A recent report by Group-IB has exposed a highly advanced phishing campaign targeting employees from 30 companies across 15 jurisdictions. Using trusted domains and cutting-edge personalization techniques, attackers have bypassed Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) and exploited victims in critical sectors such as finance, government, aerospace, and energy.
The investigation, initiated in July 2024, uncovered the attackers' use of:
“Nine out of ten cyberattacks start with a phishing email, making it the most common entry point for threat actors,” the report emphasized.
The attackers used professionally designed phishing emails that impersonated well-known brands, including:
These emails featured professional formatting, familiar logos, and dynamically personalized elements. For example, by extracting a victim’s email domain, the attackers matched logos and page titles to the targeted organization, enhancing credibility.
“Scammers use a technique that dynamically pulls company logos from the official website to make the phishing links look legitimate,” the report noted.
The attackers leveraged APIs like https://logo.clearbit.com/[company domain]
to integrate authentic logos into phishing sites. This seamless branding approach increased user trust and made phishing attempts harder to detect.
To evade detection, attackers used:
Victims were redirected to phishing pages that appeared legitimate, with pre-filled email addresses further enhancing the illusion of authenticity. Once users entered their credentials, the stolen data was sent to Command-and-Control (C2) servers or Telegram bots via API endpoints.
The phishing sites contained JavaScript snippets that transmitted stolen credentials using Base64 encoding, effectively hiding the data during analysis. Group-IB analysts observed: “The JSON response from Telegram’s API confirms that the stolen credentials were successfully sent to a private chat controlled by the attacker.”
Group-IB warns that these techniques signify a continuous evolution in phishing methodologies: “Threat actors are quickly adapting, constantly refining and improving their techniques to bypass security measures and exploit vulnerabilities.”
This campaign serves as a stark reminder of the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats. Organizations must strengthen their defenses and educate employees to identify and respond to increasingly sophisticated phishing attempts.
The attackers behind this campaign are impersonating the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU), a tactic designed to exploit the trust and authority associated with this organization. By doing so, they aim to deceive recipients into believing that the phishing emails are legitimate and urgent. This method of social engineering is particularly effective in high-stakes environments where quick responses are often required.
The phishing emails contain a ZIP file attachment, which, when opened, reveals an MSI installer. This installer is loaded with a malware strain known as ANONVNC. Once installed, ANONVNC provides the attackers with remote desktop access to the infected computers. This level of access allows them to monitor activities, steal sensitive information, and potentially disrupt operations.
The phishing emails are crafted to appear as official communications from the SSU. They often contain subject lines and content that create a sense of urgency, prompting the recipient to open the attachment without due diligence. Once the ZIP file is opened and the MSI installer is executed, the ANONVNC malware is deployed.
ANONVNC is a remote access tool (RAT) that enables the attackers to take control of the infected computer. This includes the ability to view the screen, access files, and execute commands. The malware operates stealthily, making it difficult for users to detect its presence. This allows the attackers to maintain prolonged access to the compromised systems, increasing the potential for data theft and other malicious activities.
By targeting government computers, the attackers are not only seeking to steal sensitive information but also to undermine the operational integrity of Ukrainian governmental functions. This can have a cascading effect, potentially disrupting public services and eroding trust in governmental institutions.
Moreover, the use of ANONVNC as the malware of choice highlights the evolving nature of cyber threats. Remote access tools are becoming increasingly sophisticated, enabling attackers to carry out complex operations with relative ease. This underscores the need for robust cybersecurity measures and continuous vigilance.
The phishing email campaign began in September 2023, right after the FBI took down the Qbot (Qakbot) infrastructure.
In a report recently published by Cofense, researchers explain that the DarkGate and Pikabot operations employ strategies and methods that are reminiscent of earlier Qakbot attacks, suggesting that the threat actors behind Qbot have now shifted to more recent malware botnets.
"This campaign is undoubtedly a high-level threat due to the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that enable the phishing emails to reach intended targets as well as the advanced capabilities of the malware being delivered," the report reads.
This presents a serious risk to the organization because DarkGate and Pikabot are modular malware loaders that have many of the same features as Qbot, and Qbot was one of the most widely used malware botnets that were spread by malicious email.
Threat actors would likely utilize the new malware loaders, like Qbot, to get initial access to networks and carry out ransomware, espionage, and data theft assaults.
Earlier this year, there had been a dramatic surge in malicious emails promoting the DarkGate ransomware. Starting in October 2023, threat actors have begun using Pikabot as the main payload.
This phishing attack takes place by sending an email – that is a reply or forward of a stolen discussion threat – to the targeted victims, who trust the fraudulent communications.
After clicking on the embedded URL, users are prompted to download a ZIP file containing a malware dropper that retrieves the final payload from a remote location. These tests ensure that the users are legitimate targets.
According to Cofense, the attackers tested a number of early malware droppers to see which one worked best, including:
DarkGate first came to light in 2017, however only became available to the threat actors past summer. As a result, its contribution to conducting phishing attacks and malvertising increases.
This sophisticated modular malware may perform a wide range of malicious actions, such as keylogging, bitcoin mining, reverse shelling, hVNC remote access, clipboard theft, and information (files, browser data) theft.
PikaBot, on the other hand, was discovered much recently in 2023. It consists of a loader and a core module, slotting in extensive anti-debugging, anti-VM, and anti-emulation mechanisms.
The malware profiles targeted systems and transfers the data to its command and control (C2) infrastructure, awaiting additional instructions.
The C2 delivers the commands to the malware that order it to download and run modules in the form of DLL or PE files, shellcode, or command-line commands.
Cofense has further cautioned that PikaBot and DarkGarw campaigns are being conducted by threat actors who are conversant with what they are doing and that their capabilities are top-of-the-line. Thus, organizations must be thoroughly introduced to the TTPs for this phishing campaign.