Cybersecurity researchers at GreyNoise have uncovered widespread exploitation of a critical zero-day vulnerability in Zyxel CPE Series devices, months after it was initially reported to the manufacturer. The flaw, identified as CVE-2024-40891, allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on affected devices, potentially leading to data breaches, network infiltration, and complete system compromise. GreyNoise has disclosed the issue to raise awareness among organizations and individuals at risk, as mass exploitation attempts have already been observed.
The vulnerability, CVE-2024-40891, was first reported to Zyxel by researchers at VulnCheck in August 2024. However, Zyxel has yet to release a public advisory or an official CVE entry for the flaw, leaving users without a patch to mitigate the risk. GreyNoise collaborated with VulnCheck to disclose the issue, following standard security policies. A GreyNoise spokesperson stated, “Due to first-hand, confirmed mass exploitation attempts for this vulnerability, we chose to disclose this to raise awareness among those who may be impacted.”
Security analysts at Censys estimate that approximately 1,500 devices are online and potentially vulnerable, though definitive confirmation of affected versions is still pending. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) has not yet provided additional details about the issue. To assess the extent of malicious activity, GreyNoise and VulnCheck conducted a joint investigation, revealing that attackers are actively targeting the flaw.
Researchers noted that CVE-2024-40891 shares similarities with another Zyxel vulnerability, CVE-2024-40890, which also involves authentication and command injection exploits. The key difference is that CVE-2024-40891 is exploited via telnet, while CVE-2024-40890 is HTTP-based. This latest vulnerability follows a recent warning from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and German authorities about another security flaw in Zyxel firewalls, CVE-2024-11667, which was exploited to deploy Helldown ransomware in early December.
With no official patch available, Zyxel users remain vulnerable to exploitation. Security experts urge organizations to implement temporary mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of compromise. Key recommendations include:
A VulnCheck spokesperson confirmed that the firm is actively working with Zyxel on the disclosure process and expects to share further insights in the coming week. In the meantime, organizations are advised to remain vigilant and take proactive steps to protect their networks.
The widespread exploitation of CVE-2024-40891 highlights the critical importance of timely vulnerability disclosure and patch management. As attackers continue to target Zyxel devices, organizations must prioritize cybersecurity measures to safeguard their systems and data. While waiting for an official patch, implementing temporary mitigation strategies and staying informed about updates can help reduce the risk of exploitation. This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in securing network devices and the need for collaboration between manufacturers, researchers, and users to address vulnerabilities effectively.
Cryptojacking, the unauthorized exploitation of an organization’s computing resources to mine cryptocurrency, has emerged as a significant yet often overlooked cybersecurity threat. Unlike ransomware, which overtly disrupts operations, cryptojacking operates covertly, leading to substantial financial and operational impacts. In 2023, cryptojacking attacks surged by 659%, totaling 1.1 billion incidents, according to SonicWall’s 2024 Cyber Threat Report.
This dramatic increase underscores the growing appeal of cryptojacking among cybercriminals. The financial implications for businesses are severe. Research indicates that for every dollar’s worth of cryptocurrency mined illicitly, companies incur approximately USD 53 in cloud service costs. This disparity highlights the hidden expenses organizations face when their systems are compromised for unauthorized mining activities.
Attackers employ various methods to infiltrate systems, including:
The rise of containerized environments has also provided new avenues for attackers. For example, cybercriminals can embed mining scripts within public repository images or target exposed Docker APIs to deploy cryptojacking malware.
Beyond financial losses, cryptojacking degrades system performance by overutilizing CPU and GPU resources. This leads to slower operations, reduced productivity, and increased energy consumption. Over time, the strain on hardware can cause overheating and potential equipment failure. Additionally, compromised systems are more vulnerable to further security breaches, as attackers can leverage their access to escalate attacks.
To defend against cryptojacking, organizations must implement proactive security measures. Key strategies include:
Organizations should also prioritize employee training to recognize phishing attempts and other common attack vectors. Regularly updating and patching software can close vulnerabilities that attackers exploit to infiltrate systems. Additionally, implementing robust access controls and monitoring for unusual user activity can help prevent unauthorized access.
The surge in cryptojacking attacks highlights the growing sophistication of cybercriminals and the need for organizations to adopt comprehensive cybersecurity measures. While cryptojacking may not be as visibly disruptive as ransomware, its financial and operational impacts can be equally devastating. By deploying advanced detection tools, analyzing network traffic, and regularly testing defenses, businesses can mitigate the risks posed by cryptojacking and protect their computing resources from unauthorized exploitation. As cyber threats continue to evolve, proactive and adaptive security strategies will be essential to safeguarding organizational assets and maintaining operational efficiency.
Generative AI (GenAI) is transforming the cybersecurity landscape, with 52% of CISOs prioritizing innovation using emerging technologies. However, a significant disconnect exists, as only 33% of board members view these technologies as a top priority. This gap underscores the challenge of aligning strategic priorities between cybersecurity leaders and company boards.
According to the latest Splunk CISO Report, cyberattacks are becoming more frequent and sophisticated. Yet, 41% of security leaders believe that the requirements for protection are becoming easier to manage, thanks to advancements in AI. Many CISOs are increasingly relying on AI to:
However, GenAI is a double-edged sword. While it enhances threat detection and protection, attackers are also leveraging AI to boost their efforts. For instance:
This has led to growing concerns among security professionals, with 36% of CISOs citing AI-powered attacks as their biggest worry, followed by cyber extortion (24%) and data breaches (23%).
One of the major challenges is the gap in budget expectations. Only 29% of CISOs feel they have sufficient funding to secure their organizations, compared to 41% of board members who believe their budgets are adequate. Additionally, 64% of CISOs attribute the cyberattacks their firms experience to a lack of support.
Despite these challenges, there is hope. A vast majority of cybersecurity experts (86%) believe that AI can help attract entry-level talent to address the skills shortage, while 65% say AI enables seasoned professionals to work more productively. Collaboration between security teams and other departments is also improving:
To strengthen cyber defenses, experts emphasize the importance of foundational practices:
Generative AI is reshaping the cybersecurity landscape, offering both opportunities and challenges. While it enhances threat detection and operational efficiency, it also empowers attackers to launch more sophisticated and frequent attacks. To navigate this evolving landscape, organizations must align strategic priorities, invest in AI-driven solutions, and reinforce foundational cybersecurity practices. By doing so, they can better protect their systems and data in an increasingly complex threat environment.
A new Android malware called FireScam is being distributed through phishing websites hosted on GitHub, masquerading as a premium version of the Telegram app. These fraudulent sites mimic RuStore, Russia’s official mobile app marketplace, tricking users into downloading the malware. This incident highlights how cybercriminals exploit trusted platforms to deploy sophisticated threats.
RuStore was launched in May 2022 by Russian tech company VK (VKontakte) with support from the Ministry of Digital Development as an alternative to Google Play and Apple’s App Store. It was designed to provide Russian users access to mobile applications despite Western sanctions. Cybercriminals have taken advantage of RuStore’s credibility by creating phishing pages that distribute malware under the guise of legitimate applications. According to security researchers at CYFIRMA, attackers have set up a GitHub-hosted phishing page impersonating RuStore, delivering an initial malware payload named GetAppsRu.apk.
Once installed, the dropper module requests multiple permissions, allowing it to identify installed applications, access device storage, and install additional software. It then downloads and installs the primary malware payload, disguised as Telegram Premium.apk. This second-stage malware requests extensive permissions, enabling it to monitor notifications, read clipboard data, access SMS and call information, and track user activity.
FireScam displays a fake Telegram login page via WebView to steal user credentials. The malware then communicates with Firebase Realtime Database, where stolen data is uploaded in real time. Each infected device is assigned a unique identifier, allowing attackers to track it. According to CYFIRMA, the stolen data is temporarily stored in Firebase before being filtered and transferred to another location. FireScam maintains a persistent WebSocket connection with a Firebase-based command-and-control (C2) endpoint, allowing attackers to execute real-time commands, download and install additional payloads, modify surveillance settings, and trigger immediate data uploads.
FireScam continuously tracks various device activities, including screen on/off events, active app usage, and user interactions lasting over 1,000 milliseconds. One of its most concerning features is its focus on e-commerce transactions. The malware attempts to intercept sensitive financial data by logging keystrokes, tracking clipboard content, and extracting auto-filled credentials from password managers.
While the identity of FireScam’s operators remains unknown, CYFIRMA researchers describe it as a sophisticated and multifaceted threat that employs advanced evasion techniques. To minimize the risk of infection, users should avoid downloading apps from unverified sources, be cautious when clicking on unfamiliar links, download applications only from official platforms like Google Play or verified stores, and regularly review and restrict app permissions to prevent unauthorized data access. The rise of malware like FireScam underscores the growing need for cybersecurity awareness. Staying vigilant and adopting secure online practices is essential to protecting personal and financial data from evolving cyber threats.
A cybersecurity incident has compromised at least 35 Google Chrome extensions, affecting approximately 2.6 million users globally. Over 400,000 devices have reportedly been infected with malicious code as part of a coordinated attack.
An investigation revealed that the attack began on December 5, although related domains were registered as early as March 2024. This indicates the attackers had been preparing for months before launching their campaign.
One targeted entity was a data loss prevention startup, whose Chrome extension was exploited. The breach reportedly began with a phishing email impersonating a Google policy alert, urging a developer to install a "Privacy Policy Extension." This malicious extension, when granted permissions, allowed attackers to access the developer’s account.
Once access was obtained, the attackers uploaded a malicious update to the compromised extensions. This update bypassed security protocols and was automatically distributed to users, facilitating the infection. The primary objective appeared to be data harvesting, with an emphasis on collecting Facebook-related information from users.
The affected company reported that the compromised employee had Google Advanced Protection and multi-factor authentication (MFA) enabled. Despite following standard protocols, the employee inadvertently authorized a malicious third-party application. The company clarified that no suspicious MFA prompts were received, and the employee's Google credentials remained secure.
Domains associated with the attack were initially registered in March 2024, with additional registrations occurring closer to the campaign’s escalation in November and December.
This incident underscores the evolving tactics of cybercriminals and the importance of constant vigilance and robust cybersecurity measures, particularly in the face of sophisticated phishing campaigns.
The FBI has issued a cautionary alert for travelers, urging them to avoid using public USB charging stations found in airports, hotels, and other public spaces. A rising cyber threat, known as “juice jacking,” enables cybercriminals to steal sensitive data and install malware through these ports. While convenient for charging devices on the go, these stations are increasingly being exploited to compromise personal and financial security.
The Mechanics Behind Juice Jacking
Juice jacking takes advantage of a fundamental vulnerability in USB technology, which supports both power delivery and data transfer. When an unsuspecting user plugs their device into a compromised USB port, malware can be silently installed, or data can be extracted without their knowledge. The malicious software may remain dormant, activating later to steal passwords, lock files for ransom, or even mine cryptocurrency, which can drain the device’s battery and degrade its performance.
Adding to the complexity of this threat, even charging cables can be tampered with to include hidden components that extract data as soon as they are connected. This makes it possible for travelers to fall victim to juice jacking even if they avoid public charging stations but use unfamiliar or unverified cables.
The threat of juice jacking extends far beyond U.S. borders. Airports, hotels, and shopping malls worldwide have reported similar incidents, as the universal nature of USB charging technology makes it a convenient vector for cyberattacks. The rise in reported cases has prompted security experts to raise awareness about this subtle yet significant risk, urging travelers to rethink how and where they charge their devices.
How to Protect Yourself
To stay safe, the FBI and cybersecurity professionals recommend adopting these precautions:
Some airports and transportation hubs are beginning to address the issue by installing “charge-only” stations that disable data transfer capabilities. However, such solutions are not yet widespread, making it essential for individuals to remain vigilant and proactive in protecting their devices.
Corporate and Financial Sector Responses
Businesses are taking the juice jacking threat seriously, with many companies updating travel policies to discourage employees from using public USB ports. Instead, employees are being provided with approved chargers and power banks to ensure the safety of corporate devices and sensitive data.
The financial sector is also raising alarms, advising customers to avoid conducting banking transactions or accessing sensitive accounts while connected to public USB ports. Even a brief connection to a compromised charging station could lead to unauthorized access to financial apps and accounts, potentially resulting in significant losses.
While steps are being taken to make public charging safer, the onus remains on travelers to prioritize device security. By carrying personal charging equipment, avoiding unverified cables, and utilizing tools like USB data blockers, individuals can mitigate the risks of juice jacking and safeguard their personal and financial information against this evolving cyber threat.
For years, cybersecurity experts have criticized passwords as outdated and insecure. Frequently re-used, susceptible to phishing, and vulnerable to leaks, they remain one of the weakest links in online security. Passkeys have been hailed as the solution — a frictionless and secure alternative that leverages biometric authentication while addressing many of the vulnerabilities associated with traditional passwords.
However, despite their promise, passkeys face challenges that could hinder their widespread adoption. While the technology offers undeniable advantages, issues like inconsistent functionality and platform lock-ins complicate the user experience.
How Passkeys Work
Passkeys represent a safer and more streamlined authentication method. Instead of typing a password, users authenticate through biometric verification, such as Face ID, Touch ID, or similar local methods. This approach shifts the security focus to the device itself, adopting a trust model akin to mobile payment systems like Apple Pay. In theory, this allows for seamless logins across devices.
The Reality of Cross-Platform Challenges
In practice, however, the experience is less cohesive. Within Apple’s ecosystem, passkeys function smoothly, with iCloud synchronization ensuring consistency. Yet outside this "walled garden," complications arise.
As highlighted by Ars Technica, users attempting to log into the same service with passkeys across platforms—such as PayPal on Windows versus iOS — encounter varying experiences. Some services further restrict passkey usage to specific browsers, frustrating users who frequently switch between platforms.
Platform Lock-In and User Frustration
A more pressing issue is platform dominance. Tech giants like Apple and Google often push users toward their proprietary passkey management systems, sometimes overriding user preferences. For instance, even if a passkey is synced via a third-party password manager, users may still be redirected to Google’s system when logging into certain sites, such as LinkedIn.
Adding to the frustration, many services operate passkeys alongside passwords rather than replacing them entirely. This undermines the very purpose of passkeys, as users are still required to create passwords during registration, perpetuating traditional security risks.
The Push for a Password-Free Future
Despite these setbacks, some organizations are leading the charge toward a password-free future. As Grayson Mixon, a user commenting on the issue, noted:
"The company I work for introduced passkeys months ago. Now they are disabling passwords as an option. It will be passkeys only in 2025."
While such initiatives signal progress, the path to universal adoption of passkeys is far from straightforward. For passkeys to truly replace passwords, the industry must overcome challenges related to interoperability, user convenience, and platform neutrality.
Passkeys have the potential to revolutionize online authentication, offering a more secure and convenient alternative to passwords. Yet, current inconsistencies and platform restrictions highlight the need for continued innovation and collaboration across the tech industry. Until these hurdles are addressed, the journey toward a password-free digital landscape will remain a work in progress.