Leading cardiac surgery medical device company Artivion has reported a ransomware attack that occurred on November 21, resulting in the encryption of certain systems and unauthorized data access. The incident forced the Atlanta-based company to take part of its operations offline while addressing the attack.
In its 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Artivion disclosed that it promptly initiated an investigation and engaged external advisors, including legal, cybersecurity, and forensics professionals. "The incident involved the acquisition and encryption of files. The Company is working to securely restore its systems as quickly as possible and to evaluate any notification obligations," the filing stated.
The company also noted that disruptions to its corporate operations, order processing, and shipping were largely resolved. Despite having insurance coverage for incident response costs, Artivion anticipates additional expenses that will not be covered.
Artivion operates manufacturing facilities in Germany, Texas, and Georgia and employs over 1,250 people globally, with sales representatives in more than 100 countries. Although the immediate disruptions caused by the ransomware attack have been mitigated, the company is likely to face longer-term implications, including potential reputational damage and increased cybersecurity investments.
The ransomware attack on Artivion is part of a broader wave of cyberattacks targeting healthcare organizations. Recently, the BianLian cybercrime group attacked Boston Children's Health Physicians (BCHP), threatening to expose stolen files unless a ransom was paid. Similarly, UMC Health System and Anna Jaques Hospital faced significant disruptions due to ransomware assaults earlier this year.
These incidents highlight the growing vulnerabilities in the healthcare sector, where sensitive patient data and critical operations make organizations attractive targets for cybercriminals.
The Artivion ransomware attack underscores the urgent need for the healthcare sector to adopt robust cybersecurity measures. Key takeaways include:
As cyber threats continue to evolve, healthcare organizations must prioritize cybersecurity to safeguard sensitive data and maintain trust in their services.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, the San Francisco-based company revealed last week that that during an attack in March 2023, threat actors stole personal information and critical health data of more than 637,000 data breach victims.
Orrick said that the hackers had taken massive amounts of data from its systems related to security incidents at other organizations, for which he provided legal assistance, in a series of letters notifying those impacted of the data breach.
Orrick informs that the data involved in the breach involved its customers’ data, including those with dental policies with Delta Dental, a major healthcare insurance network that covers millions of Americans' dental needs, and those with vision plans with insurance company EyeMed Vision Care.
The company further added that it had contacted with the U.S. Small Business Administration, the behavioral health giant Beacon Health Options (now Carelon), and the health insurance provider MultiPlan that their data was also exposed in Orrick's data breach.
Apparently, the stolen data includes victims’ names, dates of birth, postal address and email addresses, and government-issued identification numbers, such as Social Security numbers, passport and driver license numbers, and tax identification numbers. Also, information about patient’s medical treatment and diagnosis details, insurance claim like date and service-charges, and healthcare insurance numbers and provider details have been compromised.
Orrick further says that credit or debit card details as well as online account credentials were also involved in the breach.
Since the initial announcement of the breach, the number of affected individuals have been on the rise. In its recent breach notice, Orrick states that it “does not anticipate providing notifications on behalf of additional businesses,” however the company did not specify how it came to this conclusion.
Orrick said in December to a federal court in San Francisco that it reached a preliminary settlement to end four class action lawsuits that claimed Orrick failed to disclose the breach from victims for months after it had occurred.
“We are pleased to reach a settlement well within a year of the incident, which brings this matter to a close, and will continue our ongoing focus on protecting our systems and the information of our clients and our firm,” added Orrick’s spokesperson.