Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label FTX. Show all posts

Elliptic Claims: FTX Hacks Could Have Possible Connection to Russia


In November 2022, the disorderly collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX resulted in a staggering $477 million hack. The previously inactive stolen funds became active just days before Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder and CEO of FTX, went on trial. Elliptic analysts have investigated the event in-depth, following the intricate blockchain trail left by the hackers and finding evidence of Russia's involvement. 

Elliptic’s Insight for the Hack 

According to a report by Elliptic – one of the largest providers of blockchain analytics and crypto compliance solutions – the hackers cleverly masked their activity by moving the stolen assets through a series of intricate transactions. They used private wallets and decentralized exchanges to make it more difficult to trace them. Elliptic was able to track the money, though, and discovered that the hackers distributed a sizable percentage of it to several locations after converting a considerable amount into ether. Potential connections to Russian actors are also revealed by Elliptic's on-chain analysis.

A Possible FTX Hack-Russia Connection 

According to Elliptic, Russia is potentially behind the FTC hack. Apparently, the hacker’s procedures and the subsequent travel of the stolen funds resemble tactics frequently linked to Russian cybercriminals.

The research firm claimed that the laundering tactics used post-theft are strikingly similar to those typically used by Russian hackers. The method they moved money, the private wallets they preferred, and their affinity for decentralized exchanges are all reminiscent of strategies Russian hackers have employed in the past.

The speed and efficiency with which the stolen fund’s laundering is carried out suggested that the campaign was well-planned by an experienced group of hackers. The suspects so far have included everyone from rogue FTX personnel carrying out an inside job to the North Korean hacking collective Lazarus, which has been linked to a number of crypto protocol flaws. While the suspects could be several in number, Russian threat actors check most of the boxes for the ones behind the hack.

Elliptic stated "A Russia-linked actor seems a stronger possibility. Of the stolen assets that can be traced through ChipMixer, significant amounts are combined with funds from Russia-linked criminal groups, including ransomware gangs and darknet markets, before being sent to exchanges.”

Elliptic’s analysis not only emphasize the significance of advanced blockchain analytics in confronting such challenges but also highlights the geopolitical implications present in cybercrime cases. With the swift developments in the digital currency realm, acquiring an insight into the origins and motivations behind these attacks has become important for both security measures and international diplomatic relations.  

FTX Reinforces Security Measures After Recent Cyber Breach

 

A notable cryptocurrency exchange called FTX recently experienced a security compromise that briefly caused its gateway to be unavailable. The event sparked worries about the security of users' assets on the network among users and the larger crypto community. To strengthen its defenses against potential attacks, FTX quickly implemented stronger security measures as a response.

FTX CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried, assured users that their funds were safe and that the breach was quickly contained. He stated, "Our team acted promptly to isolate the breach and secure the affected systems. No user funds were compromised, and we have taken steps to prevent such incidents in the future."

Following the breach, FTX collaborated closely with cybersecurity experts to conduct a thorough investigation. The findings led to the identification of vulnerabilities that were promptly addressed. The exchange has now implemented additional security protocols, including multi-factor authentication and advanced intrusion detection systems.

Cybersecurity experts lauded FTX's swift response and proactive approach to fortifying their platform. Dr. Emily White, a leading cybersecurity analyst, commended FTX's efforts, saying, "FTX's rapid response and commitment to shoring up their security measures demonstrate a proactive approach to safeguarding user assets. This incident serves as a reminder of the evolving nature of cyber threats and the importance of continuous vigilance."

In the wake of the breach, FTX has taken steps to enhance communication with its user base. The exchange has established a dedicated channel for updates on security-related matters, providing users with real-time information and transparency about any potential risks.

The incident at FTX serves as a wake-up call for the entire cryptocurrency industry. As the digital asset space continues to grow, exchanges must prioritize security measures to protect user funds and maintain trust in the ecosystem.

The FTX response to the latest security issue emphasizes how crucially important strong cybersecurity procedures are in the cryptocurrency business. FTX has proven its dedication to protecting user assets by quickly fixing vulnerabilities and deploying improved security processes. This incident should serve as a reminder to all exchanges to emphasize security and keep lines of communication open with their user base.


Emerging Phishing Campaigns Aim FTX Users After Kroll Data Breach

 

In a recent turn of events that has reverberated across the cryptocurrency community, Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao, the Chief Executive Officer of Binance, a globally renowned cryptocurrency exchange, has issued a stern caution to users who were formerly associated with the now-defunct FTX platform. 

This alert revolves around a fresh surge of phishing attacks that have been set in motion following a significant data breach stemming from Kroll, the claims agent responsible for managing FTX’s bankruptcy case.

The Core of the Issue: Kroll Data Breach and Its Ramifications

The crux of this matter revolves around a recent breach in cybersecurity suffered by Kroll, the entity tasked with overseeing claims linked to the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings of FTX. While the specific details of the breach were initially kept confidential, it has now been unveiled that the breach exposed certain non-sensitive customer data belonging to specific claimants involved in the case.

Zhao’s warning emphasizes the seriousness of the situation, explicitly connecting the current series of phishing attacks to this data breach. The pronouncements from the CEO of Binance closely follow FTX’s own declaration concerning the breach, a revelation that has understandably triggered significant apprehension among its user community.

However, what renders this breach especially alarming is the technique through which it was executed. Zhao has illuminated the fact that a SIM swap maneuver executed on an employee's account was pivotal in enabling the breach. For those unfamiliar, a SIM swap involves malicious actors deceiving cellular service providers into transferring a victim’s phone number to a device under their control.

Subsequently, this maneuver allows them to intercept crucial information, including authentication codes, effectively circumventing security measures like two-factor authentication. The gravity of the threat was so pronounced that FTX was compelled to temporarily suspend operations on its claims portal.

The Escalating Peril of Phishing Attacks

Phishing attacks are not an emerging concept in the digital domain. Nevertheless, their persistent and evolving nature has solidified their status as one of the most malicious hazards that internet users encounter today. Fundamentally, these attacks capitalize on deception and psychological manipulation to deceive unsuspecting individuals into disclosing sensitive information, spanning from login credentials to personal financial particulars.

Zhao’s recent alert acts as a somber reminder of the possible havoc that phishing attacks can unleash. When successful, these attacks can lead to a spectrum of consequences, encompassing identity theft, unauthorized entry into sensitive accounts, and substantial financial losses. The fact that prominent platforms like FTX, BlockFi, and the now-defunct Genesis crypto exchange have become targets for cybercriminals underscores the sheer scale and audacity of these threats.

Bolstering Defenses Against the Digital Threatscape

In light of these unfolding events, the responsibility falls upon individual users to enhance their digital safeguards. Zhao's message is crystal clear: complacency is not an option. Users are urged to be proactive in their stance on online security, adopting a multifaceted approach to thwart potential threats.

Foremost, staying well-informed is of paramount significance. Being cognizant of the latest threats and comprehending the strategies of cybercriminals can play a pivotal role in precluding potential attacks. Equally important is vigilance. Users ought to exercise caution in response to unsolicited communications, particularly those soliciting personal or financial information.

Furthermore, embracing robust security measures is imperative. This encompasses, but is not limited to, utilizing strong and distinct passwords for various accounts, activating two-factor authentication whenever feasible, and regularly updating software and applications to rectify known vulnerabilities.

While the digital era presents unparalleled conveniences and avenues, it also introduces an array of challenges. The recent events encompassing the FTX platform and the Kroll data breach underline the ever-evolving nature of the threat landscape. Nonetheless, by merging awareness, vigilance, and resilient security practices, users can confidently navigate this landscape, securing their digital well-being.

Cryptocurrency Giants FTX, BlockFi, and Genesis Hit by Kroll Hack

Customers of prominent cryptocurrency companies FTX, BlockFi, and Genesis had their financial and personal information exposed in a recent cybersecurity breach. Concerns have been expressed about the security of private information in the cryptocurrency sector as a result of the hack.

The breach, according to claims from sources, was carried out by taking advantage of flaws in the systems of Kroll, a reputable data management business. The personal information of innumerable users is now in danger due to Kroll's involvement in processing the client data of these cryptocurrency companies.

FTX, BlockFi, and Genesis being prominent names in the cryptocurrency sector, have a significant user base that relies on their platforms for trading, lending, and other financial services. The compromised data includes user names, email addresses, phone numbers, transaction histories, and potentially even account passwords. This sensitive information falling into the wrong hands could lead to identity theft, phishing attacks, and financial fraud.

The incident raises questions about the industry's overall data security practices. While the cryptocurrency market has been praised for its decentralized nature and robust encryption, this breach underscores the persistent vulnerabilities that exist in digital systems. Companies dealing with such high-value assets and sensitive data must prioritize cybersecurity measures to prevent such incidents.

The breach has consequences beyond only the immediate loss of client data. Users may stop using these platforms, which could result in lost revenue for the impacted businesses. Regulatory organizations might examine these occurrences more closely, which would result in tougher compliance standards for cryptocurrency businesses.

FTX, BlockFi, and Genesis have assured their consumers that they are acting right now in reaction to the intrusion. They are trying to improve their security procedures, assisting law enforcement, and carrying out in-depth investigations to ascertain the scope of the intrusion. Users who are affected are advised to modify their passwords, use two-factor authentication, and be on the lookout for phishing attacks.

The Bitcoin industry as a whole needs to pay attention after this tragedy. The digital world has unmatched prospects, but it also has its own challenges, notably in terms of cybersecurity. To properly protect the information of their users, businesses must implement proactive security measures, carry out routine audits, and spend money on powerful encryption.

Customers of these affected sites must implement suggested security procedures and stay up to date on developments as the investigation progresses. Additionally, the event highlights how crucial industry cooperation is to jointly fix vulnerabilities and improve the overall security posture of the Bitcoin ecosystem.


Crypto Withdrawals of $8bn Hit Silvergate, a US bank

 


Silvergate, the US bank that offers cryptocurrency services, has reported that its clients have withdrawn over $8 billion (£6.7 billion) of their cryptocurrency-linked deposits over the past several weeks. 

In the final three months of 2022, roughly one-third of the bank's customers pulled their deposits from the bank. The bank sold assets worth $5.2 billion to cover the cost and maintain liquidity. 

According to three US regulators, issuance or holding crypto would conflict with safe and sound banking practices as it would be "highly likely that such practices would be compromised." 

Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Silvergate is a bank regulated by the New York Stock Exchange and a part of the financial sector. A few businesses within this sector offer cryptocurrency services, and this business is one of the very few. Before the November bankruptcy filing of FTX, the crypto exchange was once valued at $32 billion. Withdrawals followed the collapse of the FTX exchange. 

A former FTX boss has pleaded not guilty to charges that he defrauded customers and investors as part of his role at the company. Approximately one million credits may have been affected by bankruptcy, according to prosecutors. 

Cryptocurrencies have been affected by the case, leading to bankruptcy filings at other companies and the price of crypto falling. 

Silvergate's chief executive officer, Alan Lane, said the bank had sold assets to cover customer withdrawals to compensate for the trading risks associated with digital assets "in response to increasing changes in the digital asset market." It seems that Silvergate has also fallen victim to the chilling "crypto winter" that has been devouring the cryptocurrency industry since last spring. 

As the name implies, the so-called crypto bank fills an unusual position in the market, serving as a bank for cryptocurrency companies that had difficulty finding banking services that could be offered by traditional banks. 

An Alameda Research company, which is now bankrupt, is owned by Sam Bankman-Fried. He is suspected of fraud and is awaiting trial in the United States. There is no doubt that Bankman-Fried's downfall has been a blow for Silvergate, but the risk of market confidence has been a more risky blow to the company. In the aftermath of Bankman-Fried's collapse, several small and large investors have pulled their money out of crypto companies, transferring billions of dollars from crypto accounts stored by companies. 

Binance and Coinbase have so far survived the unprecedented withdrawals of users and have become some of the biggest names in the industry. While it seems that Silvergate is also weathering the storm, its balance sheet is taking a heavy hit as a direct result of the storm. 

Before entering the world of cryptocurrency, in November 2019, Silvergate was a small US bank that had recently been made public. The shares of the company had grown by more than 1,500% by the time the market reached its climax in 2021. This was mainly due to the massive growth of crypto during this period. There was a period during which it attempted to launch its stablecoin. During this period, it tried to create a cryptocurrency directly tied to an asset such as gold, the US dollar, or another cryptocurrency. 

Additionally, Silvergate spent $182 million in January 2022 to acquire the technology used in Meta's proposed Diem (formerly Libra) stablecoin, which is yet to hit the market. According to a filing filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the bank said it had sold the debt to cover withdrawals from its accounts. It said that the purchase of the diem is no longer classified as an asset, indicating that the purchase has been written off. The bank has also deducted its workforce by 40% - about 200 people. Since 2013, withdrawals have cost the company $718m in losses, an amount greater than its profit.   

Cybersecurity in 2023: Will the Crypto Crash Impact It?

 


One of the questions that naturally arise for those working within the cybersecurity industry after the fall of the FTX exchange puts an end to the cryptocurrency crash of 2022, includes asking how it will affect the cybercrime economy as a result of this rapid decline in cryptocurrency valuations. 

Cybercriminals have been using and abusing cryptocurrency ever since the most recent crypto boom began more than a decade ago to build up their empires and make money. Through the use of cryptocurrency, ransomware is creating a world where you can pay extortion and face jail time. By using cryptocurrency, scammers target consumers to steal their wallets and accounts. A wide range of cybercriminal enterprises has traditionally relied on this method to conceal the fact that they are laundering money behind the scenes in an anonymous manner. 

Although many cybersecurity experts and intelligence analysts agree that there have been some changes in trends and tactics that they believe are loosely related to the crypto crash, the jury is still out on the effects of the crypto crash over the long run, and the jury is still out on how the crypto crash will affect the cyber world. 

The Shifting Trends & Tactics of Cryptocurrencies in 2022 

Despite the value of cryptos this year, cybercriminals have developed a more sophisticated strategy for monetizing their attacks with cryptocurrencies, according to Helen Short, Accenture cybersecurity intelligence analyst, who points to the use of yield farming within the field of decentralized finance, as an example of some ransomware groups making use of yield farming as a monetization method. 

In other words, yield farming is similar to lending money, in that the amount of interest that has to be paid is clearly outlined in the contract that outlines the amount that has to be paid," she explains. As a ransomware group, the advantages are that they will be able to collect legitimate proceeds from the ransom and they will not be forced to launder or hide the funds." 

In her analysis, she has found that threat actors have increasingly turned to 'stablecoins,' which are typically 'pegged' to fiat currencies or gold. This is to decrease the volatility of their wallets. Cryptocurrency is making headlines worldwide due to the recent downturn in its price. This has resulted in cybercriminals having a heightened appetite for risk, leading to more investment frauds and cryptocurrency scams being perpetrated. 

In addition to some people losing their wallet value, others may have simply lost interest in keeping an eye on their accounts. They may have stopped paying as much attention to them. Brittany Allen, the team's trust and safety architect and fraud researcher, offers some insight into how this is fueling another trend. "Fraudsters are noticing that consumers are paying less attention to their crypto wallets than they were when crypto prices were higher earlier this year and in 2021, as a result of plummeting prices for cryptocurrency," she said. Consequently, cryptocurrency account takeover attacks have increased by 79% in the last few months. 

According to the researcher, there is an increasing number of threat actors joining forces instead of being paid by each other for their specialist services. This reduces the costs of the attack as there is a set share of the proceeds included in the agreement. 

Ransomware Will Not Go Away

As far as cybersecurity pundits are concerned, one thing that has been agreed upon almost unanimously is that ransomware will remain prevalent for some time despite the growing volatility of cryptocurrencies. Ransomware activity in 2022 has seen a slight decline compared to early 2022. Despite that, the threat intelligence analyst at Optiv, Aamil Karimi, said that there are other factors out of our control, such as the war in Ukraine. These factors contribute to the decrease in activity.  

A significant regrouping of ransomware cartels has resulted in a decline in activity in recent years, which is more likely to be due to this than anything else. For as long as cryptocurrency is a popular extortion target, he believes extortion will remain a popular business model. 

As of right now, cryptocurrency is the safest medium through which cybercriminals can act as a means of doing transactions. Cryptocurrency is the preferred payment method by extortion," Karimi says. The amount of cybercrime and extortionary activity will not slow down soon, as Karimi doesn't anticipate any slowdown." 

The evolution to be expected in 2023

Cybercriminals may also evolve their techniques in response to increased friction between law enforcement and themselves about other types of attacks in addition to ransomware. This is a result of increased friction between the two organizations. The most common among these is business email compromise (BEC), which does not require cryptocurrency. 

It was determined in the FBI's annual IC3 report [PDF] that business email compromise was the most common method used by attackers to steal fiat coins. It is becoming increasingly easy and convenient for technology to mimic human writing, speech, and even live video. This is a result of advances in artificial intelligence, according to GreyNoise's Rudis. As businesses, ransomware groups have been around for a long time. Therefore, it makes sense to assume that they would use their technological skills to deploy more advanced BEC schemes in addition to their primary mission of stealing money.  

At the same time, attackers are likely to continue advancing technology to stay one step ahead of the authorities. This is regarding the tracking and laundering of money, thereby staying one step ahead of the police. 

"The number of attackers will increase, and they will try to obfuscate their illicit funds by breaking the sequence of blockchain transactions, which will become increasingly sophisticated," Short says. "We will likely see a professionalization of cryptocurrency mixers, such as Tornado Cash, with threat actors offering fast and high value 'cash out as-a-service offerings." 

As a result, she believes that there will be an increase in demand for account takeovers to repurpose stolen accounts to create mule accounts as a way of cashing out on the back end of various scams by 2023, as it will increase the value of personally identifiable information (PII).

5 Most Significant Online Influencers of 2022

The Wired portal has taken the initiative to publish a list of the individuals that sparked the most online debates in 2022. Controversies motives, false information, and online turmoil will also be on the minds of many people going forward. 

Despite some issues that appear to be fading, such as the COVID-19 outbreak and the world of cryptocurrency, these issues frequently come up on social media. Money laundering, theft, and fraud are among the issues frequently in these debates. 

1. Sam Bankman-Fried

Money laundering, theft, and scams have been rampant in the cryptocurrency sector, from the Crypto dark-web drug trade to billions of dollars being taken from crypto firms by cybercriminals. Sam Bankman-Fried is currently charged with fraud of more than $8 billion in connection with the fall of the bitcoin exchange FTX. The exact extent of the misuse of user cash in FTX's collapse is still unknown, and even the new CEO of the firm, John Ray, claims he's never witnessed a greater catastrophe. This could have far-reaching effects on the cryptocurrency economy. 

In addition to the staggering losses, Bankman-Fried stands in as a particularly alarming example of the problems with the crypto economy.  He seemed to really embrace increased government controls of the business, unlike so others in the crypto sphere.

2. Elon Musk

After the purchase of Twitter, Musk's dark side was exposed, and the erratic power of the world's richest person suddenly put a major online institution in danger. Elon fired at least 4,400 contract workers after letting go of nearly 50% of the Twitter personnel, jeopardizing the operations of a service that acts as Twitter's main artery.

Additionally, Twitter has drastically reduced the size of its team of content moderators, creating scenarios where only one employee is left to monitor child abuse-related tweets across the entirety of Japan and the Asia-Pacific area. Twitter has also outlawed left-wing accounts under Musk's supervision which goes against his support for free speech. He provides a glimpse of the conspiracy-minded ideas and trolling that really motivates his behavior. 

3. Xi Jinping

Every wave of brutality under Xi Jinping has been accompanied by a tightening of online restrictions as censors combed social media for any mention of protests. Han Chinese authorities in Xinjiang have even insisted that Uyghurs install an app that checks their phones for prohibited information.

This year's protests against China's oppressive zero-Covid lockdowns have sparked a new round of online repression, in which it is now illegal to even like a protest-related post, and any indication of wrongdoing is monitored through a controlled credit system with the potential to result in users' immediate expulsion from online platforms. He's made it quite apparent that dictatorial control will infiltrate the Chinese digital life.

4. Narendra Modi

India has begun to resemble China ever more in how it suppresses both offline and online protests under Modi and the BJP. The Indian government has recently taken steps to tighten its control over social media, including temporarily shutting down the internet in the disturbed region of Kashmir, banning several Chinese apps, including TikTok, and giving a three-person group control over social media moderation policy choices.

The government can use the new IT regulations as a tool to challenge the platforms when it wants. It's the initial step toward making it possible to restrict online speech like in China.

5. GRU

In the past seven years, Russia's GRU military intelligence units known as Sandworm and APT28 caused two blackouts in Ukraine. In 2022, it started a plethora of cyberattacks aimed at erasing data from the Ukrainian government and business networks, frequently concurrent with direct physical assaults by the invading army. In a NotPetya-like incident of collateral damage, one GRU malware operation even managed to shut down connectivity to 5,000 wind turbines spread around Germany. A third blackout strike in Ukraine was also attempted by GRU's Sandworm hackers, but this time, at least in the view of the Ukrainian government, defenses were able to prevent it.

The year 2022 will be regarded as a time of major global events with several noteworthy events and occasions. Despite some issues that appear to be fading, such as the COVID-19 outbreak and the world of cryptocurrency, money laundering, theft, and fraud are among the issues frequently on social media. 

What does Downfall of FTX Uncovers about Crypto Media

 

What happens when a crypto mogul holds the crypto equivalent of a press conference and is confronted with his role in a crypto media scandal? 

Sam Bankman-Fried was grilled this morning about Friday's revelation of his secret payments to the Block, a cryptocurrency publication founded in 2018. The question came at the end of a Twitter Spaces hosted by Unusual Whales, a pseudonymous Twitter account that gained a following by tweeting about congressional stock trades during the pandemic and now offers a financial information service with a heavy emphasis on crypto data. For the record, it resembled many old-fashioned press conferences, albeit in a new setting: Bankman-Fried dodged the question and exited the conversation.

But the moment emphasizes how much crypto-native media exists and how quickly it has developed its own online information realm that is largely distinct from the mainstream media. Crypto media, on the other hand, is a full-fledged entity in its own right. Much of it appears to be traditional outlets with newsrooms, articles, and podcasts that happen to cover a niche topic.

However, it is also inextricably linked to Twitter, the chat platform Discord, the encrypted messaging app Telegram, and tools for direct analysis of blockchain data. And it has a lot of overlap with the rest of the anti-establishment digital media sphere, as the FTX collapse demonstrates better than anything else.

Indeed, as part of the mogul’s ongoing apology tour, crypto entrepreneur Mario Nawfal, who hosted Musk for a Twitter Spaces to discuss the "Twitter Files," also hosted a Spaces with Bankman-Fried. To truly understand the crypto media sphere, go back to the early stages of the FTX collapse — one of the biggest stories in the world right now — and examine how much of it occurred in this largely self-contained ecosystem.

Bankman Fried's problems began with a Nov. 2 report by CoinDesk, a decade-old crypto news service owned by Digital Currency Group, a crypto-focused venture capital firm. According to financial records obtained by CoinDesk, FTX was more financially intertwined with its sister firm, the hedge fund Alameda Research, than previously known.

The report sparked online speculation that Bankman Fried's empire was not financially sound and that the price of FTX's native token, FTT, had been inflated. Changpeng Zhao, the CEO of rival exchange Binance, announced on Twitter four days later that his company was selling its FTT holdings.

Bankman-Fried and Alamada's CEO, Caroline Ellison, fought back on Twitter, assuring the cryptocurrency community that their finances were solid. On-chain analysis — the interpretation of publicly available blockchain data — suggested that the two were not as confident in FTX's financial position as they showed up. According to The Data Nerd, a pseudonymous Twitter account dedicated to on-chain analysis, Alameda sent more than $250 million in stablecoins to FTX in a single day.

As the collapse began, much of the most foresighted real-time analysis of FTX's precarious financial position came in Tweet threads and Twitter Spaces from Dylan LeClair, a contributor to Bitcoin Magazine.

As the fallout from the collapse unfolds, Autism Capital — a Twitter account created in 2020 and linked to a Discord chat — is one source of extensive leads and tips about it. It sometimes reports details of the fallout before mainstream media outlets. The account tweeted on December 4 that Ellison was represented by the law firm WilmerHale. Bloomberg has since confirmed this.

Of course, mainstream media outlets have covered the FTX story as well. POLITICO has covered the intricacies of Washington's response; the FT and Wall Street Journal have scooped stories about internal corruption; a Vox reporter published a damning interview with Bankman-Fried; and the New York Times landed a much-watched live interview with Bankman-Fried.

The tone of coverage, on the other hand, frequently varies. The FTX story is mostly about the dangers of cryptocurrency, with its lack of regulation and ever-present scams, in mainstream media. More emphasis is being placed in the crypto media world on the extent to which Bankman-Fried funded establishment media outlets and politicians while becoming the crypto mogul most embraced by those establishments. 

What's the big picture here?

Media ecosystems tend to form around important human interaction sites, such as governments and markets.

Governments' core activities generate fundamental units of information (e.g. bills and executive orders). Markets are the same way (prices and trading volumes). More elaborate media ecosystems can sprout up around these core pieces of information to cover everything else that's going on.
 
These digital networks also generate basic information, such as social media posts. Furthermore, blockchain networks — a new subset of digital networks — are abandoning on-chain data.

Could they one day support similarly robust media ecosystems?

It is astounding how large and developed the crypto media ecosystem has become. However, it is possible that it is too large.

After all, as Byron Guilliam, senior markets strategist at Blockworks, a crypto media firm aimed at financial institutions, told DFD, "the entire crypto market cap is smaller than Apple, and Apple does not have 15 media outlets covering it."

The demise of the FTX could point to the future of digital information. Or, as the crypto markets remain stagnant and the Block is now rocked by scandal, it could be the last gasp of a crypto media bubble about to burst.

FTX: Failed Crypto Exchange Could Owe More Than 1 Million Creditors


Following the collapse of the crypto exchange FTX, and its associated businesses, it could owe money to more than a million people and organizations, according to the bankruptcy filings. The documents filed in bankruptcy court demonstrated the extent of a corporate collapse that has stripped traders’ accounts, plunging the crypto sector into crises. 

The investigations for bankruptcy commenced last week when FTX experienced an $8 billion shortfall due to a run-on deposit. Consequently, this led to the company which was once regarded as one of the safest and most reliable institutions of the freewheeling crypto industry crumbling overnight. 

The exchange’s founder Sam Bankman-Fried reportedly transferred $10 billion of customer funds from FTX to his trading company ‘Alameda Research.’ A large amount of that total fund has since disappeared. The total amount is said to be between $1-2 billion. 

The financial hole later came to light in records shared by Bankman-Fried with other senior executives last Sunday. The records provided a real-time account of the situation, some sources said. 

The company’s sudden downfall due to the run-on deposits last week left FTX unable to fulfill its customers' demands. Consequently, Bankman-Fried struck a rescue deal to sell his firm to its largest rival exchange, Binance. 

After a lengthy online skirmish between Bankman-Fried and Changpeng Zhao, CEO of Binance, a review stating FTX’s finances revealed various problems, posing as a deal breaker and Binance pulled out of the deal. Bankman-Fried attempted to secure new financing but was unable to, and later declared bankruptcy. The Justice Department and SEC are currently looking into his management of FTX. They are apparently focusing on whether FTX inappropriately transferred customer funds to Alameda Research.  

In regards to the case, Associate Professor in Finance Technology at the University of Liverpool, Gavin Brown referred to a recent report that suggested “42% of the exchanges which failed simply disappeared without traces.” 

According to Prof Brown “In the event of exchange failure, or even bankruptcy, it is the investors who are on the hook for losses” He, along with other industry experts warned that often smaller investors often end up back of the queue, after the remains of a crypto business are divided among themselves. They doubt much money will be coming back. 

"The unfortunate news is that the money's all gone. It's just not there anymore. Investors should expect pennies on the dollar," says crypto blogger and author David Gerard.   

The Hunt for the FTX Thieves Has Started

 

Cryptocurrency has always provided an interesting mix of temptations and difficulties for those trying to steal it.  It is a lucrative target because it is digital cash held in multibillion-dollar sums on hackable, internet-connected networks. However, once stolen, the blockchains on which almost every cryptocurrency is built allow for tracking the money's every move and, in many cases, identifying the thieves.  

Recently, unknown transactions were reported to have drained FTX wallets. As per observers, FTX was hacked or insiders stole client funds during the abrupt FTX collapse. There have been "unauthorized transactions" from the group's wallets to addresses not controlled by FTX, according to FTX US general counsel Ryne Miller. FTX filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection from its creditors yesterday. These creditors are concerned that some of their funds will be unavailable for payment.

On Twitter, a developer announced that "hundreds of millions of dollars" in cryptocurrency were being transferred from FTX wallets. Because of the late hour of the transactions, it appeared that liquidators were not assisting creditors.

Afterward, on-chain forensics expert ZachXBT tweeted that the receiving addresses were not FTX wallets, according to former FTX employees. Because FTX and FTX US are supposedly separate businesses and were operated as such, a hacker would be unlikely to gain simultaneous access to the private keys of both exchanges unless they had inside information or were insiders.

However, given FTX's demise, anything is possible. According to Bloomberg, junior employees took the initiative to sell off some of FTX's troubled assets. There are two major drainage areas that have been identified. It is possible that up to $383 million in cryptocurrency was stolen:
Main draining address: 
https://etherscan.io/address/0x59abf3837fa962d6853b4cc0a19513aa031fd32b

Shitcoin draining address:
https://etherscan.io/address/0xd8019a114e86ad41d71a3eeb6620b19dd166a969

According to Nansen, a crypto analytics research firm, the outflows totaled at least $266 million. As per the Australian Financial Review, the number of missing funds in Ethereum, Solana, BNB LINK, AVAX, and MATIC could be as high as $600 million.

Were the FTX app and website also compromised?

There are also unconfirmed reports that the FTX app has been infected with malware and should no longer be used, as well as the FTX website. However, Rey, an FTX Telegram administrator, uploaded it.

Nevertheless, the puzzling scenario for the 1,2 million FTX customers is still evolving. The FTX app has been updated, but for the time being, experts recommend all FTX clients avoid running the update or interacting with their FTX account.

Customers are advised not to make any changes to their accounts until further information, presumably in the form of an official announcement from FTX, becomes available. According to his most recent tweet, Binance founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) is unimpressed with the latest turn of events. Elon Musk also contributed, despite the fact that he was expected to be preoccupied with the blue tick scandal.

FTX Filed for Bankruptcy Protection in US

Facing the digital equivalent of a banking collapse, the financially troubled cryptocurrency exchange FTX filed for US bankruptcy protection on Friday.

Bitcoin fell to a two-year low this week after a week of reports regarding the platform's financial difficulties, and by Friday night, the price of the cryptocurrency was trading at $16,861 (€16,256).

The company revealed that Sam Bankman-Fried, its former CEO, has also left after a remarkable turn of events at the second-largest cryptocurrency exchange in the world. His FTX empire crumbled in a little more than a week, shattering trust in the already unstable cryptocurrency market.

Coindesk and customer reports on social media claim that the unstable platform has finally permitted some users to withdraw money for the first time in days.

Summary of FXT company

According to a tweet from the company, FTX, Alameda Research, a cryptocurrency trading company that is linked with it, and roughly 130 of its other businesses have started voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy procedures in Delaware. In the US, a firm can use Chapter 11 to reorganize its debts while still operating under court supervision.

FTX Trading claimed in its bankruptcy filing that the firm has assets worth between $10 billion and $50 billion, liabilities between $10 billion and $50 billion, and more than 100,000 creditors.

Customers left FTX earlier this week because of concern about a lack of capital, leading to an agreement to sell the company to larger rival Binance.

Kingston student Thomas, 22, who has been a customer of FTX for over a year, calls it a 'hub for crypto.'For the £2,000 he claimed to have on the exchange, which he calls a 'fairly large amount of money,' he claims he was able to submit a withdrawal request.

However, he is worried about the number of requests being made by FTX consumers and is unsure if all of them will be fulfilled as the business struggles.

The cryptocurrency community had hoped that Binance, the biggest cryptocurrency exchange in the world, could be able to save FTX and its depositors.

After reviewing FTX's financial records, Binance came to the conclusion that the issues facing the smaller exchange were insurmountable, and it withdrew from the agreement. A business that was once the pride of the cryptocurrency market had a dramatic fall in popularity.

In January, FTX collected $400 million from investors, valuing the business at $32 billion.






Hong Kong Will Legalize Retail Crypto Trading to Establish a Cryptocurrency Hub

 


A plan to legalize retail cryptocurrency trading has been announced by Hong Kong to create a more friendly regulatory regime for cryptocurrencies. There has been an opposite trend over the last few years in the city, with skeptical views, as well as China's ban on the practice. 

According to sources familiar with the matter, an upcoming mandatory licensing program for crypto platforms scheduled to take effect in March next year will allow retail traders access to crypto platforms. There has been a request not to name these people since they are not authorized to release this information publicly.

There have been reports that the regulators are planning to allow the listing of higher-value tokens in the coming months but will not endorse specific coins such as Bitcoin or Ether, according to the people. They noted that the details and timeframe are yet to be finalized since a public consultation is due first.

At a fintech conference that starts on Monday, the government is expected to provide more details regarding its recently announced goal of creating a top crypto hub in the region. To restore Hong Kong's reputation as a financial center after years of political turmoil and the aftermath of Covid curbs sparked a talent exodus, the marketing campaign comes amid a larger effort to put Hong Kong back on the map.

Gary Tiu, executive director at crypto firm BC Technology Group Ltd, said that, while mandatory licensing in Hong Kong is one of the most effective things regulators can do, they cannot forever satisfy the needs of retail investors who are investing in crypto assets. 

Criteria for listing 

According to people familiar with the matter, the upcoming regime for listing tokens on retail exchanges is likely to include criteria such as the token's market value, liquidity, and membership in third-party crypto indexes to determine eligibility for listing. Their approach resembles the one they used when it came to structured products such as warrants, they continued. 

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment regarding the details of the revised stance adopted by the agency. 

Several crypto-related Hong Kong companies that are listed on the stock exchange increased their share prices on Friday. In the same report, BC Technology climbed 4.8% to its highest in three weeks during the third quarter, whilst Huobi Technology Holdings Ltd. rose slightly. 

In a world where more and more regulators are grappling with how to manage the volatile area of digital assets. This area has gone through a $2 trillion rout, following a peak in early November 2021. The sector is finding it difficult to regain its previous strength. Firms that dealt in cryptocurrency were crushed by the crash because their leverage grew without limit and their risk management methods were exposed.

It is widely believed that Singapore has tightened up its digital-asset rules to curb retail trading in digital assets to deal with the implosion that has hit Hong Kong. 

There was a proposal earlier this week by Singapore to ban the purchase of leveraged retail tokens on the retail market. There was a ban on cryptos in China a year ago because it was largely illegal. 

Michel Lee, executive president of digital-asset specialist HashKey Group, said that Hong Kong is trying to frame a crypto regime that extends beyond the retail token trading market to incorporate all types of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies. 

Bringing the ecosystem to the next level 

Among other things, Lee believes that tokenized versions of stocks and bonds could become a much more significant segment in the future as time passes on. Lee said, "Just trading digital assets on its own is not the goal". According to Lee, digital assets are not intended to be traded on their own but the ecosystem must grow as quickly as possible.”

A big exchange such as Binance and FTX once had their base in Hong Kong. Their attraction was the reputation of a laissez-faire regime and their strong ties to China. A voluntary licensing regime, that was introduced by the city in 2018, limited crypto platforms' access to clients with portfolios exceeding HK$8 million ($1 million) to those with portfolios of less than that amount. 

It has been confirmed that only two firms have been approved to operate under the license, BC Group and HashKey. FTX successfully managed to turn away the more lucrative consumer-facing business to the Bahamas last year as a result of the signal of a tough approach. 

However, the plan to attract crypto entrepreneurs back to Hong Kong seems to be a bit short of what is needed to usher them back. Among other things, it remains to be seen if mainland Chinese investors would be able to trade in tokens through Hong Kong if that were to be permitted. 

Leonhard Weese, the co-founder of the Bitcoin Association of Hong Kong, expressed a fear that there might be a very strict licensing regime in the future. "The conversations I have had indicate that people still fear it will be very stressful," he said. The company claims that it is not competitive on the same level as overseas platforms. Therefore, it will not be as attractive to customers as it would be if it dealt directly with retail users. 

According to blockchain specialist Chainalysis Inc., the volume of digital-token transactions in Hong Kong through June declined less than 10% from a year earlier, the most modest increase in the region outside of a slump in China, in the 12 months through June. It has fallen two positions from its global ranking of 39 in 2021 to 46 in 2022 when it comes to crypto adoption throughout the city. 

The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong's Fintech Department has also suggested that the city could take further steps in this area, including the establishment of a regime to authorize exchange-traded funds seeking exposure to mainstream virtual assets. 

It shows that the one country, two systems principle is being put into action in financial markets, Wong said at an event last week. He said that the fact that the city can introduce a cryptocurrency framework distinct from China's indicates how far it has come.