Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Data. Show all posts

Exposed Training Opens the Gap for Crypto Mining in Cloud Enviornments


Purposely flawed training apps are largely used for security education, product demonstrations, and internal testing. Tools like bWAPP, OWASP Juice Shop, and DVWA are built to be unsafe by default, making them useful to learn how common attack tactics work in controlled scenarios. 

The problem is not the applications but how they are used in real-world cloud environments. 

Penetra Labs studied how training and demo apps are being deployed throughout cloud infrastructures and found a recurring pattern: apps made for isolated lab use were mostly found revealed to the public internet, operating within active cloud profiles, and linked to cloud agents with larger access than needed. 

Deployment Patterns analysis 

Pentera Labs found that these apps were often used with default settings, extra permissive cloud roles, and minimal isolation. The research found that alot of these compromised training environments were linked to active cloud agents and escalated roles, allowing attackers to infiltrate the vulnerable apps themselves and also tap into the customer’s larger cloud infrastructure. 

In the contexts, just one exposed training app can work as initial foothold. Once the threat actors are able to exploit linked cloud agents and escalated roles, they are accessible to the original host or application. But they can also interact with different resources in the same cloud environment, raising the scope and potential impact of the compromise. 

As part of the investigation, Pentera Labs verified nearly 2,000 live, exposed training application instances, with close to 60% hosted on customer-managed infrastructure running on AWS, Azure, or GCP.

Proof of active exploitation 

The investigation revealed that the exposed training environments weren't just improperly set up. Pentera Labs found unmistakable proof that attackers were actively taking advantage of this vulnerability in the wild. 

About 20% of cases in the larger dataset of training applications that were made public were discovered to have malicious actor-deployed artifacts, such as webshells, persistence mechanisms, and crypto-mining activity. These artifacts showed that exposed systems had already been compromised and were still being abused. 

The existence of persistence tools and active crypto-mining indicates that exposed training programs are already being widely exploited in addition to being discoverable.

SolarWinds Web Help Desk Compromised for RCE Multi Stage


SolarWinds compromised 

The threat actors used internet-exposed SolarWinds Web Help Desk (WHD) instances to gain initial access and then proceed laterally across the organization's network to other high-value assets, according to Microsoft's disclosure of a multi-stage attack. 

However, it is unclear if the activity used a previously patched vulnerability (CVE-2025-26399, CVSS score: 9.8) or recently revealed vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-40551, CVSS score: 9.8, and CVE-2025-40536, CVSS score: 8.1), according to the Microsoft Defender Security Research Team.

"Since the attacks occurred in December 2025 and on machines vulnerable to both the old and new set of CVEs at the same time, we cannot reliably confirm the exact CVE used to gain an initial foothold," the company said in the report. 

About the exploit

CVE-2025-40551 and CVE-2025-26399 both relate to untrusted data deserialization vulnerabilities that could result in remote code execution, and CVE-2025-400536 is a security control bypass vulnerability that might enable an unauthenticated attacker to access some restricted functionality.

Citing proof of active exploitation in the field, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added CVE-2025-40551 to its list of known exploited vulnerabilities (KEVs) last week. By February 6, 2026, agencies of the Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) were required to implement the solutions for the defect. 

The impact 

The successful exploitation of the exposed SolarWinds WHD instance in the attacks that Microsoft discovered gave the attackers the ability to execute arbitrary commands within the WHD application environment and accomplish unauthenticated remote code execution.

Microsoft claimed that in at least one instance, the threat actors used a DCSync attack, in which they impersonated a Domain Controller (DC) and asked an Active Directory (AD) database for password hashes and other private data. 

What can users do?

Users are recommended to update WHD instances, identify and eliminate any unauthorized RMM tools, rotate admin and service accounts, and isolate vulnerable workstations to minimize the breach in order to combat the attack. 

"This activity reflects a common but high-impact pattern: a single exposed application can provide a path to full domain compromise when vulnerabilities are unpatched or insufficiently monitored," the creator of Windows stated.

Ukraine Increases Control Over Starlink Terminals


New Starlink verification system 

Ukraine has launched a new authentication system for Starlink satellite internet terminals used by the public and the military after verifying that Russia state sponsored hackers have started using the technology to attack drones. 

The government has also introduced a compulsory “whitelist” for Starlink terminals, where only authenticated and registered devices will work in Ukraine. All other terminals used will be removed, as per the statement from Mykhailo Fedorov, country's recently appointed defense chief. 

Why the new move?

Kyiv claims that Russian unmanned aerial vehicles are now being commanded in real time using Starlink links, making them more difficult to detect, jam, or shoot down. This action is intended to counteract these threats. "It is challenging to intercept Russian drones that are equipped with Starlink," Fedorov stated earlier this week. "They can be controlled by operators over long distances in real time, will not be affected by electronic warfare, and fly at low altitudes." The Ministry of Defense is implementing the whitelist in collaboration with SpaceX, the company that runs the constellation of low-Earth orbit satellites for Starlink.

The step is presently the only technological way to stop Russia from abusing the system, Fedorov revealed Wednesday, adding that citizens have already started registering their terminals. "The government has taken this forced action to save Ukrainian lives and safeguard our energy infrastructure," he stated. 

How will it impact other sectors?

Businesses will be able to validate devices online using Ukraine's e-government services, while citizens will be able to register their terminals at local government offices under the new system. According to Ukraine's Ministry of Defense, military units will be exempt from disclosing account information and will utilize a different secure registration method.

Using Starlink connectivity, Ukraine discovered a Russian drone operating over Ukrainian territory at the end of January. After then, Kyiv got in touch with SpaceX to resolve the problem, albeit the specifics of the emergency procedures were not made public. Army, a Ukrainian military outletSetting a maximum speed at which Starlink terminals can operate was one step, according to Inform, which cited an initial cap of about 75 kilometers per hour. According to the study, Russian strike drones usually fly faster than that, making it impossible for operators to manage them in real time.


YouTube's New GenAI Feature in Tools Coming Soon


Youtube is planning something new for its platform and content creators in 2026. The company plans to integrate AI into its existing and new tools. The CEO said that content creators will be able to use GenAI for shorts. While we don't know much about the feature yet, it looks like OpenAI’s Sora app where users make videos of themselves via prompt. 

What will be new in 2026? 

“This year you'll be able to create a Short using your own likeness, produce games with a simple text prompt, and experiment with music “ said CEO Neal Mohan. All these apps will be AI-powered which many creators may not like. Many users prefer non-AI content. CEO Neil Mohan has addressed these concerns and said that “throughout this evolution, AI will remain a tool for expression, not a replacement.”

But the CEO didn't provide other details about these new AI capabilities. It is not clear how this will help the creators and the music experimentation work. 

That's not all, though.

Additionally, YouTube will introduce new formats for shorts. According to Mohan, Shorts would let users to share images in the same way as Instagram Reels does. Direct sharing of these will occur on the subscribers' feed. 

In 2026, YouTube will likewise concentrate on the biggest displays it can be accessed on, which are televisions. According to Mohan, the business will soon introduce "more than 10 specialized YouTube TV plans spanning sports, entertainment, and news, all designed to give subscribers more control," along with "fully customizable multiview.”

Why new feature?

Mohan noted that the creator economy is another area of concern. According to YouTube's CEO, video producers will discover new revenue streams this year. The suggestions made include fan funding elements like jewelry and gifts, which will be included in addition to the current Super Chat, as well as shopping and brand bargains made possible by YouTube. 

YouTube's new venture

The business also hopes to grow YouTube Shopping, an affiliate program that lets content producers sell goods directly in their videos, shorts, and live streams. The business stated that it will implement in-app checkout in 2026, enabling users to make purchases without ever leaving the site.


Infy Hackers Strike Again With New C2 Servers After Iran's Internet Shutdown Ends


Infy group's new attack tactic 

An Iranian hacking group known as Infy (aka Prince of Persia) has advanced its attack tactics to hide its operations. The group also made a new C2 infrastructure while there was a wave of internet shutdown imposed earlier this year. The gang stopped configuring its C2 servers on January 8 when experts started monitoring Infy. 

In reaction to previous protests, Iranian authorities implemented a nationwide internet shutdown on this day, which probably indicates that even government-affiliated cyber units did not have the internet. 

About the campaign 

The new activity was spotted on 26 January 2026 while the gang was setting up its new C2 servers, one day prior to the Iranian government’s internet restrictions. This suggests that the threat actor may be state-sponsored and supported by Iran. 

Infy is one of the many state-sponsored hacking gangs working out of Iran infamous for sabotage, spying, and influence campaigns coordinated with Tehran’s strategic goals. However, it also has a reputation for being the oldest and less famous gangs staying under the radar and not getting caught, working secretly since 2004 via “laser-focused” campaigns aimed at people for espionage.

The use of modified versions of Foudre and Tonnerre, the latter of which used a Telegram bot probably for data collection and command issuance, were among the new tradecraft linked to the threat actor that SafeBreach revealed in a report released in December 2025. Tornado is the codename for the most recent version of Tonnerre (version 50).

The report also revealed that threat actors replaced the C2 infrastructure for all variants of Tonnerre and Foudre and also released Tornado variant 51 that employs both Telegram and HTTP for C2.

It generates C2 domain names using two distinct techniques: a new DGA algorithm initially, followed by fixed names utilizing blockchain data de-obfuscation. We believe that this novel method offers more flexibility in C2 domain name registration without requiring an upgrade to the Tornado version.

Experts believe that Infy also abused a 1-day security bug in WinRAR to extract the Tornado payload on an infected host to increase the effectiveness of its attacks. The RAR archives were sent to the Virus Total platform from India and Germany in December 2025. This means the two countries may have been victims. 



Experts Find Malicious Browser Extensions, Chrome, Safari, and Edge Affected


Threat actors exploit extensions

Cybersecurity experts found 17 extensions for Chrome, Edge, and Firefox browsers which track user's internet activity and install backdoors for access. The extensions were downloaded over 840,000 times. 

The campaign is not new. LayerX claimed that the campaign is part of GhostPoster, another campaign first found by Koi Security last year in December. Last year, researchers discovered 17 different extensions that were downloaded over 50,000 times and showed the same monitoring behaviour and deploying backdoors. 

Few extensions from the new batch were uploaded in 2020, exposing users to malware for years. The extensions appeared in places like the Edge store and later expanded to Firefox and Chrome. 

Few extensions stored malicious JavaScript code in the PNG logo. The code is a kind of instruction on downloading the main payload from a remote server. 

The main payload does multiple things. It can hijack affiliate links on famous e-commerce websites to steal money from content creators and influencers. “The malware watches for visits to major e-commerce platforms. When you click an affiliate link on Taobao or JD.com, the extension intercepts it. The original affiliate, whoever was supposed to earn a commission from your purchase, gets nothing. The malware operators get paid instead,” said Koi researchers. 

After that, it deploys Google Analytics tracking into every page that people open, and removes security headers from HTTP responses. 

In the end, it escapes CAPTCHA via three different ways, and deploy invisible iframes that do ad frauds, click frauds, and tracking. These iframes disappear after 15 seconds.

Besides this, all extensions were deleted from the repositories, but users shoul also remove them personally. 

This staged execution flow demonstrates a clear evolution toward longer dormancy, modularity, and resilience against both static and behavioral detection mechanisms,” said LayerX. 

The PNG steganography technique is employed by some. Some people download JavaScript directly and include it into each page you visit. Others employ bespoke ciphers to encode the C&C domains and use concealed eval() calls. The same assailant. identical servers. many methods of delivery. This appears to be testing several strategies to see which one gets the most installs, avoids detection the longest, and makes the most money.

This campaign reflects a deliberate shift toward patience and precision. By embedding malicious code in images, delaying execution, and rotating delivery techniques across identical infrastructure, the attackers test which methods evade detection longest. The strategy favors longevity and profit over speed, exposing how browser ecosystems remain vulnerable to quietly persistent threats.

Federal Agencies Worldwide Hunt for Black Basta Ransomware Leader


International operation to catch Ransomware leader 

International law enforcement agencies have increased their search for individuals linked to the Black Basta ransomware campaign. Agencies confirmed that the suspected leader of the Russia-based Ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) group has been put in the EU’s and Interpol’s Most Wanted list and Red Notice respectively. German and Ukrainian officials have found two more suspects working from Ukraine. 

As per the notice, German Federal Criminal Police (BKA) and Ukrainian National Police collaborated to find members of a global hacking group linked with Russia. 

About the operation 

The agencies found two Ukrainians who had specific roles in the criminal structure of Black Basta Ransomware. Officials named the gang’s alleged organizer as Oleg Evgenievich Nefedov from Russia. He is wanted internationally. German law enforcement agencies are after him because of “extortion in an especially serious case, formation and leadership of a criminal organization, and other criminal offenses.”

According to German prosecutors, Nefedov was the ringleader and primary decision-maker of the group that created and oversaw the Black Basta ransomware. under several aliases, such as tramp, tr, AA, Kurva, Washingt0n, and S.Jimmi. He is thought to have created and established the malware known as Black Basta. 

The Ukrainian National Police described how the German BKA collaborated with domestic cyber police officers and investigators from the Main Investigative Department, guided by the Office of the Prosecutor General's Cyber Department, to interfere with the group's operations.

The suspects

Two individuals operating in Ukraine were found to be carrying out technical tasks necessary for ransomware attacks as part of the international investigation. Investigators claim that these people were experts at creating ransomware campaigns and breaking into secured systems. They used specialized software to extract passwords from business computer systems, operating as so-called "hash crackers." 

Following the acquisition of employee credentials, the suspects allegedly increased their control over corporate environments, raised the privileges of hacked accounts, and gained unauthorized access to internal company networks.

Authorities claimed that after gaining access, malware intended to encrypt files was installed, sensitive data was stolen, and vital systems were compromised. The suspects' homes in the Ivano-Frankivsk and Lviv regions were searched with permission from the court. Digital storage devices and cryptocurrency assets were among the evidence of illicit activity that police confiscated during these operations.

Apple's New Feature Will Help Users Restrict Location Data


Apple has introduced a new privacy feature that allows users to restrict the accuracy of location data shared with cellular networks on a few iPad models and iPhone. 

About the feature

The “Limit Precise Location” feature will start after updating to iOS26.3 or later. It restricts the information that mobile carriers use to decide locations through cell tower connections. Once turned on, cellular networks can only detect the device’s location, like neighbourhood instead of accurate street address. 

According to Apple, “The precise location setting doesn't impact the precision of the location data that is shared with emergency responders during an emergency call.” “This setting affects only the location data available to cellular networks. It doesn't impact the location data that you share with apps through Location Services. For example, it has no impact on sharing your location with friends and family with Find My.”

Users can turn on the feature by opening “Settings,” selecting “Cellular,” “Cellular Data Options,” and clicking the “Limit Precise Location” setting. After turning on limited precise location, the device may trigger a device restart to complete activation. 

The privacy enhancement feature works only on iPhone Air, iPad Pro (M5) Wi-Fi + Cellular variants running on iOS 26.3 or later. 

Where will it work?

The availability of this feature will depend on carrier support. The mobile networks compatible are:

EE and BT in the UK

Boost Mobile in the UK

Telecom in Germany 

AIS and True in Thailand 

Apple hasn't shared the reason for introducing this feature yet.

Compatibility of networks with the new feature 

Apple's new privacy feature, which is currently only supported by a small number of networks, is a significant step towards ensuring that carriers can only collect limited data on their customers' movements and habits because cellular networks can easily track device locations via tower connections for network operations.

“Cellular networks can determine your location based on which cell towers your device connects to. The limit precise location setting enhances your location privacy by reducing the precision of location data available to cellular networks,”

AI Agent Integration Can Become a Problem in Workplace Operations


AI agents were considered harmless sometime ago. They did what they were supposed to do: write snippets of code, answer questions, and help users in doing things faster. 

Then business started expecting more.

Slowly, companies started using organizational agents over personal copilots- agents integrated into customer support, HR, IT, engineering, and operations. These agents didn't just suggest, but started acting- touching real systems, changing configurations, and moving real data:

  • A support agent that gets customer data from CRM, triggers backend fixes, updates tickets, and checks bills.
  • An HR agent who overlooks access throughout VPNs, IAM, SaaS apps.
  • A change management agent that processes requests, logs actions in ServiceNow, updates production configurations and Confluence.
  • These AI agents automate oversight and control, and have become core of companies’ operational infrastructure

Work of AI agents

Organizational agents are made to work across many resources, supporting various roles, multiple users, and workflows via a single implement. Instead of getting linked with an individual user, these business agents work as shared resources that cater to requests, and automate work of across systems for many users. 

To work effectively, the AI agents depend on shared accounts, OAuth grants, and API keys to verify with the systems for interaction. The credentials are long-term and managed centrally, enabling the agent to work continuously. 

Threat of AI agents in workplace 

While this approach maximizes convenience and coverage, these design choices can unintentionally create powerful access intermediaries that bypass traditional permission boundaries.

Although this strategy optimizes coverage and convenience, these design decisions may inadvertently provide strong access intermediaries that go beyond conventional permission constraints. The next actions may seem legitimate and harmless when agents inadvertently grant access outside the specific user's authority. 

Reliable detection and attribution are eliminated when the execution is attributed to the agent identity, losing the user context. Conventional security controls are not well suited for agent-mediated workflows because they are based on direct system access and human users. Permissions are enforced by IAM systems according to the user's identity, but when an AI agent performs an activity, authorization is assessed based on the agent's identity rather than the requester's.

The impact 

Therefore, user-level limitations are no longer in effect. By assigning behavior to the agent's identity and concealing who started the action and why, logging and audit trails exacerbate the issue. Security teams are unable to enforce least privilege, identify misuse, or accurately assign intent when using agents, which makes it possible for permission bypasses to happen without setting off conventional safeguards. Additionally, the absence of attribution slows incident response, complicates investigations, and makes it challenging to ascertain the scope or aim of a security occurrence.

n8n Supply Chain Attack Exploits Community Nodes In Google Ads Integration to Steal Tokens


Hackers were found uploading a set of eight packages on the npm registry that pretended as integrations attacking the n8n workflow automation platform to steal developers’ OAuth credentials. 

About the exploit 

The package is called “n8n-nodes-hfgjf-irtuinvcm-lasdqewriit”, it copies Google Ads integration and asks users to connect their ad account in a fake form and steal OAuth credentials from servers under the threat actors’ control. 

Endor Labs released a report on the incident. "The attack represents a new escalation in supply chain threats,” it said. Adding that “unlike traditional npm malware, which often targets developer credentials, this campaign exploited workflow automation platforms that act as centralized credential vaults – holding OAuth tokens, API keys, and sensitive credentials for dozens of integrated services like Google Ads, Stripe, and Salesforce in a single location," according to the report. 

Attack tactic 

Experts are not sure if the packages share similar malicious functions. But Reversing labs Spectra Assure analysed a few packages and found no security issues. In one package called “n8n-nodes-zl-vietts,” it found a malicious component with malware history. 

The campaign might still be running as another updated version of the package “n8n-nodes-gg-udhasudsh-hgjkhg-official” was posted to npm recently.

Once installed as a community node, the malicious package works as a typical n8n integration, showing configuration screens. Once the workflow is started, it launches a code to decode the stored tokens via n8n’s master key and send the stolen data to a remote server. 

This is the first time a supply chain attack has specially targeted the n8n ecosystem, with hackers exploiting the trust in community integrations. 

New risks in ad integration 

The report exposed the security gaps due to untrusted workflows integration, which increases the attack surface. Experts have advised developers to audit packages before installing them, check package metadata for any malicious component, and use genuine n8n integrations. 

The findings highlight the security issues that come with integrating untrusted workflows, which can expand the attack surface. Developers are recommended to audit packages before installing them, scrutinize package metadata for any anomalies, and use official n8n integrations.

According to researchers Kiran Raj and Henrik Plate, "Community nodes run with the same level of access as n8n itself. They can read environment variables, access the file system, make outbound network requests, and, most critically, receive decrypted API keys and OAuth tokens during workflow execution.”

Trust Wallet Browser Extension Hacked, $7 Million Stolen


Users of the Binance-owned Trust wallet lost more than $7 million after the release of an updated chrome extension. Changpenng Zhao, company co-founder said that the company will cover the stolen money of all the affected users. Crypto investigator ZachXBT believes hundreds of Trust Wallet users suffered losses due to the extension flaw. 

Trust Wallets in a post on X said, “We’ve identified a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68 only. Users with Browser Extension 2.68 should disable and upgrade to 2.69.”

CZ has assured that the company is investigating how threat actors were able to compromise the new version. 

Affected users

Mobile-only users and browser extension versions are not impacted. User funds are SAFE,” Zhao wrote in a post on X.

The compromise happened because of a flaw in a version of the Trust Wallet Google Chrome browser extension. 

What to do if you are a victim?

If you suffered the compromise of Browser Extension v2.68, follow these steps on Trust Wallet X site:

  • To safeguard your wallet's security and prevent any problems, do not open the Trust Wallet Browser Extension v2.68 on your desktop computer. 
  • Copy this URL into the address bar of your Chrome browser to open the Chrome Extensions panel: chrome://extensions/?id=egjidjbpglichdcondbcbdnbeeppgdph
  • If the toggle is still "On," change it to "Off" beneath the Trust Wallet. 
  • Select "Developer mode" from the menu in the top right corner. 
  • Click the "Update" button in the upper left corner. 
  • Verify the 2.69 version number. The most recent and safe version is this one. 

Please wait to open the Browser Extension until you have updated to Extension version 2.69. This helps safeguard the security of your wallet and avoids possible problems.

How did the public react?

Social media users expressed their views. One said, “The problem has been going on for several hours,” while another user complained that the company ”must explain what happened and compensate all users affected. Otherwise reputation is tarnished.” A user also asked, “How did the vulnerability in version 2.68 get past testing, and what changes are being made to prevent similar issues?”

Okta Report: Pirates of Payrolls Attacks Plague Corporate Industry


IT helps desks be ready for an evolving threat that sounds like a Hollywood movie title. In December 2025, Okta Threat Intelligent published a report that explained how hackers can gain unauthorized access to payroll software. These threats are infamous as payroll pirate attacks. 

Pirates of the payroll

These attacks start with threat actors calling an organization’s help desk, pretending to be a user and requesting a password reset. 

“Typically, what the adversary will do is then come back to the help desk, probably to someone else on the phone, and say, ‘Well, I have my password, but I need my MFA factor reset,’” according to VP of Okta Threat Intelligence Brett Winterford. “And then they enroll their own MFA factor, and from there, gain access to those payroll applications for the purposes of committing fraud.”

Attack tactic 

The threat actors are working at a massive scale and leveraging various services and devices to assist their malicious activities. According to Okta report, cyber thieves employed social engineering, calling help desk personnel on the phone and attempting to trick them into resetting the password for a user account. These attacks have impacted multiple industries,

“They’re certainly some kind of cybercrime organization or fraud organization that is doing this at scale,” Winterford said. Okta believes the hackers gang is based out of West Africa. 

Recently, the US industry has been plagued with payroll pirates in the education sector. The latest Okta research mentions that these schemes are now happening across different industries like retail sector and manufacturing. “It’s not often you’ll see a huge number of targets in two distinct industries. I can’t tell you why, but education [and] manufacturing were massively targeted,” Winterford said. 

How to mitigate pirates of payroll attacks?

Okta advises companies to establish a standard process to check the real identity of users who contact the help desk for aid. Winterford advised businesses that depend on outsourced IT help should limit their help desks’ ability to reset user passwords without robust measures. “In some organizations, they’re relying on nothing but passwords to get access to payroll systems, which is madness,” he said.



Google Launches Emergency Location Services in India for Android Devices


Google starts emergency location service in India

Google recently announced the launch of its Emergency Location Service (ELS) in India for compatible Android smartphones. It means that users who are in an emergency can call or contact emergency service providers like police, firefighters, and healthcare professionals. ELS can share the user's accurate location immediately. 

Uttar Pradesh (UP) in India has become the first state to operationalise ELS for Android devices. Earlier, ELS was rolled out to devices having Android 6 or newer versions. For integration, however, ELS will require state authorities to connect it with their services for activation. 

More about ELS

According to Google, the ELS function on Android handsets has been activated in India. The built-in emergency service will enable Android users to communicate their location by call or SMS in order to receive assistance from emergency service providers, such as firefighters, police, and medical personnel. 

ELS on Android collects information from the device's GPS, Wi-Fi, and cellular networks in order to pinpoint the user's exact location, with an accuracy of up to 50 meters.

Implementation details

However, local wireless and emergency infrastructure operators must enable support for the ELS capability. The first state in India to "fully" operationalize the service for Android devices is Uttar Pradesh. 

ELS assistance has been integrated with the emergency number 112 by the state police in partnership with Pert Telecom Solutions. It is a free service that solely monitors a user's position when an Android phone dials 112. 

Google added that all suitable handsets running Android 6.0 and later versions now have access to the ELS functionality. 

Even if a call is dropped within seconds of being answered, the business claims that ELS in Android has enabled over 20 million calls and SMS messages to date. ELS is supported by Android Fused Location Provider- Google's machine learning tool.

Promising safety?

According to Google, the feature is only available to emergency service providers and it will never collect or share accurate location data for itself. The ELS data will be sent directly only to the concerned authority.

Recently, Google also launched the Emergency Live Video feature for Android devices. It lets users share their camera feed during an emergency via a call or SMS with the responder. But the emergency service provider has to get user approval for the access. The feature is shown on screen immediately when the responder requests a video from their side. User can accept the request and provide a visual feed or reject the request.

High Severity Flaw In Open WebUI Can Leak User Conversations and Data


A high-severity security bug impacting Open WebUI has been found by experts. It may expose users to account takeover (ATO) and, in some incidents, cause full server compromise. 

Talking about WebUI, Cato researchers said, “When a platform of this size becomes vulnerable, the impact isn’t just theoretical. It affects production environments managing research data, internal codebases, and regulated information.”

The flaw is tracked as CVE-2025-64496 and found by Cato Networks experts. The vulnerability affects Open WebUI versions 0.6.34 and older if the Director Connection feature is allowed. The flaw has a severity rating of 7.3 out of 10. 

The vulnerability exists inside Direct Connections, which allows users to connect Open WebUI to external OpenAI-supported model servers. While built for supporting flexibility and self-hosted AI workflows, the feature can be exploited if a user is tricked into linking with a malicious server pretending to be a genuine AI endpoint. 

Fundamentally, the vulnerability comes from a trust relapse between unsafe model servers and the user's browser session. A malicious server can send a tailored server-sent events message that prompts the deployment of JavaScript code in the browser. This lets a threat actor steal authentication tokens stored in local storage. When the hacker gets these tokens, it gives them full access to the user's Open WebUI account. Chats, API keys, uploaded documents, and other important data is exposed. 

Depending on user privileges, the consequences can be different.

Consequences?

  • Hackers can steal JSON web tokens and hijack sessions. 
  • Full account hack, this includes access to chat logs and uploaded documents.
  • Leak of important data and credentials shared in conversations. 
  • If the user has enabled workspace.tools permission, it can lead to remote code execution (RCE). 

Open WebUI maintainers were informed about the issue in October 2025, and publicly disclosed in November 2025, after patch validation and CVE assignment. Open WebUI variants 0.6.35 and later stop the compromised execute events, patching the user-facing threat.

Open WebUI’s security patch will work for v0.6.35 or “newer versions, which closes the user-facing Direct Connections vulnerability. However, organizations still need to strengthen authentication, sandbox extensibility and restrict access to specific resources,” according to Cato Networks researchers.





New US Proposal Allows Users to Sue AI Companies Over Unauthorised Data Use


US AI developers would be subject to data privacy obligations applicable in federal court under a wide legislative proposal disclosed recently by the US senate Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn. 

About the proposal

Beside this, the proposal will create a federal right for users to sue companies for misusing their personal data for AI model training without proper consent. The proposal allows statutory and punitive damages, attorney fees and injunctions. 

Blackburn is planning to officially introduce the bill this year to codify President Donald Trump’s push for “one federal rule book” for AI, according to the press release. 

Why the need for AI regulations 

The legislative framework comes on the heels of Trump’s signing of an executive order aimed at blocking “onerous” AI laws at the state level and promoting a national policy framework for the technology.  

In order to ensure that there is a least burdensome national standard rather than fifty inconsistent State ones, the directive required the administration to collaborate with Congress. 

Michael Kratsios, the president's science and technology adviser, and David Sacks, the White House special adviser for AI and cryptocurrency, were instructed by the president to jointly propose federal AI legislation that would supersede any state laws that would contradict with administration policy. 

Blackburn stated in the Friday release that rather than advocating for AI amnesty, President Trump correctly urged Congress to enact federal standards and protections to address the patchwork of state laws that have impeded AI advancement.

Key highlights of proposal:

  • Mandate that regulations defining "minimum reasonable" AI protections be created by the Federal Trade Commission. 
  • Give the U.S. attorney general, state attorneys general, and private parties the authority to sue AI system creators for damages resulting from "unreasonably dangerous or defective product claims."
  • Mandate that sizable, state-of-the-art AI developers put procedures in place to control and reduce "catastrophic" risks associated with their systems and provide reports to the Department of Homeland Security on a regular basis. 
  • Hold platforms accountable for hosting an unauthorized digital replica of a person if they have actual knowledge that the replica was not authorized by the person portrayed.
  • Require quarterly reporting to the Department of Labor of AI-related job effects, such as job displacement and layoffs.

The proposal will preempt state laws regulating the management of catastrophic AI risks. The legislation will also mostly “preempt” state laws for digital replicas to make a national standard for AI. 

The proposal will not preempt “any generally applicable law, including a body of common law or a scheme of sectoral governance that may address” AI. The bill becomes effective 180 days after enforcement. 

India's Fintech Will Focus More on AI & Compliance in 2026


India’s Fintech industry enters the new year 2026 with a new set of goals. The industry focused on rapid expansion through digital payments and aggressive customer acquisition in the beginning, but the sector is now focusing more towards sustainable growth, compliance, and risk management. 

“We're already seeing traditional boundaries blur- payments, lending, embedded finance, and banking capabilities are coming closer together as players look to build more integrated and efficient models. While payments continue to be powerful for driving access and engagement, long-term value will come from combining scale with operational efficiency across the financial stack,” said Ramki Gaddapati, Co-Founder, APAC CEO and Global CTO, Zeta.

India’s fintech industry is preparing to enter 2026 with a new Artificial intelligence (AI) emerging as a critical tool in this transformation, helping firms strengthen fraud detection, streamline regulatory processes, and enhance customer trust.

What does the data suggest?

According to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data, digital payment volumes crossed 180 billion transactions in FY25, powered largely by the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and embedded payment systems across commerce, mobility, and lending platforms. 

Yet, regulators and industry leaders are increasingly concerned about operational risks and fraud. The RBI, along with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), has highlighted vulnerabilities in digital payment ecosystems, urging fintechs to adopt stronger compliance frameworks. A

AI a major focus

Artificial intelligence is set to play a central role in this compliance-first era. Fintech firms are deploying AI to:

Detect and prevent fraudulent transactions in real time  

Automate compliance reporting and monitoring  

Personalize customer experiences while maintaining data security  

Analyze risk patterns across lending and investment platforms  

Moving beyond payments?

The sector is also diversifying beyond payments. Fintechs are moving deeper into credit, wealth management, and banking-related services, areas that demand stricter oversight. It allows firms to capture new revenue streams and broaden their customer base but exposes them to heightened regulatory scrutiny and the need for more robust governance structures.

“The DPDP Act is important because it protects personal data and builds trust. Without compliance, organisations face penalties, data breaches, customer loss, and reputational damage. Following the law improves credibility, strengthens security, and ensures responsible data handling for sustained business growth,” said Neha Abbad, co-founder, CyberSigma Consulting.




Former Cybersecurity Employees Involved in Ransomware Extortion Incidents Worth Millions


It is very unfortunate and shameful for the cybersecurity industry, when cybersecurity professionals themselves betray trust to launch cyberattacks against their own country. In a shocking incident, two men have admitted to working normal jobs as cybersecurity professionals during the day, while moonlighting as cyber attackers.

About accused

An ex-employee of the Israeli cybersecurity company Sygnia has pleaded guilty to federal crimes in the US for having involvement in ransomware cyberattacks aimed to extort millions of dollars from firms in the US. 

The culprit, Ryan Clifford Goldberg, worked as a cyber incident response supervisor at Sygnia, and accepted that he was involved in a year-long plan of attacking business around the US. 

Kevin Tyler Martin, another associate,who worked as an ex DigitalMint employee, worked as a negotiation intermediary with the threat actors, a role supposed to help ransomware targets, has also accepted involvement. 

The situation is particularly disturbing because both men held positions of trust inside the sector established to fight against such threats.

Accused pled guilty to extortion charges 

Both the accused have pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to manipulate commerce via extortion, according to federal court records. In the plea statement, they have accepted that along with a third actor (not charged and unknown), they both launched business compromises and ransom extortions over many years. 

Extortion worth millions 

In one incident, the actors successfully extorted over $1 million in crypto from a Florida based medical equipment firm. According to the federal court, besides their legitimate work, they deployed software ‘ALPHV BlackCat’ to extract and encode target’s data, and distributed the extortion money with the software’s developers. 

According to DigitalMint, two of the people who were charged were ex-employees. After the incident, both were fired and “acted wholly outside the scope of their employment and without any authorization, knowledge or involvement from the company,” DigitalMint said in an email shared with Bloomberg.

In a recent conversation with Bloomberg, Sygnia mentioned that it was not a target of the investigation and the accused Goldberg was relieved of his duties as soon as the news became known.

A representative for Sygnia declined to speak further, and Goldberg and Martin's lawyers also declined to comment on the report.

2FA Fail: Hackers Exploit Microsoft 365 to Launch Code Phishing Attacks


Two-factor authentication (2FA) has been one of the most secure ways to protect online accounts. It requires a secondary code besides a password. However, in recent times, 2FA has not been a reliable method anymore, as hackers have started exploiting it easily. 

Experts advise users to use passkeys instead of 2FA these days, as they are more secure and less prone to hack attempts. Recent reports have shown that 2FA as a security method is undermined. 

Russian-linked state sponsored threat actors are now abusing flaws in Microsoft’s 365. Experts from Proofpoint have noticed a surge in Microsoft 365 account takeover cyberattacks, threat actors are exploiting authentication code phishing to compromise Microsoft’s device authorization flow.

They are also launching advanced phishing campaigns that escape 2FA and hack sensitive accounts. 

About the attack

The recent series of cyberattacks use device code phishing where hackers lure victims into giving their authentication codes on fake websites that look real. When the code is entered, hackers gain entry to the victim's Microsoft 365 account, escaping the safety of 2FA. 

The campaigns started in early 2025. In the beginning, hackers relied primarily on code phishing. By March, they increased their tactics to exploit Oauth authentication workflows, which are largely used for signing into apps and services. The development shows how fast threat actors adapt when security experts find their tricks.

Who is the victim? 

The attacks are particularly targeted against high-value sectors that include:

Universities and research institutes 

Defense contractors

Energy providers

Government agencies 

Telecommunication companies 

By targeting these sectors, hackers increase the impact of their attacks for purposes such as disruption, espionage, and financial motives. 

The impact 

The surge in 2FA code attacks exposes a major gap, no security measure is foolproof. While 2FA is still far stronger than relying on passwords alone, it can be undermined if users are deceived into handing over their codes. This is not a failure of the technology itself, but of human trust and awareness.  

A single compromised account can expose sensitive emails, documents, and internal systems. Users are at risk of losing their personal data, financial information, and even identity in these cases.

How to Stay Safe

Verify URLs carefully. Never enter authentication codes on unfamiliar or suspicious websites.  

Use phishing-resistant authentication. Hardware security keys (like YubiKeys) or biometric logins are harder to trick.  

Enable conditional access policies. Organizations can restrict logins based on location, device, or risk level.  

Monitor OAuth activity. Be cautious of unexpected consent requests from apps or services.  

Educate users. Awareness training is often the most effective defense against social engineering.  


Antivirus vs Identity Protection Software: What to Choose and How?


Users often put digital security into a single category and confuse identity protection with antivirus, assuming both work the same. But they are not. Before you buy one, it is important to understand the difference between the two. This blog covers the difference between identity theft security and device security.

Cybersecurity threats: Past vs present 

Traditionally, a common computer virus could crash a machine and infect a few files. That was it. But today, the cybersecurity landscape has changed from compromising computers via system overload of resources to stealing personal data. 

A computer virus is a malware that self-replicates, travelling through devices. It corrupts data and software, and can also steal personal data. 

With time, hackers have learned that users are easier targets than computers. These days, malware and social engineering attacks pose more threats than viruses. A well planned phishing email or a fake login page will benefit hackers more than a traditional virus. 

Due to the surge in data breaches, hackers have got it easy. Your data- phone number, financial details, passwords is swimming in databases, sold like bulk goods on the dark web. 

AI has made things worse and easier to exploit. Hackers can now create believable messages and even impersonate your voice. These shenanigans don't even require creativity, they need to be convincing enough to bait a victim to click or reply. 

Where antivirus fails

Your personal data never stays only on your computer, it is collected and sold by data brokers and advertisers, or to third-parties who benefit from it. When threat actors get their hands on this data, they can use it to impersonate you. 

In this case, antivirus is of no help. It is unable to notice breaches happening at organizations you don't control or someone impersonating you. Antivirus protects your system from malware that exists outside your system. There is a limit to what it can do. Antivirus can protect the machine, but not the user behind it. 

Role of identity theft protection 

Identity protection doesn't concern itself with your system health. It looks out for information that follows you everywhere- SSN, e-mail addresses, your contact number and accounts linked to your finances. If something suspicious turns up, it informs you. Identity protection works more on the monitoring side. It may watch your credit reports for threats- a new account or a hard enquiry, or falling credit score. Identity protection software looks out for early warning signs of theft, as mentioned above. It also checks if your data has been put up on dark web or part of any latest leaks. 

Trust Wallet Chrome Extension Hack Costs $8.5 Million Theft


Chrome extension compromise resulted in millions of theft

Trust Wallet recently disclosed that the Sha1-Hulur supply chain attack last year in November might be responsible for the compromise of its Google Chrome extension, causing $8.5 million assets theft. 

About the incident

According to the company, its "developer GitHub secrets were exposed in the attack, which gave the attacker access to our browser extension source code and the Chrome Web Store (CWS) API key." The attacker obtained full CWS API access via the leaked key, allowing builds to be uploaded directly without Trust Wallet's standard release process, which requires internal approval/manual review."

Later, the threat actor registered the domain "metrics-trustwallet[.]com" and deployed a malware variant of the extension with a backdoor that could harvest users' wallet mnemonic phrases to the sub-domain "api.metrics-trustwallet[.]com."

Attack tactic 

According to Koi, a cybersecurity company, the infected code activates with each unlock causing sensitive data to be harvested. It doesn't matter if the victims used biometrics or password, and if the wallet extension was opened once after the 2.68 version update or in use for months. 

The researchers Yuval Ronen and Oren Yomtov reported that, "the code loops through every wallet in the user's account, not just the active one. If you had multiple wallets configured, all of them were compromised. Seed phrases are stuffed into a field called errorMessage inside what looks like standard unlock telemetry. A casual code review sees an analytics event tracking unlock success with some error metadata."

Movie “Dune” reference? Yes.

Besides this, the analysis also revealed that querying the server directly gave the reply "He who controls the spice controls the universe." It's a Dune reference that is found in similar incidents like the Shai-Hulud npm. "The Last-Modified header reveals the infrastructure was staged by December 8 – over two weeks before the malicious update was pushed on December 24," it added. "This wasn't opportunistic. It was planned."

The findings came after Trust Wallet requested its one million users of Chrome extension to update to variant 2.69 after a malicious update (variant 2.68) was triggered by unknown hackers on December 24, 2025, in the browser's extension marketplace. 

The breach caused $8.5 million loss in cryptocurrency assets being stolen from 2,520 wallet addresses. The wallet theft was first reported after the malicious update.

Control measures 

Post-incident, Trust Wallet has started a reimbursement claim process for affected victims. The company has implemented additional monitoring measures related to its release processes.