Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Data Leak. Show all posts

DeepSeek Faces Ban From App Stores in Germany

 

DeepSeek, a competitor of ChatGPT, may face legal ramifications in the European Union after the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection ordered that Google and Apple remove the AI app from their stores. 

After discovering that the DeepSeek app violates the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information Meike Kamp issued a press release on June 27 urging Google and Apple to take the app down. The action follows Kamp's earlier request that DeepSeek either voluntarily remove its app from Germany or alter its procedures to safeguard the data of German users, neither of which DeepSeek did. 

"The transfer of user data by DeepSeek to China is unlawful. DeepSeek has not been able to provide my office with convincing evidence that data of German users is protected in China at a level equivalent to that of the European Union. Chinese authorities have extensive access rights to personal data held by Chinese companies,” Kamp stated. 

"In addition, DeepSeek users in China do not have enforceable rights and effective legal remedies as guaranteed in the European Union. I have therefore informed Google and Apple, as operators of the largest app platforms, of the violations and expect a prompt review of a blocking.” 

This does not imply that DeepSeek will be removed from the Google Play Store or App Store right away. Apple and Google must consider Kamp's request and choose their course of action. If the app is eventually taken down, it probably won't affect users in other countries; it might only be blocked in Germany or the EU broadly. Despite this, millions of users may be looking for a new favourite AI software, given that DeepSeek had over 50 million downloads on the Google Play Store as of July 2025.

In any case, given this news, some users might wish to get rid of the app altogether. As Kamp's news statement states, "According to its own website, [DeepSeek] processes extensive personal data of users, including all text entries, chat histories, and uploaded files, as well as information about location, devices used, and networks.” 

Users who care about their data privacy, regardless of where they live, should likely be concerned about Kamp's office's increased efforts to have DeepSeek banned in Germany or to have it provide data protection that complies with EU regulations. However, the same could be said for the majority of social media and AI apps.

Axis Max Life Cyberattack: A Warning to the Indian Insurance Sector

 

On July 2, 2025, Max Financial Services revealed a cybersecurity incident targeting its subsidiary, Axis Max Life Insurance, India's fifth-largest life insurer. This incident raises severe concerns regarding data security and threat detection in the Indian insurance sector. 

The breach was discovered by an unknown third party who notified Axis Max Life Insurance of the data access, while exact technical specifics are still pending public release. In response, the company started: 

  • Evaluation of internal security 
  • Log analysis 
  • Consulting with cybersecurity specialists for investigation and remediation 

Data leaked during the breach 

The firm accepted that some client data could have been accessed, but no specific data types or quantities were confirmed at the time of the report. Given the sensitive nature of insurance data, the exposed data could include: 

  • Personally identifiable information (PII). 
  • Financial/Insurance Policy Data Contact and health information (common for life insurers) 

This follows a recent trend of PII-focused assaults on Indian insurers (e.g., Niva Bupa, Star Health, HDFC Life), indicating an increased threat to consumer data. 

Key takeaways

Learning of a breach from an anonymous third party constitutes a serious failure in internal threat identification and monitoring. Implement real-time threat detection across endpoints, servers, and cloud platforms with SIEM, UEBA, and EDR/XDR to ensure that the organisation identifies breaches before external actors do. 

Agents, partners, and tech vendors are frequently included in insurance ecosystems, with each serving as a possible point of compromise. Extend Zero Trust principles to all third-party access, requiring tokenised, time-limited access and regular security evaluations of suppliers with data credentials. 

Mitigation tips 

  • Establish strong data inventory mapping and access logging, particularly in systems that store personally identifiable information (PII) and financial records. 
  • Have a pre-established IR crisis communication architecture that is linked with legal, regulatory, and consumer response channels that can be activated within hours. 
  • Continuous vulnerability scanning, least privilege policies, and red teaming should be used to identify exploitable holes at both the technical and human layers. 
  • Employ continuous security education, necessitate incident reporting processes, and behavioural monitoring to detect policy violations or insider abuse early.

Qantas Investigates Cyber Attack That May Have Affected Millions of Customers

 



Qantas Airways has revealed that a cyber attack on one of its third-party service platforms may have compromised the personal data of up to six million customers. The breach was linked to a customer service tool used by a Qantas-operated call centre, and the airline confirmed that suspicious activity was detected earlier this week.

In an official statement, Qantas said a malicious actor gained access to this external platform, but the intrusion has since been contained. Investigations are ongoing to determine how much customer data was exposed, though initial findings suggest the impact could be significant.

The company confirmed that the exposed information may include customer names, contact numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, and frequent flyer membership numbers. However, Qantas clarified that no financial data—such as credit card details, bank information, or passport numbers—was stored on the affected system.

The airline also confirmed that sensitive account credentials, such as passwords, login PINs, and security information, were not accessed. Flight operations and the safety of air travel have not been affected by this breach.

Qantas Group CEO Vanessa Hudson addressed the incident, expressing regret over the situation. “Our customers place their trust in us to protect their personal data, and we deeply regret that this has occurred. We are contacting affected individuals directly and are committed to offering them full support,” she said.

To assist impacted customers, Qantas has launched a dedicated help centre offering expert guidance on identity protection. The support service is reachable at 1800 971 541 or +61 2 8028 0534 for international callers. Customers with upcoming flights have been assured that they do not need to take any action regarding their bookings.

Australian authorities have been notified, including the Australian Cyber Security Centre, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), and the Australian Federal Police. Qantas has pledged full cooperation with the agencies involved in the investigation.

Shadow Minister for Cyber Security Melissa Price commented on the breach during an interview with ABC, calling it a serious wake-up call for all Australian companies. She emphasized the need for transparency and continuous updates to the public when incidents of this scale occur.

This breach adds to a growing list of cybersecurity incidents in Australia. Other major organizations, including AustralianSuper and Nine Media, have also suffered data leaks in recent months.

Earlier this year, the OAIC reported that 2024 saw the highest number of recorded data breaches since tracking began in 2018. Australian Privacy Commissioner Carly Kind warned that the risks posed by cyber threats are growing and called on both private companies and public agencies to strengthen their defences.

As data breaches become more frequent and complex, cybersecurity remains a critical issue for businesses and consumers alike.

Swiss Health Foundation Ransomware Attack Exposes Government Data

 

The Swiss government is announcing that a ransomware assault at the third-party company Radix has affected sensitive data from multiple federal offices.

The Swiss authorities claim that the hackers obtained information from Radix systems and then posted it on the dark web. The nation's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) is assisting in the analysis of the leaked data to determine which government agencies are affected and to what extent. 

“The foundation Radix has been targeted by a ransomware attack, during which data was stolen and encrypted,” the Swiss government noted. “Radix’s customers include various federal offices. The data has been published on the dark web and will now be analyzed by the relevant offices.” 

Radix is a Zurich-based non-profit focused on health promotion. It operates eight competence centres that carry out projects and services for the Swiss federal government, cantonal and municipal corporations, and other public and private organisations. 

According to the organization's statement, Sarcoma ransomware affiliates penetrated its systems on June 16. Sarcoma is a newly emerging ransomware outfit that began operations in October 2024 quickly became one of the most active, claiming 36 victims in its first month. One notable example was an attack on PCB giant Unimicron. 

Phishing, supply-chain attacks, and outdated flaws are some of the ways Sarcoma gains access. Once RDP connections are exploited, the hackers usually proceed laterally across the network. The threat actor may encrypt the data in addition to stealing it in the final phase of the attack. On June 29, the ransomware outfit uploaded the stolen Radix data on their leak portal on the dark web, most likely after extortion attempts failed. 

Personalised alerts were sent to affected individuals, according to Radix, which also states that there is no proof that critical information from partner organisations was compromised. Radix advises potentially vulnerable users to be on guard over the next few months and to be cautious of attempts to obtain their account credentials, credit card details, and passwords in order to mitigate this risk. 

In March 2024, the Swiss government confirmed it had experienced a similar exposure via third-party software services provider Xplain, which was attacked by the Play ransomware gang on May 23, 2023. As a result of that incident, 65,000 Federal Administration documents were leaked, many of which included private and sensitive data.

FIR Filed After Noida Logistics Company Claims User Data Leaked

 

High-profile clients' private information, including that of top government officials, was leaked due to a significant cybersecurity incident at Agarwal Packers and Movers Ltd (APML) in India. Concerns over the security of corporate data as well as possible national security implications have been raised by the June 1 incident. An inquiry is still under progress after police filed a formal complaint. 

In what could be one of the most sensitive data breaches in recent memory, Agarwal Packers and Movers Ltd (APML), a well-known logistics company with its headquarters located in Sector 60, Noida, has disclosed that private client information, including the addresses and phone numbers of senior government clients, has been stolen. 

The intrusion was detected on June 1 after several clients, including prominent bureaucrats, diplomats, and military people, began receiving suspicious, highly targeted phone calls.

"The nature of the calls strongly indicated that the callers had access to specific customer queries and records related to upcoming relocations," the complainant, Jaswinder Singh Ahluwalia, Group President and CEO of APML, stated in the police FIR. He cautioned that this is more than just a disclosure of company data. It has an impact on personal privacy, public trust, and possibly national security. 

The company initiated an internal technical inspection, which uncovered traces of unauthorised cyber infiltration, confirming worries regarding a breach. The audit detected collaboration between internal personnel and external cybercriminals. While the scope of the hack is still being investigated, its significance is undeniable: the firm serves India's elite, making the stolen data a potential goldmine for bad actors. 

In accordance with Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66C (identity theft) and 66D (impersonation by computer resource) of the Information Technology Act, a formal complaint was filed at the Sector 36 Cyber Crime Police Station. 

According to Cyber SHO Ranjeet Singh, they have a detailed complaint with technological proof to back it up. At the moment, their cyber unit is looking through access trails, firewall activity, and internal server records. Due to the nature of clients impacted, the issue is being handled with the highest attention. 

The attack has triggered calls for stricter cybersecurity practices in private companies that serve sensitive sectors. While APML has yet to reveal how many people were affected, its internal records allegedly include relocation information for high-level clientele like as judges, intelligence officers, and foreign dignitaries.

Meta.ai Privacy Lapse Exposes User Chats in Public Feed

 

Meta’s new AI-driven chatbot platform, Meta.ai, launched recently with much fanfare, offering features like text and voice chats, image generation, and video restyling. Designed to rival platforms like ChatGPT, the app also includes a Discover feed, a space intended to showcase public content generated by users. However, what Meta failed to communicate effectively was that many users were unintentionally sharing their private conversations in this feed—sometimes with extremely sensitive content attached. 

In May, journalists flagged the issue when they discovered public chats revealing deeply personal user concerns—ranging from financial issues and health anxieties to legal troubles. These weren’t obscure posts either; they appeared in a publicly accessible area of the app, often containing identifying information. Conversations included users seeking help with medical diagnoses, children talking about personal experiences, and even incarcerated individuals discussing legal strategies—none of whom appeared to realize their data was visible to others. 

Despite some recent tweaks to the app’s sharing settings, disturbing content still appears on the Discover feed. Users unknowingly uploaded images and video clips, sometimes including faces, alongside alarming or bizarre prompts. One especially troubling instance featured a photo of a child at school, accompanied by a prompt instructing the AI to “make him cry.” Such posts reflect not only poor design choices but also raise ethical questions about the purpose and moderation of the Discover feed itself. 

The issue evokes memories of other infamous data exposure incidents, such as AOL’s release of anonymized user searches in 2006, which provided unsettling insight into private thoughts and behaviors. While social media platforms are inherently public, users generally view AI chat interactions as private, akin to using a search engine. Meta.ai blurred that boundary—perhaps unintentionally, but with serious consequences. Many users turned to Meta.ai seeking support, companionship, or simple productivity help. Some asked for help with job listings or obituary writing, while others vented emotional distress or sought comfort during panic attacks. 

In some cases, users left chats expressing gratitude—believing the bot had helped. But a growing number of conversations end in frustration or embarrassment when users realize the bot cannot deliver on its promises or that their content was shared publicly. These incidents highlight a disconnect between how users engage with AI tools and how companies design them. Meta’s ambition to merge AI capabilities with social interaction seems to have ignored the emotional and psychological expectations users bring to private-sounding features. 

For those using Meta.ai as a digital confidant, the lack of clarity around privacy settings has turned an experiment in convenience into a public misstep. As AI systems become more integrated into daily life, companies must rethink how they handle user data—especially when users assume privacy. Meta.ai’s rocky launch serves as a cautionary tale about transparency, trust, and design in the age of generative AI.

Massive Data Leak Exposes 16 Billion Login Records from Major Online Services

 

A recent investigation by Cybernews has uncovered a staggering 30 separate online datasets containing approximately 16 billion stolen login credentials from services including Apple, Google, and Facebook. These data dumps, discovered through open sources, appear to be the result of large-scale malware attacks that harvested user information through infostealers. 

Each dataset contains a URL alongside usernames and passwords, suggesting that malicious software was used to collect login details from infected devices. While some overlap exists among the records, the overall size and spread of the leak make it difficult to determine how many unique users have been compromised. 

Except for one dataset previously identified by cybersecurity researcher Jeremiah Fowler—which included over 185 million unique credentials—most of the remaining 29 databases had not been publicly reported before. These leaked collections are often only temporarily available online before being removed, but new compilations are regularly uploaded, often every few weeks, with fresh data that could be weaponized by cybercriminals. The exact sources and individuals behind these leaks remain unknown. 

To avoid falling victim to similar malware attacks, experts advise staying away from third-party download platforms, especially when obtaining software for macOS. Users are encouraged to download apps directly from the Mac App Store or, if not available there, from a developer’s official website. Using cracked or pirated software significantly increases the risk of malware infection. 

Phishing scams remain another common threat vector. Users should be cautious about clicking on links in unsolicited emails or messages. Even if a message appears to come from a trusted company, it’s vital to verify the sender’s address and inspect URLs carefully. You can do this by copying the link and pasting it into a text editor to see its actual destination before clicking. 

To reduce the chance of visiting malicious sites, double-check the spelling of URLs typed manually and consider bookmarking commonly used sites. Alternatively, using a search engine and clicking on verified results can reduce the risk of visiting typo-squatting domains. 

If you suspect your credentials may have been compromised, take immediate action. Start by updating passwords on any affected services and enabling two-factor authentication for added security. It’s also wise to check your financial statements for unauthorized activity and consider placing a freeze on your credit file to prevent fraudulent account openings. 

Additionally, tools like Have I Been Pwned can help verify if your email address has been part of a known breach. Always install the latest system and app updates, as they often include crucial security patches. Staying current with updates is a simple but effective defense against vulnerabilities and threats.

T-Mobile Denies Involvement After Hackers Claim Massive Customer Data Breach

 

T-Mobile is once again in the cybersecurity spotlight after a hacking group claimed to have obtained sensitive personal information belonging to 64 million customers. The hackers alleged the data was freshly taken as of June 1, 2025, and listed their find on a well-known dark web forum popular among cybercriminals and data traders.  

The leaked trove reportedly contains highly personal information, including full names, birthdates, tax identification numbers, addresses, contact details, device and cookie IDs, and IP addresses. Such data can be extremely valuable to cybercriminals for fraud, identity theft, or phishing attacks. Cybernews, which analyzed a sample of the data, confirmed its sensitive nature, raising alarm over the scale and potential damage of the breach.  

Yet, T-Mobile has come forward to strongly deny any connection to the alleged hack. In a statement to The Mobile Report, the telecom company asserted that the leaked data does not belong to T-Mobile or any of its customers. “Any reports of a T-Mobile data breach are inaccurate. We have reviewed the sample data provided and can confirm the data does not relate to T-Mobile or our customers,” the company stated. 

Despite T-Mobile’s denial, cybersecurity analysts remain cautious. Cybernews pointed out that portions of the leaked data mirror details from previous breaches that targeted T-Mobile, suggesting there may be some overlap with older incidents. This has sparked speculation that the latest claim may not be based on a new breach, but rather a repackaging of previously stolen information to create hype or confusion. 

Adding to the uncertainty, Have I Been Pwned—a trusted platform used to monitor data breaches—has yet to list the supposed breach, which could support the theory that the leaked data is not new. Still, the situation has left many T-Mobile customers in limbo, unsure whether their data has truly been compromised again. 

If the claims prove to be true, it would be another in a series of cybersecurity setbacks for T-Mobile. The company only recently began issuing compensation checks related to its 2021 data breach, suggesting that resolution in such matters can take years. 

For now, the legitimacy of this latest breach remains unclear. Until further evidence surfaces or an independent investigation confirms or refutes the claims, customers are advised to remain vigilant and monitor their accounts for any unusual activity.

Massive Data Leak Exposes Billions of Records in Suspected Chinese Surveillance Database

 

Cybersecurity experts have uncovered a massive trove of sensitive information left exposed online, potentially placing millions of individuals at significant risk. The discovery, made by researchers from Cybernews in collaboration with SecurityDiscovery.com, revealed an unsecured database totaling 631 gigabytes—containing an estimated four billion individual records. 

The open instance, which lacked any form of password protection, was quickly taken offline once the exposure was reported, but experts remain unsure about how long it had remained publicly accessible. The data, according to the investigation, appears to primarily concern Chinese citizens and users, with entries collected from various platforms and sources. 

Cybernews researchers believe this is not a random collection, but rather a systematically curated database. They described it as a tool capable of constructing detailed behavioral, social, and financial profiles of nearly any individual included in the records. The structured and diverse nature of the data has led analysts to suspect that the repository may have been created as part of a broader surveillance or profiling initiative. 

Among the most alarming elements of the database is the presence of extensive personally identifiable information (PII). The exposed details include full names, birth dates, phone numbers, financial records, bank card data, savings balances, debt figures, and personal spending patterns. Such information opens the door to a wide range of malicious activities—ranging from identity theft and financial fraud to blackmail and sophisticated social engineering attacks. 

A large portion of the exposed records is believed to originate from WeChat, the popular Chinese messaging app, which accounts for over 805 million entries. Another 780 million records relate to residential data tied to specific geographic locations. Meanwhile, a third major portion of the database labeled “bank” contains around 630 million records of financial and sensitive personal data. 

If confirmed, the scale of this leak could surpass even the National Public Data breach, one of the most significant data security incidents in recent memory. Experts are particularly troubled by the implications of a centralized data cache of this magnitude—especially one that may have been used for state-level surveillance or unauthorized commercial data enrichment. 

While the server hosting the information has been taken offline, the potential damage from such an exposure may already be done. Investigators continue to analyze the breach to determine its full impact and whether any malicious actors accessed the data while it was left unsecured.

Kettering Health Ransomware Attack Linked to Interlock Group

 

Kettering Health, a prominent healthcare network based in Ohio, is still grappling with the aftermath of a disruptive ransomware attack that forced the organization to shut down its computer systems. The cyberattack, which occurred in mid-May 2025, affected operations across its hospitals, clinics, and medical centers. Now, two weeks later, the ransomware gang Interlock has officially taken responsibility for the breach, claiming to have exfiltrated more than 940 gigabytes of data.  

Interlock, an emerging cybercriminal group active since September 2024, has increasingly focused on targeting U.S.-based healthcare providers. When CNN first reported on the incident on May 20, Interlock had not yet confirmed its role, suggesting that ransom negotiations may have been in progress. With the group now openly taking credit and releasing some of the stolen data on its dark web site, it appears those negotiations either failed or stalled. 

Kettering Health has maintained a firm position that they are against paying ransoms. John Weimer, senior vice president of emergency operations, previously stated that no ransom had been paid. Despite this, the data breach appears extensive. Information shared by Interlock indicates that sensitive files were accessed, including private patient records and internal documents. Patient information such as names, identification numbers, medical histories, medications, and mental health notes were among the compromised data. 

The breach also impacted employee data, with files from shared network drives also exposed. One particularly concerning element involves files tied to Kettering Health’s in-house police department. Some documents reportedly include background checks, polygraph results, and personally identifiable details of law enforcement staff—raising serious privacy and safety concerns. In a recent public update, Kettering Health announced a key development in its recovery process. 

The organization confirmed it had restored core functionalities of its electronic health record (EHR) system, which is provided by healthcare technology firm Epic. Officials described this restoration as a significant step toward resuming normal operations, allowing teams to access patient records, coordinate care, and communicate effectively across departments once again. The full scope of the breach and the long-term consequences for affected individuals still remains uncertain. 

Meanwhile, Kettering Health has yet to comment on whether Interlock’s claims are fully accurate. The healthcare system is working closely with cybersecurity professionals and law enforcement agencies to assess the extent of the intrusion and prevent further damage.

Lee Enterprises Ransomware Attack Exposes Data of 40,000 Individuals

 

Lee Enterprises, a major U.S. news publisher, is alerting nearly 40,000 individuals about a data breach following a ransomware attack that took place in early February 2025. The company, which owns and operates 77 daily newspapers and hundreds of weekly and special-interest publications across 26 states, reported that the cyberattack resulted in the theft of personal information belonging to thousands of people. 

Details of the breach were revealed in a recent disclosure to the Maine Attorney General’s office. According to the company, the attackers gained unauthorized access to internal documents on February 3, 2025. These files contained combinations of personal identifiers such as names, Social Security numbers, driver’s license details, bank account information, medical data, and health insurance policy numbers. The security incident caused widespread operational disruptions. 

Following the attack, Lee Enterprises was forced to shut down multiple parts of its IT infrastructure, impacting both the printing and delivery of its newspapers. Several internal tools and systems became inaccessible, including virtual private networks and cloud storage services, complicating daily workflows across its local newsrooms. In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission shortly after the breach, the company confirmed that critical systems had been encrypted and that a portion of its data had been copied by the attackers. 

The source of the attack is yet to be identified, a group known as Qilin has allegedly claimed responsibility near the end of February. The group alleged it had stolen over 120,000 internal files, totaling 350 gigabytes, and threatened to publish the material unless their demands were met. Soon after, Qilin posted a sample of the stolen data to a dark web leak site, which included scans of government-issued IDs, financial spreadsheets, contracts, and other confidential records. The group also listed Lee Enterprises as a victim on its public-facing extortion portal. 

When asked about the authenticity of the leaked data, a spokesperson for Lee Enterprises stated the company was aware of the claims and was actively investigating. This is not the first cybersecurity issue Lee Enterprises has faced. The company’s network was previously targeted by foreign actors during the lead-up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election, where hackers from Iran allegedly attempted to use compromised media outlets to spread disinformation. 

The ransomware attack highlights ongoing threats facing media companies, especially those handling high volumes of personal and financial data. As Lee Enterprises continues its recovery and legal steps, the incident serves as a reminder of the need for robust digital defenses in today’s information-driven landscape.

Zero-Day Flaw in Chrome and Chromium Puts Windows and Linux Users at Data Risk

 

A newly revealed zero-day vulnerability identified as CVE-2025-4664 has triggered serious concerns for billions of Google Chrome and Chromium users. Security experts have warned that this flaw, which affects both Windows and Linux platforms, could be exploited to leak sensitive cross-origin data such as OAuth tokens and session identifiers—all without requiring any user action.  

The vulnerability has been discovered within the Loader component of Chrome and Chromium browsers. It is linked to how these browsers interpret the Link HTTP header for sub-resource requests such as images or scripts. While most mainstream browsers follow strict guidelines for handling such requests, Chrome’s unique behavior stands out. It continues to respect the referrer-policy directive even when loading sub-resources, which can unintentionally expose sensitive information. 

This default behavior can be manipulated by attackers. A malicious site could inject a loose policy like “unsafe-url,” which then forces the browser to reveal complete URLs—including potentially sensitive credentials or session data—to third-party servers. This results in a severe breach of user privacy and circumvents traditional browser security measures. Cybersecurity firm Wazuh has stated that their Vulnerability Detection module can identify and address this specific flaw. 

The module leverages information from their Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) service to monitor browser versions and trigger alerts when vulnerable builds are detected. In controlled testing using Wazuh OVA 4.12.0, researchers were able to scan systems running Windows 11 and Debian 11 to determine if they were running affected versions of Chrome or Chromium. According to Wazuh’s platform, users can search for the vulnerability by querying CVE-2025-4664. If vulnerable software is found, the module changes the system status from “Active” to “Solved” after the necessary fixes are applied, helping administrators track progress in real time. 

In response to the discovery, Google has issued an emergency patch for Chrome users on Windows and Gentoo Linux. It is strongly recommended that users on these operating systems update their browsers immediately to avoid exposure. However, users on Debian 11 who rely on Chromium remain at risk, as no updated version has been released for that platform. All Chromium builds up to version 120.0.6099.224 are still considered vulnerable. Until a patch is available, security professionals advise uninstalling Chromium on affected Debian systems as a precautionary measure. 

While these immediate actions are important, experts caution that relying solely on browser updates is not a comprehensive defense. The broader cybersecurity strategy must include the use of endpoint protection platforms, anti-malware systems, and modern antivirus tools. These security layers can help detect and neutralize threats that slip past browser-based defenses and provide a stronger safety net for users and enterprises alike. 

As browser-based zero-day threats continue to emerge, users must remain vigilant. Rapid patching combined with proactive cybersecurity tools offers the best chance of mitigating risks and maintaining a secure browsing environment.

Adidas Confirms Data Leak After User Service Provider Hack

 

Adidas confirmed that a third-party customer service provider's vulnerability allowed a threat actor to steal company data. 

Contact details of customers who have previously dealt with the Adidas customer service help desk are among the impacted data. However, passwords, credit cards, and other financial or payment information are not included.

"Adidas is in the process of informing potentially affected consumers as well as appropriate data protection and law enforcement authorities consistent with applicable law," the company explained in a notification on its website. 

It has subsequently initiated an investigation to gather facts about a breach and is working with information security professionals. Adidas did not reveal the name of its third-party customer support provider. It also remains unknown who carried out the strike. 

"This incident underscores a critical truth: third-party breaches swiftly become your organization's breaches, which highlights the necessity of robust oversight mechanisms," noted Fletcher Davis, senior security research manager at BeyondTrust. "Mandating security assessments, multifactor authentication, and zero-trust architecture for all vendor access, while deploying real-time identity infrastructure monitoring to cut response times to minutes, as opposed to days.” 

Adidas is not the first well-known brand to have experienced data leaks or cyberattacks in recent years. Recent ransomware attacks have targeted the Co-op Group, Marks & Spencer, and the luxury shop Harrods. Marks & Spencer reported that its customers' personal information was stolen during the incident, and that retail operations had been affected.

Scattered Spider was possibly responsible for the attack, unleashing DragonForce ransomware against the UK retailer, forcing Marks & Spencer to estimate a $400 million hit on earnings.

Establishing strong defense 

Forward-thinking merchants are implementing new techniques to mitigate third-party risk. Consider the following best practices: 

Zero trust approach: Treat every provider as a potential risk and restrict data access to what is absolutely essential. 

Incident simulation: Conduct regular exercises that simulate third-party breaches and test your response procedures. 

Continuous vendor assessment: Use automated systems to track vendor security status all year, not just during annual audits. 

The Adidas breach was not an isolated incident. It is a warning to the entire retail sector. As hackers become more adept, businesses must consider third-party risk as a key priority rather than just a compliance concern.

Vietnam Blocks Telegram Messaging App

 

Vietnam's technology ministry has ordered telecommunications service providers to ban the messaging app Telegram for failing to cooperate in the investigation of alleged crimes committed by its users, a move Telegram described as shocking.

In a document dated May 21 and signed by the deputy head of the telecom department at the technology ministry, telecommunications firms were asked to start steps to block Telegram and report back to the ministry by June 2. 

In the document seen by Reuters, the ministry was acting on behalf of the nation's cybersecurity department after police revealed that 68% of Vietnam's 9,600 Telegram channels and groups were breaking the law. They cited drug trafficking, fraud, and "cases suspected of being related to terrorism" as some of the illicit activities conducted through the app. 

According to the document, the ministry requested that telecom companies "deploy solutions and measures to prevent Telegram's activities in Vietnam.” Following the release of the Reuters piece, the government announced the measures against Telegram on its website. 

"Telegram is surprised by those statements. We have responded to legal requests from Vietnam on time. This morning, we received a formal notice from the Authority of Communications regarding a standard service notification procedure required under new telecom regulations. The deadline for the response is May 27, and we are processing the request," the Telegram representative noted. 

According to a technology ministry official, the move was prompted by Telegram's failure to share customer information with the government when requested as part of criminal investigations.

The Vietnamese police and official media have regularly cautioned citizens about potential crimes, frauds, and data breaches on Telegram channels and groups. Telegram, which competes globally with major social networking apps such as Facebook's (META.O), WhatsApp and WeChat, remain available in Vietnam on Friday. 

Vietnam's ruling Communist Party maintains strict media censorship and tolerates minimal opposition. The country has regularly asked firms such as Facebook, Google (GOOGL.O), YouTube, and TikTok to work with authorities to remove "toxic" data, which includes offensive, misleading, and anti-state content. 

According to the document, Telegram has been accused of failing to comply with regulations requiring social media platforms to monitor, remove, and restrict illegal content. "Many groups with tens of thousands of participants were created by opposition and reactionary subjects spreading anti-government documents" based on police information. 

The free-to-use site, which has about 1 billion users globally, has been embroiled in scandals over security and data breaches, particularly in France, where its founder, Pavel Durov, was temporarily detained last year.

LockBit Ransomware Platform Breached Again, Ops Data Leaked

 

A breach of an administration panel used by the LockBit ransomware outfit resulted in the exposure of information that can be extremely valuable to law enforcement and the cybersecurity community.

The breach was discovered on May 7, when a domain linked with a LockBit administrator panel was vandalised to display the message "Don't do crime, crime is bad xoxo from Prague". The defaced page is also linked to an archive file containing information acquired from the stolen server. 

The leaked data includes private messages exchanged between LockBit affiliates and victims, Bitcoin wallet addresses, affiliate accounts, attack specifics, and malware and infrastructure details. 

Numerous cybersecurity specialists have examined the leaked data. The Bitcoin addresses could assist law enforcement, according to Christiaan Beek, senior director of threat analytics at Rapid7. 

In addition, Luke Donovan, head of threat intelligence at Searchlight Cyber, stated how the leaked data could benefit the cybersecurity community. According to the expert, the leaked user data is most likely related to ransomware affiliates or administrators. In the publicly available data, Searchlight Cyber has found 76 entries, including usernames and passwords.

“This user data will prove to be valuable for cybersecurity researchers, as it allows us to learn more about the affiliates of LockBit and how they operate. For example, within those 76 users, 22 users have TOX IDs associated with them, which is a messaging service popular in the hacking community,” Donovan noted.

He added, “These TOX IDs have allowed us to associate three of the leaked users with aliases on hacking forums, who use the same TOX IDs. By analysing their conversations on hacking forums we’ll be able to learn more about the group, for example the types of access they buy to hack organizations.” 

Searchlight Cyber discovered 208 chats between LockBit affiliates and victims. The messages, which stretch from December 2024 to April 2025, could be "valuable for learning more about how LockBit's affiliates negotiate with their victims". Indeed, Rapid7's Beek noted that the leaked chats illustrate how active LockBit affiliates were during the ransom negotiations. 

“In some cases, victims were pressured to pay just a few thousand dollars. In others, the group demanded much more: $50,000, $60,000, or even $100,000,” Beek stated. 

As for who is responsible for the LockBit hack, Searchlight Cyber's Donovan pointed out that the defacement message is identical to the message displayed last month on the compromised website of a different ransomware outfit, Everest. 

“While we cannot be certain at this stage, this does suggest that the same actor or group was behind the hack on both of the sites and implies that this data leak is the result of infighting among the cybercriminal community,” Beek added. 

On May 8, a statement released on LockBit's breach website admitted the vulnerability of an administration panel but minimised the impact, claiming that victims' decryptors and sensitive data were unaffected. 

LockBitSupp, the mastermind behind the LockBit operation, identified by authorities as Russian national Dmitry Yuryevich Khoroshev, has stated that he is willing to pay for information on the identity of the attacker. 

Law enforcement authorities across the globe have been taking steps to disrupt LockBit, but after inflicting a severe blow last year, the cybercrime operation remains operational and poses a threat to organisations.

Details of 1.1 Million Job Applicants Leaked by a Major Recruitment Platform

 

While looking for a new job can be enjoyable, it is surely not fun to lose your personal information in the process. In the meantime, the Cybernews investigation team found an unprotected GCS bucket belonging to the talent pool platform beWanted that had more than 1.1 million files.

The company, which has its headquarters in Madrid, Spain, bills itself as "the largest Talent Pool ecosystem in the world." beWanted is a software-as-a-service (SaaS) company that links companies and job seekers. The business maintains offices in the UK, Germany, and Mexico. 

The exposed instance was found by the researchers in November of last year. Despite the fact that the relocation temporarily affected service availability, beWanted claims that the company secured the bucket on May 9. 

"We prioritized data security. The solution was fully implemented, and the properly secured service was restored last Friday, May 9, 2025. We have been conducting exhaustive internal testing since Friday and can confirm that the solution is definitive. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge and following relevant investigations, no data leakage has occurred," the company stated.

The researchers claim that resumes and CVs from job seekers make up the vast majority of the files from the more than a million compromised files. The information that was leaked included details that a job seeker would normally include such as Full names and surnames, phone numbers, email addresses, home addresses, dates of birth national id numbers, nationalities, places of birth, social media links, employment history and educational background. 

The researchers believe that a data leak involving over a million files, each of which likely represents a single person, is a serious security issue for beWanted. The fact that the data has been exposed for at least six months exacerbates the situation: hostile actors continue to comb the web for unprotected instances, downloading whatever they can find.

“This exposure creates multiple attack vectors, enabling cybercriminals to engage in identity theft, where personal information can be used to create synthetic identities or fraudulent accounts,” researchers added. 

Malicious actors can also use leaked information to create highly personalised and credible-looking phishing attempts, which could result in unauthorised access to financial accounts, passwords, or other sensitive data. 

Furthermore, the leaked information highlighted that the problem has worldwide implications. The leaked national ID numbers, for example, are from Spanish, Argentine, Guatemalan, Honduran, and other residents.

iHeartMedia Cyberattack Exposes Sensitive Data Across Multiple Radio Stations

 

iHeartMedia, the largest audio media company in the United States, has confirmed a significant data breach following a cyberattack on several of its local radio stations. In official breach notifications sent to affected individuals and state attorney general offices in Maine, Massachusetts, and California, the company disclosed that cybercriminals accessed sensitive customer information between December 24 and December 27, 2024. Although iHeartMedia did not specify how many individuals were affected, the breach appears to have involved data stored on systems at a “small number” of stations. 

The exact number of compromised stations remains undisclosed. With a network of 870 radio stations and a reported monthly audience of 250 million listeners, the potential scope of this breach is concerning. According to the breach notification letters, the attackers “viewed and obtained” various types of personal information. The compromised data includes full names, passport numbers, other government-issued identification numbers, dates of birth, financial account information, payment card data, and even health and health insurance records. 

Such a comprehensive data set makes the victims vulnerable to a wide array of cybercrimes, from identity theft to financial fraud. The combination of personal identifiers and health or insurance details increases the likelihood of victims being targeted by tailored phishing campaigns. With access to passport numbers and financial records, cybercriminals can attempt identity theft or engage in unauthorized transactions and wire fraud. As of now, the stolen data has not surfaced on dark web marketplaces, but the risk remains high. 

No cybercrime group has claimed responsibility for the breach as of yet. However, the level of detail and sensitivity in the data accessed suggests the attackers had a specific objective and targeted the breach with precision. 

In response, iHeartMedia is offering one year of complimentary identity theft protection services to impacted individuals. The company has also established a dedicated hotline for those seeking assistance or more information. While these actions are intended to mitigate potential fallout, they may offer limited relief given the nature of the exposed information. 

This incident underscores the increasing frequency and severity of cyberattacks on media organizations and the urgent need for enhanced cybersecurity protocols. For iHeartMedia, transparency and timely support for affected customers will be key in managing the aftermath of this breach. 

As investigations continue, more details may emerge regarding the extent of the compromise and the identity of those behind the attack.

Kelly Benefits Data Leak Affects 260,000 People

 

A Maryland-based outsourced benefits and payroll manager is notifying nine large customers and nearly 264,000 individuals that their private and sensitive data may have been compromised in a December hack. The number of impacted people has increased by eight-fold since Kelly & Associates Insurance Group, also known as Kelly Benefits, published an estimate of the hack's scope earlier this month. 

The company's current total of 263,893 affected persons is far higher than the 32,234 initially reported on April 9 to state regulators and the US Department of Health and Human Services as a HIPAA breach. 

The benefits company announced that it is sending breach notices to impacted individuals on behalf of nine clients: Amergis, Beam Benefits, Beltway Companies, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, Guardian Life Insurance Co., Intercon Truck of Baltimore, Publishers Circulation Fulfilment, Quantum Real Estate Management, and Transforming Lives. 

Kelly Benefits declined to comment, citing "the sensitive nature of the incident and subsequent investigation.” An investigation following the incident revealed that unauthorised access to the company's IT infrastructure occurred between December 12 and December 17, 2024. The company claimed that throughout that period, the attackers copied and stole specific files.

"Kelly Benefits then began a time-intensive and detailed review of all files affected by this event to determine what information was present in the impacted files and to whom it related," the company noted. It analysed internal records to match the individual with the relevant client or carrier. 

Individuals' information compromised in the event varies, but it could include their name, Social Security number, date of birth, medical information, health insurance information, or financial account information.

Kelly Benefits informed the FBI about the incident. This company stated that it is still reviewing its security policies, procedures, and technologies. At the time of writing, at least one proposed federal class action lawsuit against Kelly Benefits was filed in connection with the hacking incident. The lawsuit claims Kelly Benefits was negligent in failing to safeguard sensitive personally identifying information from unauthorised access.

"Even with several months of credit monitoring services, the risk of identity theft and unauthorized use of plaintiff's and class members' PII is still substantially high. Cybercriminals need not harvest a person's Social Security number or financial account information in order to commit identity fraud or misuse plaintiffs and the class's PII," the lawsuit notes. "Cybercriminals can cross-reference the data stolen from the data breach and combine with other sources to create 'Fullz' packages, which can then be used to commit fraudulent account activity on plaintiff and the class's financial accounts."

Co-op Cyberattack Exposes Member Data in Major Security Breach

 

Millions of Co-op members are being urged to remain vigilant following a significant cyberattack that led to a temporary shutdown of the retailer’s IT infrastructure. The company confirmed that the breach resulted in unauthorized access to sensitive customer data, although it emphasized that no financial or account login information was compromised. 

Shirine Khoury-Haq, Chief Executive Officer of Co-op, addressed members directly, expressing regret and concern over the breach. She assured customers that the company’s core operations were largely unaffected by the attack and that members could continue to use their accounts and services as normal. However, she acknowledged the seriousness of the data exposure, which has affected both current and past members of the Co-op Group. 

“We deeply regret that personal member information was accessed during this incident. While we’ve been able to prevent disruption to our services, we understand how unsettling this news can be,” Khoury-Haq stated. “I encourage all members to take standard security precautions, including updating their passwords and ensuring they are not reused across platforms.” 

According to an official statement from Co-op, the malicious activity targeted one of their internal systems and successfully extracted customer data such as names, contact information, and dates of birth. Importantly, the company clarified that no passwords, payment details, or transactional records were included in the breach. They also emphasized that their teams are actively investigating the incident in coordination with the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and the National Crime Agency (NCA). 

The company said that it has implemented enhanced security measures to prevent further unauthorized access, while minimizing disruption to business operations and customer services. Forensic specialists are currently assessing the full scope of the breach, and affected individuals may be contacted as more information becomes available. In response to the incident, Stephen Bonner, Deputy Commissioner of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), offered guidance to concerned members. “Cyberattacks like this can be very unsettling for the public. 

If you’re concerned about your data, we recommend using strong, unique passwords for each of your online accounts and enabling two-factor authentication wherever possible,” he advised. “Customers should also stay alert to updates from Co-op and follow any specific instructions they provide.” The Co-op has apologized to its customers and pledged to continue prioritizing data protection as it works to resolve the issue. While the investigation continues, members are encouraged to remain cautious and take proactive steps to safeguard their personal information online.

Pakistan-Based Hackers Launch Cyber Attack on Indian Defence Websites, Claim Access to Sensitive Data

 

In a concerning escalation of cyber hostilities, a Pakistan-based threat group known as the Pakistan Cyber Force launched a coordinated cyber offensive on multiple Indian defence-related websites on Monday. The group claimed responsibility for defacing the official site of a Ministry of Defence public sector undertaking (PSU) and asserted that it had gained unauthorized access to sensitive information belonging to Indian defence personnel. According to reports, the targeted websites included those of the Military Engineering Service (MES) and the Manohar Parrikar Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), both critical components in India’s defence research and infrastructure network. 

The group’s social media posts alleged that it had exfiltrated login credentials and personal data associated with defence personnel. One particularly alarming development was the defacement of the official website of Armoured Vehicle Nigam Limited (AVNL), a key PSU under the Ministry of Defence. The hackers replaced the homepage with the Pakistani flag and an image of the Al Khalid tank, a symbol of Pakistan’s military capabilities. A message reportedly posted on social platform X read, “Hacked. Your security is illusion. MES data owned,” followed by a list of names allegedly linked to Indian defence staff. 

Sources quoted by ANI indicated that there is a credible concern that personal data of military personnel may have been compromised during the breach. In response, authorities promptly took the AVNL website offline to prevent further exploitation and launched a full-scale forensic audit to assess the scope of the intrusion and restore digital integrity. Cybersecurity experts are currently monitoring for further signs of intrusion, especially in light of repeated cyber threats and defacement attempts linked to Pakistani-sponsored groups. 

The ongoing tensions between the two countries have only heightened the frequency and severity of such state-aligned cyber operations. This latest attack follows a pattern of provocative cyber incidents, with Pakistani hacker groups increasingly targeting sensitive Indian assets in attempts to undermine national security and sow discord. Intelligence sources are treating the incident as part of a broader information warfare campaign and have emphasized the need for heightened vigilance and improved cyber defense strategies. 

Authorities continue to investigate the breach while urging government departments and defense agencies to reinforce their cybersecurity posture amid rising digital threats in the region.