening stations alone, where the Android technique was used. 

The total electron content (TEC) referred to as ionospheric traffic is a measure of the number of electrons in the ionosphere used within a cellular telephone network. Satellites and ground stations are used to measure this amount of electrons in the ionosphere. These detection tools are indeed effective, but they are also relatively expensive and difficult to build and maintain, which means that they are not used as commonly in developing regions of the world. 

The fact that monitoring stations are not accessible equally leads to disparities in the accuracy of the global ionospheric maps. However, Google researchers did not address one issue. They chose to use something that more than half of the world's population already possessed: mobile phones. In an interview with Popular Science, Google researcher Brian Williams discussed how changes in the ionosphere have been hindering GPS capabilities when working on Android products.

If the ionosphere were to change shortly, this may undermine GPS capabilities. Aside from contributing to scientific advances, he sees this project as an opportunity to improve accuracy and provide a more useful service to mobile device users regularly.  Rather than considering ionosphere interference with GPS positioning as an obstacle, the right thing to do is to flip the idea and imagine that GPS receiver is an instrument to measure the ionosphere, not as an obstacle," Williams commented.

The ionosphere can be seen in a completely different light by combining the measurements made by millions of phones, as compared to what would otherwise be possible." Thousands of Android phones, already known as 'distributed sensor networks', have become a part of the internet. GPS receivers are integrated into most smartphones to measure radio signals beamed from satellites orbiting approximately 1,200 miles above us in medium Earth orbit (MEO).

A receiver determines your location by calculating the distance from yourself to the satellite and then using the distance to locate you, with an accuracy of approximately 15 feet. The ionosphere acts as a barrier that prevents these signals from travelling normally through space until they reach the Earth. In terms of GPS accuracy errors, many factors contribute to the GPS measurement error, including variables like the season, time of day, and distance from the equator, all of which can affect the quality of the GPS measurement. 

There is usually a correctional model built into most phone receivers that can be used to reduce the estimated error by around half, usually because these receivers provide a correctional model.  Google researchers wanted to see if measurements taken from receivers that are built into Android smartphones could replicate the ionosphere mapping process that takes place in more advanced monitoring stations by combining measurements taken directly from the phone. 

There is no doubt that monitoring stations have a clear advantage over mobile phones in terms of value per pound. The first difference between mobile phones and cellular phones is that cellular phones have much larger antennas. Also, the fact that they sit under clear open skies makes them a much better choice than mobile phones, which are often obscured by urban buildings or the pockets of the user's jeans.

In addition, every single phone has a customized measurement bias that can be off by several microseconds depending on the phone. Even so, there is no denying the fact that the sheer number of phones makes up for what they are lacking in individual complexity.  As well as these very immediate benefits, the Android ionosphere maps are also able to provide other less immediate benefits. According to the researchers, analyzing Android receiving measurements revealed that they could detect a signal of electromagnetic activity that matched a pair of powerful solar storms that had occurred earlier this year. 

According to the researchers, one storm occurred in North America between May 10 and 11, 2024. During the time of the peak activity, the ionosphere of that area was measured by smartphones and it showed a clear spike in activity followed by a quick depletion once again. The study highlights that while monitoring stations detected the storm, phone-based measurements of the ionosphere in regions lacking such stations could provide critical insights into solar storms and geomagnetic activity that might otherwise go unnoticed. This additional data offers a valuable opportunity for scientists to enhance their understanding of these atmospheric phenomena and improve preparation and response strategies for potentially hazardous events.

According to Williams, the ionosphere maps generated using phone-based measurements reveal dynamics in certain locations with a level of detail previously unattainable. This advanced perspective could significantly aid scientific efforts to understand the impact of geomagnetic storms on the ionosphere. By integrating data from mobile devices, researchers can bridge gaps left by traditional monitoring methods, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the ionosphere’s behaviour. This approach not only paves the way for advancements in atmospheric science but also strengthens humanity’s ability to anticipate and mitigate the effects of geomagnetic disturbances, fostering greater resilience against these natural occurrences.

Ransomware Gangs Actively Recruiting Pen Testers: Insights from Cato Networks' Q3 2024 Report

 

Cybercriminals are increasingly targeting penetration testers to join ransomware affiliate programs such as Apos, Lynx, and Rabbit Hole, according to Cato Network's Q3 2024 SASE Threat Report, published by its Cyber Threats Research Lab (CTRL).

The report highlights numerous Russian-language job advertisements uncovered through surveillance of discussions on the Russian Anonymous Marketplace (RAMP). Speaking at an event in Stuttgart, Germany, on November 12, Etay Maor, Chief Security Strategist at Cato Networks, explained:"Penetration testing is a term from the security side of things when we try to reach our own systems to see if there are any holes. Now, ransomware gangs are hiring people with the same level of expertise - not to secure systems, but to target systems."

He further noted, "There's a whole economy in the criminal underground just behind this area of ransomware."

The report details how ransomware operators aim to ensure the effectiveness of their attacks by recruiting skilled developers and testers. Maor emphasized the evolution of ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS), stating, "[Ransomware-as-a-service] is constantly evolving. I think they're going into much more details than before, especially in some of their recruitment."

Cato Networks' team discovered instances of ransomware tools being sold, such as locker source code priced at $45,000. Maor remarked:"The bar keeps going down in terms of how much it takes to be a criminal. In the past, cybercriminals may have needed to know how to program. Then in the early 2000s, you could buy viruses. Now you don't need to even buy them because [other cybercriminals] will do this for you."

AI's role in facilitating cybercrime was also noted as a factor lowering barriers to entry. The report flagged examples like a user under the name ‘eloncrypto’ offering a MAKOP ransomware builder, an offshoot of PHOBOS ransomware.

The report warns of the growing threat posed by Shadow AI—where organizations or employees use AI tools without proper governance. Of the AI applications monitored, Bodygram, Craiyon, Otter.ai, Writesonic, and Character.AI were among those flagged for security risks, primarily data privacy concerns.

Cato CTRL also identified critical gaps in Transport Layer Security (TLS) inspection. Only 45% of surveyed organizations utilized TLS inspection, and just 3% inspected all relevant sessions. This lapse allows attackers to leverage encrypted TLS traffic to evade detection.

In Q3 2024, Cato CTRL noted that 60% of CVE exploit attempts were blocked within TLS traffic. Prominent vulnerabilities targeted included Log4j, SolarWinds, and ConnectWise.

The report is based on the analysis of 1.46 trillion network flows across over 2,500 global customers between July and September 2024. It underscores the evolving tactics of ransomware gangs and the growing challenges organizations face in safeguarding their systems.

CISA Issues Alert on Ongoing Exploitation of Palo Alto Networks Bugs

 


A report released by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, a nonprofit organization that monitors and analyzes threats to the nation's infrastructure, found that Palo Alto Networks' firewall management software was actively exploited in the wild on Thursday. These attacks followed last week's attacks that exploited flaws in similar software. Attackers can exploit the unauthenticated command injection vulnerability (CVE-2024-9463) and the SQL injection vulnerability (CVE-2024-9465) to gain access to unpatched systems running the company's Expedition migration tool. 

This tool allows users to migrate configurations from Checkpoint, Cisco, and other supported vendors to new systems. CVE-2024-9463 is a vulnerability that allows attackers to run arbitrary commands as root on a PAN-OS firewall system, revealing usernames, cleartext passwords, device configurations, and device API keys. Secondly, a second vulnerability can be exploited to gain access to Expedition database contents (including password hashes, usernames, device configurations, and device API keys) and create or read arbitrary files on vulnerable systems by exploiting this vulnerability. 

There is important information in CVE-2024-9474 that could lend itself to a chained attack scenario, potentially resulting in a high level of security breach. It should be noted that Palo Alto Networks has publicly acknowledged the CVE, but has not yet provided detailed technical information on the vulnerability's mechanics. This leaves room for speculation regarding what is causing the vulnerability.

A spokesperson for Palo Alto Networks (PAN) confirmed patches were available to address these security vulnerabilities, and stated the company is "monitoring a limited set of exploit activities" and is working with external researchers, business partners, and customers to share information in a timely fashion. It was reported to CISA that CVE-2024-5910 had been added to the KEV catalog on Nov. 7 but the software vendor had originally disclosed the bug back in July. 

To exploit this vulnerability, there needs to be authentication within the firewall deployment and management software. Without authentication, an administrator account can be taken over by getting access to the network. There is a CVSS score of 9.3 for the vulnerability, and it is also reported to Palo Alto Networks as PAN-SA-2024-0015, as well. As a result, Palo Alto Networks has continuously monitored and worked with customers to identify and minimize the very few PAN-OS devices that have management web interfaces that are exposed to the Internet or other untrusted networks," the company stated in a separate report describing indicators of compromise for attacks that are targeting the vulnerability. 

Although the company claims these zero-days are only impacting a "very small number" of firewalls, threat monitoring platform Shadowserver reported on Friday that it monitors more than 8,700 outside management interfaces for the PAN-OS operating system. A Palo Alto Networks security advisory from early October states, "Several vulnerabilities have been identified in Palo Alto Networks Expedition that allow unauthorized access to the Expedition database and the arbitrary files on the system, as well as the ability to write arbitrary files to temporary storage locations." 

In addition, the advisory stated that the firewall, Panorama, Prisma Access, and Cloud NGFW products are not affected by these vulnerabilities. Even though the two vulnerabilities have been added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, a binding operational directive (BOD 22-01) has compelled federal agencies to patch Palo Alto Networks Expedition servers on their networks within three weeks, by December 5, to comply with the binding directive. 

Earlier this week, CISA issued a warning about yet another Expedition security hole that is capable of allowing threat actors to reselect and reset the credentials for application administrators. The security flaw (CVE-2024-5910) was patched in July and has been actively exploited in attacks. In a proof-of-concept exploit released by Horizon3.ai researcher Zach Hanley last month, he demonstrated that CVE-2024-5910 can be chained with an additional command injection vulnerability (CVE-2024-9464), that was patched in October, to allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on vulnerable Expedition servers that are exposed to the Internet. 

It has been noted that CVE-2024-9464 is linked to other Expedition security vulnerabilities that were also addressed last month. This may allow firewall admins to take over unpatched PAN-OS firewalls if they have not yet been patched. As of now, there seems to be a hotfix available for those who are concerned about being exploited, and those who are concerned should upgrade their Expedition tool to version 1.2.96, or higher. 

It has been recommended by Palo Alto Networks that, those users who are unable to install the Expedition patch immediately, should restrict access to the Expedition network to approved hosts and networks. It is crucial to note that when a vulnerability is added to KEV, not only does it introduce the possibility of an attack that exploits that vulnerability, but also that federal agencies have a deadline to either patch it or stop utilizing the flawed solution entirely. 

There is usually a deadline for that, which is 21 days from the time the bug is added to the bug-tracking system. There has recently been an addition to KEV of CVE-2024-5910, a bug that is described as being missing for crooks who have access to networks. This is Palo Alto Networks Expedition, a tool designed to simplify and automate the complexity of using Palo Alto Networks' next-generation firewalls by optimizing security policies that apply to them. In addition to making it easier for users to migrate from legacy firewall configurations to Palo Alto Networks' security platforms, users can also minimize errors and manual efforts. 

The Palo Alto Networks (PAN) management interface has recently been redesigned to provide a more secure experience for users. A report claiming an unverified remote code execution vulnerability via the PAN-OS management interface prompted the company to release an information bulletin. Those interested in knowing more about hardening network devices are urged to review PCA's recommendations for hardening network devices, and PCA's instructions for gaining access to scan results for the Organization's internet-facing management interfaces are discouraged from following them.

New SMTP Cracking Tool for 2024 Sold on Dark Web Sparks Email Security Alarm

 

A new method targeting SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) servers, specifically updated for 2024, has surfaced for sale on the dark web, sparking significant concerns about email security and data privacy.

This cracking technique is engineered to bypass protective measures, enabling unauthorized access to email servers. Such breaches risk compromising personal, business, and government communications.

The availability of this tool showcases the growing sophistication of cybercriminals and their ability to exploit weaknesses in email defenses. Unauthorized access to SMTP servers not only exposes private correspondence but also facilitates phishing, spam campaigns, and cyber-espionage.

Experts caution that widespread use of this method could result in increased phishing attacks, credential theft, and malware distribution. "Organizations and individuals must prioritize strengthening email security protocols, implementing strong authentication, and closely monitoring for unusual server activity," they advise.

Mitigating these risks requires consistent updates to security patches, enforcing multi-factor authentication, and using email encryption. The emergence of this dark web listing highlights the ongoing threats cybercriminals pose to critical communication systems.

As attackers continue to innovate, the cybersecurity community emphasizes vigilance and proactive defense strategies to safeguard sensitive information. This development underscores the urgent need for robust email security measures in the face of evolving cyber threats.

Data Leak Reported Due to Power Pages Misconfiguration


 

The Power Pages platform from Microsoft offers users an easy-to-use, low-code platform that enables them to build data-driven websites with only a little bit of programming knowledge or experience. In both the public and private sectors, companies large and small rely on this tool to facilitate the collection and analysis of data that can assist them with all manner of problems that may arise from customers or citizens seeking information to solve a problem. 

There may be other issues regarding these web pages, such as the possibility of leaks of sensitive information for their respective organizations as well if the settings for these web pages are not set up properly.  According to cybersecurity researchers, a new vulnerability has been discovered in Microsoft Power Pages that stems from misconfigured access controls within websites built with this platform that can expose sensitive data. 

If the vulnerability resulted in millions of sensitive business records being exposed to unauthorized users, this could pose a serious security risk for affected organizations as a result. It is an application service platform, that is based on the Power Platform, and offers developers a low-code platform that can be used to build externally facing websites on top of Microsoft's infrastructure without a lot of coding. 

To guarantee a layer of access control, the Power Pages system uses a layered approach when it comes to writing a custom website. A site's permissions can be configured from a table level, a column level, or a column-level. Despite these risks, misconfigurations of these settings can unintentionally expose sensitive data to the public internet when businesses misconfigure these settings.  Organizers can expose more columns to the Web API than are necessary, thereby increasing the potential attack surface of their applications. 

According to Aaron Costello, AppOmni's chief of SaaS security research, Power Pages users have to pay more attention to the software's security settings to ensure their information is protected, especially given the product's popularity. It was announced earlier this year that websites that are created using Power Pages have over 250 million users every month, according to a statement from Microsoft.  Several AppOmni and Microsoft 365 customers are now using AppOmni Insights to assist with the detection of these kinds of exposures and to provide subsequent remediation guidance if such exposures are found. 

For a detailed understanding of how these kinds of vulnerabilities can arise, it is worthwhile to first understand the platform's RBAC model and how Power Pages are constructed. In contrast to traditional custom web development, Power Pages has the following main advantages: out-of-the-box (OOB) role-based access control (RBAC), the option of using Microsoft's Dataverse as the database automatically and the ease of a drag-and-drop interface, which is made possible by prebuilt components, which greatly reduces the need for custom code in the design of the web site. 

Affording too many permissions to roles like "Anonymous Users" (non-authenticated visitors) and "Authenticated Users" (authenticated visitors) may expose an organization to potential data leaks, which may not have been anticipated. It is worth noting that Microsoft's customers have the option of easily deploying these data-driven web applications. However, if these applications are mismanaged from a security perspective, they may have a heavy cost to pay for their security. This data is primarily made up of internal organization files as well as sensitive personal information regarding both users from inside the organization and those who register on the website and are registered to either organization. 


PII was recovered from most of these cases and consisted of full names, email addresses, phone numbers, and addresses for the home, in the majority of cases.  The information of over 1.1 million NHS employees was leaked by a large shared business service provider to the NHS, with many parts of the data including email addresses, telephone numbers, and even the addresses of the employees' homes, and this was being done without the employee's knowledge. 

In this particular case, the findings were fully disclosed responsibly and have been resolved since then. A lack of understanding of the access controls in Power Pages, as well as insecure custom code implementations are the main reasons for these data leaks. With excessive permissions given to unauthenticated users, any user may be able to extract records from the database if they have access to the readily available Power Page APIs available on the web. 

A Power Pages site also allows users to generate accounts and become authenticated with the help of APIs once they have registered. Users from outside of the company can also be granted global access for reading operations on the system. Researchers identified that the absence of column-level security in Microsoft Power Pages could enable unauthorized individuals to access sensitive data without restrictions. Additionally, it was noted that users often fail to replace sensitive information with masked strings, further exacerbating security vulnerabilities. 

In response, Microsoft has implemented multiple safeguards within the backend of Power Pages and Power Platform Apps. These measures include warning banners across all Power Platform admin console pages, as well as prominent alerts and warning icons on the table permissions configuration page of Power Pages. These updates aim to help administrators identify and address potentially risky configurations. This incident underscores the importance of proactive security practices in safeguarding sensitive data. Organizations utilizing Power Pages are encouraged to review and strengthen their configurations to mitigate risks and enhance overall security.

Reboot Revolution Protecting iPhone Users

 


Researchers at the University of Michigan (UMI) believe that Apple's new iPhone software has a novel security feature. It presents that the feature may automatically reboot the phone if it has been unlocked for 72 hours without being unlocked. 

As 404 Media reported later, a new technology called "inactivity reboot" was introduced in iOS 18.1, which forces devices to restart if their inactivity continues for more than a given period.  Aside from the Inactivity Reboot feature, Apple continues to enhance its security framework with additional features as part of its ongoing security enhancements. Stolen Data Protection is one of the features introduced in iOS 17.3. It allows the device to be protected against theft by requiring biometric authentication (Face ID or Touch ID) before allowing it to change key settings. 

There are various methods to ensure that a stolen device is unable to be reconfigured easily, including this extra layer of security. With the upcoming iOS 18.2 update, Apple intends to take advantage of a feature called Stolen Data Protection, which is set to be turned off by default to avoid confusing users. However, Apple plans to encourage users to enable it when setting up their devices or after a factory reset to maintain an optimal user experience. 

As a result, users will be able to have more control over the way their personal information is protected. Apple has quietly introduced a new feature to its latest iPhone update that makes it even harder for anyone to unlock a device without consent—whether they are thieves or law enforcement officers. With this inactivity reboot feature, Apple has made unlocking even more difficult for anyone. When an iPhone has been asleep or in lock mode for an extended period, a new feature is introduced with iOS 18.1 will automatically reboot it in addition to turning it off. 

A common problem with iPhones is that once they have been rebooted, they become more difficult to crack since either a passcode or biometric signature is required to unlock them. According to the terms of the agreement, the primary objective of this measure is to prevent thieves (or police officers) from hacking into smartphones and potentially accessing data on them. There is a new "inactivity reboot" feature included in iOS 18 that, according to experts who spoke to 404 Media, will restart the device after approximately four days of dormancy if no activity is made.

A confirmation of this statement was provided by Magnet Forensics' Christopher Vance in a law enforcement group chat as described in Magnet Forensics' Christopher Vance, who wrote that iOS 18.1 has a timer which runs out after a set amount of time, and the device then reboots, moving from an AFU (After First Unlock) state to a BFU (Before First Unlock) state at the end of this timer. According to 404 Media, it seems that the issue was discovered after officers from the Detroit Police Department found the feature while investigating a crime scene in Detroit, Michigan.

When officers were working on iPhones for forensic purposes in the course of their investigation, they noticed that they automatically rebooted themselves frequently, which made it more difficult for them to unlock and access the devices. As soon as the devices were disconnected from a cellular network for some time, the working theory was that the phones would reboot when they were no longer connected to the network.  

However, there are actually much simpler explanations that can be provided for this situation. The feature, which AppleInsider refers to as an inactivity reboot, is not based on the current network connection or the state of the battery on the phone, which are factors that may affect the reboot timer. The reboot typically occurs after a certain amount of time has elapsed -- somewhere around 96 hours in most cases.  Essentially, the function of this timer is identical to the Mac's hibernation mode, which is intended to put the computer to sleep as a precaution in case there is a power outage or the battery is suddenly discharged. 

During the BFU state of the iPhone, all data on the iPhone belongs to the user and is fully encrypted, and is nearly impossible for anyone to access, except a person who knows the user's passcode to be able to get into the device. However, when the phone is in a state known as "AFU", certain data can be extracted by some device forensic tools, even if the phone is locked, since it is unencrypted and is thus easier to access and extract.  

According to Tihmstar, an iPhone security researcher on TechCrunch, the iPhones in these two states are also known as "hot" devices or "cold" devices depending on their temperature.  As a result, Tihmstar was making a point to emphasize that the majority of forensic firms are focusing on "hot" devices in an AFU state as they can verify that the user entered the correct passcode in the iPhone's secure enclave at some point. A "cold" device, on the other hand, is considerably more difficult to compromise because its memory can not be easily accessed once the device restarts, so there is no easy way to compromise it.

The law enforcement community has consistently opposed and argued against new technology that Apple has implemented to enhance security, arguing that this is making their job more difficult. According to reports, in 2016, the FBI filed a lawsuit against Apple in an attempt to force the company to install a backdoor that would enable it to open a phone owned by a mass shooter. Azimuth Security, an Australian startup, ultimately assisted the FBI in gaining access to the phone through hacking. 

These developments highlight Apple’s ongoing commitment to prioritizing user privacy and data security, even as such measures draw criticism from law enforcement agencies. By introducing features like Inactivity Reboot and Stolen Data Protection, Apple continues to establish itself as a leader in safeguarding personal information against unauthorized access. 

These innovations underscore the broader debate between privacy advocates and authorities over the balance between individual rights and security imperatives in an increasingly digitized world.

Reimagining Healthcare with Synthetic Data

 


It has been espoused in the generative AI phenomenon that the technology's key uses would include providing personalized shopping experiences for customers and creating content. Nonetheless, generative AI can also be seen to be having a very real impact on fields such as healthcare, for example. There is a tectonic shift in healthcare and life sciences, as technology is being implemented and data-driven systems are being integrated. 

A must-follow trend in this revolution is the burgeoning use of synthetic data, a breakthrough advancement poised to reshape how medical research is conducted, AI is developed, and patient privacy will be protected in the coming years. Data available in synthetic format is comparable to data available in real-world format (such as real fibers such as hemp). In the course of human evolution, humans have created synthetic products to achieve our goals and to develop new products that improve our lives in many different ways. 

It's widely known that synthetic fiber is used in clothing, rope, industrial equipment, automobiles, and many other places. It is because of the ability to create synthetic fiber that a wide range of products can be created that are needed in modern life. Healthcare is another area where synthetic data can have an impact similar to that of traditional data. Synthetic data is created based on real-world data using a data synthesizer. 

These synthesizers may leverage different methods to create synthetic data that have the same statistical and correlative properties as the original data; however, they are completely independent from the real-world data (1, 2). Notably, synthetic data do not contain any personal identifying information which ensures personal privacy and full compliance with privacy regulations such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

The use of high-fidelity synthetic data for data augmentation is an area of growing interest in data science, generating virtual patient cohorts, such as digital twins, to estimate counterfactuals in silico trials, allowing for better prediction of treatment outcomes and personalised medicine. Synthetic data allows clinicians to use prompts to generate a conversation between a patient with depression and a therapist where they are discussing the onset of symptoms. 

Healthcare providers can also use partially synthetic data, which takes a real-life transcript and has AI adjust it to remove personally identifiable information or private health information, while still telling a cohesive story. This data can then be used to train AI models to develop transcripts, training materials and so on. Regardless of whether the data is fully or partially synthetic, the data can (and often is) adjusted as needed with additional prompts until it reaches the desired result. Healthcare is subjected to a variety of privacy rules through HIPAA. 

Eliminating these privacy concerns is a primary reason Read feels synthetic data is valuable in training models. With synthetic data, healthcare providers don’t need to use real people’s data to train models. Instead, they can generate a conversation that is representative of a specific therapeutic intervention without involving anyone’s protected health information. As Read explains, “Synthetic data also makes it easy to calibrate what we’re looking for — like to generate different examples of how a healthcare provider could say something explicitly or implicitly. This makes it easier to provide different examples and tighten up the information we provide to AI models to learn from, ensuring that we can teach it the right data for providing training or feedback to real-world clinicians.” 

Synthetic data also democratizes the ability of different healthcare organizations to train and fine-tune their own machine learning models. Whereas previously, an organization might need to provide hundreds (or even thousands) of hours of transcribed sessions between patients and clinicians as well as other data points, synthetic data erases this barrier to entry. Synthetic data allows for models to learn and build out responses at a much faster rate — which also makes it easier for new players in healthcare to enter the field. 

As Read’s insights reveal, the use of AI and synthetic data isn’t going to replace clinicians’ value or decision-making authority. But with the help of synthetic data, AI can help push clinicians in the right direction to ensure that there is greater standardization and adherence to best practices. As more providers begin to utilize synthetic data to ensure they are following best practices in all patient interactions and to get feedback on their sessions, they can elevate the quality of care for all. A similar impact could also be felt in the healthcare sector by the use of synthetic data similar to how traditional data would. 

With the help of a data synthesizer, it is possible to create synthetic data based on real-world data. It has been shown that these synthesizers can leverage different methods to produce synthetic data which are capable of being compared to the original data, even if those properties cannot be extracted from the original data, but they are completely independent of real-world data (1, 2). A distinctive feature of synthetic data is the absence of any personal identifying information, which ensures that the data is completely private to the individual and complies with all needed privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union. 

As a result of increasing interest in data science, the use of high-fidelity synthetic data for data augmentation is becoming increasingly popular. To better predict treatment outcomes and tailor medical treatments for individual patients, digital twins, and virtual cohorts are used to estimate counterfactuals in silico trials, allowing better predictions of treatment outcomes. As a result of synthetic data, clinicians can generate a conversation between patients with depression and therapists to demonstrate how their symptoms began, and these prompts can be used to guide the conversation. 

Providers of healthcare can also use partially synthetic data, which is a combination of a real-life transcript and AI processing that removes any personally identifiable information or private health information, while still telling a coherent story. By using this data, it can then be developed into the types of transcripts, materials for training, etc, that are needed for creating transcripts. Whether the data being used is synthetic data or not, it can (and often is) manipulated or adjusted, as necessary, with additional prompts, until it reaches the result that is desired regardless of whether the data is synthetic or not. 

HIPAA is a sort of Federal law that imposes a variety of privacy rules on the healthcare industry. The fact that Synthetic Data is useful in training models is because it can eliminate these privacy concerns, according to Read. To train models based upon synthetic data, healthcare providers do not need to rely on real person-to-person information. This would allow them to generate a conversation in which they would represent a specific therapeutic intervention, without involving any protected health information of anybody involved in such a conversation. 

Moreover, Read explains, "Synthetic data also allows us to calibrate our search in a much easier way - like for example, generating examples of how a healthcare provider would be able to send an implicit or explicit message to an individual." Moreover, synthetic data democratizes the possibility of various healthcare organizations to train and refine their own artificial intelligence models by enabling them to use synthetic data. 


An organization might have previously been required to provide hundreds (or even thousands) of hours of transcribed sessions between patients and clinicians, along with other information points about these sessions, in order to offer this service, but with synthetic data, businesses are no longer required to do so. Using synthetic data, it is possible for models to learn and develop responses at much faster rates as well, making it easier for new players in healthcare to enter the field to learn and build on existing responses. 

In light of Read's insights, it's important to emphasize that AI and synthetic data are not going to replace clinicians' capabilities or their decision-making authority as Read identifies. By using synthetic data, however, AI has the potential to help clinicians in the right direction to ensure that better standards of care are observed and that best practices are followed. As healthcare providers increasingly adopt synthetic data, they gain a valuable tool for adhering to best practices in patient interactions and enhancing the overall quality of care.

By leveraging synthetic data, practitioners can simulate various clinical scenarios, ensuring their approaches align with industry standards and ethical guidelines. This technology also enables providers to receive constructive feedback on their patient sessions, helping to identify areas for improvement and fostering continuous professional development. The integration of synthetic data into healthcare workflows not only supports more consistent and informed decision-making but also elevates the standard of care delivered to patients across diverse settings. By embracing synthetic data, providers can drive innovation, improve outcomes, and contribute to a more efficient and patient-centered healthcare ecosystem.

Volt Typhoon rebuilds malware botnet following FBI disruption

 


There has recently been a rise in the botnet activity created by the Chinese threat group Volt Typhoon, which leverages similar techniques and infrastructure as those previously created by the group. SecurityScorecard reports that the botnet has recently made a comeback and is now active again. It was only in May of 2023 that Microsoft discovered that the Volt Typhoon was stealing data from critical infrastructure organizations in Guam, which it linked to the Chinese government. This knowledge came as a result of a spy observing the threat actor stealing data from critical infrastructure organizations on US territory. 

Several Cisco and Netgear routers have been compromised by Chinese state-backed cyber espionage operation Volt Typhoon since September, to rebuild its KV-Botnet malware, which had previously been disrupted by the FBI and was unsuccessfully revived in January, reports said. A report by Lumen Technologies' Black Lotus Labs released in December 2023 revealed that outdated devices mostly powered Volt Typhoon's botnet from Cisco, Netgear, and Fortinet. 

The botnet was used to transfer covert data and communicate over unsecured networks. The US government recently announced that the Volt Typhoon botnet had been neutralized and would cease to operate. Leveraging the botnet's C&C mechanisms, the FBI remotely removed the malware from the routers and changed the router's IP address to a port that is not accessible to the botnet. 

Earlier this month, in response to a law enforcement operation aimed at disrupting the KV-Botnet malware botnet, Volt Typhoon, which is widely believed to be sponsored by the Chinese state, has begun to rebuild its malware botnet after law enforcement officials disrupted it in January. Among other networks around the world, Volt Typhoon is considered one of the most important cyberespionage threat groups and is believed to have infiltrated critical U.S. infrastructure at least for the past five years. 

To accomplish their objectives, they hack into SOHO routers and networking devices, such as Netgear ProSAFE firewalls, Cisco RV320s, DrayTek Vigor routers, and Axis IP cameras, and install proprietary malware that establishes covert communication channels and proxies, as well as maintain persistent access to targeted networks through persistent access. 

Volt Typhoon was a malicious botnet created by a large collection of Cisco and Netgear routers that were older than five years, and, therefore, were not receiving security updates as they were near the end of their life cycle as a result of having reached end-of-life (EOL) status. This attack was initiated by infecting devices with the KV Botnet malware and using them to hide the origin of follow-up attacks targeting critical national infrastructure (CNI) operations located in the US and abroad. 

There has been no significant change in Volt Typhoon's activity in the nine months since SecurityScorecard said they observed signs of it returning, which makes it seem that it is not only present again but also "more sophisticated and determined". Strike team members at SecurityScorecard have been poring over millions of data points collected from the organization's wider risk management infrastructure as part of its investigation into the debacle and have come to the conclusion that the organization is now adapting and digging in in a new way after licking its wounds in the wake of the attack. 

In their findings, the Strike Team highlighted the growing danger that the Volt Typhoon poses to the environment. To combat the spread of the botnet and its deepening tactics, governments and corporations are urgently needed to address weaknesses in legacy systems, public cloud infrastructures, and third-party networks, says Ryan Sherstobitoff, the senior vice president of SecurityScorecard's threat research and intelligence. "Volt Typhoon is not only a botnet that has resilience, but it also serves as a warning computer virus. 

In the absence of decisive action, this silent threat could trigger a critical infrastructure crisis driven by unresolved vulnerabilities, leading to a critical infrastructure disaster." It has been observed that Volt Typhoon has recently set up new command servers to evade the authorities through the use of hosting services such as Digital Ocean, Quadranet, and Vultr. Afresh SSL certificates have also been registered to evade the authorities as well. 

The group has escalated its attacks by exploiting legacy Cisco RV320/325 and Netgear ProSafe router vulnerabilities. According to Sherstobitoff, even in the short period that it took for the operation to be carried out, 30 per cent of the visible Cisco RV320/325 network equipment around the world was compromised. According to SecurityScorecard, which has been monitoring this matter for BleepingComputer, the reason behind this choice is likely to be based on geographical factors by the threat actors.

It would seem that the Volt Typhoon botnet will return to global operations soon; although the size of the botnet is nowhere near its previous size, it is unlikely that China's hackers will give up on their mission to eradicate the botnet. As a preventative measure, older routers should be replaced with more current models and placed behind firewalls. Remote access to admin panels should not be made open to the internet, and passwords for admin accounts should be changed to ensure that this threat is not created. 

To prevent exploitation of known vulnerabilities, it is highly recommended that you use SOHO routers that are not too old to install the latest firmware when it becomes available. Among the areas in which the security firm has found similarities between the previous Volt Typhoon campaigns and the new version of the botnet are its fundamental infrastructure and techniques. A vulnerability in the VPN of a remote access point located on the small Pacific island of New Caledonia was found by SecurityScorecard's analysis. As the network was previously shut down, researchers observed it being used once again to route traffic between the regions of Asia-Pacific and America, although the system had been taken down previously. 

Texas Oilfield Supplier Operations Impacted by Ransomware Incident

 


About two months before the Newpark Resources attack, oilfield services giant Halliburton had been afflicted with a cyberattack that it then disclosed in a regulatory filing, which occurred about two months earlier.  Last week, Halliburton, the world's largest energy services provider, announced that about $35 million in expenses were incurred because of the attack. Still, the impact on the company's finances is relatively small, especially considering Halliburton is one of the world's largest energy services providers.  

There was an incident in August when Halliburton, a global provider of services for the energy industry, had to shut down the systems of some of its subsidiaries due to a cyber attack. In most cases, this type of breach involves unauthorized access by third parties; oftentimes, this leads to operations being disrupted, systems being shut down, and incident response plans being activated as a result of the breach. A cyber-response plan was activated at that time and a comprehensive investigation was conducted internally with the assistance of external advisors to assess and remedy any unauthorized activity that the company was aware of at that time.  

Halliburton announced last week that in its third-quarter results it incurred a pretax charge of $116 million as a result of severity costs, impairment of assets held for sale, expenses related to cybersecurity incidents, gains on equity investments, and other items. The company said in the release that it recorded a pretax charge of $116 million in the third quarter of 2024. In a report released on Tuesday, Halliburton's chairman, president, and CEO, Jeff Miller, said that Halliburton "experienced a $0.02 per share impact on its adjusted earnings from storms in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Gulf of Mexico due to the August cybersecurity event." 

While the update is not in any way noteworthy, Andy Watkin-Child, founding partner at Veritas GRC told LinkedIn it shows cyber incidents are moving to the top of the corporate agenda, in a post on the social media platform. The board of directors is more transparent, as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission when it comes to the impact of cyber incidents. Following the attack on Halliburton, the company had to postpone billing and collection activities, as well as put a halt on its share buyback program. 

According to the company, the full impact will not be material for the company's operations in the long run.   The Newpark Resources Group announced this week that access to certain information systems and business applications has been disrupted due to a ransomware attack that has hit their network. According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the incident was discovered on October 29 and a cybersecurity response plan was activated immediately, the Texas-based company that provides drilling fluids systems and composite matting systems for the oilfield sector, said in its statement. 

In his statement, Newpark stated that "the incident has caused disruptions and limitations in access to certain of the company's information systems and business applications that support aspects of the company's operations and corporate functions, including financial and operational reporting systems", and the company is still paying the price. To continue operating uninterruptedly, the company reverted to downtime procedures, allowing it to safely continue manufacturing and field operations during the downtime period.  

Based on the company's current understanding of the facts and circumstances regarding this incident, this incident appears not to have a reasonably likely impact on the company's financial situation or its results of operations, the company said in a statement. Newpark declined to provide information about how the attackers accessed its network, as well as who might have been responsible for the incident, nor did it explain how they gained access. No ransomware group is known to be claiming responsibility for the attack, according to SecurityWeek. 

About two months before the Newpark Resources breach, there was also a cyberattack on oilfield services giant Halliburton that was also announced in a regulatory filing by that company.  The company has just reported that as a result of the attack, Halliburton has incurred approximately $35 million in expenses. However, given that the company is one of the leading energy service companies in the world, the financial impact is relatively small.  

The incident at Newpark Resources highlighted the importance of network segmentation in protecting networks, according to Chris Grove, director of cybersecurity strategy at Nozomi Networks. He says that when networks are under attack, network segmentation can ensure their security.  According to Grove, separating OT from IT is one way to minimize the risk of a security breach and possibly hurt key operations if there is a breach. However, organizations are facing an increasingly pressing challenge: securing the advantages of segmentation while enabling controlled connectivity, which is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. 

Cybersecurity Dive has been informed by researchers from NCC Group via email that there has been no public leak of data from the Newpark Resources attack and that there has been no claim made regarding the leak.  Neither the company nor the company's shareholders have been able to determine what costs and financial impacts will be associated with this incident, but about the company's financial condition and results of operations, they believe that the attack "is not reasonably likely to have a material impact."

As a manufacturer, seller, and rental company, Newpark Resources is dedicated to serving the petroleum industry and various other sectors related to energy, such as pipelines, renewable energy, petrochemicals, construction, and oilfields. In its Thursday earnings report, the Woodlands, Texas-based company disclosed quarterly revenue exceeding $44 million and projected an annual revenue reaching up to $223 million. This performance underscores the company's strong market presence despite recent challenges, though it remains under pressure following a recent ransomware attack by unidentified cyber actors. 

As of Thursday, no specific hacking group had taken responsibility for the attack. The oil and gas sector recognized as a globally essential industry, has increasingly become a focal point for ransomware attacks. Due to the industry’s high financial stakes and critical role in infrastructure, it is often targeted by cybercriminals who expect ransom payments to restore access to compromised systems. Notably, ransomware incidents have affected major players in the sector. Over the past four years, corporations such as Shell, Halliburton, Colonial Pipeline, Encino Energy, Oiltanking, and Mabanaft have experienced cybersecurity breaches that have disrupted operations and prompted significant financial and reputational impacts.

These incidents have drawn heightened attention from government entities, prompting federal authorities to pursue enhanced cybersecurity measures across critical infrastructure sectors. The rise in ransomware attacks has spurred the government to implement stricter cybersecurity regulations, with mandates designed to bolster defense mechanisms within vulnerable industries.

Global Companies Targeted by "CopyR(ight)hadamantys" Phishing Scam Using Advanced Infostealer Malware

 

Hundreds of organizations worldwide have recently fallen victim to a sophisticated spear-phishing campaign, where emails falsely claiming copyright infringement are used to deliver an advanced infostealer malware.

Since July, Check Point Research has tracked the distribution of these emails across regions like the Americas, Europe, and Southeast Asia. Each email originates from a unique domain, and hundreds of Check Point’s clients have been targeted, suggesting the campaign's scope may be even broader.

The emails are designed to provoke recipients into downloading Rhadamanthys, a powerful infostealer capable of extracting sensitive data, such as cryptocurrency wallet information. Check Point researchers refer to the campaign as "CopyR(ight)hadamantys" and note the use of automated tools to send emails from different addresses. This automation can lead to awkward results, such as emails written in incorrect languages, limiting the emails’ ability to impersonate recognizable brands effectively. Roughly 70% of impersonated companies belong to the tech or media and entertainment sectors, including Check Point itself.

The phishing emails claim that the recipient has violated copyright laws by posting unauthorized content online. According to Sergey Shykevich, threat intelligence manager at Check Point, these accusations often cause recipients to question if they mistakenly used copyrighted material, increasing the chance they'll download the malware.

Recipients are directed to download a password-protected file, which contains a link leading to Dropbox or Discord. This file holds a decoy document, a legitimate program, and a malicious DLL (dynamic link library) that installs Rhadamanthys. Rhadamanthys stands out as one of the most sophisticated information-stealing tools sold on the dark web, priced around $1,000—significantly higher than other infostealers, which typically range from $100 to $200. Rhadamanthys is known for its modularity, obfuscation, and stealth, making detection much more challenging.

One notable feature of Rhadamanthys is its machine-learning-based OCR (optical character recognition) component. While limited in capability—it struggles with complex fonts and handwriting—this feature allows it to extract information from images and PDF files. The OCR module in the current campaign contains a dictionary of words tied to Bitcoin wallet security, suggesting a focus on cryptocurrency theft.

The CopyR(ight)hadamantys campaign aligns with financially motivated tactics, but Rhadamanthys has also been linked to state-sponsored actors, including Iran’s Void Manticore and the pro-Palestinian Handala group. Organizations are advised to enhance phishing defenses, though this campaign has an additional, unusual feature.

Once deployed, the malicious DLL creates a much larger file in the user’s Documents folder, disguised as a Firefox component. This larger version, though identical in function, uses an "overlay" of excess data, which serves two purposes: altering the file’s hash value, and potentially avoiding antivirus detection by exploiting a tendency of some programs to skip scanning large files.

According to Shykevich, organizations should monitor unusually large files downloaded via email, though legitimate files may also be large. He believes implementing effective download rules could help combat this tactic.

Veeam RCE Bug Now a Target for Frag Ransomware Operators

 


Recently, a critical VBR (Veeam Backup & Replication) security flaw was exploited by cyber thieves to distribute Frag ransomware along with the Akira and Fog ransomware attacks. Florian Hauser, a security researcher with Code White, has discovered that the vulnerability (tracked as CVE-2024-40711) is a result of the deserialization of untrusted data weakness that unauthenticated threat actors can abuse to gain remote code execution (RCE) on Veeam VBR servers by exploiting. 

Despite releasing a technical analysis of CVE-2024-40711 on September 9, Watchtower Labs delayed the release of a proof-of-concept exploit until September 15 to allow admins to take advantage of the security updates that Veeam released on September 4 for this vulnerability. 

According to Sophos researchers, ransomware operators are leveraging a critical vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication called CVE-2024-40711 to create rogue accounts and deploy malware to users in order to execute their attacks. On early September 2024, Veeam released security updates for the Service Provider Console, Veeam Backup & Replication, and Veeam One products to address several vulnerabilities that could undermine the security of their products.

The company fixed 18 issues with high or critical severity for these products. This September's security bulletin contains a critical, remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability tracked as CVE-2024-40711 that affects Veeam Backup & Replication (VBR), which has a CVSS v3.1 score of 9.8 (CVSS score of 10.4). A software product developed by the Veeam software company called Veeam Backup & Replication offers a comprehensive solution for data protection and disaster recovery. With this technology, companies are able to back up, restore, and replicate data across physical, virtual, and cloud environments at the same time. 

There is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel that allows unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE)." as stated in the advisory. The vulnerabilities were discovered by Florian Hauser, a researcher at CODE WHITE Gmbh who specializes in cybersecurity. In addition to Veeam Backup & Replication 12.1.2.172, earlier versions of version 12 are also affected by this flaw.  According to the Sophos X-Ops incident response team, the delay in releasing an exploit did not have much effect on the number of Akira and Fog ransomware attacks that were prevented. 

By exploiting the RCE vulnerability along with stolen credentials from the VPN gateway, the attackers were able to register rogue accounts on unpatched servers and exploit the RCE flaw. There was also a threat activity cluster, which was known as 'STAC 5881,' that was later found to have used exploits from CVE-2024-40711 to download Frag ransomware onto compromised networks, as a result of attacks that exploited CVE-2024-40711. 

According to Sean Gallagher, a principal threat researcher at Sophos X-Ops, the tactics associated with STAC 5881 were used again, this time, however, they led to the deployment of the previously undocumented 'Frag' ransomware which is now being referred to as Black Drop. There is a possibility that the threat actor exploited a vulnerability in the VEEAM component to gain access to the system, created a new account named 'point', and accessed the system from that account. As a result of this incident, a second account has also been created, known as 'point2'. 

Anew report by British cybersecurity company Agger Labs revealed that the Frag ransomware gang has made extensive use of Living Off The Land binaries (LOLBins), a type of software that is already installed on compromised computers and which is commonly known as Living Off The Land software (LOLBins). Defendants have a hard time detecting their activity due to the fact that this is difficult to detect. According to the Frag gang's playbook, the playbook of Akira and Fog operators is somewhat similar, as they often exploit vulnerabilities in unpatched backup and storage software and misconfigurations in the solutions that they deploy. This vulnerability has a high severity and can allow malicious actors to breach backup infrastructure if not patched. Veeam patched another high severity vulnerability in March 2023, CVE-2023-27532. There has been extensive use of this exploit in attacks linked to the financially motivated FIN7 threat group and in Cuba ransomware attacks that targeted companies and institutions critical to the American economy. 

Over 500,000 consumers worldwide rely on Veeam's products, including approximately 74% of all companies from the Global 2,000 list. Veeam reports that its products are used by over 550,000 customers worldwide. Agger Labs, a cybersecurity firm, also noted that tactics, techniques, and practices used by the threat actors behind Frag share many similarities to those used by Akira and Fog threat actors in their tactics, techniques, and practices. 

The main reason why Frag ransomware can remain stealthy is that it uses LOLBins, an approach that has been widely adopted by more traditional actors in the cybercrime sphere. The attackers can now bypass endpoint detection systems by employing familiar, legitimate software already present on most networks to conduct malicious operations. The fact that ransomware crews are adapting their approaches to ransomware shows that they are changing their approach despite not being new to the threat actor space.” 

Agger Labs notes. Despite Frag's use of LOLBins, the function has been used by ransomware strains like Akira and Fog which also use similar techniques to blend in with normal network activity and hide from detection.". As a result of using LOLBins as a means of exploitation for malicious purposes, these operators make it harder for us to detect them timely.”