Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label RBI. Show all posts

Cyberattacks Skyrocket in India, Are We Ready for the Digital Danger Ahead?


 

India is experiencing a rise in cyberattacks, particularly targeting its key sectors such as finance, government, manufacturing, and healthcare. This increase has prompted the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to urge banks and financial institutions to strengthen their cybersecurity measures.

As India continues to digitise its infrastructure, it has become more vulnerable to cyberattacks. Earlier this year, hackers stole and leaked 7.5 million records from boAt, a leading Indian company that makes wireless audio and wearable devices. This is just one example of how cybercriminals are targeting Indian businesses and institutions.

The RBI has expressed concern about the growing risks in the financial sector due to rapid digitization. In 2023 alone, India’s national cybersecurity team, CERT-In, handled about 16 million cyber incidents, a massive increase from just 53,000 incidents in 2017. Most banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) now see cybersecurity as a major challenge as they move towards digital technology. The RBI’s report highlights that the speed at which information and rumours can spread digitally could threaten financial stability. Cybercriminals are increasingly focusing on financial institutions rather than individual customers.

The public sector, including government agencies, has also seen a dramatic rise in cyberattacks. Many organisations report that these attacks have increased by at least 50%. Earlier this year, a hacking group targeted government agencies and energy companies using a type of malware known as HackBrowserData. Additionally, countries like Pakistan and China have been intensifying their cyberattacks on Indian organisations, with operations like the recent Cosmic Leopard campaign.

According to a report by Cloudflare, 83% of organisations in India experienced at least one cybersecurity incident in the last year, placing India among the top countries in Asia facing such threats. Globally, India is the fifth most breached nation, bringing attention  to the bigger picture which screams for stronger cybersecurity measures.

Indian companies are most worried about threats related to cloud computing, connected devices, and software vulnerabilities. The adoption of new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing, combined with the shift to remote work, has accelerated digital transformation, but it also increases the need for stronger security measures.

Manu Dwivedi, a cybersecurity expert from PwC India, points out that AI-powered phishing and sophisticated social engineering techniques have made ransomware a top concern for organisations. As more companies use cloud services and open-source software, the risk of cyberattacks grows. Dwivedi also stresses the importance of protecting against insider threats, which requires a mix of strategy, culture, training, and governance.

AI is playing a growing role in both defending against and enabling cyberattacks. While AI has the potential to improve security, it also introduces new risks. Cybercriminals are beginning to use AI to create more advanced malware that can avoid detection. Dwivedi warns that as AI continues to evolve, it may become harder to track how these tools are being misused by attackers.

Partha Gopalakrishnan, founder of PG Advisors, emphasises the need for India to update its cybersecurity laws. The current law, the Information Technology Act of 2000, is outdated and does not fully address today’s digital threats. Gopalakrishnan also stressed upon the growing demand for AI skills in India, suggesting that businesses should focus on training in both AI and cybersecurity to close the skills gap. He warns that as AI becomes more accessible, it could empower a wider range of people to carry out sophisticated cyberattacks.

India’s digital growth presents great opportunities, but it also comes with strenuous challenges. It’s crucial for Indian businesses and government agencies to develop comprehensive cybersecurity strategies and stay vigilant.


Fintechs Encouraged to Join National Cyber Fraud Reporting System


The Fintech Association of India (FACE) has urged its members to register on the Citizen Financial Cyber Fraud Reporting and Management System (CFCFRMS). This platform, part of the broader National Cybercrime Reporting Portal, facilitates the reporting and management of financial cyber frauds. By joining, fintech companies can better handle customer complaints and collaborate with law enforcement to prevent fraud.

This initiative by FACE is noteworthy, especially as it seeks approval to become a self-regulatory organisation (SRO) for fintech lenders. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is expected to announce its decision soon, with FACE and the Digital Lenders’ Association of India both in the running to be recognised as an SRO. The establishment of an SRO will likely lead to more stringent industry oversight, promoting higher standards of operation and better consumer protection within the fintech sector.

The push for fintechs to join the CFCFRMS comes at a critical time. As digital transactions grow more common, the opportunities for cyber fraud have increased. The convergence of various financial entities— such as banks, non-banking financial companies, insurance providers, and payment services—has created more potential points of vulnerability. The CFCFRMS is designed to coordinate the efforts of all stakeholders, enabling action to block fraudulent transactions before they can be completed.

RBI’s New Platform to Combat Payment Frauds

In a parallel effort to bolster cybersecurity, the RBI is developing the Digital Payments Intelligence Platform (DPIP). This platform aims to use cutting-edge technology to detect and prevent payment fraud. A committee led by A P Hota, former CEO of the National Payments Corporation of India, is currently formulating recommendations for the DPIP, which is expected to upgrade the ability to share real-time data across the payment ecosystem. This initiative is especially important in addressing frauds where victims are tricked into making payments or divulging sensitive information.

Alarming Increase in Cyber Fraud Losses

The importance of these measures is empathised by recent statistics from the Ministry of Finance. Financial losses due to cyber fraud have more than doubled in the last fiscal year, rising to Rs 177.05 crore in FY24 from Rs 69.68 crore in FY23. This sharp increase underlines the growing threat posed by cybercriminals and the need for more robust security measures.

Public Awareness and Digital Payment Safety

While the rise in cyber fraud is concerning, a survey by the RBI offers some reassurance. According to the survey, 94.5% of digital payment users have not experienced fraud. However, the risk remains, especially in semi-urban areas, where fraud attempts are slightly more common than in metropolitan regions. The most prevalent form of fraud is vishing, or voice phishing, where criminals trick individuals into revealing sensitive information over the phone. Other common tactics include phishing emails, misuse of payment requests, and remote access scams.

As digital payments become increasingly integrated into everyday life, ensuring their safety is crucial. Initiatives like CFCFRMS and DPIP are essential in building a secure and trustworthy digital financial environment. By building up on fraud prevention measures, these platforms can help maintain public confidence and encourage wider adoption of digital payment systems.


Cyber Heist: Rs 40 Crore Taken from IndusInd Bank

 


According to Maharashtra Cyber, which reported the recovery of 31.89 crores out of 40 crores allegedly fraudulently transferred from IndusInd Bank to 20 different mule accounts on Friday, the agency said. As a result of the fraud, more than $4.2 million were stolen from ATMs around the country, while police are still looking for the remaining $2.87 million. 

It has been reported that IndusInd Bank in Mumbai has reported a loss of Rs 40 crore as a result of an unauthorized transaction which took place on their network. Maharashtra Cyber Police, responsible for detecting and responding to cyber frauds in the state, has managed to recoup Rs 32 crore as a major achievement in one of the state's largest cases of cyber fraud. According to the bank's Hyderabad branch manager, he is being held responsible for making unauthorized transactions on behalf of the bank. 

By improving the reporting process through the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCCRP), the Maharashtra Cyber Police were able to take swift action on the report of the cybercrime within a short period. With such a prompt response, the authorities were able to track down and freeze the fraudulent accounts in a short period. In addition to the fraudulent transactions, the Hyderabad branch manager also made two significant transfers of Rs 15 crore and Rs 25 crore with no authorization from the Mumbai head office on whether these transfers should be carried out. 

A total of nearly 20 accounts were involved in the disbursement of the funds. Even though the Hyderabad police department registered the FIR, it was Mumbai that originally made the complaint. The team’s efforts and process continued, resulting in blocking a total of ₹32.89 crore till July 25 in 11 bank accounts in India. The fraud managed to withdraw ₹4.24 crore from different ATMs of the bank, said Shintre. Efforts are still on to recover the remaining money,” he added. 

The amount was transferred to different banks from the Hyderabad branch, so an FIR has been registered there, and the Hyderabad police are investigating the case. After the Maharashtra Cyber Police team got wind of the complaint on July 19, one of its officers explained that the team immediately started pursuing the matter. In coordination with all finance intermediaries responsible for the processing of the money, they were able to place a hold on approximately Rs 31 crore by 6 PM on the same day. 

IndusInd Bank's Bandra Kurla Complex branch, which is located at the Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC), was alerted to the fraud through their helpline number after informing the cyber police about the fraudulent transactions. It was only after the cyber police took action that they were able to freeze the accounts worth 312.890 crores, which were held in various banks. According to the report, the team noticed on July 19 that there has been significant fraud involving transactions amounting to approximately $40 crore that have been reported. 

Following the realisation of the urgency of the situation, a team was immediately formed, and the following morning a follow-up process was initiated and immediate coordination was initiated with the appropriate financial intermediaries involved in the transactions. This resulted in an approximate saving of approximately 31 crores by 6 pm that day," said Shintre. A total of 31.89 crores of currency worth 32.89 crores were blocked from 11 bank accounts in India as a result of the team's work and process up until July 25. 

Shintre informed the press that the fraudster was able to withdraw a total of Rs.4.24 crore from ATMs across the bank. The team is constantly working on recovering the remaining money to get it back," he stated. It is believed that the money from the Hyderabad branch was transferred to different banks, which is why an FIR was filed there, and the Hyderabad police are presently investigating the situation. 

In the past three and a half years, Maharashtra Cyber has received 281,019 reports of cyber fraud, resulting in a staggering loss of approximately ₹3,325 crore to complainants across the state. During this period, efforts by the Cyber Police have successfully blocked and safeguarded around ₹358.77 crore in transactions through banking channels. 

The scale of the issue is reflected in the daily volume of calls received by Maharashtra Cyber's helpline number, 1930, which averages between 4,000 and 5,000 calls. To manage this influx, the organization operates 20 functional lines manned by a dedicated workforce of over 110 individuals working round-the-clock. A specialized team of 10 personnel focuses exclusively on follow-up procedures, liaising directly with banks and law enforcement agencies to expedite the resolution of complaints. 

Additionally, Maharashtra Cyber has implemented dedicated Artificial Intelligence (AI) units across various branches. These units facilitate data analysis, pattern recognition, digital forensics, and behavioural analysis, significantly aiding investigators in their efforts. From 2021 to July 26, 2024, the helpline recorded a total of 281,019 complaints, resulting in the recovery of ₹3,324.90 crore from fraudulent transactions, with an additional ₹358.77 crore placed on hold. This underscores the effectiveness and commitment of Maharashtra Cyber in addressing and mitigating cybercrime incidents. Ongoing investigations are aimed at ensuring compliance with RBI regulations and enhancing internal banking checks to prevent future occurrences.

RBI Issues Advisory to Support Cybersecurity in Banks


 

Amid escalating cyber threats, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has released a comprehensive advisory to all scheduled commercial banks. This advisory, disseminated by the Department of Banking Supervision in Mumbai, stresses upon the paramount importance of robust cybersecurity measures in the modern digital banking infrastructure.

The advisory highlights the crucial role of Corporate Governance in maintaining accountability within banks, emphasising that IT Governance is a key component of this framework. The RBI stresses that effective IT Governance necessitates strong leadership, a clear organisational structure, and efficient processes. Responsibility for IT Governance, the advisory states, lies with both the Board of Directors and Executive Management.

With technology becoming integral to banking operations, nearly every commercial bank branch has adopted some form of digital solution, such as core banking systems (CBS) and alternate delivery channels like internet banking, mobile banking, phone banking, and ATMs. In light of this, the RBI provides specific guidelines to banks for enhancing their IT Governance.

The RBI recommends that banks clearly define the roles and responsibilities of their Board and Senior Management to ensure effective project control and accountability. Additionally, it advises the establishment of an IT Strategy Committee at the Board level, comprising members with substantial IT expertise. This committee is tasked with advising on strategic IT directions, reviewing IT investments, and ensuring alignment with business goals.

The advisory also suggests structuring IT functions based on the bank’s size and business activities, with dedicated divisions such as technology and development, IT operations, IT assurance, and supplier management. Each division should be headed by experienced senior officials to manage IT systems effectively.

Implementing IT Governance PractiPracticehe RBI stresses the importance of implementing robust IT Governance practices aligned with international standards like COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies). These practices focus on value delivery, IT risk management, strategic alignment, resource management, and performance measurement.

Information Security Governance

Recognizing the critical nature of information security, the RBI advises banks to develop comprehensive security governance frameworks. This includes creating security policies, defining roles and responsibilities, conducting regular risk assessments, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. The advisory also recommends that the information security function be separated from IT operations to enhance oversight and mitigate risks.

Risk Management and Compliance

The RBI underscores the necessity of integrating IT risks into banks’ overall risk management frameworks. This involves identifying threats, assessing vulnerabilities, and implementing appropriate controls to mitigate risks. Regular monitoring and oversight through steering committees are essential to ensure compliance with policies and regulatory standards.

The RBI’s advisory serves as a crucial reminder for banks to strengthen their cybersecurity defences amidst growing digital threats. By adopting robust IT Governance and information security frameworks, banks can enhance operational resilience, protect customer data, and safeguard financial stability. Adhering to these guidelines not only ensures regulatory compliance but also bolsters trust and confidence in the banking sector.

As technology continues to play an increasingly pivotal role in banking, the RBI urges banks to remain vigilant against emerging threats. Proactive measures taken today will help secure the future of banking operations against cybersecurity challenges. For detailed guidelines, banks are encouraged to refer to the official communication from the Reserve Bank of India.


Online Banking Frauds: The Silent Threat to India’s Financial Stability

Online Banking Frauds: The Silent Threat to India’s Financial Stability

Bank frauds in India: A soaring trend

According to an analysis of frauds recorded across banks, the number of fraud cases filed in FY24 increased by approximately 300 percent from 9,046 in FY22. However, the sum involved has decreased from Rs 45,358 crore to Rs 13,930 crore, according to the central bank's annual report for fiscal year 24 released on Thursday.

Every year, the amount involved in total frauds reported decreased by 46.7% during fiscal year 24.

The numbers speak

The RBI stated that, while private sector banks reported the most frauds in the recent three years, public sector banks contributed the most to the fraud total. According to the RBI, digital payments (card payments and internet) were the most common source of fraud. 

According to the RBI, digital payments (card payments and internet) were the most common source of fraud. However, in terms of value, the frauds were concentrated in the loan portfolio.

While small value card/internet frauds accounted for the majority of frauds recorded by private sector banks, RBI investigation revealed that frauds in public sector banks were primarily in loan portfolios.

The number of scams involving card and internet payments jumped from 3,596 in FY22 to 29,082 in FY24. In terms of value, it rose from Rs 155 crore in FY22 to Rs 1,457 crore.

Observing the time lag

In an assessment of cases reported in FY23 and FY24, the RBI discovered a significant time lag between the date a fraud occurred and its identification.

According to the RBI, the amount engaged in frauds from prior fiscal years accounted for 94.0 percent of the frauds reported in FY23 in terms of value. Approximately 89% of the frauds recorded in FY24 by value occurred in previous fiscal years.

Factors contributing to the surge

  • Technological advancements: The digital revolution has transformed banking, making transactions faster and more accessible. However, it has also exposed vulnerabilities. Cybercriminals exploit weak security measures, phishing attacks, and identity theft to siphon off funds.
  • Lax oversight: Despite regulatory frameworks, some banks struggle to implement robust risk management practices. Inadequate internal controls and complacency contribute to the rising fraud numbers.
  • Insider threats: Employees with access to sensitive information can be both an asset and a liability. Insider fraud—whether intentional or due to negligence—poses a significant risk.
  • Complex financial products: As financial products become more intricate, so do the opportunities for fraud. From complex derivatives to shadow banking, the landscape is ripe for exploitation.

Mitigating the risk

  • Enhanced security measures: Banks must invest in cutting-edge cybersecurity tools. Multi-factor authentication, real-time monitoring, and AI-driven anomaly detection can help thwart fraud attempts.
  • Training and awareness: Educating bank staff and customers about fraud risks is crucial. Regular workshops, simulated phishing exercises, and awareness campaigns can empower everyone to stay vigilant.
  • Collaboration: Banks, regulators, and law enforcement agencies must collaborate closely. Sharing threat intelligence and best practices can strengthen the collective defense against fraud.
  • Strengthening legal frameworks: Stricter penalties and faster legal proceedings can act as deterrents. Swift action against fraudsters sends a strong message.

Don’t Be a Victim: How to Avoid Digital House Arrest

Don’t Be a Victim: How to Avoid Digital House Arrest

Criminals are using a new "Digital House Arrest" method to target individuals. Scammers contact victims and compel them to stay home by pretending to be law enforcement officials such as police officers, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) agents, or customs officials. 

They then exploit the victim's bank accounts. Numerous cases of this fraudulent conduct have recently emerged.

According to a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) study, India experienced bank frauds totaling more than Rs 30,000 crore in FY23. Over the last decade, Indian banks have reported 65,017 fraud instances, resulting in a total loss of Rs 4.69 trillion. 

To deceive naive people, cybercriminals use a variety of strategies, such as UPI, credit card, OTP, job, and delivery scams. Digital house arrest is a new popular scamming strategy.

About digital arrest

Digital house arrest occurs when cybercriminals trap victims in their homes to trick them. Perpetrators instill terror by making calls, frequently impersonating law enforcement officers via AI-generated voice or video calls.

They fraudulently accuse victims of misconduct involving their Aadhaar or phone number, creating a sense of imminent arrest and pushing them to send money.

Hackers usually contact victims and claim they shipped or received boxes carrying illegal substances such as narcotics or false passports. They may even fraudulently alert the target's relatives or acquaintances about their involvement in a crime, instilling a sense of urgency.

Criminals pose as law enforcement officers, and demand money from victims as compensation for covering the case. Victims are pressured to remain visible on video conferencing services until their requests are granted.

Forcing potential victims

Hackers use strategies such as setting up fake police stations or government offices and dressing in uniforms mimicking those of law enforcement authorities.

Uttar Pradesh Police launched an investigation into the first recorded case of 'digital arrest' in December of last year after receiving a complaint from a Noida resident.

The victim fell victim to the fraud, losing more than Rs 11 lakh and facing a day-long 'digital arrest'. Perpetrators posed as police officers, impersonating an IPS officer from the CBI and the founder of a bankrupt airline, and implicated the victim in a manufactured money-laundering case.

Government's response to frauds

The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) and the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) are collaborating to combat the influx of spoof calls coming from abroad. These callers falsely claim to be from law enforcement authorities such as the Narcotics Control Bureau or the Central Bureau of Investigation, among others, and claim 'digital arrests'.

In addition, I4C has partnered with Microsoft to fight the abuse of law enforcement emblems. These logos are regularly used by scammers abroad to take money from Indian nationals.

To raise awareness, I4C has released infographics and videos on its social media platform Cyberdost and its X (Twitter), Facebook, and Instagram pages. The Ministry has asked citizens to remain vigilant and raise awareness about cybercrime.

How to stay safe?

If you get a similar call or message, contact the authorities. The government of India has launched the Chakshu portal on the Sanchar Saathi website to combat cyber and online fraud. Individuals can also report similar incidents using the cybercrime helpline 1930 or online http://www.cybercrime.gov.in.


Can Legal Measures Slow Down Cybercrimes?

 


Cybercrime has transpired as a serious threat in India, prompting calls for comprehensive reforms and collaborative efforts from various stakeholders. Experts and officials emphasise the pressing need to address the evolving nature of cyber threats and strengthen the country's legal and regulatory framework to combat this menace effectively.

Former IPS officer and cybersecurity expert Prof Triveni Singh identified the necessity for fundamental changes in India's legal infrastructure to align with the pervasive nature of cybercrime. He advocates for the establishment of a national-level cybercrime investigation bureau, augmented training for law enforcement personnel, and the integration of cyber forensic facilities at police stations across the country.

A critical challenge in combating cybercrime lies in the outdated procedures for reporting and investigating such offences. Currently, victims often encounter obstacles when filing complaints, particularly if they reside outside India. Moreover, the decentralised nature of law enforcement across states complicates multi-jurisdictional investigations, leading to inefficiencies and resource depletion.

To streamline the process, experts propose the implementation of an independent online court system to expedite judicial proceedings for cybercrime cases, thereby eliminating the need for physical hearings. Additionally, fostering enhanced cooperation between police forces of different states and countries is deemed essential to effectively tackle cross-border cybercrimes.

Acknowledging the imperative for centralised coordination, proposals for the establishment of a national cybercrime investigation agency have been put forward. Such an agency would serve as a central hub, providing support to state police forces and facilitating collaboration in complex cybercrime cases involving multiple jurisdictions.

Regulatory bodies, notably the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), also play a crucial role in combatting financial cybercrimes. Experts urge the RBI to strengthen oversight of banks and enhance Know Your Customer (KYC) norms to prevent the misuse of accounts by cyber criminals. They should aim to utilise technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to detect anomalous transaction patterns and consolidate efforts to identify and thwart cybercrime activities.

There is a growing consensus on the necessity for a comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy and legislation in India. Such initiatives would furnish a robust framework for addressing the omnipresent nature of this threat and safeguarding the country's cyber sovereignty.

The bottom line is putting a stop to cybercrime demands a concerted effort involving lawmakers, regulators, law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, and internet service providers. By enacting comprehensive reforms and fostering greater cooperation, India can intensify its cyber resilience and ensure a safer online environment for all.



RBI Issues Warning Against Scam Via KYC trick

 

On February 2, 2024, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) reiterated its prior warning to the public, offering further suggestions in response to a rising tide of scams involving Know Your Customer (KYC) updates. RBI amplified the cautionary tips issued earlier to the public on September 13, 2021, citing continuing incidents/reports of consumers falling victim to scams being perpetrated in the name of KYC updation. 

Modus operandi 

Customers typically receive unsolicited calls, texts, or emails requesting personal information, account or login credentials, or the installation of unapproved apps via links in the message. 

Frequently, the messages intentionally instil a false feeling of urgency by threatening to freeze or close the customer's account if they don't cooperate. Customers provide fraudsters unauthorised access to their accounts and enable them to commit fraudulent operations when they divulge critical private details or login credentials. 

Quick reporting 

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) advised victims of financial cyber fraud to report the incident right away on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (www.cybercrime.gov.in) or by calling the cybercrime hotline in 1930. 

Preventive measures 

To prevent people from becoming victims of KYC fraud, the RBI published a list of dos and don'ts. Critical data such as card details, PINs, passwords, OTPs, and account login credentials should never be shared with third parties, the RBI cautions the public. 

Individuals are also advised not to click on dubious or unverified links they receive via email or mobile devices, nor share KYC documents with unrecognised or unknown parties. "Do not share any sensitive information through unverified/unauthorised websites or applications," the central bank advised.

For confirmation and help, get in touch with the bank or financial institution immediately when you get a request for KYC updates. Get phone numbers for customer service or contact information exclusively from the official website or other sources. Report any incidents of cyber fraud to the bank right away. Ask the bank about the possible ways to update your KYC information.

Enhancing API Security: CSPF's Contribution to Wallarm's Open-Source Project

 

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital security, the Cyber Security & Privacy Foundation (CSPF) remains a beacon of innovation and support. Our mission extends beyond mere advocacy for cybersecurity; we actively enhance the tools that fortify our digital world. A testament to this commitment is our recent focus on Wallarm's API Firewall, a robust tool designed to protect APIs from emerging cyber threats. 
 
Our journey with Wallarm's API Firewall began with a simple yet powerful intention: to make this tool not just effective but also adaptable to the stringent requirements of B2B and high-security environments. In doing so, we embarked on a path that not only led us to add new functionalities but also to discover and rectify hidden vulnerabilities. 
 
Introducing the AllowedIPList Feature and Addressing the Denylist Bug 
 
The new feature we introduced, the AllowedIPList, is a game-changer for API security. It restricts API access to specific, pre-approved IP addresses, an essential requirement for secure, business-to-business communications and high-security domains. This addition ensures that only authorized machines can interact with the API, thereby enhancing the security manifold. 
 
In our journey of innovation, we encountered a critical bug in the existing Denylist feature. The Denylist, designed to block requests using certain compromised keys, cookies, or tokens, had a significant flaw. The bug stemmed from a cache implementation error, leading to the failure of adding entries to the Denylist if the list was shorter than 53 characters. This vulnerability was particularly concerning for shorter tokens, commonly used in HTTP basic authentication and cookies.  
 
Our team promptly addressed this issue, ensuring that the Denylist functioned as intended, regardless of the character count. The resolution of this bug, alongside the implementation of the AllowedIPList, marked a significant enhancement in the API Firewall's security capabilities. 
 
The Broader Impact of Open-Source Contributions 
 
This initiative underscores the importance of not just using open-source software but actively contributing to it. While the immediate financial returns might be non-evident, such contributions lead to a more secure and robust digital ecosystem. It is through diverse collaboration and multiple perspectives that we can uncover and rectify latent vulnerabilities. 

Link - 

https://github.com/CSPF-Founder/api-firewall/tree/main
 
Founder & TechCore Team
Cyber Security and Privacy Foundation
https://github.com/CSPF-Founder/

Cybersecurity Risk to Banking Sector a Significant Challenge: RBI Governor

 

As cybersecurity concerns become a challenge, India's banking system is well-positioned to sustain the nation's growth, as Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Shaktikanta Das stated earlier this week.

He noted at the Mint BFSI conclave that a dedicated team of RBI supervisors monitors the IT systems of banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) and identifies loopholes.

“Enhance focus on IT and cybersecurity risk. Going forward for all financial institutions, the robustness of their IT systems and threat from cybersecurity can become a major challenge. As a part of our supervision, we also look at the IT systems of banks and NBFCs – the banks more particularly. We have a team which looks into the robustness of the IT systems, they go deep into the IT systems of various banks and NBFCs and wherever we see gaps or loopholes, it is immediately brought to the notice of the management to take corrective measures,” Das explained. 

The primary focus of the RBI is to guarantee that the financial system continues to be strong, resilient, and equipped to facilitate India's transition to an advanced economy. 

India's recent success story has been largely attributed to the astounding turnaround in the country's banking sector. The banking system in India is currently positioned to help the country's continued economic expansion in the years to come. According to Das, the Reserve Bank has pledged to protect the trust element in the Indian financial system. 

Based on my interactions with all serious participants in the banking sector and top management of banks, I receive advice from bank CEOs on potential areas of risk buildup in the banking and NBFC sectors. In the past 6-8 months, at least two or three bank CEOs have privately expressed concern regarding these areas, Das concluded.

Security Issue in Banking Applications?

Recently, we tested a mobile application of a BFSI platform, which allowed the organization's employees to view and interact with new customer leads. 

The mobile app had a password-based authentication system, with the username being the mobile number of the user. We identified a major weakness in this mobile app. The app allows a user to reset the password if they can prove themselves via an OTP. When the 'forgot password' button is pressed, the user is sent to a page where they are prompted to enter an OTP. The OTP is sent to the phone number, and if the wrong OTP is entered, the server responds with `{"OTP":"Failure"}`. While this seems to have been implemented properly, we tried to change the server response by conducting an MITM. We changed the response from the server to `{"OTP":"Success"}`. This redirection led us to the password change screen, where we were prompted to enter a new password. 

Initially, we believed this was only a visual bug and that the password reset would fail. However, we soon discovered that the password reset page itself does not check the OTP, and there is no session to track the successful OTP. This means any attacker can take the password change request, replace the phone number, and change the password of any other user (phone number). In simple terms, the OTP verification and the password reset page are not connected. The password reset API call did not have any verification or authentication to ensure only the correct user can change the password. 

This reveals how BFSI developers, when asked to build an app, often create the requested features without considering any security architecture. These apps are usually rushed, and only the positive/happy paths are checked. Security testing and architecture are often considered only as an afterthought. Unless BFSI incorporates security architecture into the development stage itself, such vulnerabilities will continue to emerge.  

By
Suriya Prakash
Head DARWIS 
CySecurity Corp

RBI Announces Draft Norms to Ensure Security of Payment System Operators


Reserved Bank of India (RBI), India’s central bank and regulatory body is all set to enhance the safety and security of digital payments amidst the raising cyber risks, the draft regulations for payment system operators (PSOs) announced on Friday.

The draft, Master Directions on Cyber Resilience and Digital Payment Security Controls for PSO, proposes a governance mechanism for the identification, analysis, monitoring, and management of cybersecurity risks.

RBI confirms that these norms will be implemented from April 1, 2024, for large non-bank-PSOs. For medium-sized non-bank PSOs, the norms will be implemented by April 1, 2026, as for the smaller ones, the deadline is April 1, 2028.

The key responsibility of the draft circular will be designated to a sub-committee of the board that must meet at least once every quarter.

"The PSO shall formulate a board-approved Information Security (IS) policy to manage potential information security risks covering all applications and products concerning payment systems as well as management of risks that have materialised," the draft note said.

“The directions will also cover baseline security measures for ensuring system resiliency as well as safe and secure digital payment transactions[…]However, they shall endeavour to migrate to the latest security standards. The existing instructions on security and risk mitigation measures for payments done using cards, Prepaid Payment Instruments (PPIs) and mobile banking continue to be applicable as hitherto,” the RBI noted.

What are the Draft Norms? 

As per the proposed norms, the PSO will define relevant key risk indicators (KRIs) to identify possible risk events and key performance indicators (KPIs) to evaluate the efficacy of security controls.

According to the RBI, the PSO must conduct cyber-risk assessment exercises pertaining to the launch of new products, services, and technologies along with initiating innovative changes in infrastructure or processes of existing products and services. The central bank is seeking feedback on the draft norms by June 30.

In order to manage potential information security risks involving all applications and products related to payment systems, the PSO has been asked to develop an Information Security (IS) policy that has been authorized by the board.

According to the proposed norms, the PSO was required to create a business continuity plan (BCP) based on several cyber threat scenarios, including the most unlikely but conceivable occurrences to which it might be subjected. To manage cyber security events or incidents, the BCP should be evaluated at least once a year and include a thorough response, resume, and recovery plan.

Moreover, a senior-level executive like the chief information security officer (CISO) will be in charge of implementing the information security policy and the cyber resilience framework as well as continuously reviewing the overall IS posture of PSO. According to the draft norms, the PSO must implement safeguards to keep its network and systems safe from external assaults.

The PSO must also implement a thorough data leak prevention policy to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, availability, and protection of business and customer information (both in transit and at rest), in accordance with the importance and sensitivity of the information held or transmitted.  

Indian Digital Currency Era – A Quick Look

Compared to more conventional forms of money like cash notes or coins, electronic money stored in bank accounts, mobile banking applications, and credit cards is quickly replacing the public's perception of finance.

The popularity of UPI demonstrates the preference for digital money systems. India has been pushing hard to become cashless, starting with the decision to implement demonetization in 2016. That same year also saw the launch of the real-time payments system known as the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). The paradox in the existing system is that although digital transactions are becoming more common, cash is still very popular in India.

In terms of transaction value, UPI executed 7.3 billion transactions in October, totaling Rs. 12.11 lakh crore, a record high. While volumes increased 73.3 percent during the same period, transaction values increased by 56.6 percent year over year.

Cryptocurrencies vs. Digital Rupee

A CBDC, as defined by the RBI, is "a legal tender issued by a central bank in digital form. It can be exchanged one-to-one for fiat money and is equivalent to it. All that has changed is its form. "

However, it is impossible to directly compare a CBDC to a cryptocurrency.

"A CBDC is not a commodity or a claim on a commodity or a digital asset, unlike cryptocurrencies. They are not money definitely not a currency in the sense that the term has historically been used, "according to the RBI's release.

According to the tracker maintained by the Atlantic Council, 98 nations are currently investigating CBDCs. Of these, 11 nations have started CBDCs. In light of this situation, the RBI is acting in a calibrated way to start CBDCs. It is currently looking into the possibility of implementing wholesale CBDCs based on accounts and retail CBDCs based on tokens.

"When something new enters the market, the old need to adapt, and the new need to control the change", says Nikhil Kamath, co-founder of Zerodha. "While many have been critical of #CBDC, we might be overlooking the big picture, remittances, unbanked economy, and minimizing subsidy leakage."

The increasing use of cryptocurrency stablecoins, which tie their value to another currency or asset, has also alarmed a number of central banks. According to a Press Trust of India report, RBI officials informed a parliamentary finance committee in 2022 that the 'dollarization' of a portion of the economy by cryptocurrencies could be detrimental to the nation's interests.

Money transfers via cell phones would be quick and easy, according to Sathvik Vishwanath, co-founder, and CEO of Unocoin, a rival cryptocurrency exchange. The digital rupee will most importantly aid in the eradication of problems with counterfeit money.

According to FIS's Cheema, adoption of the CBDC in the wholesale sector (CBDC-W) has large benefits and substantially fewer dangers than in the more complicated domain of retail CBDC (CBDC-R). In the future, CBDC-R will supplement existing payment structures, not replace them.

The digital rupee will therefore be available for use by all Indian citizens whenever the RBI begins to print it.




Reserve Bank Stress Tests Simulate Stagflation


As part of their latest Reserve Bank solvency stress test, New Zealand banks were asked to take into account a cyberattack for the first time. Despite a severe stagflation-like scenario, the Reserve Bank says most firms would have to raise capital, restrict dividends and cut expenses to be able to keep functioning, even though they will have to raise fresh capital, limit dividends, and cut expenses to do so. 

During the stagflation scenario considered in the model, high inflation, increasing interest rates, and a severe recession resulting in a surging unemployment rate are some of the features modeled. Since 2014, it has been the first time a reserve bank has conducted a stress test in which high-interest rates were present. 

Banks included in the annual stress test were ANZ NZ, ASB, BNZ, Westpac NZ, Kiwibank, Heartland Bank, TSB, ICBC, and Bank of China. They received instructions from the Reserve Bank in April. 

6% was the Consumer Price Index inflation rate for the NZ economy. According to Statistics NZ, this was below the 7.2% reported in the current year, as well as the 6.9% reported by Statistics NZ in May for March. 

As part of the arrangement, the Reserve Bank also had to increase the Official Cash Rate (OCR) from just 1% – the rate it had at that time – to 3% by the year 2022. Currently, the OCR stands at 3.5%. It is expected to increase to at least 4% on November 23, 2022. This is when it will be reviewed for the last time of the year. A significant part of this scenario includes the sale of the NZ dollar. This has been an element of inflation that has been imported, and which has been occurring this year as well. 

The Reserve Bank will incorporate a specific cyber risk event into the stress test that will be administered to participating banks in 2022 for the first time. Over time, this resulted in 1.3 billion dollars in aggregate costs. 

In addition to considering how a cyberattack would impact the banks' business, this year's solvency stress test also asked banks to consider how low the likelihood of such an attack was. This is in response to a one-in-25-year cyber risk event that may threaten the general banking system. 

To tackle this challenge, banks have come up with several strategies, such as modeling the impacts of different scenarios. These include distributed denial of service attacks, attacks that lock banks out of critical infrastructure, kill chain malware, ransomware, and other threats. These attacks are modeled to last for at least one to two months in the event of a significant attack.

It can be assumed, therefore, that the estimated losses resulting from each event will vary as expected. This is based on the benchmark and the operational risk of the bank at the time. There is an assortment of reasons why companies lose money, including reimbursements from customers, consultancy and legal fees, losses in business, technology upgrades, communications and media expenses, and technology upgrades, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia. 

Banks should be aware that multiple risks can crystallize and need to be managed during economic downturns, the Reserve Banks emphasize. The Reserve Bank also shared, "this is even though the aggregate cost of the cyber risk event was small compared with impairment expenses in this stress test. Our understanding of banks' handling and quantification of cyber-risk stress events was enhanced by the exercise." There is one thing in your life that you have no control over:

Last week, in an interview with interest.co.NZ, ANZ NZ CEO Antonia Watson told the website that attackers strive "all the time" to penetrate the bank's security system. 

According to Watson, "This is one of the things you cannot do anything about since there will always be someone who will find some way of finding a backdoor."

Cyberattacks can happen to organizations of all sizes, which is why it plays a crucial role in our risk management strategy as a business. Because of that, it is one of the key risks that we see as a business. This is why we invest so much money to help educate our customers regarding these types of attacks.

National Australia Bank's Ross McEwan, the CEO of the bank's parent company BNZ, revealed last week that NAB's digital channels receive approximately 50 million attacks every month. He further notes that this incident along with the recent cyber-attack on Optus in Australia is what keeps CEOs awake at night. 

The scenario

During the NZ economy's stress test scenario, the following scenarios will be experienced:

• In comparison to the peak in November 2021, house prices have fallen by 42% (47% from its peak in November 2021) 

• A 38% decline in equity prices has been recorded since December 2021 (42% in the past year). 

• At the same time, the unemployment rate rose from 3.3% to 9.3%. 

• During the period of the recession, the gross domestic product decreased by 5%. 

• A peak in the OCR has been recorded at 5.5%, as well as the peak in the 2-year mortgage rate of 8.4% (the average bank's 2-year rate at the moment is 5.8%, but the big five banks all have rates above 6%); 

• There is one more aspect of the economic scenario that banks must take into account and model as well, which is a cyber-risk event that occurs once every 25 years. 

A scenario like this has the potential to generate aggregate impairment expenses for banks of $20.8 billion over the next four years, which is higher than the $1.7 billion that has been incurred from the COVID-19 pandemic in the last four years, according to the Reserve Bank. During the second year of the four-year stress test, banks have been sinking into the red. 

During the stress test, the common equity Tier 1 ratio for the aggregate company fell by 3.3 percentage points to a minimum of 8.9% before mitigation. This is well above the regulatory minimum of 4.5% as shown in Figure 1 [below]. 

According to the Reserve Bank of Australia's report on its 2022 stress testing program, this annual solvency stress test was included in the Reserve Bank's stress testing program for the year 2022. Additionally, a liquidity stress test and a test to determine whether the residential mortgage portfolio is sensitive to flooding risks were also included in the study. As part of the Reserve Bank's Financial Stability Report released on Wednesday, the Reserve Bank will present a summary of the "high-level results" in these two areas. 

In its description of the stress test on solvency, the Reserve Bank thinks that it is predominantly a bottom-up exercise, where banks normally use their models, sometimes on a loan-by-loan basis, to estimate the impact of the Reserve Bank's specified scenario on capital ratios in the future. 

During the release of the instructions and templates for the solvency stress test, the company noted that it is the first time that these have been published publicly.

RBI Employs Tokenization to Combat Breaches

 

The RBI, the central bank of India, is now prepared to impose card tokenization in India after permitting customers to link credit cards with UPI. In the midst of all of this, many users are perplexed as to what card tokenization actually is and why applications and websites advise users to safeguard their credit and debit cards following the RBI's new rules.
 
What is tokenization? 

Tokenization is the process of replacing actual card information with a special alternate code called a 'token,' which must be different for each card, token requester, and device, i.e. the organization that accepts customer requests for card tokenization and forwards them to the card network to produce a corresponding token.

Researchers are still quite aware of the data exposures from MobiKwik and Domino's India. As users can see, the data becomes vulnerable to data breaches and leaks if you store your private card information on the cloud servers of numerous such online apps and websites.

Although some websites might have the highest levels of security in place to protect user credit card information, others may not be adhering to international security requirements. Having credit card information being dispersed over several servers with varying levels of security gives hackers more access points. The RBI now wants to alter the current state of digital payments and standardize 'tokenization' to increase the security of all online card transactions.

In September 2021, the RBI ordered that card-on-file (CoF) tokenization be used instead of retailers holding client card information on their systems beginning January 1, 2022. In addition, businesses such as apps, websites, payment processors like RazorPay, or banks will no longer be responsible for safeguarding your card information. Tokenization is a technique the RBI developed to protect domestic card transactions by employing random strings of tokens rather than disclosing the user's personal card information.

Since the regulation on tokenization was published, according to Deputy Governor Sankar, the central bank has been in close contact with all stakeholders to guarantee a smooth transition to the tokenization policy.

How does tokenization work? 

The process of tokenizing cards is straightforward. When a card is chosen to be tokenized, the card network such as Visa, MasterCard, etc. issues the token with the bank's approval and gives it to the retailer. For example, when you save an SBI Visa debit card on Paytm by RBI's requirements, Visa will create the token with SBI's permission and share it with Paytm.

If you decide to save the identical credit or debit card on some other app, let's say Amazon, a new token will be issued and shared with Amazon. The token will vary based on the merchant and device, even if it's the same card. From a security standpoint, it implies the tokens are unique and discrete, which is beneficial.

Potential effects of tokenization

The RBI was forced to develop card tokenization as a result of the constant data leaks, thefts, and breaches that occur in the digital age. Not to add that the various security standards used by apps, websites, payment processors, and other middlemen compromise users' online security.

Tokenization has very little of an effect on the customer. Customers simply need to submit their card information once to receive a token. The process of tokenization will then be initiated by the merchant at no further cost or customer effort.

According to experts, there are no drawbacks to card tokenization from the perspective of the end-user. The RBI standards must be implemented by merchants and payment systems, but aside from that, consumers benefit.

How Banks Evade Regulators For Cyber Risks

 


As of late, the equilibrium between the banks, regulators, and vendors has taken a hit as critics claim that banks are not doing enough for safeguarding the personally identifiable information of the clients and customers they are entrusted with. As there has been rapid modernization in internet banking and modes of instant payments, it has widened the scope of attack vectors, introducing new flaws and loopholes in the system; consequently, demanding financial institutions to combat the threat more actively than ever. 

In the wake of the tech innovations that have broadened the scope of cybercrime, the RBI has constantly felt the need to put forth reminders for banks to strengthen their cyber security mechanisms; of which they reportedly fell short. As financial frauds relating to electronic money laundering, identity theft, and ATM card frauds surge, banks have increasingly avoided taking the responsibility.  

It's a well-known fact that banks hire top-class vendors to circumvent cyber threats, however, not a lot of people would know that banks have gotten complacent with their reliance on vendors to the point of holding them accountable for security loopholes and cybersecurity mismanagement. Subsequently, regulators fine the third-party entity, essentially the 'vendors' providing diligent cyber security risk management to the banks.  

The question that arises is that are banks on their own doing enough to protect their customers from cyber threats? Banks need to understand monitoring and management tools available to manage cyber security and mitigate risks. Financial institutions have an inherent responsibility of aggressively combating fraud and working on behalf of their customers and clients to stay one step ahead of threats.  

Banks can detect and effectively prevent their customers' privacy and security from being jeopardized. For instance, banks can secure user transactions by proactively monitoring SMS using the corresponding mobile bank app. They can screen phishing links and unauthorized transactions and warn customers if an OTP comes during a call.  

Further, banks are expected to strictly adhere to the timeframe fixed for reporting frauds and ensuring that customer complaints regarding unscrupulous activities are timely registered with police and investigation agencies. Banks must take accountability in respect of reporting fraud cases of their customers by actively tracking the accounts and interrupting vishing/phishing campaigns on behalf of their customers as doing so will allow more stringent monitoring of the source, type, and modus operandi of the attacks. 

“We are getting bank fraud cases from the customers of SBI and Axis Bank also. It is yet to be verified whether the data has been leaked or not. There might be data loss or it could be some social engineering fraud,” Telangana’s Cyberabad Crimecrime police said. 

“Police said that the fraudsters had updated data of the thousands of customers who received new credit cards and it was a bank’s insider who is the architect of this whole fraud,” reads a report pertaining to an aforementioned security incident by The Hindu.  

“This is a classic case to explain the poor procedure practised by the network providers while issuing SIM cards, and of course the data security system at the banks,” a senior police officer said. 

In relation to the above stated, banks should assume accountability for their customers’ security and shall review and strengthen the monitoring process, while meticulously following the preventive course of action based on risk categorization like checking at multiple levels, closely monitoring credits and debits, sending SMS alerts, and (wherever required) alerting the customer via a phone call. The objective, essentially, is for banks to direct the focus on aspects of prevention, prompt detection, and timely reporting for the purpose of aggregation and necessary corrective measures by regulators which will inhibit the continuity of crime, in turn reducing the ‘quantum’ of loss.  

Besides, vigorously following up with police and law authorities, financial institutions have many chances to detect ‘early warning signals’ which they can not afford to ignore, banks should rather use those signals as a trigger to instigate detailed pre-investigations. Cyber security is a ‘many-leveled’ thing conception, blaming the misappropriations on vendors not only demonstrates the banks’ tendency to avoid being a defaulter but also impacts the ‘recoverability aspects’ like effective monitoring for the customers to a great degree.

The RBI Warns Patrons of Unauthorized Money Lending Apps

 

Reserve Bank of India has forewarned Indians against unauthorized money lending apps that are increasingly rising day by day, consequently subjecting customers to fraudulent deeds. The threat actors lure the patrons with instant loans, capitalizing on their needs, and then trouble victims for the dues.

What are unauthorized money lending apps?

Money lending apps are rackets where you could get an instant personal loan offered through mobile apps at inflated interest rates by some unauthorized lenders. These apps are easily available on Google Play Store and do not have any tie-up with any banks or Non-Banking Financial Institutes. Any patron can avail the loan within a few weeks or less after updating all the personal information like Aadhar Card, PAN card, etc., details in the app. 

The company misguides the patrons into fraud by drastically reducing the original amount of the loan. The modus operandi of the app includes taking and feeding all the personal information of the patron in one particular app and then circulating the phone number across other such fraud apps. The other apps would now call the patrons and lure them into availing more loans. The lender would claim that the patrons are eligible for the loan as they have already verified the credentials from the previous app from which they borrowed the loan. Notably, ‘n’ number of patrons fell into this trap and later regretted the same. In the entire process, there comes a time when the patron needs to pay more than the borrowed amount due to the high-interest rate, GST fees, and other penalties for overlooking the due date. 

The worst part comes when these lenders circulate the patrons' private and confidential information on the internet and various other media platforms. They threaten the patron and also their relatives via various social media platforms. 

In the last few months especially after the COVID-19 situation where a lot of people have lost their jobs, such cases of fraud have seen a significant surge. A lot of them have registered a complaint against the money lenders. These apps are under the media scanner of law enforcement officials of India for indulging in unlawful practices, especially while colleting the dues from the patrons. 

On the other hand, The Digital Lenders Association of India (DLAI) trusts that there is a clear demarcation between legally regulated entities and unreliable firms. In this regard, they added, “we have been proactive in ensuring our members follow a strict code of conduct that serves as a guideline. It covers multiple aspects such as interest rates, recovery mechanism, and data privacy”. 

While warning the patrons of such fraudsters, RBI stated in its press release, “Moreover, consumers should never share copies of KYC documents with unidentified persons, unverified/unauthorized Apps and should report such Apps/Bank Account information associated with the Apps to concerned law enforcement agencies or use Sachet portal to file an online complaint.”

RBI's new guidelines for Debit and Credit Cards, effective today



To combat the ever increasing financial frauds and to make online payments safer, RBI (Reserve Bank of India) has issued new guidelines for debit and credit cards effective from 1st October 2020.


 The new guideline for Debit and Credit Card by RBI-

  •  International Transactions to be Optional-

According to this users can now either opt in Or opt out for International Transactions. The bank can disable old cards for international payments or issue new cards for the customers choosing to indulge in international exchange. 

Gaurav Chopra, CEO, IndiaLends says, “For new cards being issued, the users will only be able to use these services after registering for them. The main reason for this is to prevent card fraud and misuse and give the consumer better power to manage his or her finances. With spend and withdrawal caps, even if an individual becomes a victim of cyber or ATM fraud, the damage will be limited.” 

  • Disable cards that have never been used for online payment- 

RBI has directed banks to disable the online payment service for all those debit and credit cards that have never been used for online money exchange. This does not include gift cards or prepaid cards.

Rajesh Mirjankar, MD and CEO, InfrasoftTech, says, “RBI has mandated banks to incorporate risk-mitigation features in customers’ debit cards and credit cards from 1st October. With this new feature, consumers can set up a limit on their credit cards and debit cards. Cardholders will have the option to switch on and off their debit and credit cards for any facility – ATM, NFC, POS, or eCommerce (card-not-present) transaction.” 

  • NFC (Near Field Communication) Or Contactless payment will also be optional- 

Users will now be able to switch on and off their NFC payment whenever they want. Suppose on a trip to Korea they switched on NFC, they can opt out of it on returning to India. Cardholders can also set a limit to NFC payment, earlier it was Rs.2000 per day now they can increase or decrease as per to their preference.

 Mirjankar, of InfrasoftTech, says “The apps that banks have already rolled out with these features allow customers to set separate limits for each channel such as ATM, PoS, card-not-present, and NFC, in addition, to be able to revise downward their overall card limit.”

Reserve Bank of India Experiences a Technical Glitch; NEFT and RTGS Go Down for Half a Day!


Electronic money transfer is something that has changed the way people used to transact. It has offered a way more convenient method that goes along the lines of modernity and the need of recent times.

The most widely used and popular mediums of transferring money between bank accounts in India are NEFT and RTGS. While NEFT has neither minimum nor maximum limits, RTGS is designed for heavier sums of money with 2 lac being the minimum amount and 10 lac being the maximum per day.

Per reports, National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT) and Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) were disrupted for more than half a day. The signs of this started to show from Monday midnight.

Sources mention that this happened because of a technical glitch in the systems of the Reserve Bank of India. Nevertheless, NEFT and RTGS have been reinstated after inactivity of 12 hours.

Several reports reveal that the main issue allegedly was grappled by the Indian Financial Technology and Allied Services (IFTAS), which is an RBI affiliated branch when the “disaster recovery site” was being moved from locale A to B.

Sources impart that the NEFT transactions have as of now been brought back. The “end-of-day” RTGS transactions of the previous day are being worked on to get them to reach completion but the “start-of-day” for RTGS hasn’t ensued yet. Still, the restoration of RTGS is expected soon.

The setup for NEFT was established and supported by the Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology. People will now be able to use this medium for online transferring of funds and money 24x7. Meaning that holidays or weekends would never come in the way of money transfers and funds would be transferred any day and at any time at all.

NEFT and RTGS are the most commonly used routes for online transfer of funds.

The former medium facilitates a provision for limitless one-to-one transfer of money from and to individuals and corporates with an account in any bank branch in the country. The latter, however, has the aforementioned limits and is a continuous and real-time settlements of fund transfers.

RBI AnyDesk Warning; here's how Scammers Use it to Steal Money



In February, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued warning regarding a remote desktop app known as 'AnyDesk', which was employed by scammers to carry out unauthorized transactions from bank accounts of the customers via mobile or laptop.

In the wake of RBI's warning, various other banks such as HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank and Axis Bank along with a few others, also issued an advisory to make their customers aware about AnyDesk's fraudulent potential and how it can be used by the hackers to steal money via Unified Payments Interface (UPI).

However, it is important to notice that Anydesk app is not infectious, in fact, on the contrary, it is a screen-sharing platform of extreme value to the IT professionals which allows users to connect to various systems and mobiles remotely over the internet.

How the Scam Takes Places? 

When a customer needs some help from the customer care, he gets in touch via a call and if he gets on line with a scammer, he would ask him to download AnyDesk app or a similar app known as TeamViewer QuickSupport on his smartphone.

Then, he would ask for a remote desk code of 9-digit which he requires to view the customer's screen live on his computer. He can also record everything that is been shown on the screen. Subsequently, whenever the victim enters the ID and password of his UPI app, the scammer records it.

Users are advised not to download AnyDesk or any other remote desktop applications without fully understanding their functioning.

You should also be highly skeptical of the additional apps that customer support executives may ask you to download as besides fraudsters, no one asks for codes, passwords or any other sensitive information.