Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Scammers. Show all posts

Call Merging Scams and Financial Security Risks with Prevention Strategies

 


It is not uncommon for fraudsters to develop innovative tactics to deceive their targets, with one of the latest scams being the called merging scam in which the scammers attempt to gain unauthorized access to the victim's accounts to defraud them. In many cases, the victims suffer substantial financial losses due to this scheme. 

There has been a warning issued by the Indian authorities in regards to a new scam that involves individuals being manipulated into merging their calls by scammers, who then subsequently reveal One-Time Passwords (OTPs) unknowingly. Using this deceptive tactic, fraudsters can gain access to victims' financial accounts, which will enable them to carry out fraudulent activities. 

NPCI's Unified Payments Interface (UPI), an initiative that was developed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), has expressed concern about this emerging threat. As a precautionary measure, UPI cautioned users on its X account of the risks involved in call merging scams and stressed that call merging scams pose a serious threat to users. 

As part of the advisory, individuals were advised to remain vigilant, stating, Fraudsters are using call merging tactics to deceive users into giving out OTPs. As part of its role to oversee the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), NPCI has expressed significant concerns about the growing cyber fraud epidemic. 

The goal of social engineering scammers is to deceive unsuspecting victims into disclosing their sensitive banking credentials to take control of the situation. In most cases, the scam begins with the fraudster contacting the target, falsely claiming to have obtained their phone number through a mutual acquaintance. 

The fraudster will then try to convince the target to combine the call with a similar call from a different number. It is true that in this second call, the victim is being connected to an official OTP verification call from their bank. Therefore, the victim does not know they are being deceived, and unwittingly allows someone to access their banking details. 

It uses social engineering techniques to manipulate individuals to unknowingly divulge their One-Time Password (OTP), an important security feature used for financial transactions, through their manipulation techniques. 

It is quite common for victims to receive a phone call from a trusted source offering lucrative opportunities or a message from one of their trusted contacts recommending what seems a beneficial scheme to them. 

A significant security risk can be posed by engaging with such communications without due diligence as a result of the growing prevalence of such fraud activities. As a result, financial institutions and regulatory agencies are cautioning individuals to remain vigilant when receiving unexpected phone calls and to refrain from sharing OTPs or merging calls without verifying the identity of the callers before doing so. 

It has become increasingly common for these frauds to occur, and so the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has issued an urgent advisory that warns users about the dangers of call merging scams. To avoid being victimized by such deceptive tactics, individuals need to be vigilant and take strict security measures to protect their financial information. 

There is a deceptive technique known as the Call Merging Scam, which is used by fraudsters to trick people into divulging sensitive information such as One-Time Passwords (OTPs), unknowingly. In this manner, scammers can gain unauthorized access to victims' bank accounts and other secured platforms by exploiting this technique to commit financial fraud on the victims. 

Modus Operandi of the Scam


It is quite common for fraudsters to make deceptive telephone calls, falsely stating that they have obtained the recipient's phone number from an acquaintance or source that is reliable. 

There are many scams out there that involve victims being persuaded to merge calls with another individual. This is often accomplished by presenting another individual as a friend or a bank representative, depending on the scam. 

There is an automatic OTP verification call that they will be connected to without their knowledge. The automated call will direct them to a bank site that activates a mobile OTP verification system for verification. 

As a scammer, the victim is deceitfully manipulated into believing that sharing the OTP for their financial accounts to be accessed is necessary because sharing it is required for authentication. 

Preventive Measures to Safeguard Against Fraud 


To avoid the merging of calls between unknown callers, decline the request right away. Be careful about authenticating the identity of a caller: Whenever users receive an email from someone who claims to represent a financial institution, they should contact the bank directly through their official customer support phone number. Recognize Fraudulent Requests: Banks never ask customers for an OTP over the phone. 

A request of this nature should be viewed as an indication of a potential fraud and reported promptly. Ift an unsolicited OTP or suspected fraudulent activity occurs, individuals should notify their bank immediately and call 1930 (the national cybercrime helpline), so the incident can be investigated further. 

Considering the increasing number of scams like these, it has become imperative that one remains vigilant and adopts strict security practices as a precautionary measure to avoid financial loss. Many viral videos and discussions on social media emphasize a single aspect of fraudulent transactions — receiving an OTP via a merged call as opposed to a text message. 

Despite this, they often overlook the important point: an OTP is not sufficient for authorization of a transaction by itself. A fraudster needs to obtain essential banking details such as a card number, a card verification value, or a UPI Personal Identification Number (PIN) before he or she can use an OTP as a final step in committing an unauthorized transaction. 

To mitigate such risks, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has implemented strict security protocols to minimize them. To complete electronic transactions, financial institutions and payment service providers must implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) as of 2021 so that user authentication can be verified by more than one factor. This level of protection is achieved by implementing multiple authentication measures in combination with a combination of vital characteristics, including OTP verification, mobile device authentication, biometric identification, and hardware security tokens, which together provide a high level of security against unauthorized access. 

Digital transactions are typically protected by multiple layers of security, each requiring a combination of authentication factors to ensure their integrity. There are three types of authentication: manual, which includes everything the user possesses, such as their credentials, card numbers, and UPI IDs; known, such as their password, CVV, or PIN; and dynamic, such as their OTP, biometric authentication, or device authentication. 

To achieve the highest level of security, all three levels are necessary for most online banking and card transactions. However, a UPI transaction with a value up to a lakh does not require an OTP and can be authorized with only a UPI ID and PIN, without the need for an OTP. As a result of this multi-layered approach, financial fraud risks are greatly reduced and the security of digital payments is greatly strengthened.

Enhanced In-Call Security in Android 16 Aims to Tackle Scammers

 


As part of a new security feature being developed by Google, users will no longer be able to modify sensitive settings when they are on a phone call. As a part of the in-call anti-scam protection, users are specifically prevented from enabling settings that allow applications to be installed from unknown sources and the grant of accessibility access as part of this in-call anti-scam protection. 

To mitigate the risk of scams exploiting these permissions during phone conversations, the developers of the app have developed several features. Android Authority was the first to report the development. As users attempt to alter their information while speaking to a customer service representative, a warning message appears stating as follows: "Scammers often request these actions during phone call conversations, so that is why it has been blocked. If users are guided to do this by someone they are not familiar with, it could be a scam." 

A new version of Android 16 Beta 2 was released this week, which introduced several new features and a modification to the phone call settings. The new features are intended to help improve not only the user experience but also to protect users against fraudulent scams. One of the features, which has just been introduced, is anti-scammer protection during phone calls, which is designed to protect the privacy and sensitive data of users during a phone call. 

The number of telephone scams has grown to an alarming level of sophistication, with scammers now employing ever-increasing sophistication to deceive unsuspecting individuals for fraudulent purposes. It is also common to install malware on individuals to gain access to sensitive information. Android 16 Beta 2 addresses this issue by implementing restrictions that prevent users from enabling certain sensitive settings, such as sideloading permissions, while a phone call is active, to reduce the risk of scams exploiting these permissions during conversations. 

The purpose of this measure is to enhance security by reducing the risk of scams. Moreover, Android 16 Beta 2 also introduces a restriction that prevents users from granting applications access to accessibility services when a phone call is currently underway. As of earlier this week, Android 16 Beta 2 now includes this feature, which was implemented by adding additional security measures to counter a technique commonly used by malicious actors to distribute malware. 

It was first introduced in Android 16 beta 2. As part of this method, which is known as telephone-oriented attack delivery (TOAD), a false sense of urgency is created and sent to potential victims to coerce them into calling a specific number. The NCSC-FI and the NCC Group reported in 2023 that cybercriminals were distributing dropper applications through SMS messages and phone calls to deceive individuals into installing malware, such as Vultr. The hacker community intended to use this technique to trick people into installing malware. 

 The company introduced several new security features as part of Android 15 when it began rolling out last year, aimed at reducing the risks caused by malicious applications as they were introduced. Google took these measures, among them was the automatic disabling of sensitive permissions for apps that weren't available in Gthe oogle Play Store or was downloaded from unverified sources that posed a threat to users. The goal of this enhancement is to better protect users from potential scams and the possibility of unauthorized access to sensitive information. 

The sideloading permission, which allows apps to install other apps, is disabled as a security measure by default to prevent malicious software from installing outside of official app stores, which poses significant risks for users. Users must be able to enable this permission manually through Settings > Apps > Special App Access > Install Unknown Apps. Furthermore, users who are enrolled in Advanced Protection Mode are not permitted to modify this permission due to the significant security risks involved. As a result, unauthorized installations can be prevented and overall device security will be enhanced. 

The Android 16 operating system offers additional security measures even if a user already allows sideloading or has installed malicious apps; the device also blocks the possibility of granting access to accessibility during phone calls when the user doesn't want it granted. This restriction is vital because applications that offer accessibility can exert a lot of control over a device, which may compromise user security and privacy. 

The misuse of such permissions can result in malicious applications stealing sensitive data or locking users out of their devices, as well as performing harmful actions. To combat scammers exploiting phone conversations as a way to install malware or gain unauthorized access to critical permissions, Google is preventing these changes during active calls. It is becoming increasingly sophisticated as cybercriminals utilize phone calls as a primary method of manipulating and defrauding individuals as online scams get more sophisticated. In particular, these scams are usually targeted at older people or those who are less familiar with digital security practices. 

Often, scammers use psychological tactics to deceive victims into following their instructions, such as inducing a false sense of urgency or fear. A scammer usually lures victims into installing applications, often under the guise of providing technical assistance with an issue that is fabricated. Once the attacker has installed the application, it gives him or her access to the victim's device, potentially allowing them to exploit it further. As part of Google's proactive efforts to mitigate these threats, it has implemented enhanced security features on Android 16. 

The Android 16 update will restrict users from sideloading applications or granting high-risk permissions during a phone call, which will help to reduce the effectiveness of such fraud schemes and improve overall user security. A significant advancement in mobile protection, especially as phone scams are becoming increasingly complex, this security feature represents a significant advance in mobile protection. 

With Google's introduction of obstacles into the scam process, Google hopes that fraudulent activity will become more difficult to carry out. Even in cases where scammers instruct victims to terminate a call and attempt the process again, the additional step required to activate certain settings may raise suspicion and may discourage the victim from trying it again. 

As part of Android 16 Beta 2, Google has implemented anti-scammer protections that allow users to access their phone while they are on a call, a proactive approach to fighting the growing threat of phone scams. By limiting access to sensitive settings while they are on a call, the company seeks to enhance user security and prevent malicious actors from exploiting them.

Meet Daisy, the AI Grandmother Designed to Outwit Scammers

 

The voice-based AI, known as Daisy or "dAIsy," impersonates a senior citizen to engage in meandering conversation with phone scammers.

Despite its flaws, such as urging people to eat deadly mushrooms, AI can sometimes be utilised for good. O2, the UK's largest mobile network operator, has implemented a voice-based AI chatbot to trick phone scammers into long, useless talks. Daisy, often known as "dAIsy," is a chatbot that mimics the voice of an elderly person, the most typical target for phone scammers. 

Daisy's goal is to automate "scambaiting," which is the technique of deliberately wasting phone fraudsters' time in order to keep them away from potential real victims for as long as possible. Scammers employ social engineering to abuse the elderly's naivety, convincing them, for example, that they owe back taxes and would be arrested if they fail to make payments immediately.

When a fraudster gets Daisy on the phone, they're in for a long chat that won't lead anywhere. If they get to the point when the fraudster requests private data, such as bank account information, Daisy will fabricate it. O2 claims that it is able to contact fraudsters in the first place by adding Daisy's phone number to "easy target" lists that scammers use for leads. 

Of course, the risk with a chatbot like Daisy is that the same technology can be used for opposite ends—we've already seen cases where real people, such as CEOs of major companies, had their voices deepfaked in order to deceive others into giving money to a fraudster. Senior citizens are already exposed enough. If they receive a call from someone who sounds like a grandchild, they will very certainly believe it is genuine.

Finally, preventing fraudulent calls and shutting down the groups orchestrating these frauds would be the best answer. Carriers have enhanced their ability to detect and block scammers' phone numbers, but it remains a cat-and-mouse game. Scammers use automated dialling systems, which allow them to phone numbers quickly and only alert them when they receive an answer. An AI bot that frustrates fraudsters by responding and wasting their time is preferable to nothing.

Tax Season Vigilance: Guarding Against Fraudulent Schemes

 


When people think about filing taxes, they get stressed out and intimidated. In this respect, they may be more susceptible to deception, including scammers' attempts to obtain valuable personal information from them, claim refunds under their names, and trick them into paying for fraudulent tax services, among others.

It is at the beginning of the tax season, which began on Jan. 29, when the Internal Revenue Service began processing and accepting federal income tax returns for 2023, that scammers will begin to attack us with scams. Tax season is coming up and the IRS is expecting more than 146 million individual returns to be filed by April 15, the due date. 

The Federal Trade Commission's Division of Financial Practices, led by an attorney who is a former employee of the agency, says that scammers use tax time to steal personal and financial information from individuals. 

To accomplish this, they pose as representatives of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and make people hand over their Social Security number and bank account information by contacting them over the phone using various high-pressure tactics. 

To maintain the trust of consumers, the IRS will not use aggressive techniques to obtain a taxpayer's personal information. They will initiate contact by letter and not use aggressive tactics to obtain the taxpayer's personal information. There are certain circumstances where the IRS may call users, but in most cases, they will send them mail messages or notices as a prelude to making the call. 

There have been a disturbing number of instances where people have been defrauded through the mail as well. It has been reported that in 2023 a scam in the mail was perpetrated by spoofing the IRS masthead, informing recipients that they had unclaimed refunds. There was a request in the letter for taxpayers to call a number to figure out more details, and also a request to provide sensitive information such as a photograph of the taxpayer's driver's license. 

Besides spoofing IRS caller IDs as well as other sophisticated tricks for fooling consumers, Dwyer says there are other methods for fooling consumers. A scammer in this case has altered the caller ID so that it appears as though the IRS is calling rather than some other unknown number. 

When the caller calls you, Dwyer advises that you let it go to voicemail and then search online to see if the number has already been reported as part of a scam before waiting to answer it. A scammer is also capable of sending emails that masquerade as IRS correspondence, with e-mail addresses, signatures, and logos that appear to be authentic, but are fakes. 

They may ask recipients to enter personal information on fraudulent websites when they click on the links in these emails. If a consumer has not heard back from the government agency about their tax filing or refund, they should generally view any phone calls or emails claiming to come from the IRS as highly suspicious. 

The IRS pays the consumer electronically in the form of a refund when they file a return in their name and provide the IRS with their bank account information, and the scammer then receives the refund by filing a return in the name of the consumer. There is no way they can accomplish this without possessing stolen personal information, including a Social Security number, which they can use to commit this crime. 

By filing your taxes as soon as possible, you can help prevent this outcome from occurring in the future. The consumer would not be made aware of the theft of their refunds until they attempt to file their tax returns after the refund has been stolen. Moreover, it would be a good idea to avoid sharing any personal information with identity thieves which would allow them to file a fake tax return to claim a refund that is not theirs. 

Scammers who ask for sensitive information by posing as people are not restricted to tax season only, so be mindful of their requests throughout the year. Individuals who have fallen victim to identity theft or are aware of a breach in their sensitive data are advised to exercise heightened caution and consider utilizing a credit monitoring service to ascertain if their information has been used for unauthorized account openings. 

Those affected by identity theft can leverage the services offered by the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) website, IdentityTheft.gov, to formally report the theft and access a comprehensive recovery plan. This plan guides individuals through crucial tasks such as closing compromised accounts, rectifying inaccuracies in credit reports, and reporting the misuse of a Social Security number. 

For taxpayers grappling with the repercussions of a scam affecting their tax returns, seeking assistance from the federal Taxpayer Advocate Service is recommended. This independent organization, affiliated with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), extends support to taxpayers unable to independently resolve tax-related issues. Advocates from this service are available to provide guidance and assistance in navigating challenges stemming from fraudulent activities.

How a Fake CIA Agent Duped Someone out of $50,000

 



Given a recent incident reported by The Cut, freelance finance writer Charlotte Cowles fell victim to an elaborate scam that highlights the dangers of social engineering. The scam began with a call from a number appearing as "Amazon," leading Cowles to believe she was a victim of identity theft. The caller, posing as a Federal Trade Commission official, connected her with a fake CIA agent named Michael. Over hours on the phone, "Michael" convinced Cowles that she faced serious charges related to the identity theft and persuaded her to withdraw $50,000 in cash. The twist? She was instructed to hand over the money to the CIA, which would inexplicably issue her a check for her own funds.

Despite suspicions during the ordeal, the scammers manipulated Cowles into isolation, urging her not to involve her family or the police, claiming it could jeopardise their safety. This tactic of isolating the victim is a common element in scams, aiming to heighten emotions and push individuals into making decisions they might not otherwise make. The scammers played on Cowles' fears for herself and her family, using personal details like the last four digits of her Social Security number to further erode her judgement.

Experts emphasise that falling victim to professional scammers is not a matter of lacking savvy. Selena Larson, a senior threat intelligence analyst, stresses that fraud perpetrators excel at social engineering and employ tactics like instilling fear, excitement, or urgency to manipulate their targets. To protect against such scams, Larson advises people to be wary of anyone trying to isolate them from friends and family, cautioning against trusting individuals posing as government officials or celebrities. Immediate requests for money and a sense of urgency are red flags that should prompt individuals to break off contact and report the activity.

This cautionary tale serves as a reminder that anyone can be targeted by scams. Larson suggests a vigilant approach, emphasising the importance of staying connected with loved ones and not succumbing to isolation. Additionally, adopting a strategy similar to Cowles' newfound tactic—never answering calls from unknown numbers—can be an effective way to avoid falling prey to scams.

As online threats continue to multiply, it is crucial for individuals to remain informed and alert. The incident also borders on the broader issue of cyber threats, including state-backed hacking efforts, ransomware attacks on hospitals, and the impact of cyberattacks on vulnerable communities. Stay safe and informed as we venture through the complexities of online security.

Watch Out for Phone Scams

 


At the extent of people's gullibility, there is an increasing cybersecurity threat known as "vishing" which has become a cause for concern, impacting unsuspecting individuals and even businesses. Vishing, short for voice phishing, involves scammers attempting to trick people into revealing sensitive information over the phone. These calls often impersonate authorities like the IRS or banks, creating urgency to manipulate victims. In 2022 alone, victims reported median losses of $1,400, per the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

What Is Vishing?

Vishing operates on social engineering tactics, relying on psychological manipulation rather than malware. The scammers may pose as government officials or company representatives to extract financial details, Social Security numbers, or other sensitive data. Notably, technological advancements, such as caller ID spoofing and AI-driven voice mimicking, contribute to the rising prevalence of vishing attacks.

Detecting a Vishing Attempt

Identifying vishing calls involves recognizing key signs. Automated pre-recorded messages claiming urgent matters or unsolicited requests for sensitive information are red flags. Scammers may pose as government officials, exploiting the authoritative tone to create a sense of urgency. The use of aggressive tactics during the call is another indicator.

What To Do? 

To safeguard against vishing scams, individuals can adopt practical strategies. Screening calls carefully and letting unknown numbers go to voicemail helps avoid falling prey to scammers who may attempt to spoof caller IDs. Remaining suspicious of unsolicited calls and refraining from sharing personal data over the phone, especially Social Security numbers or passwords, is crucial. Joining the National Do Not Call Registry can also reduce exposure to illegitimate calls.

Preventive Measures

Taking preventive measures can further fortify against vishing attacks. Signing up for the National Do Not Call Registry informs marketers about your preference to avoid unsolicited calls. Additionally, services like AT&T's TruContact Branded Call Display provide an extra layer of security, displaying the name and logo of the business calling AT&T customers.

In case one suspects falling victim to a vishing scheme, prompt action is essential. Contacting financial institutions, placing a security freeze on credit reports, and changing passwords, especially for sensitive accounts, are immediate steps. Reporting any attempted scams to the FTC and FBI adds an extra layer of protection.

As vishing scammers continually refine their tactics, individuals must stay vigilant. Being sceptical of unsolicited calls and refraining from sharing personal information over the phone is paramount in protecting against these evolving threats.

To look at the bigger picture, vishing poses a significant risk in the digital age, and awareness is key to prevention. Individuals can strengthen themselves against these deceptive attacks by staying informed and adopting precautionary measures. Remember, scepticism is a powerful tool in the fight against vishing scams, and every individual can play a role in ensuring their cybersecurity. Stay informed, stay cautious.


FTC Warns: QR Codes May Result in Identity Theft


One might want to reconsider before scanning QR codes.

The codes, which are a digital jumble of white and black squares that are frequently used to record URLs, are apparently commonplace; they may as well be seen, for example, on menus at restaurants and retail establishments. The Federal Trade Commission cautioned on Thursday that they could be dangerous for those who aren't cautious.

According to a report by eMarketer, around 94 million US consumers have used QR scanner this year. The number is only increasing, with around 102.6 million anticipated by 2026. 

As per Alvaro Puig, a consumer education specialist with the FTC, QRs are quite popular since there are endless ways to use them.

“Unfortunately, scammers hide harmful links in QR codes to steal personal information,” Puig said.

Why is Stolen Personal Data a Threat? 

The stolen data can be misused by threat actors in a number of ways: According to a separate report by FTC, the identity thieves can use victim’s personal data to illicitly file tax returns in their names and obtain tax refunds, drain their bank accounts, charge their credit cards, open new utility accounts, get medical treatment on their health insurance, and open new utility accounts.

In some cases, criminals cover the legitimate QR codes with their own, in places like parking meters, or even send codes via text messages or emails, luring victims into scanning their codes. 

One of the infamous tactic used by scammers is by creating a sense of urgency in their victims. For example, they might suggest that a product could not  be delivered and you need to reschedule or that you need to change your account password because of suspicious activity.

“A scammer’s QR code could take you to a spoofed site that looks real but isn’t,” Puig wrote. “And if you log in to the spoofed site, the scammers could steal any information you enter. Or the QR code could install malware that steals your information before you realize it.”

How can User Protect Themselves?

According to FTC, some of the measures one can follow to protect themselves from scams are:

  • Inspect URLs before clicking: Even if a URL looks familiar, it is advisable to check for any misspelling or switched letters in order to ensure it is legit. 
  • Do not scan a QR code in a suspicious/unexpected message: This is particularly valid when the text or email demands a quick response. If a user believe this to be a genuine message, it is advisable to get in touch with the business using a reliable channel, such as a working phone number or website. 
  • Protect devices and online accounts: Users are advised to use strong passwords and multifactor authentication and keep their phones’ OS in their latest versions.  

Phone Scammers Evolve: AI-Powered Voice Mimicry Poses New Threat

 

In an ever-evolving battle against phone scammers and robocalls, a growing concern is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to mimic victims' voices, making these scams even more convincing. While efforts have been made to curb scam calls, it's imperative for individuals to bolster their phone defenses and remain vigilant.

Phone scammers and robocalls have become an epidemic, with billions of spam calls plaguing people worldwide. Voice security company Hyia reported a staggering 6.5 billion instances of phone spam calls in a single quarter. In the United States, the problem is particularly acute, with an average of 12 scam calls per month per person, and one in four calls being unwanted, according to a Q2 report.

AI Voice Mimicry Adds a Dangerous Twist

The latest development in the world of phone scams involves the use of AI technology to record victims' voices and replicate them in vishing (voice phishing) attacks. This advanced generative AI text-to-speech technology allows scammers to pose as someone familiar to their victims, even incorporating personal details to enhance the believability of the scam. This puts individuals at risk of inadvertently sharing sensitive information with scammers.

As scammers become more sophisticated, individuals need to strengthen their defenses against phone scams. Cross-referencing multiple apps that offer call filtering and spam protection can enhance overall prevention. If a suspicious call does get through, it's essential to hang up without divulging personal information and report the number to relevant apps. Furthermore, caution in sharing personal phone numbers and considering the use of virtual numbers or secondary lines for public or one-time purposes can be a wise approach.

Setting Phone Defenses on Android and iPhone

For Android users, enabling "Caller ID and spam protection" on Samsung phones or using the Phone by Google app with built-in spam filtering can help screen and block unwanted calls. However, it's crucial to verify caller IDs, as scammers can manipulate them.

Apple iPhone users can benefit from the "Silence Unknown Callers" feature and explore third-party apps for call blocking and identification. While these features are effective, there may be occasional false positives, so individuals should monitor their call history.

AI voice mimickers have made scam calls more convincing than ever, with up to 70% accuracy in cloning voices. Scammers often exploit a sense of urgency and fear to elicit information from their targets. In response, individuals should avoid picking up calls from unknown numbers, refrain from saying "yes," and confirm the legitimacy of calls directly with relevant organizations.

The Role of Reporting and Data Protection

Reporting suspected scammers to tech companies is vital for identifying and flagging problematic numbers quickly. Most phone apps offer reporting features, allowing users to block or report spam calls. Additionally, data breaches have contributed to the surge in fraudulent calls, making it essential for individuals to safeguard their personal information.

Google has taken steps to combat spam calls with AI-powered screening. The latest Call Screen, which utilizes improved AI, helps users receive 50% fewer spam calls on average. Google encourages countries to adopt the STIR/SHAKEN protocol to reduce spam calls effectively.

In the ongoing battle against phone scammers, individuals must remain vigilant, employ available defense strategies, and report suspicious activity to protect themselves and others from falling victim to these evolving scams.