Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Global Security. Show all posts

AI Development Needs Global Oversight, UN Experts State


 

In a time of increasing popularity for artificial intelligence (AI), the United Nations has warned that market forces should not be the sole determining factor as the technology becomes more widely used. United Nations experts called for creating tools for global cooperation as the technology becomes increasingly popular and raises concerns about its misuse. 

A high-level United Nations body that advises the government said Thursday that developing a global framework for artificial intelligence is an "imperative". In a statement released by The World Bank last week, the bank called on the United Nations to establish the first comprehensive global organizations to regulate the fast-growing technology market. 

An analysis published by the group in a 100-page report on AI concluded that the technology "is changing our world," holding an abundance of incredible potential for good, such as opening new fields of science and accelerating economic growth as well as improving public health and agriculture, as well as optimizing energy systems. 

A report by the World Economic Forum stated that if AI is left unregulated, it would provide benefits only to a small number of countries, companies, and individuals, while it warned that even more powerful systems than those in existence today "could upend the world of work," develop autonomous weapons, and threaten peace and stability worldwide. 

There are approximately 40 experts from the fields of technology, law, and data protection on the panel, which was established by United Nations High Representative Antonio Guterres in October last year as part of his Global Agenda Council. There is a need to raise awareness about the lack of global governance of artificial intelligence such as the exclusion of developing countries from discussions concerning AI's future and its regulatory framework within the context of high-profile "Summit of the Future" events. 

Only seven of the U.N.'s 193 members belong to one of the seven major AI initiatives, while 118 others are absent from all of them -- mostly countries from the South of the globe. Recent years have seen impressive achievements in the areas of large language models and chatbots, and this has sparked high hopes for a revolution in economic productivity, but some experts have also warned that AI technology may be developing too rapidly, which may lead to problems in creating control over it in the future. 

In less than a month after ChatGPT appeared, several scientists and entrepreneurs came together and signed a letter asking for a temporary pause of the technology's development for six months to assess the risks associated with it. Among the more immediate concerns, there are the ones relating to disinformation automated through artificial intelligence, the generation of deepfake audio and video, the mass replacement of workers, and the worsening of societal algorithmic bias on an industrial scale. 

As Nelson says, "There is a sense of urgency about the situation, and people feel that we need to come together to find a solution.". The UN proposals reflect a strong commitment by government officials worldwide to regulate AI to minimize these risks to the environment. This research comes at a time when the world's major powers, including the United States and China, are frantically competing to lead the way in the development and use of technology that offers enormous economic, scientific, and military benefits, and as these countries stake out their visions for how they should be used and managed. 

As a result, differences are already beginning to appear between the sexes. It is important to remember that whole parts of the world have been left out of international discussions regarding AI governance; that is the lack of representation. It should be pointed out that seven countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the United States) are parties to seven prominent non-UN initiatives on artificial intelligence, whereas only 118 countries, predominantly in the Global South, are parties to none of these initiatives. 

"The risks caused by artificial intelligence might become more severe and might become more concentrated, leading to Member States considering the need for a more robust international institution that has authority over monitoring, reporting, verification, and enforcement. Because of the remarkable speed with which AI is advancing, the authors accept that it would be useless to compose a detailed list of the dangers, that AI poses, to demonstrate the impact of AI on society.

However, they focused on the dangers posed by disinformation, deep fakes, particularly pornographic deep fakes, as well as the continued development of autonomous weapons and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by terrorist and criminal groups. A more immediate response, given the speed, autonomy, and opacity of artificial intelligence systems, may not prove to be feasible if people wait for a threat to emerge before finding out what is happening, according to the report. 

Continual assessments and policy dialogue will help to ensure that the world will not be surprised by the events of the future. As the authors acknowledge, owing to the breakneck speed of change in the field of artificial intelligence, it would not be possible to put together a comprehensive list of the potential dangers associated with the fast-evolving technology no matter how hard they tried. 

There were 3 key points they emphasized in their report: the threat of disinformation for democracy, the rise of more realistic deep fakes - especially those associated with pornography - as well as the evolution of autonomous weapons and the use of AI for criminals and terrorists.

Defending Digital Frontiers: Strategies for Organizations in an Unstable World

Global Stability Issues Alter Cyber Threat Landscape

An overview

  • Geopolitical Tensions: Regional stability issues, such as political conflicts and economic tensions, have a direct impact on cyber threats. As geopolitical events unfold, threat actors adapt their strategies to exploit vulnerabilities.
  • Attack Trends: While no groundbreaking attack methods have emerged, existing techniques continue to evolve. Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups remain active, targeting government entities, critical infrastructure, and private organizations.
  • Leading Actors: ESET’s research identifies Russia-aligned APT groups as the most prolific attackers. Their sophisticated campaigns target various sectors, including energy, finance, and defense. China-aligned actors follow closely, focusing on espionage and intellectual property theft.

The current landscape

A recent analysis from threat intelligence analysts ESET claims that threat actors are increasing their attacks worldwide, with geographic events determining which locations are most heavily targeted. The principal author of the research recommends that CISOs to intensify their protection plans in light of the activity, even if he claims that no new attack techniques have been discovered.

The director of threat research at ESET, Jean-Ian Boutin said  that current attack methods "still work well." Thus, attackers don't always need to use innovative vectors. According to Boutin, CISOs are defending against these attacks properly; they only need to fortify themselves even more.

Impact on regional stability

The researchers claim that because the primary worldwide assault trends that ESET has identified have been directly impacted by regional stability difficulties, these challenges are also affecting the cyber sphere. The report focuses on activities of specific advanced persistent threat (APT) groups from October 2023 to March 2024, the experts said in the report.

Researchers from ESET also observed that organizations connected with Russia were concentrating on espionage activities throughout the European Union in addition to assaults against Ukraine.

Along with operations against Ukraine, ESET researchers also saw that entities connected with Russia were concentrating on espionage across the European Union. However, the researchers noted that several threat actors with ties to China took use of flaws in software and public-facing hardware, including firewalls and VPNs, as well as Confluence and Microsoft Exchange Server, to gain first access to targets across a variety of sectors.

Analysis of attacks

Using emotions to keep the assault from being disclosed is one of the more recent strategies ESET is witnessing in North Korea; this will probably increase the tactic's usefulness and duration. According to Boutin, the method has been used for years, but North Korean APT organizations are making a small adjustment.

Under the guise of a job application, the hack targets programmers and other technical talent at numerous significant US corporations. The victim is exposed to the malware and the trap is set when the attacker poses as a recruiter for such companies and requests that the victims complete an online test to demonstrate their technical proficiency.

Implications for CISOs

  • Defense Strategies: Organizations must strengthen their defense mechanisms. Proactive threat intelligence, robust network security, and employee training are essential. Zero-day vulnerabilities and supply chain attacks require constant vigilance.
  • Threat Attribution: Understanding threat actors’ motivations and affiliations is crucial. Attribution helps tailor defenses and prioritize resources effectively. Collaboration among security professionals and law enforcement agencies is vital.
  • Risk Assessment: Organizations should assess their risk exposure based on geopolitical events. Consider the impact of regional instability on critical assets and operations. Regular risk assessments inform decision-making.