Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label RansomHub. Show all posts

Halliburton Hit by Cyberattack, Data Stolen


 

Halliburton, one of the world’s largest energy companies, has confirmed that it was the victim of a cyberattack. Hackers infiltrated the company’s systems and stole sensitive information. The attack occurred last week, and Halliburton is still determining the extent of the data that was taken.

In a recent filing with government regulators, Halliburton acknowledged the breach but has yet to disclose the full details of what was stolen. The company is currently investigating the incident and deciding what legal notifications are required. In response to the attack, Halliburton took certain systems offline as a precaution and is working to restore normal operations, especially for its oil and fracking businesses. 

When approached for additional comments, company spokesperson Amina Rivera declined to elaborate further, stating that Halliburton would not provide more information beyond what was mentioned in its official filing.

Although Halliburton has not officially confirmed it, there are signs that the cyberattack may have been part of a ransomware campaign. TechCrunch obtained a ransom note related to the incident, which claims that hackers encrypted Halliburton’s files and stole sensitive data. A group known as RansomHub is believed to be behind the attack. This gang is notorious for carrying out similar cyberattacks, using stolen data as leverage to demand ransom payments. 

RansomHub typically publishes stolen files on its dark web platform when victims refuse to pay. So far, Halliburton has not been listed as one of RansomHub’s victims, but this could change if negotiations fail. RansomHub has been responsible for over 210 attacks since its rise to prominence earlier this year, and it has targeted other large organisations, including Change Healthcare.

Halliburton, with around 48,000 employees spread across various countries, is a major player in the global energy industry. In the past, the company gained notoriety due to its role in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster in 2010, for which it paid over $1 billion in fines.

The recent cyberattack is expected to have financial repercussions for the company, though the exact costs are yet to be determined. In 2023, Halliburton reported $23 billion in revenue, with CEO Jeff Miller earning $19 million in total compensation. Halliburton has noted that it will continue to bear costs related to the cyberattack as they work on restoring systems and resolving the situation.

As the investigation unfolds, much of Halliburton’s online services remain down, and the company is assessing the full impact of the breach. Halliburton has been tight-lipped about its cybersecurity efforts, declining to provide information on who is currently overseeing their response.

This attack is a reminder of how large corporations remain vulnerable to cyber threats. Halliburton's situation underscores the importance of investing in strong cybersecurity measures to safeguard sensitive data and avoid disruptions in critical operations. The company will likely provide more updates as it works to recover from this breach.


Florida Medical Lab Data Breach Exposes 300,000 Individuals’ Sensitive Information

 

Florida-based medical laboratory, American Clinical Solutions (ACS), recently experienced a significant data breach that exposed the sensitive information of approximately 300,000 individuals. The hacking incident, attributed to the criminal group RansomHub, resulted in the theft of 700 gigabytes of data, which has since been published on the dark web. The exposed data includes Social Security numbers, addresses, drug test results, medical records, insurance information, and other highly sensitive personal details. 

ACS specializes in patient testing for both prescription and illicit narcotics, offering its services to healthcare providers. On July 24, ACS reported the breach to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights. The stolen data encompasses lab testing results from January 2016 until May 2024, the period during which the hacking incident allegedly occurred. Privacy attorney David Holtzman, from the consulting firm HITprivacy LLC, expressed concerns over the nature of the exposed information, highlighting the potential for reputational harm, financial compromise, and extortion due to the sensitivity of drug testing data. 

Despite the severity of the breach, ACS has not yet issued a public statement about the incident on its website, nor has it responded to requests for further details. This lack of communication has raised concerns among legal and regulatory experts, who warn that failing to alert patients about the breach may compound the potential harm. Holtzman emphasized the importance of transparency in such situations, suggesting that the absence of a breach notification may prompt investigations by HHS or state attorneys general to determine whether ACS has complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and other relevant state laws. 

The delay in notifying affected individuals may stem from various factors, including the possibility that law enforcement advised ACS to wait or that the total number of impacted individuals has not yet been determined. Regulatory attorney Rachel Rose pointed out that drug testing data, while not subject to the stringent federal 42 CFR Part 2 privacy regulations that govern substance disorder treatment facilities, is still considered highly sensitive. Rose compared the compromised information to reproductive health records, mental health records, and data related to diseases like AIDS. 

RansomHub, the group behind the attack, has rapidly gained notoriety within the cybersecurity community since its emergence in February. The gang has claimed responsibility for several major hacks across the healthcare sector, including a June attack on the drugstore chain Rite Aid, which compromised the data of 2.2 million individuals. Security firm Rapid7 recently identified RansomHub as one of the most notable new ransomware groups, underscoring the growing threat it poses to organizations worldwide.

RansomHub Deploys EDRKillShifter Malware to Disable Endpoint Detection Using BYOVD Attacks

 

Sophos security researchers have identified a new malware, dubbed EDRKillShifter, used by the RansomHub ransomware group to disable Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems in attacks leveraging Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) techniques. This method involves deploying a legitimate but vulnerable driver on a target device to gain escalated privileges, disable security measures, and take control of the system. 

The technique has gained popularity among various threat actors, including both financially motivated ransomware groups and state-sponsored hackers. The EDRKillShifter malware was discovered during an investigation of a ransomware incident in May 2024. The attackers tried to use this tool to disable Sophos protection on a targeted computer but were unsuccessful due to the endpoint agent’s CryptoGuard feature, which prevented the ransomware executable from running. Sophos’ investigation revealed two different malware samples, both exploiting vulnerable drivers with proof-of-concept code available on GitHub. These drivers include RentDrv2 and ThreatFireMonitor, the latter being part of an obsolete system-monitoring package. 

The malware’s loader execution process follows a three-step procedure. Initially, the attacker launches the EDRKillShifter binary with a password string to decrypt and execute an embedded resource named BIN in memory. This code then unpacks and executes the final payload, which installs and exploits a vulnerable driver to elevate privileges and disable active EDR processes. Once the driver is loaded, the malware creates a service and enters an endless loop that continuously monitors and terminates processes matching names on a hardcoded target list. Interestingly, the EDRKillShifter variants discovered were compiled on computers with Russian localization, and they exploit legitimate but vulnerable drivers, using modified proof-of-concept exploits found on GitHub. 

Sophos suspects that the attackers adapted portions of these proofs-of-concept and ported the code to the Go programming language. To mitigate such threats, Sophos advises enabling tamper protection in endpoint security products, separating user and admin privileges to prevent the loading of vulnerable drivers, and keeping systems updated. Notably, Microsoft continually de-certifies signed drivers known to have been misused in previous attacks. Last year, Sophos identified another EDR-disabling malware, AuKill, which similarly exploited a vulnerable Process Explorer driver in Medusa Locker and LockBit ransomware attacks.

RansomHub and RansomHouse: Unmasking the Culprits Behind Italy’s Attacks

RansomHub and RansomHouse: Unmasking the Culprits Behind Italy’s Attacks

Hackers have claimed responsibility for three major cyberattacks in Italy in the last 24 hours. The RansomHub and RansomHouse gangs allegedly carried out the ransomware assaults in Italy. RansomHub targeted the websites of Cloud Europe and Mangimi Fusco, while RansomHouse claimed responsibility for conducting a cyberattack against Francesco Parisi.

Italy's Ransomware Attacks

Cloud Europe is a Tier IV carrier-neutral data center based in Rome's Tecnopolo Tiburtino. According to the company's website, it specializes in data center architecture and management, focusing on security and service continuity. The company creates, hosts, and operates modular infrastructure for data centers in both the private and public sectors.

The Attacks

1. Cloud Europe: On June 29, 2024, RansomHub claimed responsibility for infiltrating the servers of Cloud Europe, a prominent Tier IV certified data center in Rome. The attackers allegedly encrypted the servers and exfiltrated 70 terabytes of data. Among the stolen information were 541.41 gigabytes of sensitive data, including client records, financial documents, and proprietary software.

2. Mangimi Fusco: The same day, RansomHub targeted Mangimi Fusco, an animal food manufacturer. The group claimed to have stolen 490 gigabytes of confidential data, including client files, budget details, and payroll information. However, as of now, Mangini Fusco’s website shows no signs of the reported attack, leaving room for skepticism.

3. Francesco Parisi: RansomHouse, another hacking collective, breached the website of Francesco Parisi, a group specializing in freight forwarding and shipping services. The attack occurred on May 29, 2024, and resulted in the theft of 150 gigabytes of company data. Francesco Parisi has acknowledged the breach and is working to restore normalcy while enhancing its cybersecurity defenses.

The Implications

These attacks raise critical questions about the state of cybersecurity readiness among Italian businesses:

Vulnerabilities: Despite advancements in security protocols, organizations remain vulnerable to sophisticated attacks. The ability of threat actors to infiltrate well-established data centers and corporate websites highlights the need for continuous vigilance.

Data Privacy: The stolen data contains sensitive information that could be exploited for financial gain or used maliciously. Companies must prioritize data privacy and invest in robust encryption, access controls, and incident response plans.

Business Continuity: When ransomware strikes, business operations grind to a halt. Cloud Europe’s experience serves as a stark reminder that even data centers, designed to ensure continuity, are not immune. Organizations must have contingency plans to minimize disruptions.

How to Stay Safe?

To safeguard against ransomware and other cyber threats, companies should consider the following strategies:

  • Regular Backups: Frequent backups of critical data are essential. These backups should be stored securely and tested periodically to ensure their integrity.
  • Employee Training: Human error often opens the door to cyberattacks. Regular training sessions can educate employees about phishing emails, suspicious links, and safe online practices.
  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Implementing MFA adds an extra layer of security, making it harder for unauthorized individuals to gain access.
  • Incident Response Plans: Organizations should develop comprehensive incident response plans that outline steps to take during a breach. Swift action can minimize damage and prevent data loss.