Over the years, zero trust has become a popular model adopted by organisations due to a growing need to ensure confidential information is kept safe, an aspect that organisations view as paramount in cybersecurity. Zero-trust is a vital security framework that is fundamentally not like the traditional security perimeter-based model. Instead of relying on a robust boundary, zero-trust grants access to its resources after the constant validation of any user and every device they use, regardless of an individual's position within an organisation or the number of years since one first employed with the company. This "never trust, always verify" policy only grants minimum access to someone, even a long-tenured employee, about what is needed to fulfil their tasks. Because information for cybersecurity is often log file data, zero trust principles can provide better safeguarding of this sensitive information.
Log Files: Why They Are Both Precious and Vulnerable
Log files contain information that reflects all the digital interplay happening on the network, hence can indicate any vulnerability on a system for remediation purposes. For example, it's a good source where one will trace how companies' activities go regarding their performance by analysing log files for anything out of place or anomalies in systems' behaviours for speedy intervention for security lapses. At the same time, however, these log files can expose organisations to vulnerabilities when wrong hands gain access because of possible theft of confidential data or the intention of hacking or modification. The log files have to be strictly controlled and limited only for authorization, because the misuse has to be avoided for maintaining the network secure.
Collecting and Storing Log Data Securely
Zero trust can best be implemented only if gathering and storing of log file collection and storage are sound. It ensures that the real-time data is collected in an environment that has a tamper-resistant place that prevents data from unauthorised modification. Of late, there has been OpenTelemetry, which is gaining popularity due to its potential in the multiple data sources and secure integration with many databases, mostly PostgreSQL.
Secure log storage applies blockchain technology. A decentralised, immutable structure like blockchain ensures logs cannot be altered and their records will remain transparent as well as tamper-proof. The reason blockchain technology works through multiple nodes rather than one central point makes it nearly impossible to stage a focused attack on the log data.
Imposing Least Privilege Access Control
Least privilege access would be one of the greatest principles of zero-trust security, which means that end-users would have only access to what is required to achieve their task. However, it can be challenging when balancing this principle with being efficient in log analysis; traditional access control methods-such as data masking or classification-frequently fall short and are not very practical. One promising solution to this problem is homomorphic encryption, which enables analysis of data in its encrypted state. Analysts can evaluate log files without ever directly seeing the unencrypted data, ensuring that security is maintained without impacting workflow.
Homomorphic encryption is beyond the level of the analyst. This means other critical stakeholders, such as administrators, have access to permissions but are not allowed to read actual data. This means logs are going to be secure at internal teams and thus there is a lesser chance of accidental exposure.
In-House AI for Threat Detection
Companies can further secure log data by putting in-house AI models which are run directly within their database and hence minimise external access. For instance, the company can use a private SLM AI that was trained specifically to analyse the logs. This ensures there is safe and accurate threat detection without having to share any logs with third-party services. The other advantage that an AI trained on relevant log data provides is less bias, as all operations depend on only relevant encrypted log data that can give an organisation precise and relevant insights.
Organisations can ensure maximum security while minimising exposure to potential cyber threats by applying a zero-trust approach through strict access controls and keeping data encrypted all through the analysis process.
Zero-Trust for Optimal Log Security
One of the effective log file intelligence approaches appears to be zero trust security-a security approach that uses the technologies of blockchain and homomorphic encryption to ensure the integrity and privacy of information in management. It means one locks up logs, and it is a source for valuable security insights, kept well protected against unauthorised access and modifications.
Even if an organisation does not adopt zero-trust completely for its systems, it should still ensure that the protection of the logs is considered a priority. By taking the essential aspects of zero-trust, such as having minimal permissions and secured storage, it can help organisations decrease their vulnerability to cyber attacks while protecting this critical source of data.
In a landmark case, data storage major Western Digital has been asked to pay the highest fine of $315.7 million for violating patents associated with data encryption technology. SPEX Technologies owns these patents, having acquired them from Spyrus that developed the encryption technology. These technologies are used in older storage devices like PCMCIA and Compact Flash cards.
The jury concluded that many of Western Digital's self-encrypting storage devices infringed on these patents, which led to the hefty damages awarded. The case has been ongoing since 2016 when SPEX first sued Western Digital for using its patented technology without permission. Patents US6088802A and US6003135A, together at the heart of this case, dealt with the only plausible data encryption methods allowing secure operation of the peripherals and the host without compromising the security of the data.
Patents at the Heart of Controversy
The patents involved here deal with filed inventions in 1997 related to the protection of communication or interaction based on data in external storage that connects to computers. They have been applied in ancient standards, including PCMCIA and Compact Flash cards. Despite their patents having expired in 2017, they filed the lawsuits prior to expiration, so the case is technically valid. These patents are crafted specifically to allow encryption processes meant to safeguard the data, especially during the transfer from a peripheral device to a host computer.
Western Digital Response
Western Digital has strongly protested the allegations and clarified that it did not violate any patents. The company issued a dissent and said it would appeal after the jury verdict. Western Digital will file post-trial motions to challenge the verdict and will seek an appeal at higher courts if there is an unfavourable outcome.
This patent-related issue is not the first that Western Digital Corp. has faced. The company was recently held liable by the same court, a few months back, for violating patents on increasing capacity in hard drives. Because of this, the court ordered Western Digital to pay over $262 million in damages.
An Ongoing Dispute
This is one more protracted case in the judicial branch that has been taking years. SPEX Technologies sued Western Digital, and as this case continues, it reminds the industry that intellectual property still is the epicentre of technology, even though the older technology has evolved with time and in its effect has shown its influence on newer technologies developed into the future. The case reminds the world of one of the financial risks that companies face when patent disputes and intellectual property rights issues happen.
The two judgments already passed against Western Digital are substantial and have placed the spotlight on its real legal and financial challenges in protecting its technology and the costs of such lawsuits. A decision in the appeals will tell whether this technology will be returned to Western Digital, or it will have to pay the announced fines.
In the meantime, this case serves as a cautionary tale for other tech companies, especially by ensuring that they remain vigilant about patent rights whenever legacy technologies are still intact and protected by law.
Future Implications
This may bring tighter scrutiny of intellectual property and a re-examination on the part of companies of the technology that's being used in their products, even if it seems outdated. This case is being watched closely by the tech community as it may set a precedent for future litigation involving expired patents and the fast-changing world of data security.
Western Digital's troubles are far from over because it will currently have to navigate its appeal, manage its reputation, and continue operations. Sure enough, this case will command close attention in the tech industry and speak to all who operate from this new platform within patent law and data encryption technologies.
The cybercrime world is ever-changing, and hackers are preparing for a future quantum computer that might make current encryption techniques useless. This is called "harvest now, decrypt later," a rising phenomenon since cybercriminals steal encrypted data with hope for the time when, decrypted, it will become easy using quantum computers. Businesses must be aware of this new threat and use measures of proaction in their data protection.
Encryption has been one of the most essential practices that organisations have been carrying out for years, keeping any of the sensitive information being used to communicate, financial records, and personal information. New advances in quantum computing, however, create a potential danger that today's encryption would be relatively easy to break in the near future. Hackers are aware of this and are more aggressively collecting encrypted data that will wait for the quantum computers' ability to break down cryptographic codes.
Already, it's the reality of cyberattacks. Today, more than 70% of ransomware attacks include exfiltration of data before encrypting it. Cybercriminals are banking on quantum computing ultimately making decryption of taken data possible, no matter how safe they are today.
Threat from Quantum Computing to Encryption
There is a fundamental difference between quantum and traditional computing. In a classical computer, a bit is either one or zero. A qubit in a quantum computer, through superposition characteristic of it, is both one and zero at the same time, so that quantum computers are enabled to calculate at unprecedented speeds on complex calculations.
For instance, it would take a classical computer trillions of years to break a 2,048-bit encryption; a quantum computer can do this in a few seconds. Quantum technology is not available on a massive scale yet, but scientists predict that it will be implemented within ten years, causing hackers to put aside the data they want to encrypt in advance-by storing it encrypted today.
What Data Are Hackers Targeting?
In general terms, hackers have historically been most interested in stealing PII, which includes names, addresses, social security numbers, and even financial information. Such details are patently valuable for identity theft purposes and far more nefarious undertakings. With quantum computing, of course, hackers will no longer be limited to stealing data from databases but rather can intercept data as it travels between the web browser and server or even exploit vulnerabilities existing within internal networks.
This effectively means that companies must be even more careful to safeguard the very foundations of their HR and financial structures, communications, and any partnerships they hold. When quantum computing becomes ubiquitous, no encrypted data will ever remain safe unless new methods impervious to quantum decryption are deployed.
The Quantum Decryption Consequences
As a result, severe consequences will be meted out to businesses if they do not prepare for the quantum era. If hackers decrypt the data, the taken data may lead to initiating account takeovers, revealing identity theft campaigns that may have begun, and running targeted cyberattacks. The average cost of a data breach already runs into millions of dollars; it has risen from $4.35 million in 2022 to $4.45 million in 2023. These figures may see a great uptrend as quantum computing becomes a reality.
On the legal side, one of the main issues is possible legal implications. Companies that cannot protect client information may face billions in penalties and damage their reputation as jurisdictions worldwide are hardening their data protection measures.
Why Begin Preparing Now?
While quantum computing may not be commercially available yet, businesses cannot wait. It may take many years before the average hacker gets his hands on quantum technology, but well-funded groups-nation-states or corporate competitors-will probably soon get to use it. Companies should act now, not just to avoid losing money but to get ahead of advanced cyber threats.
Also, the development in quantum computer technology speeds up quickly. Although current quantum computers are of high price and complexity, a recent breakthrough came from a Chinese startup regarding portable consumer-grade quantum computers; this means that such quantum computers might appear more useful even sooner than thought.
Protecting Businesses Against Quantum Computing Threats
As quantum computing rapidly evolves, businesses need to take decisive actions to protect their data from future risks. Here are key steps to consider:
1. Adopt Post-Quantum Cryptography: Organisations should prioritise implementing encryption methods that are resistant to quantum computing, following the guidelines from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). By transitioning to post-quantum cryptographic standards as soon as they become available, businesses can secure their data from potential quantum-powered attacks.
2. Improve Breach Detection: Strengthening breach detection capabilities is essential. By monitoring for indicators of compromise, businesses can identify potential attacks early, allowing security teams to respond quickly. This could involve changing compromised passwords or encrypting sensitive data before hackers can exploit it.
3. Use Quantum-Safe VPNs: As quantum-safe virtual private networks (VPNs) are developed, they can provide an additional layer of security by protecting data in transit. These VPNs will ensure that hackers cannot intercept sensitive communications or steal data while it is being transmitted between systems.
4. Move Sensitive Data to Secure Locations: Business leaders should evaluate whether decrypted data poses significant risks and move critical information to secure offline storage if necessary. For highly sensitive data, businesses may need to implement segmented networks, strict access controls, or even revert to paper-based systems to protect it from potential quantum threats.
The Time to Act Is Now
With quantum computing on the horizon, businesses must begin preparing for a future where these technologies could be used to break traditional encryption. By adopting quantum-resistant cryptography, improving breach detection, and securely storing sensitive data, companies can reduce the risk of falling victim to quantum-driven cyberattacks. While quantum computers may still be years away, the consequences of failing to prepare could be disastrous. Now is the time for decision-makers to take proactive measures to protect their data before it's too late.
We live in a world of online cloud storage, where all our data is accessible everywhere and on any gadget. This has made the act of having physical storage media a lesser concern than it once used to be and more like a throwaway gadget with which we can do some cool things.
However, removing movies and episodes from streaming services and continual modifications to social media and other online archives have made physical storage more necessary than anything. We've all had a flash drive at some point, and they've grown throughout time, getting larger and more reliable.
With more than 40 lakh attacks on IoT (Internet of Things) devices, India is among one of the Top 10 Victims Countries lists in the world. This can be a disappointment for Tech Freaks and companies that have just begun using IoT devices but don't consider protecting their IoT devices such as smart cameras. Hackers didn't even flinch while penetrating the systems. That's how simple the breakthrough was.
“Simple methods like password guessing are used for getting the entry in IoT devices. Some sufferers of these attacks set passwords as naive as 'Admin.' And now, India has made it to the index of the top 10 countries that fell prey to IoT attacks in 2019,” reported CySecurity in 2019.
When looking for external storage, you may come across the IronKey series, a pretty flashy and eye-catching name for a simple flash drive. What distinguishes these from conventional flash drives and makes them so expensive? And, more importantly, is it worthwhile? Here's your comprehensive guide on understanding the IronKey.
IronKey is a flash drive brand created in the early 2000s by IronKey, a Homeland Security-funded Internet security and privacy startup that was later bought by Kingston. These were designed to provide additional security for the government, military, and business clients. While they function similarly to other flash drives, IronKey's hardware encryption differentiates it (and makes it rather pricey).
Though software encryption is simple and secure for most files, it is not as extensive or as powerful as hardware encryption, which integrates a cryptoprocessor into the device. The IronKey flash drive uses 256-bit AES hardware-based encryption in XTS mode, as well as FIPS 140-2 Level 3 validation and on-device Cryptochip Encryption Key management.
When you remove the flash drive, it senses physical tampering and immediately safeguards your data. You can use a sophisticated password or a secret phrase of up to 255 characters long to get to the files for further security, and if you fail to enter the right password ten times, the drive immediately shuts down and optionally destroys the files.
So, do you require one? That varies on how you intend to make use of it. If you solely store schoolwork or images, paying $77 for an 8GB flash drive may be expensive. However, if you have sensitive corporate records or government secrets, it may be worth spending a bit more to avoid being the victim of a security breach.
Apple has taken another significant step towards improving the security of its messaging platform, iMessage. The introduction of Contact Key Verification adds an extra layer of security to iMessage conversations, protecting user data and privacy. In this article, we will explore what Contact Key Verification is and why it matters.
iMessage is a popular messaging platform known for its end-to-end encryption, which ensures that only the sender and the recipient can read the messages. With the new Contact Key Verification feature, Apple is making iMessage even more secure by allowing users to verify the identity of the person they are messaging with.
Contact Key Verification uses public key cryptography to establish a secure connection between the sender and receiver. Each iMessage user has a unique public key, which is stored on Apple's servers. When a user sends a message, their public key is used to encrypt the message. The recipient's device then uses their private key to decrypt and read the message. This ensures that only the intended recipient can access the content.
But what Contact Key Verification does differently is that it allows users to confirm that the public key used for encryption belongs to the person they intend to communicate with. This extra layer of verification prevents man-in-the-middle attacks, where an attacker intercepts and decrypts messages meant for someone else.
The implementation of Contact Key Verification is simple. Users can access the feature by tapping on the contact's name or picture in the chat. They can then view the contact's key and verify it through various methods like scanning a QR code or comparing a series of numbers with the contact in person.
This additional security feature is essential in today's digital landscape, where data breaches and cyberattacks are increasingly common. It ensures that even if someone gains access to your device, they cannot impersonate you or read your messages without proper verification.
Apple's commitment to user privacy is evident in this move. By giving users control over their message security, they are ensuring that iMessage remains one of the most secure messaging platforms available. Moreover, the public key infrastructure used in Contact Key Verification is a proven method for securing digital communications.
Protecting your organization's data is more important than ever in an era where digital dangers are pervasive and cyberattacks are increasing in frequency and sophistication. Recognizing the pressing need for heightened cybersecurity, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) have joined forces to release a comprehensive list of the 'Top 10 Cybersecurity Misconfigurations.' As identified by the two agencies, these misconfigurations represent common vulnerabilities that malicious actors often exploit to infiltrate systems, steal data, or disrupt operations.
According to a recent report by Sophos, a global leader in cybersecurity, more than two-thirds (68%) of manufacturing companies hit by ransomware attacks globally had their data encrypted by hackers. This is the highest reported encryption rate for the sector over the past three years and is in line with a broader cross-sector trend of attackers more frequently succeeding in encrypting data.
Ransomware attacks have become an increasingly common threat to businesses and organizations of all sizes. These attacks involve hackers gaining access to a company's computer systems and encrypting their data, making it inaccessible to the company. The hackers then demand a ransom payment in exchange for the decryption key.
The manufacturing industry has been particularly hard hit by these attacks. Despite an increase in the percentage of manufacturing organizations that used backups to recover data, with 73% of the manufacturing firms using backups this year versus 58% in the previous year, the sector still has one of the lowest data recovery rates.
This highlights the importance of companies taking proactive measures to protect themselves against ransomware attacks. This includes regularly backing up important data, keeping software and systems up to date with the latest security patches, and training employees on how to recognize and avoid phishing emails and other common attack vectors.
In addition to these preventative measures, companies should also have a plan in place for how to respond in the event of a ransomware attack. This includes knowing who to contact for assistance, having a communication plan for informing customers and other stakeholders and having a plan for how to restore operations as quickly as possible.
The threat of ransomware attacks is not going away anytime soon. By taking proactive steps to protect themselves, companies can reduce their risk of falling victim to these attacks and minimize the impact if an attack does occur.
But now data storage has witnessed a massive breakthrough in technology, thanks to cloud storage solutions. Some of the prominent cloud storage services like Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, and Apple iCloud Drive made it dead simple to back up, store, and keep our documents synced across devices.
Although, this convenience came to the users at a cost of privacy. When we use any of the Big 4's major cloud services, we theoretically give them—or anybody who can hack them—access to whatever we keep on their cloud, including our financial and health information, as well as our photos, notes, and diaries.
One of the major reasons why user privacy is at stake is because all four prominent cloud service providers meagerly encrypt the documents while uploading. Since these documents are not end-to-end encrypted, it indicates that the user is the only one with the ability to decrypt.
Minimal encryption would mean that the service provider too holds the key to decrypt users’ documents, and is capable of doing so at all times. Moreover, in some severe instances, a hacker may as well get hold of the decryption key.
Out of the four major cloud services, Apple is the only service provider with Advanced Data Protection for iCloud, launched recently, which enables users to choose to have their documents end-to-end encrypted when stored in iCloud Drive. This makes Apple void of any access to the files, ensuring the user’s privacy. However, this setting is still optional, making the merely encrypted iCloud Drive a default setting.
Since the remaining three major cloud storage providers are yet to provide users with the choice of end-to-end encryption and taking into consideration the exploded usage of such personal cloud services in recent years, billions of users are currently at risk of getting their sensitive documents exposed to the third party.
It is possible to use the popular cloud storage services while preventing anyone who gains access to your account from seeing the files stored therein by encrypting those files prior to uploading them. The best part? You do not require a computer scientist or a security developer to do so. With the numerous applications, that are available for free, one could encrypt any file on one's own.
One such well-known encryption program is Encrypto, sponsored by a company called MacPaw. You may drag a file into the program, give it a password, and then encrypt it using industry AES-256 encryption. The software then enables you to save a file with an encrypted version (.crypto file type).
After encrypting the files, the user can now upload the encrypted version of the file to their preferred cloud storage provider rather than the original file containing sensitive data. If your cloud storage is then compromised, the attacker should be unable to open the Crypto file without knowing the password the user has established for it.
Encrypto is a cross-platform tool that works on both Macs and Windows PCs, despite the fact that MacPaw is known for producing Mac-specific utility apps. The recipient merely needs to download the free Encrypto app to be able to open sensitive documents that have been sent to them over email and have been encrypted using Encrypto (and you need to let them know the password, of course).
Another nice feature that the app possesses is that it enables users to set different passwords for each file they create. One can even include a password hint in the encrypted file to remind what password is being used in the file. Users are advised to establish a password that would be difficult to decipher through brute force or something that would be difficult to guess.
This being said, no matter the choice of app, encrypting the files yourself before uploading them to Google Drive Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, or iCloud Drive adds an additional layer of encryption and security to the sensitive data while still maintaining to reap the numerous benefits of cloud storage.