It so coincided that October was international cybersecurity awareness month, during which most small businesses throughout Australia were getting ready once again to defend themselves against such malicious campaigns. While all cyber crimes are growing both here and all around the world, one area remains to be targeted more often in these cases: the smaller ones. Below is some basic information any small businessman or woman should know before it can indeed fortify your position.
Protect yourself from Phishing and Scamming.
One of the most dangerous threats that small businesses are exposed to today is phishing. Here, attackers pose as trusted sources to dupe people into clicking on malicious links or sharing sensitive information. According to Mark Knowles, General Manager of Security Assurance at Xero, cyber criminals have different forms of phishing, including "vishing," which refers to voice calls, and "smishing," which refers to text messages. The tactics of deception encourage users to respond to these malicious messages, which brings about massive financial losses.
Counter-phishing may be achieved by taking some time to think before answering any unfamiliar message or link. Delaying and judging if the message appears suspicious would have averted the main negative outcome. Knowles further warns that just extra seconds to verify could have spared a business from an expensive error.
Prepare for Emerging AI-driven Threats Like Deepfakes
The emergence of AI has provided new complications to cybersecurity. Deepfakes, the fake audio and video produced using AI, make it increasingly difficult for people to distinguish between what is real and what is manipulated. It can cause critical problems as attackers can masquerade as trusted persons or even executives to get employees to transfer money.
Knowles shares a case, where the technology was implemented in Hong Kong to cheat a finance employee of $25 million. This case highlights the need to verify identities in this high-pressure situation; even dialling a phone can save one from becoming a victim of this highly sophisticated fraud.
Develop a Culture of Cybersecurity
Even a small team is a security-aware culture and an excellent line of defence. Small business owners will often hold regular sessions with teams to analyse examples of attempted phishing and discuss awareness about recognising threats. Such collective confidence and knowledge make everyone more alert and watchful.
Knowles further recommends that you network with other small business owners within your region and share your understanding of cyber threats. Having regular discussions on common attack patterns will help businesses learn from each other's experiences and build collective resilience against cybercrime.
Develop an Incident Response Plan for Cyber
Small businesses typically don't have dedicated IT departments. However, that does not mean they can't prepare for cyber incidents. A simple incident-response plan is crucial. This should include the contact details of support: trusted IT advisors or local authorities such as CERT Australia. If an attack locks down your systems, immediate access to these contacts can speed up recovery.
Besides, a "safe word" that will be used for communication purposes can help employees confirm each other's identities in such crucial moments where even digital impersonation may come into play.
Don't Let Shyness Get in Your Way
The embarrassment of such an ordeal by cyber crooks results in the likelihood that organisations are not revealing an attack as it can lead the cyber criminals again and again. Knowles encourages any organisation affected to report suspicions of the scam immediately to bankers, government, or experienced advisors in time to avoid possible future ramifications to the firm. Communicating the threat is very beneficial for mitigating damages, but if nothing was said, chances are slim to stop that firm further from getting another blow at that point of time in question.
Making use of the local networks is beneficial. Open communication adds differences in acting speedily and staying well-informed to build more resilient proactive approaches toward cybersecurity.
This is a major fraud case whereby delivery partners exploited a weakness in the logistics app Porter, syphoning Rs 90 lakh from Bengaluru. The swindle was detected by a routine business audit conducted in July by Smart Shift Logistics Solutions Pvt Ltd, which runs Porter. After this, an official of the logistics company filed a complaint with the police. Insider involvement was ruled out through automated operations.
The authorities suspected it could be an inside job when the fraud was first detected, considering the scale of the crime. They looked at the backend operations of the company and found nothing internal as most processes were automated. This led to a deep probe with Sarah Fathima, the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Southeast), assigning a team to trace the refunds made by the company since January. This series of operations was headed by ACP Govardhan Gopal, along with inspector Eshwari from the Southeast Cybercrime, Economic Offences, and Narcotics (CEN) police station.
Understanding the Scam
The investigators soon came across several refunds credited to the same accounts, and a rather clear fraud pattern began to emerge. The police were following this chain of suspicious transactions when it led them to a Shreyas TL, a 29-year-old from Hassan's Hirisave. Based on confession questioning of Shreyas, the police managed to seize three others: Kaushik KS, aged 26, from Mandya, Ranganath PR, also 26, and Anand Kumar, 30, both from Mandya.
These were earlier cab drivers and food delivery partners for various online applications who chanced upon loopholes in the Porter app after dabbling in such scams in other delivery services. They eventually managed to pinpoint how to exploit the Porter system through trial and error for their financial gains.
How the scam was run
Porter has a system where the driver can get a part of the total bill through his wallet whenever he accepts the job. And if he rejects the delivery, he will have his money back automatically. The application does not allow abusing this system, and therefore it has a strict cancellation policy where it blacklists the drivers in case they cancel two deliveries consecutively.
The fraudsters bypassed the system. Geo-spoofing is an application of the technology, using which they manipulated the app so as to pose their locations at places where there are few available drivers. This way, they accepted the jobs using their fake delivery accounts. The amount of the bill was credited to their digital wallets. Then the amount was drawn from these wallets into bank accounts. They canceled the delivery, and customers canceled the order and received a refund.
The reason they did not get blacklisted was because of repeated cancellations, so to avoid that, the gang bought fake phone numbers from Telegram groups and created new accounts on the app with them. Additionally, the gang practiced geo-spoofing to change their location into neighbouring states, making it hard for the authorities to trace them.
A Perfected Scam
The operation of the gang was so sophisticated that they managed to make off with a total of Rs 90 lakh from the company. Taking advantage of loopholes in the automation of the app, they had syphoned off the amount without raising any suspicion in the beginning. But finally, after going through a detailed investigation, it was traced by the police, and the fraudsters were caught.
This case shines a light on the importance of secure and foolproof systems in online platforms, especially those handling financial transactions. It also highlights the need to frequently audit and monitor company automated processes to detect fraud before it gets out of hand.
In a disturbing case of cybercrime, scammers used a fake profile picture of a policeman on WhatsApp to deceive a businessman. The criminals accused the businessman of being involved in human trafficking, leveraging his fear and trust in authority to manipulate him. They sent him a fabricated arrest warrant and a seizure order via an online link, further escalating the pressure on the victim. In a brazen move, one of the scammers even impersonated a Supreme Court judge during a phone call with the businessman.
Through these deceptive tactics, the fraudsters convinced the businessman that he needed to undergo a "fund legalization process" and deposit his money into an account purportedly held by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The scam, which unfolded over a gruelling period of seven to eight hours, resulted in a significant financial loss of Rs 1.3 crore for the victim.
Despite the severity of such incidents, victims often find themselves without adequate support. While the government has publicized a cybercrime helpline number, 1930, it merely directs complainants to file their cases on the website www.cybercrime.gov.in. Even after a complaint is lodged, the responsibility to follow up and ensure action is taken largely falls on the victim.
This case highlights the broader issue of law enforcement agencies not playing a proactive role in assisting citizens who fall prey to online fraudsters. The lack of timely intervention and investigation into cybercrimes exacerbates the distress faced by victims. As cybercrime rates continue to rise, there is a pressing need for law enforcement to enhance their responsiveness and take on a more active role in protecting citizens from such sophisticated digital threats.
It all started on May 5 at 10 a.m., when Rajkumar (name changed), an Indiranagar resident and retired MNC executive, got a call from 8861447031. The caller claimed as a 'FedEx' logistics executive and supplied Rajkumar's Aadhaar and mobile numbers.
He said that a package shipped to Taiwan under Shankar's name contained five passports, a laptop, 3kg of clothing, and 150 grams of MDMA. He forwarded the phone to a "police officer" after claiming a case against him had been filed at Mumbai's Andheri East cyber police station.
A man claimed to be Rajesh Pradhan, DCP (Cybercrime), Andheri and informed Shankar that he was under digital arrest until the inquiry was completed. They warned to arrest him if he left his residence and instructed him to isolate himself in a room. Later, they made a video call to him, and Shankar noticed a police station in the backdrop and assumed he was speaking with actual cops.
Pradhan informed Rajkumar that this was a high-profile and sensitive matter involving VIPs. He was told not to mention their call with anybody and threatened with arrest if he did not obey their instructions.
The con artist added that they discovered a bank account opened in his name that was being used for money laundering. They allegedly examined the charges against him, which included money laundering, NDPS, and other criminal actions, before offering to assist him.
To protect the account, he was ordered to move the full balance in his bank accounts to Reserve Bank of India (RBI) accounts.
After promising to repay him after his transactions were verified, they convinced Shankar to send money to their accounts in several transactions.
After transferring Rs 3.8 crore, Rajkumar was promised that the return would be in his account within 30 minutes of verification and the connection was discontinued. Rajkumar only realized he had been duped after the crooks went mute.
According to Kuldeep Kumar Jain, DCP (East), Shankar submitted a report on May 13, and they were able to freeze Rs 9 lakh within two days.
A case has been filed under the Information Technology Act and IPC section 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property).
According to Jain, such claims should not be taken seriously. The police force has no idea of digital arrests or online (virtual) investigations. If you receive such calls, simply disconnect and report them to your nearest police station or the 1930 cyber helpline. If you lose any money, you should contact the police right away. Delays in filing complaints will have an impact on recovery rates.
Cybercrime has transpired as a serious threat in India, prompting calls for comprehensive reforms and collaborative efforts from various stakeholders. Experts and officials emphasise the pressing need to address the evolving nature of cyber threats and strengthen the country's legal and regulatory framework to combat this menace effectively.
Former IPS officer and cybersecurity expert Prof Triveni Singh identified the necessity for fundamental changes in India's legal infrastructure to align with the pervasive nature of cybercrime. He advocates for the establishment of a national-level cybercrime investigation bureau, augmented training for law enforcement personnel, and the integration of cyber forensic facilities at police stations across the country.
A critical challenge in combating cybercrime lies in the outdated procedures for reporting and investigating such offences. Currently, victims often encounter obstacles when filing complaints, particularly if they reside outside India. Moreover, the decentralised nature of law enforcement across states complicates multi-jurisdictional investigations, leading to inefficiencies and resource depletion.
To streamline the process, experts propose the implementation of an independent online court system to expedite judicial proceedings for cybercrime cases, thereby eliminating the need for physical hearings. Additionally, fostering enhanced cooperation between police forces of different states and countries is deemed essential to effectively tackle cross-border cybercrimes.
Acknowledging the imperative for centralised coordination, proposals for the establishment of a national cybercrime investigation agency have been put forward. Such an agency would serve as a central hub, providing support to state police forces and facilitating collaboration in complex cybercrime cases involving multiple jurisdictions.
Regulatory bodies, notably the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), also play a crucial role in combatting financial cybercrimes. Experts urge the RBI to strengthen oversight of banks and enhance Know Your Customer (KYC) norms to prevent the misuse of accounts by cyber criminals. They should aim to utilise technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to detect anomalous transaction patterns and consolidate efforts to identify and thwart cybercrime activities.
There is a growing consensus on the necessity for a comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy and legislation in India. Such initiatives would furnish a robust framework for addressing the omnipresent nature of this threat and safeguarding the country's cyber sovereignty.
The bottom line is putting a stop to cybercrime demands a concerted effort involving lawmakers, regulators, law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, and internet service providers. By enacting comprehensive reforms and fostering greater cooperation, India can intensify its cyber resilience and ensure a safer online environment for all.
The UK’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is gearing up to deploy an advanced AI system aimed at detecting fraud and overpayments in social security benefits. The system will scrutinise millions of bank accounts, including those receiving state pensions and Universal Credit. This move comes as part of a broader effort to crack down on individuals either mistakenly or intentionally receiving excessive benefits.
Despite the government's intentions to curb fraudulent activities, the proposed measures have sparked significant backlash. More than 40 organisations, including Age UK and Disability Rights UK, have voiced their concerns, labelling the initiative as "a step too far." These groups argue that the planned mass surveillance of bank accounts poses serious threats to privacy, data protection, and equality.
Under the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, banks would be mandated to monitor accounts and flag any suspicious activities indicative of fraud. However, critics contend that such measures could set a troubling precedent for intrusive financial surveillance, affecting around 40% of the population who rely on state benefits. Furthermore, these powers extend to scrutinising accounts linked to benefit claims, such as those of partners, parents, and landlords.
In regards to the mounting criticism, the DWP emphasised that the new system does not grant them direct access to individuals' bank accounts or allow monitoring of spending habits. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding the broad scope of the surveillance, which would entail algorithmic scanning of bank and third-party accounts without prior suspicion of fraudulent behaviour.
The joint letter from advocacy groups highlights the disproportionate nature of the proposed powers and their potential impact on privacy rights. They argue that the sweeping surveillance measures could infringe upon individual liberties and exacerbate existing inequalities within the welfare system.
As the debate rages on, stakeholders are calling for greater transparency and safeguards to prevent misuse of the AI-powered monitoring system. Advocates stress the need for a balanced approach that addresses fraud while upholding fundamental rights to privacy and data protection.
While the DWP asserts that the measures are necessary to combat fraud, critics argue that they represent a disproportionate intrusion into individuals' financial privacy. As this discourse takes shape, the situation is pronouncing the importance of finding a balance between combating fraud and safeguarding civil liberties in the digital sphere.