Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Scammers. Show all posts

FBI Alerts Public about Scammers Using Altered Online Photos to Stage Fake Kidnappings

 



The Federal Bureau of Investigation has issued a new advisory warning people about a growing extortion tactic in which criminals take photos posted online, manipulate them, and present the edited images as supposed evidence during fake kidnapping attempts. The agency reports that these incidents, often described as virtual kidnappings, are designed to panic the target into paying quickly before verifying the claims.


How the scam begins

The operation usually starts when criminals search social media accounts or any platform where people share personal photos publicly. They collect pictures of individuals, including children, teenagers, and adults, and then edit those images to make it appear as though the person is being held against their will. Scammers may change facial expressions, blur backgrounds, add shadows, or alter body positions to create a sense of danger.

Once they prepare these altered images, they contact a relative or friend of the person in the photo. In most cases, they send a sudden text or place a call claiming a loved one has been kidnapped. The message is crafted to create immediate panic and often includes threats of harm if payment is not made right away.


The role of fake “proof of life”

One recurring tactic is the use of emotionally charged photos or short video clips that appear to show the victim in distress. These materials are presented as proof that the kidnapping is real. However, investigators have observed that the content often contains mistakes that reveal it has been edited. The inconsistencies can range from missing tattoos or scars to unnatural lighting, distorted facial proportions, or visual elements that do not match known photos of the person.

Criminals also try to limit the victim’s ability to examine the images closely. Some use disappearing messages or apps that make screenshots difficult. Others send messages in rapid succession to prevent the victim from taking a moment to reach out to the supposed abducted individual.


Why these scams escalate quickly

Scammers depend on speed and emotional intensity. They frequently insist that any delay will lead to harm, which pressures victims to make decisions without checking whether their loved one is actually safe. In some situations, criminals exploit posts about missing persons by inserting themselves into ongoing searches and providing false updates.

The FBI urges people to be mindful of the information they share online, especially when it involves personal photos, travel details, or locations. The agency recommends that families set up a private code word that can be used during emergencies to confirm identity. Individuals should avoid sharing personal information with unknown callers or strangers while traveling.

If someone receives a threatening call or message, the FBI advises them to stay calm and attempt to contact the alleged victim directly through verified communication channels. People should record or capture any messages, screenshots, phone numbers, images, or audio clips connected to the incident. These materials can help law enforcement determine whether the event is a hoax.

Anyone who believes they have been targeted by a virtual kidnapping attempt is encouraged to submit a report to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at IC3.gov. The agency requests detailed information, including phone numbers used by the scammer, payment instructions, message transcripts, and any photos or videos that were provided as supposed evidence.





Smarter Scams, Sharper Awareness: How to Recognize and Prevent Financial Fraud in the Digital Age




Fraud has evolved into a calculated industry powered by technology, psychology, and precision targeting. Gone are the days when scams could be spotted through broken English or unrealistic offers alone. Today’s fraudsters combine emotional pressure with digital sophistication, creating schemes that appear legitimate and convincing. Understanding how these scams work, and knowing how to respond, is essential for protecting your family’s hard-earned savings.


The Changing Nature of Scams

Modern scams are not just technical traps, they are psychological manipulations. Criminals no longer rely solely on phishing links or counterfeit banking apps. They now use social engineering tactics, appealing to trust, fear, or greed. A scam might start with a call pretending to be from a government agency, an email about a limited investment opportunity, or a message warning that your bank account is at risk. Each of these is designed to create panic or urgency so that victims act before they think.

A typical fraud cycle follows a simple pattern: an urgent message, a seemingly legitimate explanation, and a request for sensitive action, such as sharing a one-time password, installing a new app, or transferring funds “temporarily” to another account. Once the victim complies, the attacker vanishes, leaving financial and emotional loss behind.

Experts note that the most dangerous scams often appear credible because they mimic official communication styles, use verified-looking logos, and even operate fake customer support numbers. The sophistication makes these schemes particularly hard to spot, especially for first-time investors or non-technical individuals.


Key Red Flags You Should Never Ignore

1. Unrealistic returns or guarantees: If a company claims you can make quick, risk-free profits or shows charts with consistent gains, it’s likely a setup. Real investments fluctuate; only scammers promise certainty.

2. Pressure to act immediately: Whether it’s “only minutes left to invest” or “pay now to avoid penalties,” urgency is a manipulative tactic designed to prevent logical evaluation.

3. Requests to switch apps or accounts: Authentic businesses never ask customers to transfer funds into personal or unfamiliar accounts or to download unverified applications.

4. Emotional storylines: Fraudsters know how to exploit emotions. They may pretend to be in love, offer fake job opportunities, or issue fabricated legal threats, all aimed at overriding rational thinking.

5. Asking for security codes or OTPs: No genuine financial institution or digital platform will ever ask for these details. Sharing them gives scammers direct access to your accounts.


Simple Steps to Build Financial Safety

Protection from scams starts with discipline and awareness rather than advanced technology.

• Take a moment before responding. Don’t act out of panic. Pause, think, and verify before clicking or transferring money.

• Verify independently. If a message or call appears urgent, reach out to the organization using contact details from their official website, not from the message itself.

• Activate alerts and monitor accounts. Keep an eye on all transactions. Early detection of suspicious activity can prevent larger losses.

• Use multi-layered security. Enable multi-factor authentication on all major financial accounts, preferably using hardware security keys or authentication apps instead of SMS codes.

• Keep your digital environment clean. Regularly update your devices, operating systems, and browsers, and use trusted antivirus software to block potential malware.

• Install apps only from reliable sources. Avoid downloading apps or investment platforms shared through personal messages or unverified websites.

• Educate your family. Many scam victims are older adults who may hesitate to talk about it. Encourage open communication and make sure they know how to recognize suspicious requests.


Awareness Is the New Security

Technology gives fraudsters global reach, but it also equips users with tools to fight back. Secure authentication systems, anti-phishing filters, and real-time transaction alerts are valuable but they work best when combined with personal vigilance.

Think of security like investment diversification: no single tool provides complete protection. A strong defense requires a mix of cautious behavior, verification habits, and awareness of evolving threats.


Your Takeaway

Scammers are adapting faster than ever, blending emotional manipulation with technical skill. The best way to counter them is to slow down, question everything that seems urgent or “too good to miss,” and confirm information before taking action.

Protecting your family’s financial wellbeing isn’t just about saving or investing wisely, it’s about staying alert, informed, and proactive. Remember: genuine institutions will never rush you, threaten you, or ask for confidential information. The smartest investment today is in your awareness.


Is Your Bank Login at Risk? How Chatbots May Be Guiding Users to Phishing Scams

 


Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a troubling risk tied to how popular AI chatbots answer basic questions. When asked where to log in to well-known websites, some of these tools may unintentionally direct users to the wrong places, putting their private information at risk.

Phishing is one of the oldest and most dangerous tricks in the cybercrime world. It usually involves fake websites that look almost identical to real ones. People often get an email or message that appears to be from a trusted company, like a bank or online store. These messages contain links that lead to scam pages. If you enter your username and password on one of these fake sites, the scammer gets full access to your account.

Now, a team from the cybersecurity company Netcraft has found that even large language models or LLMs, like the ones behind some popular AI chatbots, may be helping scammers without meaning to. In their study, they tested how accurately an AI chatbot could provide login links for 50 well-known companies across industries such as finance, retail, technology, and utilities.

The results were surprising. The chatbot gave the correct web address only 66% of the time. In about 29% of cases, the links led to inactive or suspended pages. In 5% of cases, they sent users to a completely different website that had nothing to do with the original question.

So how does this help scammers? Cybercriminals can purchase these unclaimed or inactive domain names, the incorrect ones suggested by the AI, and turn them into realistic phishing pages. If people click on them, thinking they’re going to the right site, they may unknowingly hand over sensitive information like their bank login or credit card details.

In one example observed by Netcraft, an AI-powered search tool redirected users who asked about a U.S. bank login to a fake copy of the bank’s website. The real link was shown further down the results, increasing the risk of someone clicking on the wrong one.

Experts also noted that smaller companies, such as regional banks and mid-sized fintech platforms, were more likely to be affected than global giants like Apple or Google. These smaller businesses may not have the same resources to secure their digital presence or respond quickly when problems arise.

The researchers explained that this problem doesn't mean the AI tools are malicious. However, these models generate answers based on patterns, not verified sources and that can lead to outdated or incorrect responses.

The report serves as a strong reminder: AI is powerful, but it is not perfect. Until improvements are made, users should avoid relying on AI-generated links for sensitive tasks. When in doubt, type the website address directly into your browser or use a trusted bookmark.

DVLA Scams Target Thousands of UK Drivers with Fake Fines, Car Deals, and Fraudulent Fees

 

A surge in vehicle-related scams across the UK has left thousands of drivers out of pocket, with fraudulent activity disguised as legitimate DVLA communications. In 2023 alone, nearly 20,000 motorists were tricked by fake car tax messages, insurance schemes, and misleading parking fines, according to recent findings. These scams, often presented with a false sense of urgency, have affected drivers of all ages. 

Young drivers between 25 and 34 years old have been found to be prime targets for these scams, particularly for fraudulent vehicle listings and bogus insurance offers. Older motorists, meanwhile, are increasingly falling victim to fake parking fine notices designed to appear official and urgent. 

The scammers’ tactics often involve pressuring the recipient to pay immediately to avoid penalties, leading many to act before verifying the source. John Wilmot, CEO of car leasing comparison platform LeaseLoco, warned that this psychological pressure is what makes these scams so effective. Many people, he explained, rush to settle fines or fees without confirming whether the request is genuine. 

He stressed that official agencies like the DVLA never ask for payments or personal data through text messages or emails. To avoid becoming a victim, Wilmot recommends ignoring any suspicious digital messages and visiting the DVLA’s website only through the official GOV.UK portal. This small precaution could save drivers from significant financial losses and identity theft. 

One notable scam gaining traction involves tampered QR code stickers placed on parking meters, leading users to counterfeit payment websites. Drivers are urged to use only trusted mobile apps like PayByPhone or RingGo for transactions. In most UK cities, councils do not use QR codes for parking payments, further raising suspicion when encountered. 

Online used car scams have also seen a sharp rise. Fraudsters post listings with unrealistically low prices, request payments up front, and then vanish. Victims are lured in by deals that seem too good to be true. Authorities advise never transferring money before viewing a vehicle in person and checking the car’s history via government platforms. 

Scammers have also taken advantage of electronic tolling systems by sending drivers fake notifications for unpaid toll or congestion charges. These messages often include phishing links disguised as urgent payment portals, which can steal both money and sensitive information. 

As digital communication becomes a common part of motoring administration, drivers must stay alert. Verifying the source of any unexpected payment request is essential in avoiding fraud and safeguarding personal data.

Call Merging Scams and Financial Security Risks with Prevention Strategies

 


It is not uncommon for fraudsters to develop innovative tactics to deceive their targets, with one of the latest scams being the called merging scam in which the scammers attempt to gain unauthorized access to the victim's accounts to defraud them. In many cases, the victims suffer substantial financial losses due to this scheme. 

There has been a warning issued by the Indian authorities in regards to a new scam that involves individuals being manipulated into merging their calls by scammers, who then subsequently reveal One-Time Passwords (OTPs) unknowingly. Using this deceptive tactic, fraudsters can gain access to victims' financial accounts, which will enable them to carry out fraudulent activities. 

NPCI's Unified Payments Interface (UPI), an initiative that was developed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), has expressed concern about this emerging threat. As a precautionary measure, UPI cautioned users on its X account of the risks involved in call merging scams and stressed that call merging scams pose a serious threat to users. 

As part of the advisory, individuals were advised to remain vigilant, stating, Fraudsters are using call merging tactics to deceive users into giving out OTPs. As part of its role to oversee the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), NPCI has expressed significant concerns about the growing cyber fraud epidemic. 

The goal of social engineering scammers is to deceive unsuspecting victims into disclosing their sensitive banking credentials to take control of the situation. In most cases, the scam begins with the fraudster contacting the target, falsely claiming to have obtained their phone number through a mutual acquaintance. 

The fraudster will then try to convince the target to combine the call with a similar call from a different number. It is true that in this second call, the victim is being connected to an official OTP verification call from their bank. Therefore, the victim does not know they are being deceived, and unwittingly allows someone to access their banking details. 

It uses social engineering techniques to manipulate individuals to unknowingly divulge their One-Time Password (OTP), an important security feature used for financial transactions, through their manipulation techniques. 

It is quite common for victims to receive a phone call from a trusted source offering lucrative opportunities or a message from one of their trusted contacts recommending what seems a beneficial scheme to them. 

A significant security risk can be posed by engaging with such communications without due diligence as a result of the growing prevalence of such fraud activities. As a result, financial institutions and regulatory agencies are cautioning individuals to remain vigilant when receiving unexpected phone calls and to refrain from sharing OTPs or merging calls without verifying the identity of the callers before doing so. 

It has become increasingly common for these frauds to occur, and so the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has issued an urgent advisory that warns users about the dangers of call merging scams. To avoid being victimized by such deceptive tactics, individuals need to be vigilant and take strict security measures to protect their financial information. 

There is a deceptive technique known as the Call Merging Scam, which is used by fraudsters to trick people into divulging sensitive information such as One-Time Passwords (OTPs), unknowingly. In this manner, scammers can gain unauthorized access to victims' bank accounts and other secured platforms by exploiting this technique to commit financial fraud on the victims. 

Modus Operandi of the Scam


It is quite common for fraudsters to make deceptive telephone calls, falsely stating that they have obtained the recipient's phone number from an acquaintance or source that is reliable. 

There are many scams out there that involve victims being persuaded to merge calls with another individual. This is often accomplished by presenting another individual as a friend or a bank representative, depending on the scam. 

There is an automatic OTP verification call that they will be connected to without their knowledge. The automated call will direct them to a bank site that activates a mobile OTP verification system for verification. 

As a scammer, the victim is deceitfully manipulated into believing that sharing the OTP for their financial accounts to be accessed is necessary because sharing it is required for authentication. 

Preventive Measures to Safeguard Against Fraud 


To avoid the merging of calls between unknown callers, decline the request right away. Be careful about authenticating the identity of a caller: Whenever users receive an email from someone who claims to represent a financial institution, they should contact the bank directly through their official customer support phone number. Recognize Fraudulent Requests: Banks never ask customers for an OTP over the phone. 

A request of this nature should be viewed as an indication of a potential fraud and reported promptly. Ift an unsolicited OTP or suspected fraudulent activity occurs, individuals should notify their bank immediately and call 1930 (the national cybercrime helpline), so the incident can be investigated further. 

Considering the increasing number of scams like these, it has become imperative that one remains vigilant and adopts strict security practices as a precautionary measure to avoid financial loss. Many viral videos and discussions on social media emphasize a single aspect of fraudulent transactions — receiving an OTP via a merged call as opposed to a text message. 

Despite this, they often overlook the important point: an OTP is not sufficient for authorization of a transaction by itself. A fraudster needs to obtain essential banking details such as a card number, a card verification value, or a UPI Personal Identification Number (PIN) before he or she can use an OTP as a final step in committing an unauthorized transaction. 

To mitigate such risks, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has implemented strict security protocols to minimize them. To complete electronic transactions, financial institutions and payment service providers must implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) as of 2021 so that user authentication can be verified by more than one factor. This level of protection is achieved by implementing multiple authentication measures in combination with a combination of vital characteristics, including OTP verification, mobile device authentication, biometric identification, and hardware security tokens, which together provide a high level of security against unauthorized access. 

Digital transactions are typically protected by multiple layers of security, each requiring a combination of authentication factors to ensure their integrity. There are three types of authentication: manual, which includes everything the user possesses, such as their credentials, card numbers, and UPI IDs; known, such as their password, CVV, or PIN; and dynamic, such as their OTP, biometric authentication, or device authentication. 

To achieve the highest level of security, all three levels are necessary for most online banking and card transactions. However, a UPI transaction with a value up to a lakh does not require an OTP and can be authorized with only a UPI ID and PIN, without the need for an OTP. As a result of this multi-layered approach, financial fraud risks are greatly reduced and the security of digital payments is greatly strengthened.

Enhanced In-Call Security in Android 16 Aims to Tackle Scammers

 


As part of a new security feature being developed by Google, users will no longer be able to modify sensitive settings when they are on a phone call. As a part of the in-call anti-scam protection, users are specifically prevented from enabling settings that allow applications to be installed from unknown sources and the grant of accessibility access as part of this in-call anti-scam protection. 

To mitigate the risk of scams exploiting these permissions during phone conversations, the developers of the app have developed several features. Android Authority was the first to report the development. As users attempt to alter their information while speaking to a customer service representative, a warning message appears stating as follows: "Scammers often request these actions during phone call conversations, so that is why it has been blocked. If users are guided to do this by someone they are not familiar with, it could be a scam." 

A new version of Android 16 Beta 2 was released this week, which introduced several new features and a modification to the phone call settings. The new features are intended to help improve not only the user experience but also to protect users against fraudulent scams. One of the features, which has just been introduced, is anti-scammer protection during phone calls, which is designed to protect the privacy and sensitive data of users during a phone call. 

The number of telephone scams has grown to an alarming level of sophistication, with scammers now employing ever-increasing sophistication to deceive unsuspecting individuals for fraudulent purposes. It is also common to install malware on individuals to gain access to sensitive information. Android 16 Beta 2 addresses this issue by implementing restrictions that prevent users from enabling certain sensitive settings, such as sideloading permissions, while a phone call is active, to reduce the risk of scams exploiting these permissions during conversations. 

The purpose of this measure is to enhance security by reducing the risk of scams. Moreover, Android 16 Beta 2 also introduces a restriction that prevents users from granting applications access to accessibility services when a phone call is currently underway. As of earlier this week, Android 16 Beta 2 now includes this feature, which was implemented by adding additional security measures to counter a technique commonly used by malicious actors to distribute malware. 

It was first introduced in Android 16 beta 2. As part of this method, which is known as telephone-oriented attack delivery (TOAD), a false sense of urgency is created and sent to potential victims to coerce them into calling a specific number. The NCSC-FI and the NCC Group reported in 2023 that cybercriminals were distributing dropper applications through SMS messages and phone calls to deceive individuals into installing malware, such as Vultr. The hacker community intended to use this technique to trick people into installing malware. 

 The company introduced several new security features as part of Android 15 when it began rolling out last year, aimed at reducing the risks caused by malicious applications as they were introduced. Google took these measures, among them was the automatic disabling of sensitive permissions for apps that weren't available in Gthe oogle Play Store or was downloaded from unverified sources that posed a threat to users. The goal of this enhancement is to better protect users from potential scams and the possibility of unauthorized access to sensitive information. 

The sideloading permission, which allows apps to install other apps, is disabled as a security measure by default to prevent malicious software from installing outside of official app stores, which poses significant risks for users. Users must be able to enable this permission manually through Settings > Apps > Special App Access > Install Unknown Apps. Furthermore, users who are enrolled in Advanced Protection Mode are not permitted to modify this permission due to the significant security risks involved. As a result, unauthorized installations can be prevented and overall device security will be enhanced. 

The Android 16 operating system offers additional security measures even if a user already allows sideloading or has installed malicious apps; the device also blocks the possibility of granting access to accessibility during phone calls when the user doesn't want it granted. This restriction is vital because applications that offer accessibility can exert a lot of control over a device, which may compromise user security and privacy. 

The misuse of such permissions can result in malicious applications stealing sensitive data or locking users out of their devices, as well as performing harmful actions. To combat scammers exploiting phone conversations as a way to install malware or gain unauthorized access to critical permissions, Google is preventing these changes during active calls. It is becoming increasingly sophisticated as cybercriminals utilize phone calls as a primary method of manipulating and defrauding individuals as online scams get more sophisticated. In particular, these scams are usually targeted at older people or those who are less familiar with digital security practices. 

Often, scammers use psychological tactics to deceive victims into following their instructions, such as inducing a false sense of urgency or fear. A scammer usually lures victims into installing applications, often under the guise of providing technical assistance with an issue that is fabricated. Once the attacker has installed the application, it gives him or her access to the victim's device, potentially allowing them to exploit it further. As part of Google's proactive efforts to mitigate these threats, it has implemented enhanced security features on Android 16. 

The Android 16 update will restrict users from sideloading applications or granting high-risk permissions during a phone call, which will help to reduce the effectiveness of such fraud schemes and improve overall user security. A significant advancement in mobile protection, especially as phone scams are becoming increasingly complex, this security feature represents a significant advance in mobile protection. 

With Google's introduction of obstacles into the scam process, Google hopes that fraudulent activity will become more difficult to carry out. Even in cases where scammers instruct victims to terminate a call and attempt the process again, the additional step required to activate certain settings may raise suspicion and may discourage the victim from trying it again. 

As part of Android 16 Beta 2, Google has implemented anti-scammer protections that allow users to access their phone while they are on a call, a proactive approach to fighting the growing threat of phone scams. By limiting access to sensitive settings while they are on a call, the company seeks to enhance user security and prevent malicious actors from exploiting them.

Meet Daisy, the AI Grandmother Designed to Outwit Scammers

 

The voice-based AI, known as Daisy or "dAIsy," impersonates a senior citizen to engage in meandering conversation with phone scammers.

Despite its flaws, such as urging people to eat deadly mushrooms, AI can sometimes be utilised for good. O2, the UK's largest mobile network operator, has implemented a voice-based AI chatbot to trick phone scammers into long, useless talks. Daisy, often known as "dAIsy," is a chatbot that mimics the voice of an elderly person, the most typical target for phone scammers. 

Daisy's goal is to automate "scambaiting," which is the technique of deliberately wasting phone fraudsters' time in order to keep them away from potential real victims for as long as possible. Scammers employ social engineering to abuse the elderly's naivety, convincing them, for example, that they owe back taxes and would be arrested if they fail to make payments immediately.

When a fraudster gets Daisy on the phone, they're in for a long chat that won't lead anywhere. If they get to the point when the fraudster requests private data, such as bank account information, Daisy will fabricate it. O2 claims that it is able to contact fraudsters in the first place by adding Daisy's phone number to "easy target" lists that scammers use for leads. 

Of course, the risk with a chatbot like Daisy is that the same technology can be used for opposite ends—we've already seen cases where real people, such as CEOs of major companies, had their voices deepfaked in order to deceive others into giving money to a fraudster. Senior citizens are already exposed enough. If they receive a call from someone who sounds like a grandchild, they will very certainly believe it is genuine.

Finally, preventing fraudulent calls and shutting down the groups orchestrating these frauds would be the best answer. Carriers have enhanced their ability to detect and block scammers' phone numbers, but it remains a cat-and-mouse game. Scammers use automated dialling systems, which allow them to phone numbers quickly and only alert them when they receive an answer. An AI bot that frustrates fraudsters by responding and wasting their time is preferable to nothing.

Tax Season Vigilance: Guarding Against Fraudulent Schemes

 


When people think about filing taxes, they get stressed out and intimidated. In this respect, they may be more susceptible to deception, including scammers' attempts to obtain valuable personal information from them, claim refunds under their names, and trick them into paying for fraudulent tax services, among others.

It is at the beginning of the tax season, which began on Jan. 29, when the Internal Revenue Service began processing and accepting federal income tax returns for 2023, that scammers will begin to attack us with scams. Tax season is coming up and the IRS is expecting more than 146 million individual returns to be filed by April 15, the due date. 

The Federal Trade Commission's Division of Financial Practices, led by an attorney who is a former employee of the agency, says that scammers use tax time to steal personal and financial information from individuals. 

To accomplish this, they pose as representatives of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and make people hand over their Social Security number and bank account information by contacting them over the phone using various high-pressure tactics. 

To maintain the trust of consumers, the IRS will not use aggressive techniques to obtain a taxpayer's personal information. They will initiate contact by letter and not use aggressive tactics to obtain the taxpayer's personal information. There are certain circumstances where the IRS may call users, but in most cases, they will send them mail messages or notices as a prelude to making the call. 

There have been a disturbing number of instances where people have been defrauded through the mail as well. It has been reported that in 2023 a scam in the mail was perpetrated by spoofing the IRS masthead, informing recipients that they had unclaimed refunds. There was a request in the letter for taxpayers to call a number to figure out more details, and also a request to provide sensitive information such as a photograph of the taxpayer's driver's license. 

Besides spoofing IRS caller IDs as well as other sophisticated tricks for fooling consumers, Dwyer says there are other methods for fooling consumers. A scammer in this case has altered the caller ID so that it appears as though the IRS is calling rather than some other unknown number. 

When the caller calls you, Dwyer advises that you let it go to voicemail and then search online to see if the number has already been reported as part of a scam before waiting to answer it. A scammer is also capable of sending emails that masquerade as IRS correspondence, with e-mail addresses, signatures, and logos that appear to be authentic, but are fakes. 

They may ask recipients to enter personal information on fraudulent websites when they click on the links in these emails. If a consumer has not heard back from the government agency about their tax filing or refund, they should generally view any phone calls or emails claiming to come from the IRS as highly suspicious. 

The IRS pays the consumer electronically in the form of a refund when they file a return in their name and provide the IRS with their bank account information, and the scammer then receives the refund by filing a return in the name of the consumer. There is no way they can accomplish this without possessing stolen personal information, including a Social Security number, which they can use to commit this crime. 

By filing your taxes as soon as possible, you can help prevent this outcome from occurring in the future. The consumer would not be made aware of the theft of their refunds until they attempt to file their tax returns after the refund has been stolen. Moreover, it would be a good idea to avoid sharing any personal information with identity thieves which would allow them to file a fake tax return to claim a refund that is not theirs. 

Scammers who ask for sensitive information by posing as people are not restricted to tax season only, so be mindful of their requests throughout the year. Individuals who have fallen victim to identity theft or are aware of a breach in their sensitive data are advised to exercise heightened caution and consider utilizing a credit monitoring service to ascertain if their information has been used for unauthorized account openings. 

Those affected by identity theft can leverage the services offered by the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) website, IdentityTheft.gov, to formally report the theft and access a comprehensive recovery plan. This plan guides individuals through crucial tasks such as closing compromised accounts, rectifying inaccuracies in credit reports, and reporting the misuse of a Social Security number. 

For taxpayers grappling with the repercussions of a scam affecting their tax returns, seeking assistance from the federal Taxpayer Advocate Service is recommended. This independent organization, affiliated with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), extends support to taxpayers unable to independently resolve tax-related issues. Advocates from this service are available to provide guidance and assistance in navigating challenges stemming from fraudulent activities.