Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Data protection. Show all posts
Ransomwares
Cyber Attacks Cyber Breach Cyber Defenses Data protection financial attack Financial Loss Ransomware attack Ransomwares

Fourlis Group Confirms €20 Million Loss from IKEA Ransomware Attack

 

Fourlis Group, the retail operator responsible for IKEA stores across Greece, Cyprus, Romania, and Bulgaria, has revealed that a ransomware attack targeting its systems in late November 2024 led to significant financial losses. The cyber incident, which coincided with the busy Black Friday shopping period, disrupted critical parts of the business and caused damages estimated at €20 million (around $22.8 million). 

The breach initially surfaced as unexplained technical problems affecting IKEA’s e-commerce platforms. Days later, on December 3, the company confirmed that the disruptions were due to an external cyberattack. The attack affected digital infrastructure used for inventory restocking, online transactions, and broader retail operations, mainly impacting IKEA’s business. Other brands under the Fourlis umbrella, including Intersport and Holland & Barrett, were largely unaffected.  

According to CEO Dimitris Valachis, the company experienced a loss of approximately €15 million in revenue by the end of 2024, with an additional €5 million impact spilling into early 2025. Fourlis decided not to comply with the attackers’ demands and instead focused on system recovery through support from external cybersecurity professionals. The company also reported that it successfully blocked a number of follow-up attacks attempted after the initial breach. 

Despite the scale of the attack, an internal investigation supported by forensic analysts found no evidence that customer data had been stolen or exposed. The incident caused only a brief period of data unavailability, which was resolved swiftly. As part of its compliance obligations, Fourlis reported the breach to data protection authorities in all four affected countries, reassuring stakeholders that personal information remained secure. Interestingly, no known ransomware group has taken responsibility for the attack. This may suggest that the attackers were unable to extract valuable data or are holding out hope for an undisclosed settlement—though Fourlis maintains that no ransom was paid. 

The incident highlights the growing risks faced by digital retail ecosystems, especially during peak sales periods when system uptime is critical. As online platforms become more central to retail operations, businesses like Fourlis must invest heavily in cybersecurity defenses. Their experience reinforces the importance of swift response strategies, external threat mitigation support, and robust data protection practices to safeguard operations and maintain customer trust in the face of evolving cyber threats.
Read more »
Ransomwares
cloud storage Cyber Attacks Cyber Researchers Data Backup Data protection data security Ransomware attack Ransomwares

Ransomware Attacks Surge in Q1 2025 as Immutable Backup Emerges as Critical Defense

Ransomware attacks have seen a dramatic rise in the first quarter of 2025, with new research from Object First revealing an 84% increase compared to the same period in 2024. This alarming trend highlights the growing sophistication and frequency of ransomware campaigns, with nearly two-thirds of organizations reporting at least one attack in the past two years. 

The findings suggest that ransomware is no longer a matter of “if” but “when” for most businesses. Despite the increased threat, Object First’s study offers a silver lining. A large majority—81% of IT decision-makers—now recognize that immutable backup storage is the most effective defense against ransomware. Immutable storage ensures that once data is written, it cannot be changed or deleted, offering a critical safety net when other security measures fail. This form of storage plays a key role in enabling organizations to recover their data without yielding to ransom demands. 

However, the report also highlights a concerning gap between awareness and action. While most IT professionals acknowledge the benefits of immutable backups, only 59% of organizations have actually implemented such storage. Additionally, just 58% maintain multiple copies of their data in separate locations, falling short of the recommended 3-2-1 backup strategy. This gap leaves many companies dangerously exposed. The report also shows that ransomware actors are evolving their methods. A staggering 96% of organizations that experienced ransomware attacks in the last two years had their backup systems targeted at least once. Even more concerning, 10% of them had their backup storage compromised in every incident. 

These findings demonstrate how attackers now routinely seek to destroy recovery options, increasing pressure on victims to pay ransoms. Many businesses still place heavy reliance on traditional IT security hardening. In fact, 61% of respondents believe this approach is sufficient. But ransomware attackers are adept at bypassing such defenses using phishing emails, stolen credentials, and remote access tools. That’s why Object First recommends adopting a “breach mentality”—an approach that assumes an eventual breach and focuses on limiting damage. 

A Zero Trust architecture, paired with immutable backup, is essential. Organizations are urged to segment networks, restrict user access to essential data only, and implement multi-factor authentication. As cloud services grow, many companies are also turning to immutable cloud storage for flexible, scalable protection. Together, these steps offer a stronger, more resilient defense against today’s aggressive ransomware landscape.
Read more »
Security Keys
Cyber Security Data protection Hardware MFA online account security online accounts Online attacks Security Keys

Why Securing Online Accounts is Critical in Today’s Cybersecurity Landscape

 

In an era where cybercriminals are increasingly targeting passwords through phishing attacks, data breaches, and other malicious tactics, securing online accounts has never been more important. Relying solely on single-factor authentication, such as a password, is no longer sufficient to protect sensitive information. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) has emerged as a vital tool for enhancing security by requiring verification from multiple sources. Among the most effective MFA methods are hardware security keys, which provide robust protection against unauthorized access.

What Are Hardware Security Keys?

A hardware security key is a small physical device designed to enhance account security using public key cryptography. This method generates a pair of keys: a public key that encrypts data and a private key that decrypts it. The private key is securely stored on the hardware device, making it nearly impossible for hackers to access or replicate. Unlike SMS-based authentication, which is vulnerable to interception, hardware security keys offer a direct, offline authentication method that significantly reduces the risk of compromise.

Hardware security keys are compatible with major online platforms, including Google, Microsoft, Facebook, GitHub, and many financial institutions. They connect to devices via USB, NFC, or Bluetooth, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of hardware. Popular options include Yubico’s YubiKey, Google’s Titan Security Key, and Thetis. Setting up a hardware security key is straightforward. Users simply register the key with an online account that supports security keys. For example, in Google’s security settings, users can enable 2-Step Verification and add a security key.

Once linked, logging in requires inserting or tapping the key, making the process both highly secure and faster than receiving verification codes via email or SMS. When selecting a security key, compatibility is a key consideration. Newer devices often require USB-C keys, while older ones may need USB-A or NFC options. Security certifications also matter—FIDO U2F provides basic security, while FIDO2/WebAuthn offers advanced protection against phishing and unauthorized access. Some security keys even include biometric authentication, such as fingerprint recognition, for added security.

Prices for hardware security keys typically range from $30 to $100. It’s recommended to purchase a backup key in case the primary key is lost. Losing a security key does not mean being locked out of accounts, as most platforms allow backup authentication methods, such as SMS or authentication apps. However, having a secondary security key ensures uninterrupted access without relying on less secure recovery methods.

Maintaining Strong Online Security Habits

While hardware security keys provide excellent protection, maintaining strong online security habits is equally important. This includes creating complex passwords, being cautious with email links and attachments, and avoiding oversharing personal information on social media. For those seeking additional protection, identity theft monitoring services can offer alerts and assistance in case of a security breach.

By using a hardware security key alongside other cybersecurity measures, individuals can significantly reduce their risk of falling victim to online attacks. These keys not only enhance security but also ensure convenient and secure access to their most important accounts. As cyber threats continue to evolve, adopting advanced tools like hardware security keys is a proactive step toward safeguarding your digital life.

Read more »
Privacy
Cyberattacks CyberCrime Cyberhacker CyberThreat Data protection Privacy

Smart Meter Privacy Under Scrutiny as Warnings Reach Millions in UK

 


According to a campaign group that has criticized government net zero policies, smart meters may become the next step in "snooping" on household energy consumption. Ministers are discussing the possibility of sharing household energy usage with third parties who can assist customers in finding cheaper energy deals and lower carbon tariffs from competitors. 

The European watchdog responsible for protecting personal data has been concerned that high-tech monitors that track households' energy use are likely to pose a major privacy concern. A recent report released by the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) states that smart meters, which must be installed in every home in the UK by the year 2021, will be used not only to monitor energy consumption but also to track a great deal more data. 

According to the EDPS, "while the widespread rollout of smart meters will bring some substantial benefits, it will also provide us with the opportunity to collect huge amounts of personal information." Smart meters have been claimed to be a means of spying on homes by net zero campaigners. A privacy dispute has broken out in response to government proposals that will allow energy companies to harvest household smart meter data to promote net zero energy. 

In the UK, the Telegraph newspaper reports that the government is consulting on the idea of letting consumers share their energy usage with third parties who can direct them to lower-cost deals and lower carbon tariffs from competing suppliers. The Telegraph quoted Neil Record, the former economist for the Bank of England and currently chairman of Net Zero Watch, as saying that smart meters could potentially have serious privacy implications, which he expressed concerns to the paper. 

According to him, energy companies collect a large amount of consumer information, which is why he advised the public to remain vigilant about the increasing number of external entities getting access to household information. Further, Record explained that, once these measures are authorized, the public would be able to view detailed details of the activities of households in real-time. 

The record even stated that the public might not fully comprehend the extent to which the data is being shared and the possible consequences of this access. Nick Hunn, founder of the wireless technology consulting firm WiFore, also commented on the matter, highlighting the original intent behind the smart meter rollout, He noted that the initiative was designed to enable consumers to access their energy usage data, thereby empowering them to make informed decisions regarding energy consumption and associated costs. Getting to net zero targets will be impossible without smart meters. 

They allow energy companies to get real-time data on how much energy they are using and can be used to manage demand as needed. Using smart meters, for instance, households will be rewarded for cutting energy use during peak hours, thereby reducing the need for the construction of new gas-fired power plants. Energy firms can also offer free electricity to households when wind energy is in abundance. Using smart meters as a means of controlling household energy usage, the Government has ambitions to install them in three-quarters of all households by the end of 2025, at the cost of £13.5 billion. 

A recent study by WiFore, which is a wireless technology consulting firm, revealed that approximately four million devices are broken in homes. According to Nick Hunn, who is the founder of the firm: "This is essentially what was intended at the beginning of the rollout of smart meters: that consumers would be able to see what energy data was affecting them so that they could make rational decisions about how much they were spending and how much they were using."
Read more »
kiberphant0m
BSNL data breach CERT-In Critical Data cyberattack on BSNL cybercriminals Dark web marketplace Data Breach Data protection data security kiberphant0m

U.S. soldier linked to BSNL data breach: Arrest reveals cybercrime

 

The arrest of Cameron John Wagenius, a U.S. Army communications specialist, has unveiled potential connections to a significant data breach targeting India’s state-owned telecom provider, BSNL. The breach highlights the global reach of cybercrime networks and raises concerns about the security of sensitive data across continents. 

Wagenius, stationed in South Korea, was apprehended on December 20, 2023, for allegedly selling hacked data from U.S. telecom companies. According to cybersecurity experts, he may also be the individual behind the alias “kiberphant0m” on a dark web marketplace. In May 2023, “kiberphant0m” reportedly attempted to sell 278 GB of BSNL’s critical data, including subscriber details, SIM numbers, and server snapshots, for $5,000. Indian authorities confirmed that one of BSNL’s servers was breached in May 2023. 

While the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) reported the intrusion, the identity of the perpetrator remained elusive until Wagenius’s arrest. Efforts to verify the hacker’s access to BSNL servers through Telegram communication and sample data proved inconclusive. The breach exposes vulnerabilities in telecom providers’ security measures, as sensitive data such as health records, payment details, and government-issued identification was targeted. 

Additionally, Wagenius is accused of selling call records of prominent U.S. political figures and data from telecom providers across Asia. The arrest also sheds light on Wagenius’s links to a broader criminal network led by Connor Riley Moucka. Moucka and his associates reportedly breached multiple organizations, extorting millions of dollars and selling stolen data. Wagenius’s involvement with this network underscores the organized nature of cybercrime operations targeting telecom infrastructure. 

Cybersecurity researchers, including Allison Nixon of Unit 221B, identified Wagenius as the individual behind illicit sales of BSNL data. However, she clarified that these activities differ from state-sponsored cyberattacks by groups such as Salt Typhoon, a Chinese-linked advanced persistent threat actor known for targeting major U.S. telecom providers. The case has also exposed challenges in prosecuting international cybercriminals. Indian authorities have yet to file a First Information Report (FIR) or engage with U.S. counterparts on Wagenius’s case, limiting legal recourse. 

Experts suggest leveraging international treaties and cross-border collaboration to address such incidents. As the investigation unfolds, the breach serves as a stark reminder of the growing threat posed by insider actions and sophisticated cybercriminal networks. It underscores the urgent need for robust data protection measures and international cooperation to counter cybercrime.
Read more »
Salt Typhoon
China Hackers Cyber Attacks cyber espionage Cybersecurity awareness Data protection data security FBI Salt Typhoon

T-Mobile Thwarts Cyberattack Amid Growing Telecom Threats

 

Between September and November, T-Mobile successfully defended against a cyberattack attributed to the Chinese state-sponsored group Salt Typhoon. Unlike previous incidents, this time, no data was compromised. However, the attack highlights growing cybersecurity vulnerabilities in the U.S. telecom sector. 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has identified nine telecom carriers targeted by cyberattacks, with Verizon, AT&T, and Lumen among the known victims. The identity of the ninth carrier remains undisclosed. Hackers reportedly accessed SMS metadata and communication patterns from millions of Americans, including high-profile figures such as presidential candidates and government officials. 

While China denies any involvement in the cyberattacks, its alleged role in the breach underscores the persistent threat of state-sponsored cyber espionage. Though the attackers did not obtain classified information, they managed to collect substantial data for analyzing communication patterns, fueling concerns over national security. 

In response, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is weighing penalties for carriers that fail to secure their networks. The agency is also considering a ban on China Telecom operations within the United States. Additionally, the U.S. government has advised citizens to use encrypted telecom services to bolster their privacy and security. 

Senator Ben Ray Luján called the Salt Typhoon incident one of the most significant cyberattacks on the U.S. telecom industry. He stressed the urgent need to address vulnerabilities within national infrastructure to prevent future breaches. 

Anne Neuberger, Deputy National Security Advisor, highlighted the inadequacy of voluntary cybersecurity measures. The FCC is now working on a proposed rule requiring telecom companies to submit annual cybersecurity reports, with penalties for non-compliance. The rule aims to make it harder for hackers to exploit weak networks by encouraging stronger protections.  

Neuberger also emphasized the importance of network segmentation to limit the damage from potential breaches. By isolating sections of a network, companies can contain attackers and reduce the scope of compromised data. She cited a troubling example where a single administrative account controlling 100,000 routers was breached, granting attackers widespread access. 

The FCC’s proposed rule is expected to be voted on by January 15. If passed, it could mandate fundamental security practices to protect critical infrastructure from cyberattacks by adversarial nations. 

The telecom industry’s repeated exposure to breaches highlights the necessity of robust security frameworks and accountability measures. As hackers evolve their tactics, stronger regulations and proactive measures are essential to safeguarding sensitive data and national security. By adopting stricter cybersecurity practices, telecom companies can mitigate risks and enhance their resilience against state-sponsored threats.
Read more »
SEV
Advantech vulnerabilities Cyber Privacy Cyber Technology Cyberattacks CyberCrime Cyberhackers Cybersecurity Cyberthreats Data Breach Data protection nAMD System SEV

AMD Systems Vulnerability Could Threaten Encrypted Data Protection

 


There has been an announcement of a new technique for bypassing key security protections used in AMD chips to gain access to the clients of those services. Researchers believe that hackers will be able to spy on clients through physical access to cloud computing environments. Known as the "badRAM" security flaw, it has been described as a $10 hack that undermines the trust that the cloud has in it. 

This vulnerability was announced on Tuesday. Like other branded vulnerabilities, this vulnerability is being disclosed on a website with a logo and will be explained in a paper to be presented at next May's IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2025. 

There is an increasing use of encryption in today's computers to protect sensitive data in their DRAM, especially in shared cloud environments with multiple data breaches and insider threats, which are commonplace. The Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) technology of AMD enables users to protect privacy and trust in cloud computing by encrypting the memory of virtual machines (VMs) and isolating them from advanced attackers, including those who compromise critical infrastructure like the virtual machine manager and firmware, which is a cutting-edge technology. 

According to researchers, AMD's Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) program, which protects processor memory from prying eyes in virtual machine (VM) environments, is capable of being tricked into letting someone access the contents of its encrypted memory using a test rig which costs less than $10 and does not require additional hardware. It is important to note that AMD is among the first companies to leverage the capabilities of chipset architecture to improve processor performance, efficiency, and flexibility. 

It has been instrumental in extending and building upon Moore's Law performance gains and extending them further. As a result of the firm's research, performance gains under Moore's Law have been extended and built upon, and the company announced in 2018 that the first processor would have a chipset-based x86 CPU design that was available. Researchers at the University of Lübeck, KU Leven, and the University of Birmingham have proposed a conceptually easy and cheap attack called “BadRAM”. 

It consists of a rogue memory module used to trick the CPU into believing that it has more memory than it does. Using this rogue memory module, you get it to write its supposedly secret memory contents into a "ghost" space that is supposed to contain the hidden memory contents. In order to accomplish this task, researchers used a test rig anyone could afford to buy, composed of a Raspberry Pi Pico, which costs a couple of dollars, and a DIMM socket for DDR4/5 RAM modules. 

The first thing they did was manipulate the serial presence detection (SPD) chip within the memory module so that it would misreport the amount of memory onboard when the device was booted up – the “BadRAM” attack. Using reverse engineering techniques to locate these memory aliases, they had access to memory contents by bypassing the system's trusted execution environment (TEE), as this created two physical addresses referencing the same DRAM location. 

According to the CVE description, the issue results from improper input validation of DIM SPD metadata, which could potentially allow an attacker with certain access levels to overwrite guest memory, as the issue is described as a result of improper input validation. It has been deemed a medium severity threat on the CVSS, receiving a 5.3 rating owing to the high level of access that a potential attacker would need to engage to successfully exploit the problem. 

According to AMD, the issue may be a memory implementation issue rather than a product vulnerability, and the barriers to committing the attack are a lot higher than they would be if it were a software product vulnerability. AMD was informed of the vulnerability by the researchers in February, which has been dubbed CVE-2024-21944, as well as relates specifically to the company’s third and fourth-generation EPYC enterprise processors. According to AMD’s advisory, the recommendation is to use memory modules that lock SPD and to follow physical security best practices. 

A firmware update has also been issued, although each OEM's BIOS is different, according to AMD. As the company has stated on several occasions, it will make mitigations more prominent in the system; there is specific information on the condition of a Host OS/Hypervisor, and there is also information available on the condition of a Virtual Machine (Guest) to indicate that mitigation has been applied.

The AMD company has provided an in-depth explanation of the types of access an attacker would need to exploit this issue in a statement given to ITPro, advising clients to follow some mitigation strategies to prevent the problem from becoming a problem. The badRAM website states that this kind of tampering may occur in several ways — either through corrupt or hostile employees at cloud providers or by law enforcement officers with physical access to the computer. 

In addition, the badRAM bug may also be exploited remotely, although the AMD memory modules are not included in this process. All manufacturers, however, that fail to lock the SPD chip in their memory modules, will be at risk of being able to modify their modules after boot as a result of operating system software, and thus by remote hackers who can control them remotely. 

According to Recorded Future News, Oswald has said that there has been no evidence of this vulnerability being exploited in the wild. However, the team discovered that Intel chips already had mitigations against badRAM attacks. They could not test Arm's modules because they were unavailable commercially. An international consortium of experts led by researchers from KU Leuven in Belgium; the University of Luebeck in Germany; and the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom conducted the research.
Read more »
Streaming Platform
Amazon Data Breach Data Leak Data protection data security Fines Hacker attack Personal Data Streaming Platform

Amazon Fined for Twitch Data Breach Impacting Turkish Nationals

 

Türkiye has imposed a $58,000 fine on Amazon for a data breach that occurred on its subsidiary, Twitch, in 2021. The breach exposed sensitive personal information of thousands of Turkish citizens, drawing scrutiny from the country’s Personal Data Protection Board (KVKK). The incident began when an anonymous hacker leaked Twitch’s entire source code, along with personally identifiable information (PII) of users, in a massive 125 GB torrent posted on the 4chan imageboard. The KVKK investigation revealed that 35,274 Turkish nationals were directly affected by the leak. 

As a result, KVKK levied fines totaling 2 million lira, including 1.75 million lira for Amazon’s failure to implement adequate preemptive security measures and 250,000 lira for not reporting the breach in a timely manner. According to the regulatory body, Twitch’s risk and threat assessments were insufficient, leaving users’ data vulnerable to exploitation. The board concluded that the company only addressed the vulnerabilities after the breach had already occurred. Twitch, acquired by Amazon in 2014 for $970 million, attempted to minimize concerns by assuring users that critical login credentials and payment information had not been exposed. The company stated that passwords were securely hashed with bcrypt, a strong encryption method, and claimed that systems storing sensitive financial data were not accessed. 

However, the leaked information still contained sensitive PII, leading to significant privacy concerns, particularly for Turkish users who were impacted. The motivation behind the hack was reportedly ideological rather than financial. According to reports from the time, the hacker expressed dissatisfaction with the Twitch community and aimed to disrupt the platform by leaking the data. The individual claimed their intent was to “foster more disruption and competition in the online video streaming space.” While this rationale highlighted frustrations with Twitch’s dominance in the industry, the data breach had far-reaching consequences, including legal action, reputational damage, and increased regulatory scrutiny. Türkiye’s actions against Amazon and Twitch underline the growing importance of adhering to local data protection laws in an increasingly interconnected world. 

The fines imposed by KVKK serve as a reminder that global corporations must ensure compliance with regional regulations to avoid significant penalties and reputational harm. Türkiye’s regulations align with broader trends, as data privacy and security become critical components of global business practices. This incident also underscores the evolving nature of cybersecurity challenges. Hackers continue to exploit vulnerabilities in popular platforms, putting pressure on companies to proactively identify and address risks before they lead to breaches. As regulatory bodies like KVKK become more assertive in holding companies accountable, the need for robust data protection frameworks has never been more urgent. The Twitch breach also serves as a case study for the importance of transparency and swift response in the aftermath of cyberattacks. 

While Twitch’s reassurances regarding encrypted data helped mitigate some concerns, the lack of prompt reporting to Turkish authorities drew criticism. Companies handling large amounts of user data must prioritize both preventive measures and clear communication strategies to regain user trust after incidents. Looking forward, the Twitch data breach highlights the necessity for all companies—especially those managing sensitive user data—to invest in proactive cybersecurity strategies. As hackers grow increasingly sophisticated, businesses must adopt a forward-thinking approach to safeguard their platforms, comply with local laws, and ensure users’ privacy remains uncompromised.
Read more »
Personal Data
Data Breach Data breaches attacks Data protection Data Theft Financial Data Hacker attack Hackers Personal Data

Set Forth Data Breach: 1.5 Million Impacted and Next Steps

 

The debt relief firm Set Forth recently experienced a data breach that compromised the sensitive personal and financial information of approximately 1.5 million Americans. Hackers gained unauthorized access to internal documents stored on the company’s systems, raising serious concerns about identity theft and online fraud for the affected individuals. Set Forth, which provides administrative services for Americans enrolled in debt relief programs and works with B2B partners like Centrex, has initiated notification protocols to inform impacted customers. The breach reportedly occurred in May this year, at which time Set Forth implemented incident response measures and enlisted independent forensic specialists to investigate the incident. 

However, the full extent of the attack is now coming to light. According to the company’s notification to the Maine Attorney General, the hackers accessed a range of personal data, including full names, Social Security numbers (SSNs), and dates of birth. Additionally, information about spouses, co-applicants, or dependents of the affected individuals may have been compromised. Although there is currently no evidence that the stolen data has been used maliciously, experts warn that it could end up on the dark web or be utilized in targeted phishing campaigns. This breach highlights the ongoing risks associated with storing sensitive information digitally, as even companies with incident response plans can become vulnerable to sophisticated cyberattacks. 

To mitigate the potential damage, Set Forth is offering free access to Cyberscout, an identity theft protection service, for one year to those affected. Cyberscout, which has over two decades of experience handling breach responses, provides monitoring and support to help protect against identity fraud. Impacted customers will receive notification letters containing instructions and a code to enroll in this service. For those affected by the breach, vigilance is critical. Monitoring financial accounts for unauthorized activity is essential, as stolen SSNs can enable hackers to open lines of credit, apply for loans, or even commit crimes in the victim’s name. 

Additionally, individuals should remain cautious when checking emails or messages, as hackers may use the breach as leverage to execute phishing scams. Suspicious emails—particularly those with urgent language, unknown senders, or blank subject lines—should be deleted without clicking links or downloading attachments. This incident serves as a reminder of the potential risks posed by data breaches and the importance of proactive protection measures. While Set Forth has taken steps to assist affected individuals, the breach underscores the need for businesses to strengthen their cybersecurity defenses. For now, impacted customers should take advantage of the identity theft protection services being offered and remain alert to potential signs of fraud.
Read more »
trending news
cyberattacks news Data protection Data Theft Privacy smart home devices trending news

UK Watchdog Urges Data Privacy Overhaul as Smart Devices Collect “Excessive” User Data

 

A new study by consumer group Which? has revealed that popular smart devices are gathering excessive amounts of personal data from users, often beyond what’s required for functionality. The study examined smart TVs, air fryers, speakers, and wearables, rating each based on data access requests. 

Findings suggested many of these devices may be gathering and sharing data with third parties, often for marketing purposes. “Smart tech manufacturers and their partners seem to collect data recklessly, with minimal transparency,” said Harry Rose from Which?, calling for stricter guidelines on data collection. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is expected to release updated guidance on data privacy for smart devices in 2025, which Rose urged be backed by effective enforcement. 

The study found all three tested air fryers, including one from Xiaomi, requested precise user locations and audio recording permissions without clarification. Xiaomi’s fryer app was also linked to trackers from Facebook and TikTok, raising concerns about data being sent to servers in China, though Xiaomi disputes the findings, calling them “inaccurate and misleading.” 

Similar privacy concerns were highlighted for wearables, with the Huawei Ultimate smartwatch reportedly asking for risky permissions, such as access to location, audio recording, and stored files. Huawei defended these requests, stating that permissions are necessary for health and fitness tracking and that no data is used for marketing. 

Smart TVs from brands like Samsung and LG also collected extensive data, with both brands connecting to Facebook and Google trackers, while Samsung’s app made additional phone permission requests. Smart speakers weren’t exempt from scrutiny; the Bose Home Portable speaker reportedly had several trackers, including from digital marketing firms.  

Slavka Bielikova, ICO’s principal policy adviser, noted, “Smart products know a lot about us and that’s why it’s vital for consumers to trust that their information is used responsibly.” She emphasized the ICO’s upcoming guidance, aiming to clarify expectations for manufacturers to protect consumers. 

As the debate over data privacy intensifies, Which? recommends that consumers opt out of unnecessary data collection requests and regularly review app permissions for added security.
Read more »
training
Awareness Cyber Attacks Cyberattacks Cybersecurity Data protection Digital Security Education human error legislation malware training

Addressing Human Error in Cybersecurity: The Unseen Weak Link

 

Despite significant progress in cybersecurity, human error remains the most significant vulnerability in the system. Research consistently shows that the vast majority of successful cyberattacks stem from human mistakes, with recent data suggesting it accounts for 68% of breaches.

No matter how advanced cybersecurity technology becomes, the human factor continues to be the weakest link. This issue affects all digital device users, yet current cyber education initiatives and emerging regulations fail to effectively target this problem.

In cybersecurity, human errors fall into two categories. The first is skills-based errors, which happen during routine tasks, often when someone's attention is divided. For instance, you might forget to back up your data because of distractions, leaving you vulnerable in the event of an attack.

The second type involves knowledge-based errors, where less experienced users make mistakes due to a lack of knowledge or not following specific security protocols. A common example is clicking on a suspicious link, leading to malware infection and data loss.

Despite heavy investment in cybersecurity training, results have been mixed. These initiatives often adopt a one-size-fits-all, technology-driven approach, focusing on technical skills like password management or multi-factor authentication. However, they fail to address the psychological and behavioral factors behind human actions.

Changing behavior is far more complex than simply providing information. Public health campaigns, like Australia’s successful “Slip, Slop, Slap” sun safety campaign, demonstrate that sustained efforts can lead to behavioral change. The same principle should apply to cybersecurity education, as simply knowing best practices doesn’t always lead to their consistent application.

Australia’s proposed cybersecurity legislation includes measures to combat ransomware, enhance data protection, and set minimum standards for smart devices. While these are important, they mainly focus on technical and procedural solutions. Meanwhile, the U.S. is taking a more human-centric approach, with its Federal Cybersecurity Research Plan placing human factors at the forefront of system design and security.

Three Key Strategies for Human-Centric Cybersecurity

  • Simplify Practices: Cybersecurity processes should be intuitive and easily integrated into daily workflows to reduce cognitive load.
  • Promote Positive Behavior: Education should highlight the benefits of good cybersecurity practices rather than relying on fear tactics.
  • Adopt a Long-term Approach: Changing behavior is an ongoing effort. Cybersecurity training must be continually updated to address new threats.
A truly secure digital environment demands a blend of strong technology, effective policies, and a well-educated, security-conscious public. By better understanding human error, we can design more effective cybersecurity strategies that align with human behavior.
Read more »
unauthorized software
ChatGPT risks Cybersecurity Data Leaks Data protection Digital Assets Information Security privacy laws server vulnerabilities Shadow IT Technology unauthorized software

Mitigating the Risks of Shadow IT: Safeguarding Information Security in the Age of Technology

 

In today’s world, technology is integral to the operations of every organization, making the adoption of innovative tools essential for growth and staying competitive. However, with this reliance on technology comes a significant threat—Shadow IT.  

Shadow IT refers to the unauthorized use of software, tools, or cloud services by employees without the knowledge or approval of the IT department. Essentially, it occurs when employees seek quick solutions to problems without fully understanding the potential risks to the organization’s security and compliance.

Once a rare occurrence, Shadow IT now poses serious security challenges, particularly in terms of data leaks and breaches. A recent amendment to Israel’s Privacy Protection Act, passed by the Knesset, introduces tougher regulations. Among the changes, the law expands the definition of private information, aligning it with European standards and imposing heavy penalties on companies that violate data privacy and security guidelines.

The rise of Shadow IT, coupled with these stricter regulations, underscores the need for organizations to prioritize the control and management of their information systems. Failure to do so could result in costly legal and financial consequences.

One technology that has gained widespread usage within organizations is ChatGPT, which enables employees to perform tasks like coding or content creation without seeking formal approval. While the use of ChatGPT itself isn’t inherently risky, the lack of oversight by IT departments can expose the organization to significant security vulnerabilities.

Another example of Shadow IT includes “dormant” servers—systems connected to the network but not actively maintained. These neglected servers create weak spots that cybercriminals can exploit, opening doors for attacks.

Additionally, when employees install software without the IT department’s consent, it can cause disruptions, invite cyberattacks, or compromise sensitive information. The core risks in these scenarios are data leaks and compromised information security. For instance, when employees use ChatGPT for coding or data analysis, they might unknowingly input sensitive data, such as customer details or financial information. If these tools lack sufficient protection, the data becomes vulnerable to unauthorized access and leaks.

A common issue is the use of ChatGPT for writing SQL queries or scanning databases. If these queries pass through unprotected external services, they can result in severe data leaks and all the accompanying consequences.

Rather than banning the use of new technologies outright, the solution lies in crafting a flexible policy that permits employees to use advanced tools within a secure, controlled environment.

Organizations should ensure employees are educated about the risks of using external tools without approval and emphasize the importance of maintaining information security. Proactive monitoring of IT systems, combined with advanced technological solutions, is essential to safeguarding against Shadow IT.

A critical step in this process is implementing technologies that enable automated mapping and monitoring of all systems and servers within the organization, including those not directly managed by IT. These tools offer a comprehensive view of the organization’s digital assets, helping to quickly identify unauthorized services and address potential security threats in real time.

By using advanced mapping and monitoring technologies, organizations can ensure that sensitive information is handled in compliance with security policies and regulations. This approach provides full transparency on external tool usage, effectively reducing the risks posed by Shadow IT.
Read more »
Personal Information
Customer Data Customer Data Exposed Cybersecurity Breach Data Breach Data Leak Data protection Personal Information

Avis Data Breach Exposes Over 400,000 Customers’ Personal Information

 

Over 400,000 customers of Avis, a prominent car rental company known for its presence at U.S. airports, have had their personal data compromised in a recent cybersecurity breach. The company revealed the incident to the public on Monday, stating that the breach occurred between August 3 and August 6. Avis, which is part of the Avis Budget Group, sent notifications to affected customers last week, advising them on how to protect themselves from potential identity theft or fraud. 

The Avis Budget Group, which owns both Avis and Budget, operates over 10,000 rental locations across 180 countries, generating $12 billion in revenue in 2023, according to its most recent financial report. However, the recent data breach has cast a shadow over its operations, highlighting vulnerabilities in its data security measures. In a data breach notice filed with the Iowa Attorney General’s office, Avis disclosed that the compromised information includes customer names, dates of birth, mailing addresses, email addresses, phone numbers, credit card details, and driver’s license numbers. 

A separate filing with the Maine Attorney General revealed that the data breach has impacted a total of 299,006 individuals so far. Texas has the highest number of affected residents, with 34,592 impacted, according to a report filed with the Texas Attorney General. The fact that sensitive personal information was stored in a manner that allowed it to be accessed by cybercriminals has raised serious questions about the company’s data protection practices. Avis first became aware of the data breach on August 5 and took immediate steps to stop the unauthorized access to its systems.

The company stated that it had launched a comprehensive investigation into the incident and enlisted third-party security consultants to help identify the breach’s origins and scope. Avis has not yet disclosed specific details about the nature of the attack, the vulnerabilities exploited, or the identity of the perpetrators, leaving many questions unanswered. This breach underscores the growing challenges faced by companies in protecting customer data in an increasingly digital world. While Avis acted quickly to contain the breach, the company’s reputation could suffer due to the extent of the data compromised and the sensitive nature of the information accessed. 

The breach also serves as a reminder of the importance of robust cybersecurity measures, especially for businesses that handle large volumes of personal and financial data. The incident has also prompted scrutiny from regulators and data privacy advocates. Many are questioning how sensitive customer information was stored and protected and why it was vulnerable to such an attack. Companies like Avis must ensure they are equipped with advanced security systems, encryption protocols, and regular audits to prevent such breaches from occurring in the future. As the investigation continues, Avis customers are advised to monitor their financial accounts closely, watch for signs of identity theft, and take appropriate measures.
Read more »
Twitter
Ai Data AI Models Cyber Security Data protection data security DPC EDPB EU Personal Data Twitter

Irish Data Protection Commission Halts AI Data Practices at X

 

The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) recently took a decisive step against the tech giant X, resulting in the immediate suspension of its use of personal data from European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) users to train its AI model, “Grok.” This marks a significant victory for data privacy, as it is the first time the DPC has taken such substantial action under its powers granted by the Data Protection Act of 2018. 

The DPC initially raised concerns that X’s data practices posed a considerable risk to individuals’ fundamental rights and freedoms. The use of publicly available posts to train the AI model was viewed as an unauthorized collection of sensitive personal data without explicit consent. This intervention highlights the tension between technological innovation and the necessity of safeguarding individual privacy. 

Following the DPC’s intervention, X agreed to cease its current data processing activities and commit to adhering to stricter privacy guidelines. Although the company did not acknowledge any wrongdoing, this outcome sends a strong message to other tech firms about the importance of prioritizing data privacy when developing AI technologies. The immediate halt of Grok AI’s training on data from 60 million European users came in response to mounting regulatory pressure across Europe, with at least nine GDPR complaints filed during its short stint from May 7 to August 1. 

After the suspension, Dr. Des Hogan, Chairperson of the Irish DPC, emphasized that the regulator would continue working with its EU/EEA peers to ensure compliance with GDPR standards, affirming the DPC’s commitment to safeguarding citizens’ rights. The DPC’s decision has broader implications beyond its immediate impact on X. As AI technology rapidly evolves, questions about data ethics and transparency are increasingly urgent. This decision serves as a prompt for a necessary dialogue on the responsible use of personal data in AI development.  

To further address these issues, the DPC has requested an opinion from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) regarding the legal basis for processing personal data in AI models, the extent of data collection permitted, and the safeguards needed to protect individual rights. This guidance is anticipated to set clearer standards for the responsible use of data in AI technologies. The DPC’s actions represent a significant step in regulating AI development, aiming to ensure that these powerful technologies are deployed ethically and responsibly. By setting a precedent for data privacy in AI, the DPC is helping shape a future where innovation and individual rights coexist harmoniously.
Read more »
Technology
communication Data protection QSN Quantum computing Security Technology

The Quantum Revolution: What Needs to Happen Before It Transforms Our World



When Bell Labs introduced the transistor in 1947, few could have predicted its pivotal role in shaping the digital age. Today, quantum computing stands at a similar crossroads, poised to revolutionise industries by solving some of the most complex problems with astonishing speed. Yet, several key challenges must be overcome to unlock its full potential.

The Promise of Quantum Computing

Quantum computers operate on principles of quantum physics, allowing them to process information in ways that classical computers cannot. Unlike traditional computers, which use bits that represent either 0 or 1, quantum computers use qubits that can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This capability enables quantum computers to perform certain calculations exponentially faster than today’s most advanced supercomputers.

This leap in computational power could revolutionise industries by simulating complex systems that are currently beyond the reach of classical computers. For example, quantum computing could imminently accelerate the development of new pharmaceuticals by modelling molecular interactions more precisely, reducing the costly and time-consuming trial-and-error process. Similarly, quantum computers could optimise global logistics networks, leading to more efficient and sustainable operations across industries such as shipping and telecommunications.

Although these transformative applications are not yet a reality, the rapid pace of advancement suggests that quantum computers could begin addressing real-world problems by the 2030s.

Overcoming the Challenges

Despite its promise, quantum computing faces technical challenges, primarily related to the stability of qubits, entanglement, and scalability.

Qubits, the fundamental units of quantum computation, are highly sensitive to environmental fluctuations, which makes them prone to errors. Currently, the information stored in a qubit is often lost within a fraction of a second, leading to error rates that are much higher than those of classical bits. To make quantum computing viable, researchers must develop methods to stabilise or correct these errors, ensuring qubits can retain information long enough to perform useful calculations.

Entanglement, another cornerstone of quantum computing, involves linking qubits in a way that their states become interdependent. For quantum computers to solve complex problems, they require vast networks of entangled qubits that can communicate effectively. However, creating and maintaining such large-scale entanglement remains a significant hurdle. Advances in topological quantum computing, which promises more stable qubits, may provide a solution, but this technology is still in its infancy.

Scalability is the final major challenge. Present-day quantum computers, even the smallest ones, require substantial energy and infrastructure to operate. Realising the full potential of quantum computing will necessitate either making these systems more efficient or finding ways to connect multiple quantum computers to work together seamlessly, thereby increasing their combined computational power.

As quantum computing progresses, so too must the measures we take to secure data. The very power that makes quantum computers so promising also makes them a potential threat if used maliciously. Specifically, a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) could break many of the encryption methods currently used to protect sensitive data. According to a report by the Global Risk Institute, there is an 11% chance that a CRQC could compromise commonly used encryption methods like RSA-2048 within five years, with the risk rising to over 30% within a decade.

To mitigate these risks, governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are establishing guidelines for quantum-safe practices. These initiatives aim to develop quantum-safe solutions that ensure secure communication and data protection in the quantum era. In Europe, South Korea, and Singapore, for example, efforts are underway to create Quantum-Safe Networks (QSN), which use multiple layers of encryption and quantum key distribution (QKD) to safeguard data against future quantum threats.

Building a Quantum-Safe Infrastructure

Developing a quantum-safe infrastructure is becoming increasingly urgent for industries that rely heavily on secure data, such as finance, healthcare, and defence. Quantum-safe networks use advanced technologies like QKD and post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to create a robust defence against potential quantum threats. These networks are designed with a defence-in-depth approach, incorporating multiple layers of encryption to protect against attacks.

Several countries and companies are already taking steps to prepare for a quantum-secure future. For instance, Nokia is collaborating with Greece's national research network, GRNET, to build a nationwide quantum-safe network. In Belgium, Proximus has successfully tested QKD to encrypt data transmissions between its data centres. Similar initiatives are taking place in Portugal and Singapore, where efforts are focused on strengthening cybersecurity through quantum-safe technologies.

Preparing for the Quantum Future

Quantum computing is on the cusp of transforming industries by providing solutions to problems that have long been considered unsolvable. However, realising this potential requires continued innovation to overcome technical challenges and build the necessary security infrastructure. The future of quantum computing is not just about unlocking new possibilities but also about ensuring that this powerful technology is used responsibly and securely.

As we approach a quantum-secure economy, the importance of trust in our digital communications cannot be overstated. Now is the time to prepare for this future, as the impact of quantum computing on our lives is likely to be profound and far-reaching. By embracing the quantum revolution with anticipation and readiness, we can ensure that its benefits are both substantial and secure.


Read more »
User Privacy
China Data protection Digital Rights Privacy User Privacy

From Smartphones to State Security: The Reach of China’s New Surveillance Laws


China’s New Law Expands State Surveillance, Raises Global Concerns

China has enacted new restrictions under its Counter-espionage Law, shocking the international world and raising severe concerns about privacy and human rights. These guidelines, which went into effect on July 1, 2024, provide state security officers broad rights to inspect and search electronic equipment such as smartphones and computers, presumably in the name of national security. 

The "Provisions on Administrative Law Enforcement Procedures of National Security Organs" mark a considerable increase in state monitoring capabilities. Under the new legislation, authorities can now collect "electronic data" from personal devices such as text messages, emails, instant messages, group chats, documents, photos, audio and video files, apps, and log records. This broad mandate effectively converts each citizen's smartphone into a potential source of information for state security authorities.

Loopholes: Easy Searches and Broad Definitions

One of the most concerning downsides to these new regulations is the ease with which state security agents can conduct searches. According to Article 40 of the regulations, law enforcement officers can undertake on-the-spot inspections by just producing their police or reconnaissance cards, with the agreement of a municipal-level state security organ head. In an emergency, these checks can even be conducted without warrants, weakening safeguards against arbitrary enforcement. 

The regulations' ambiguous and sweeping nature is particularly concerning. Article 20 specifies "electronic data" and "audio-visual materials" as evidence that can be utilized in investigations, while Article 41 defines the "person being inspected" as not just the device's owner, but also its holder, custodian, or linked unit. This broad term may subject a wide range of individuals and organizations to examination.

Potential for Abuse and Privacy Invasion

Also, the regulations empower authorities to order individuals and organizations to stop utilizing specific electronic equipment, facilities, and related programs. In circumstances when people refuse to comply with "rectification requirements," state security agencies may seal or seize the gadgets in question. This provision opens the door to possible abuse, allowing the state to effectively muzzle dissenting voices or impede the functioning of organizations it considers harmful. 

The new guidelines also permit the "extraction," collecting, and storage of electronic data for evidence, as well as the seizure of original storage media. This level of penetration into personal data raises major problems regarding the preservation of privacy and confidential information, specifically foreign companies working in China.

Distrust and Limiting Free Expression

While the Ministry of State Security has attempted to soothe concerns by saying that these regulations would target "individuals and organizations related to spy groups" and that "ordinary passengers would not have their smartphones inspected at airports," the provisions' broad language leaves plenty of room for interpretation and potential abuse. 

The adoption of these laws coincides with the Chinese government's wider drive to encourage residents to be watchful against perceived risks to national security, including keeping an eye out for foreign spies in their daily lives. This culture of distrust, combined with additional powers provided to state security institutions, is likely to limit free expression and international participation in China.

Protecting Digital Rights

China's new legislation, which give state security organizations broad rights to examine and confiscate electronic devices, constitute a huge increase in the state's surveillance capabilities and a serious danger to individual privacy and freedom of speech. As the digital dragnet tightens, the international community must remain watchful and push for the protection of fundamental human rights in the digital era. The long-term repercussions of these actions may reach beyond China's borders, establishing a frightening precedent for authoritarian governance in the digital age.

Read more »
Manufacturing Organization
Cyber Awareness Cyber Security Cybersecurity Strategy Data protection data security manufacturing industry Manufacturing Organization

Building Cyber Resilience in Manufacturing: Key Strategies for Success

 

In today's digital landscape, manufacturers face increasing cyber threats that can disrupt operations and compromise sensitive data. Building a culture of cyber resilience is essential to safeguard against these risks. Here are three key strategies manufacturers can implement to enhance their cyber resilience. 

First, manufacturers must prioritize cybersecurity training and awareness across all levels of their organization. Employees should be educated about the latest cyber threats, phishing scams, and best practices for data protection. Regular training sessions, workshops, and simulations can help reinforce the importance of cybersecurity and ensure that all staff members are equipped to recognize and respond to potential threats. By fostering a knowledgeable workforce, manufacturers can significantly reduce the likelihood of successful cyberattacks. Training should be continuous and evolving to keep pace with the rapidly changing cyber threat landscape. Manufacturers can incorporate real-world scenarios and case studies into their training programs to provide employees with practical experience in identifying and mitigating threats. 

Second, adopting robust security measures is crucial for building cyber resilience. Manufacturers should implement multi-layered security protocols, including firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and encryption technologies. Regularly updating software and hardware, conducting vulnerability assessments, and implementing strong access controls can further protect against cyber threats. Additionally, integrating advanced threat detection and response solutions can help identify and mitigate risks in real-time, ensuring a proactive approach to cybersecurity. It is also vital to develop and maintain a comprehensive incident response plan that outlines specific steps to be taken in the event of a cyberattack. 
This plan should include roles and responsibilities, communication protocols, and procedures for containing and mitigating damage. Regular drills and simulations should be conducted to ensure that the incident response plan is effective and that employees are familiar with their roles during an actual event.  

Third, creating a collaborative security culture involves encouraging open communication and cooperation among all departments within the organization. Manufacturers should establish clear protocols for reporting and responding to security incidents, ensuring that employees feel comfortable sharing information about potential threats without fear of reprisal. By promoting a team-oriented approach to cybersecurity, manufacturers can leverage the collective expertise of their workforce to identify vulnerabilities and develop effective mitigation strategies. Fostering collaboration also means engaging with external partners, industry groups, and government agencies to share threat intelligence and best practices. 

By participating in these networks, manufacturers can stay informed about emerging threats and leverage collective knowledge to enhance their security posture. Moreover, manufacturers should invest in the latest cybersecurity technologies to protect their systems. This includes implementing AI-powered threat detection systems that can identify and respond to anomalies more quickly than traditional methods. Manufacturers should also consider employing cybersecurity experts or consulting firms to audit their systems regularly and provide recommendations for improvement. 

Finally, fostering a culture of cyber resilience involves leadership commitment from the top down. Executives and managers must prioritize cybersecurity and allocate sufficient resources to protect the organization. This includes not only financial investment but also dedicating time and effort to understand cybersecurity challenges and support initiatives aimed at strengthening defenses.
Read more »
Privacy
Data protection European Union GDPR Meta Privacy

Navigating Meta’s AI Data Training: Opt-Out Challenges and Privacy Considerations

Navigating Meta’s AI Data Training: Opt-Out Challenges and Privacy Considerations

The privacy policy update

Meta will reportedly amend its privacy policy beginning June 26 to allow its AI to be educated on your data. 

The story spread on social media after Meta sent out emails and notifications to subscribers in the United Kingdom and the European Union informing them of the change and offering them the option to opt out of data collecting. 

One UK-based user, Phillip Bloom, publicly published the message, informing everyone about the impending changes, which appear to also affect Instagram users.

The AI training process

These changes provide Meta permission to use your information and personal material from Meta-related services to train its AI. This implies that the social media giant will be able to use public Facebook posts, Instagram photographs and captions, and messages to Meta's AI chatbots to train its huge language model and other AI capabilities.

Meta states that private messages will not be included in the training data, and the business emphasizes in its emails and notifications that each user (in a protected region) has the "right to object" to the data being utilized. 

Once implemented, the new policy will begin automatically extracting information from the affected types of material. To avoid Meta removing your content, you can opt out right now by going to this Facebook help website. 

Keep in mind that this page will only load if you are in the European Union, the United Kingdom, or any country where Meta is required by law to provide an opt-out option.

Opting out: EU and UK users

If you live in the European Union, the United Kingdom, or another country with severe enough data protection regulations for Meta to provide an opt-out, go to the support page listed above, fill out the form, and submit it. 

You'll need to select your nation and explain why you're opting out in a text box, and you'll have the option to offer more information below that. You should receive a response indicating whether Meta will honor your request to opt out of having your data utilized. 

Prepare to fight—some users say that their requests are being denied, even though in countries governed by legislation such as the European Union's GDPR, Meta should be required to honor your request.

Challenges for users outside the EU and UK

There are a few caveats to consider. While the opt-out protects you, it does not guarantee that your postings will be protected if they are shared by friends or family members who have not opted out of using data for AI training. 

Make sure that any family members who use Facebook or other Meta services opt out, if possible. This move isn't surprising given that Meta has been gradually expanding its AI offerings on its platforms. 

As a result, the utilization of user data, particularly among Meta services, was always expected. There is too much data for the corporation to pass up as training material for its numerous AI programs.

Read more »
Theft Prevention
AI technology Android Android devices Android Security Cyber Security Data protection Google Theft Prevention

Google Introduces Advanced Anti-Theft and Data Protection Features for Android Devices

 

Google is set to introduce multiple anti-theft and data protection features later this year, targeting devices from Android 10 up to the upcoming Android 15. These new security measures aim to enhance user protection in cases of device theft or loss, combining AI and new authentication protocols to safeguard sensitive data. 

One of the standout features is the AI-powered Theft Detection Lock. This innovation will lock your device's screen if it detects abrupt motions typically associated with theft attempts, such as a thief snatching the device out of your hand. Another feature, the Offline Device Lock, ensures that your device will automatically lock if it is disconnected from the network or if there are too many failed authentication attempts, preventing unauthorized access. 

Google also introduced the Remote Lock feature, allowing users to lock their stolen devices remotely via android.com/lock. This function requires only the phone number and a security challenge, giving users time to recover their account details and utilize additional options in Find My Device, such as initiating a full factory reset to wipe the device clean. 

According to Google Vice President Suzanne Frey, these features aim to make it significantly harder for thieves to access stolen devices. All these features—Theft Detection Lock, Offline Device Lock, and Remote Lock—will be available through a Google Play services update for devices running Android 10 or later. Additionally, the new Android 15 release will bring enhanced factory reset protection. This upgrade will require Google account credentials during the setup process if a stolen device undergoes a factory reset. 

This step renders stolen devices unsellable, thereby reducing incentives for phone theft. Frey explained that without the device or Google account credentials, a thief won't be able to set up the device post-reset, essentially bricking the stolen device. To further bolster security, Android 15 will mandate the use of PIN, password, or biometric authentication when accessing or changing critical Google account and device settings from untrusted locations. This includes actions like changing your PIN, accessing Passkeys, or disabling theft protection. 

Similarly, disabling Find My Device or extending the screen timeout will also require authentication, adding another layer of security against criminals attempting to render a stolen device untrackable. Android 15 will also introduce "private spaces," which can be locked using a user-chosen PIN. This feature is designed to protect sensitive data stored in apps, such as health or financial information, from being accessed by thieves.                                                                           
These updates, including factory reset protection and private spaces, will be part of the Android 15 launch this fall. Enhanced authentication protections will roll out to select devices later this year. 
Google also announced at Google I/O 2024 new features in Android 15 and Google Play Protect aimed at combating scams, fraud, spyware, and banking malware. These comprehensive updates underline Google's commitment to user security in the increasingly digital age.
Read more »
VPN
Cyber Security Data protection Encryption internet Security IP address hiding Online Privacy VPN

Understanding the Complexities of VPNs: Balancing Privacy and Security in the Digital Age

 

Virtual private networks (VPNs) are crafted to safeguard online privacy through the encryption of internet traffic and concealment of IP addresses, thereby preventing the determination of user locations. This functionality becomes apparent when users attempt to access websites or services while abroad. 

Typically, an IP address triggers the loading of a URL based on the local area, potentially limiting access to U.S.-based services or sites. VPNs offer a workaround for such constraints. For instance, a U.S. traveler in Europe might face restrictions accessing certain paid streaming services available in the U.S., which can be circumvented by a VPN masking the local European IP address, thus granting access to U.S.-based content.

When utilizing a VPN, a VPN server substitutes its IP address as it transmits encrypted data to the public internet. For example, if an individual resides in New York but connects to a VPN server in Amsterdam, their IP address will reflect a location in the Netherlands. While VPNs appear to conceal a user's digital footprint, they don't ensure absolute anonymity. Internet service providers (ISPs) can detect VPN usage but cannot access specific online activities protected by VPN encryption, such as browsing history or downloaded files. VPNs are effective in preventing government agencies from surveilling users' online activities by creating an encrypted tunnel that shields data from prying eyes.

Despite their advantages, VPNs are not foolproof. In the event of a system breach, cybercriminals can bypass VPN protection and access user data. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, law enforcement agencies can obtain access to VPN data. In cases of serious crimes, police may request online data from a user's ISP, and if a VPN is employed, the VPN provider may be compelled to disclose user details. VPN logs have facilitated law enforcement in apprehending individuals involved in criminal activities by revealing their actual IP addresses.

Law enforcement agencies can legally request specific information from VPN providers, including logs of websites visited and services used while connected to the VPN, actual IP addresses, connection timestamps, and billing information. While some VPN providers claim to adhere to a no-logs policy to enhance anonymity, data may still be accessible under legal compulsion or through undisclosed logging practices. The level of cooperation with law enforcement varies among VPN providers, with some readily providing information upon request and others being less cooperative.

In terms of tracking IP addresses, police may obtain access to VPN connection logs, allowing them to trace a user's actual IP address and identify the user's device and identity. However, live encrypted VPN traffic is challenging to track, limiting law enforcement's ability to monitor online activities in real-time. Nevertheless, malware attacks and breaches in VPN security can compromise user data, emphasizing the importance of maintaining updated software and security measures.

Data retention laws vary by country, impacting the degree of privacy offered by VPNs. Users are advised to select VPN providers located in countries with strong privacy protections. Conversely, countries with stringent data retention laws may compel VPN providers to share user data with government agencies, posing risks to user privacy. Certain nations, such as China and North Korea, have extensive internet censorship measures, making it essential for users to exercise caution when using VPNs in these regions.

While VPNs alter IP addresses and encrypt data, they do not guarantee complete anonymity. Technically proficient individuals may find ways to track VPN data, and sophisticated tracking techniques, such as browser fingerprinting, can potentially reveal a user's identity. Moreover, corporate VPN users may be subject to monitoring by their employers, highlighting the importance of understanding the privacy policies of commercial VPN providers.

In conclusion, while VPNs offer enhanced privacy and security for online activities, users should be aware of their limitations and potential vulnerabilities. Maintaining awareness of privacy laws and selecting reputable VPN providers can mitigate risks associated with online privacy and data security.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)