Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label Rishi Sunak. Show all posts

Rishi Sunak Outlines Risks and Potential of AI Ahead of Tech Summit


UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has warned against the use of AI, as it could be used to design chemical and biological weapons. He says that, in the worst case scenario, people are likely to lose all control over AI, preventing it from turning off. 

However, he notes that while the potential for harm in AI usage is disputed, “we must not put heads in the sand,” over AI risks.

Sunak notes that the technology is already creating new job opportunities and that its advancement would catalyze economic growth and productivity, though he acknowledged that it would have an impact on the labor market.

“The responsible thing for me to do is to address those fears head on, giving you the peace of mind that we will keep you safe, while making sure you and your children have all the opportunities for a better future that AI can bring[…]Doing the right thing, not the easy thing, means being honest with people about the risks from these technologies,” Sunak stated. On Wednesday, the government had released documents highlighting the risks of AI. 

Existential risks from the technology cannot be ruled out, according to one research on the future risks of frontier AI, the term given to frontier AI systems will be discussed at the summit. 

“Given the significant uncertainty in predicting AI developments, there is insufficient evidence to rule out that highly capable Frontier AI systems, if misaligned or inadequately controlled, could pose an existential threat.”

The paper also presents several concerning scenarios about the advancement of AI.

One warns of the potential backlash from the public, as their jobs are being taken by AI. “AI systems are deemed technically safe by many users … but they are nevertheless causing impacts like increased unemployment and poverty,” says the paper, creating a “fierce public debate about the future of education and work”.

In another case mentioned in the document, dubbed as the ‘Wild West,’ the illicit use of AI to commit fraud and scams leads to social instability as a result of numerous victims of organized crime, widespread trade secret theft by enterprises, and an increase in the amount of AI-generated content that clogs the internet.

“This could lead to ‘personalised’ disinformation, where bespoke messages are targeted at individuals rather than larger groups and are therefore more persuasive,” said the discussion document, cautioning of the potential decrease in public trust when it comes to factual information and in civic processes like elections.

“Frontier AI can be misused to deliberately spread false information to create disruption, persuade people on political issues, or cause other forms of harm or damage,” it says. In regards to the documents, Mr. Sunak added that among the aforementioned risks outlined in the document was also a risk of AI being used by terrorist groups, "to spread fear and disruption on an even greater scale."

He notes that reducing the danger of AI causing the extinction of humans should be a "global priority".

However, he stated: "This is not a risk that people need to be losing sleep over right now and I don't want to be alarmist." He said that, on the whole, he was "optimistic" about AI's capacity to improve people's lives.

The disruption AI is already causing in the workplace is a threat that many will be far more familiar with.

Mr. Sunak emphasized how effectively AI technologies do administrative duties that are typically performed by an employee manually, such as drafting contracts and assisting in decision-making.

He added that technology has always changed how people generate money and that education is the best way to prepare individuals for the shifting market. For example, automation has already altered the nature of employment in factories and warehouses, but it has not completely eliminated human involvement.

The prime minister encouraged people to see artificial intelligence as a "co-pilot" in the day-to-day operations of the workplace, saying it was oversimplified to suggest the technology will "take people's jobs".  

With More Jobs Turning Automated, Protecting Jobs Turn Challenging


With the rapid trend of artificial intelligence being incorporated in almost all the jobs, protecting jobs in Britain now seems like a challenge, as analyzed by the new head of the state-authorized AI taskforce.

According to Ian Hogarth, a tech entrepreneur and AI investor, it was “inevitable” that more jobs would turn increasing automated.

He further urged businesses and individuals the need to reconsider how they work. "There will be winners or losers on a global basis in terms of where the jobs are as a result of AI," he said.

There have already been numerous reports of jobs that are losing their status of being ‘manual’, as companies are now increasing adopting AI tools rather than recruiting individuals. One recent instance was when BT stated “it will shed around 10,000 staff by the end of the decade as a result of the tech.”

However, some experts believe that these advancements in the job sector will also result in the emergence of new job options that do exist currently, similar to the time when the internet was newly introduced.

Validating this point is a report released by Goldman Sachs earlier this year, which noted 60% of the jobs we aware of today did not exist in 1940.

What are the Benefits?

According to Hogarth, the aim of the newly assigned taskforce was to help government "to better understand the risks associated with these frontier AI systems" and to hold the companies accountable.

Apparently, he was concerned about the possibility of AI posing harm, such as wrongful detention if applied to law enforcement or the creation of dangerous software that encourages cybercrime.

He said that, “expert warnings of AI's potential to become an existential threat should not be dismissed, even though this divides opinion in the community itself.”

However, he did not dismiss the benefits that comes with these technologies. One of them being the advancements in the healthcare sector. AI tools are not all set to identify new antibiotics, helping patients with brain damage regain movements and aiding medical professional by identifying early symptoms of diseases.

According to Mr. Hogarth, he developed a tool that could spot breast cancer symptoms in a scan.

To monitor AI safety research, the group he will head has been handed an initial £100 million. Although he declined to reveal how he planned to use the funds, he did declare that he would know he had succeeded in the job if "the average person in the UK starts to feel a benefit from AI."

What are the Challenges 

UK’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has set AI as a key priority, wanting to make UK to become a global hub for the sector.

Following this revelation, OpenAI, the company behind the very famous chatbot ChatGPT is all set to build its first international office in London. Also, data firm Palantir has also confirmed that they will open their headquarters in London.

But for the UK to establish itself as a major force in this profitable and constantly growing sector of technology, there are a number of obstacles it will have to tackle.

One instance comes from an AI start-up run by Emma McClenaghan and her partner Matt in Northern Ireland. They have created an AI tool named ‘Wally,’ which generates websites. The developers aspire to turn Wally into a more general digital assistance.

While the company – Gensys Engine – has received several awards and recognition, it still struggle getting the specialized processors, or GPUs (graphics processing units). They need to continue developing the product further.

In regards to this, Emma says, "I think there is a lack of hardware access for start-ups, and a lack of expertise and lack of funding.”

She said they waited five months for a grant to buy a single GPU - at a time when in the US Elon Musk was reported to have purchased 10,000.

"That's the difference between us and them because it's going to take us, you know, four to seven days to train a model and if he's [able to] do it in minutes, then you know, we're never going to catch up," she added.

In an email chat, McClenaghan noted that she thinks the best outcome for her company would be if it gets acquired by some US tech giant, something commonly heard from a UK startup.

This marks another challenge for the UK: to refocus on keeping prosperous companies in the UK and fostering their expansion.