Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

About Me

Showing posts with label Sensitive Information. Show all posts

Hackers Leak 8,500 Files from Lexipol, Exposing U.S. Police Training Manuals

 

An anonymous hacker group called the “puppygirl hacker polycule” recently made headlines by leaking over 8,500 files from Lexipol, a private company that provides training materials and policy manuals for police departments across the United States. 

As first reported by The Daily Dot, the data breach exposed internal documents, including thousands of police policies, emails, phone numbers, addresses, and other sensitive information about Lexipol employees. The hackers published the stolen data on Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoS), a nonprofit platform for leaked information. In a statement, the group said they targeted Lexipol because, in their view, there aren’t “enough hacks against the police,” so they took action themselves.  

Founded in 2003, Texas-based Lexipol LLC, also known for its online training platform PoliceOne, has become a significant force in police privatization. The company supplies policy manuals and training content to more than 20% of U.S. police departments, according to a 2022 Indiana Law Journal analysis. This widespread adoption has effectively shaped public policy, despite Lexipol being a private company. 

Critics have long raised concerns about Lexipol’s focus on minimizing legal liability for police departments rather than addressing issues like excessive force or racial profiling. The Intercept reported in 2020 that Lexipol’s training materials, used by the NYPD after the George Floyd protests, prioritized protecting departments from lawsuits rather than promoting accountability or reform. 

Additionally, Lexipol has actively opposed proposed changes to police use-of-force standards, favoring a more lenient “objectively reasonable” standard. The leaked documents revealed striking similarities in policy language across different police departments, with matching sections on use-of-force protocols and even identical “Code of Ethics” pages — some ending with a religious oath dedicating officers to their profession before God. 

Despite Lexipol’s intent to reduce legal risks for its clients, some police departments using its policies have faced legal consequences. In 2017, Culver City, CA, adopted a Lexipol manual that suggested detaining suspected undocumented immigrants based on “lack of English proficiency,” contradicting the city’s sanctuary status. Similarly, Spokane, WA, paid a $49,000 settlement in 2018 after police violated local immigration laws using Lexipol’s guidance. 

Although the puppygirl hacker polycule isn’t linked to previous major breaches, their tactics echo those of SiegedSec, a group known for hacking government sites and playfully demanding research into “IRL catgirls.” As political tensions rise, the hackers predict more “hacktivist” attacks, aiming to expose injustices and empower public awareness. The Lexipol breach serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in privatized law enforcement systems and the growing influence of cyberactivism.

Cyberattacks Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Government Systems

 



Cyberattacks are becoming as consequential a threat as physical insurgencies, targeting government systems and vital businesses with growing frequency. A ransomware attack on the Uttarakhand government on October 2, 2024, brought over 90 key state-run websites to a grinding halt, including important platforms such as the CM Helpline, Chardham registration portal, and land registry systems. This breach brought the state's entire IT infrastructure to a standstill, where attackers gained control of sensitive information and demanded ransom, thereby paralyzing all state operations. 


Extent of the Attack 

This attack compromised the central data center of the Uttarakhand government and compromised not only sensitive information regarding citizens and other important departments but also compromised the Chief Minister's office.

Though the government said on October 10 that no data had been lost, the incident highlighted glaringly the lack of preparedness in mitigating such threats. This incident also represents a trend, as India suffered 388 data breaches, 107 data leaks, and close to 5 billion cyberattacks in 2023. Such attack gravity was previously witnessed in 2022, when AIIMS Delhi remained closed for two weeks following a ransomware attack that crippled healthcare services. 


Scrutiny over Preparedness and Accountability

The question on the preparedness and accountability of Uttarakhand government in terms of cybersecurity has now been raised.

An initiative two years ago even assigned ITI Limited in Bengaluru to design a disaster recovery plan, which still did not come into existence.

Experts are now wondering why this state did not have the basic cybersecurity protocols in place such as data backup systems and security audits that would have minimized damage, and that there is still no dedicated cybersecurity task force or enough technical experts within the Information Technology Development Agency (ITDA). 


Urgency for Policy Overhauls


The attack puts a primer on the need for overhaul in Uttarakhand and, by extension, other states across the nation. It calls for hiring subject matter experts, carrying regular audits, and placing cybersecurity nodal officers in each department. A comprehensive program to train officials along with collabingotals with cybersecurity professionals is the need of the hour to structure an effective system for future assault. 


Learning from the Crisis  

What has been called Uttarakhand's "Cyber Security Cloud Burst," this is a wake-up call. Rather than waiting for the restoration of the state's infrastructure, by putting in place stringent protocols and opening channels for frank dialogues with cybersecurity experts, steps can be taken to create precedence for other states as well. Cybersecurity cannot and should not be considered something to be done on the back burner but something integral to governance.



DNA Testing Firm Atlas Biomed Vanishes, Leaving Customers in the Dark About Sensitive Data

A prominent DNA-testing company, Atlas Biomed, appears to have ceased operations without informing customers about the fate of their sensitive genetic data. The London-based firm previously offered insights into genetic profiles and predispositions to illnesses, but users can no longer access their online reports. Efforts by the BBC to contact the company have gone unanswered.

Customers describe the situation as "very alarming," with one stating they are worried about the handling of their "most personal information." The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) confirmed it is investigating a complaint about the company. “People have the right to expect that organisations will handle their personal information securely and responsibly,” the ICO said.

Several customers shared troubling experiences. Lisa Topping, from Essex, paid £100 for her genetic report, which she accessed periodically online—until the site vanished. “I don’t know how comfortable I feel that they have just disappeared,” she said.

Another customer, Kate Lake from Kent, paid £139 in 2023 for a report that was never delivered. Despite being promised a refund, the company went silent. “What happens now to that information they have got? I would like to hear some answers,” she said.

Attempts to reach Atlas Biomed have been fruitless. Phone lines are inactive, its London office is vacant, and social media accounts have been dormant since mid-2023.

The firm is still registered as active with Companies House but has not filed accounts since December 2022. Four officers have resigned, and two current officers share a Moscow address with a Russian billionaire who is a former director. Cybersecurity expert Prof. Alan Woodward called the Russian links “odd,” stating, “If people knew the provenance of this company and how it operates, they might not trust them with their DNA.”

Experts highlight the risks associated with DNA testing. Prof. Carissa Veliz, author of Privacy is Power, warned, “DNA is uniquely yours; you can’t change it. When you give your data to a company, you are completely at their mercy.”

Although no evidence of misuse has been found, concerns remain over what has become of the company’s DNA database. Prof. Veliz emphasized, “We shouldn’t have to wait until something happens.”

The Evolution of Phishing Emails: From Simple Scams to Sophisticated Cyber Threats

 

Phishing emails have undergone significant changes over the past few decades. Once simple and easy to detect, these scams have now evolved into a sophisticated cyber threat, targeting even the most tech-savvy individuals and organizations. Understanding the development of phishing attacks is key to protecting yourself from these ever-evolving cyber dangers.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, phishing emails were quite basic and easily identifiable. One of the most well-known scams was the "Nigerian Prince" email. These messages claimed to be from foreign royalty or officials, offering large sums of money in return for a small processing fee. The common signs included poor language, unrealistic promises, and large financial rewards—elements that eventually made these scams easy for users to recognize and dismiss.

As people became aware of these early scams, phishing attacks shifted focus, aiming to steal sensitive financial information. By the mid-2000s, attackers began impersonating banks and financial institutions in their emails. These messages often used fear-inducing language, such as warnings of account breaches, to pressure recipients into handing over personal details like login credentials and credit card information. During this time, phishing attempts were still marked by clear warning signs: poorly written emails, generic greetings, and inaccurate logos. However, as technology advanced, so did the attackers' ability to produce more convincing content.

The evolution of phishing took a major step forward with the introduction of spear phishing. Unlike traditional phishing, which targets a broad audience, spear phishing focuses on specific individuals or companies. Attackers gather personal information through social media and public records to craft emails that appear highly legitimate, often addressing the victim by name and referencing workplace details. This tailored approach makes the scam more believable and increases the chances of success.

Phishing emails today have become highly sophisticated, utilizing advanced techniques such as email spoofing to mimic trusted sources. Attackers frequently impersonate colleagues, supervisors, or official entities, making it difficult for users to tell the difference between genuine and malicious messages. Modern phishing schemes often rely on psychological tactics, using fear or urgency to pressure recipients into clicking harmful links or downloading malware. This evolution reflects the growing complexity of cybercriminal activities, demanding greater awareness and stronger cybersecurity defenses.

In summary, phishing emails have evolved from basic scams to intricate, personalized attacks that are harder to detect. Being informed about these tactics and staying vigilant is critical in the digital age. If you're ever in doubt about an email’s legitimacy, contact your Information Security Team for verification.

New Version of Snake Keylogger Targets Victims Through Phishing Emails


Researchers at Fortinet's FortiGuard Labs have uncovered a newly evolved variant of the Snake Keylogger, a type of malicious software notorious for capturing and recording everything a user types. Keyloggers are often used by cybercriminals to steal personal information, such as passwords, credit card numbers, and other sensitive data. This new variant of Snake Keylogger, also known as “404 Keylogger” or “KrakenKeylogger,” is being distributed through phishing campaigns and has been upgraded to exploit specific vulnerabilities, making it even more dangerous.

The attack is initiated by a deceptive phishing email that pretends to be a notification about a financial transaction. FortiGuard Labs’ security systems identified the email, which was flagged with the subject line “[virus detected],” and it contains an attached Excel file named “swift copy.xls.” Although the file may appear harmless, opening it sets off a chain reaction that ultimately leads to the installation of the Snake Keylogger on the recipient's computer.

The Excel file attached to the phishing email is no ordinary spreadsheet—it has been specially crafted to take advantage of a known security vulnerability, CVE-2017-0199. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute code remotely by embedding a malicious link within the file. When the victim opens the document, this hidden link discreetly connects to a remote server, which then delivers a secondary malicious file in the form of an HTA (HTML Application) file. This file, containing obfuscated JavaScript, is executed automatically by the Windows operating system, setting the stage for further malicious actions.

The HTA file is programmed to run a VBScript that initiates the download and execution of a final payload—a malicious executable named “sahost.exe”—from a remote server. This payload, known as the Loader module, is designed with multiple layers of encryption and obfuscation, making it difficult for antivirus software to detect or analyse. Once executed, the Loader module unpacks additional encrypted components, including the main module of the Snake Keylogger, which is hidden within an encrypted Bitmap resource.

The Loader module not only delivers the Snake Keylogger but also ensures that it remains undetected and continues operating on the infected system. It accomplishes this by decrypting and loading several key components into the computer's memory, where they can execute without being noticed. Among these components is a critical module called “Tyrone.dll,” which plays a crucial role in the keylogger’s ability to persist on the victim's system. This persistence is maintained through a scheduled task that launches the keylogger whenever the computer is started.

Once installed, the Snake Keylogger operates stealthily, capturing everything the user types and taking screenshots of their activities. It targets a wide range of applications, including web browsers, email clients, and messaging software, and is capable of extracting saved credentials and other sensitive information from these programs. To avoid detection, the keylogger uses a technique called process hollowing, which involves injecting malicious code into a legitimate process, allowing it to operate without raising alarms.

One of the most concerning features of this keylogger is its ability to send the stolen data directly to the attacker via email. The keylogger uses SMTP to transmit the victim’s credentials and other sensitive information in real-time, enabling the attacker to quickly exploit the data or commit financial theft. Additionally, FortiGuard Labs discovered that this variant of Snake Keylogger employs sophisticated anti-analysis techniques. For example, it can detect if it is being run in a security research environment, in which case it refrains from sending the stolen data, making it harder for researchers to analyse the malware.

To protect against these types of threats, FortiGuard Labs advises caution when it comes to emails from unknown sources, especially those with attachments. It's imperative to keep all software up-to-date and utilise robust security solutions to prevent such attacks. By staying informed and vigilant, individuals and organizations can better protect themselves from this and other emerging cyber threats.




Florida Medical Lab Data Breach Exposes 300,000 Individuals’ Sensitive Information

 

Florida-based medical laboratory, American Clinical Solutions (ACS), recently experienced a significant data breach that exposed the sensitive information of approximately 300,000 individuals. The hacking incident, attributed to the criminal group RansomHub, resulted in the theft of 700 gigabytes of data, which has since been published on the dark web. The exposed data includes Social Security numbers, addresses, drug test results, medical records, insurance information, and other highly sensitive personal details. 

ACS specializes in patient testing for both prescription and illicit narcotics, offering its services to healthcare providers. On July 24, ACS reported the breach to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights. The stolen data encompasses lab testing results from January 2016 until May 2024, the period during which the hacking incident allegedly occurred. Privacy attorney David Holtzman, from the consulting firm HITprivacy LLC, expressed concerns over the nature of the exposed information, highlighting the potential for reputational harm, financial compromise, and extortion due to the sensitivity of drug testing data. 

Despite the severity of the breach, ACS has not yet issued a public statement about the incident on its website, nor has it responded to requests for further details. This lack of communication has raised concerns among legal and regulatory experts, who warn that failing to alert patients about the breach may compound the potential harm. Holtzman emphasized the importance of transparency in such situations, suggesting that the absence of a breach notification may prompt investigations by HHS or state attorneys general to determine whether ACS has complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and other relevant state laws. 

The delay in notifying affected individuals may stem from various factors, including the possibility that law enforcement advised ACS to wait or that the total number of impacted individuals has not yet been determined. Regulatory attorney Rachel Rose pointed out that drug testing data, while not subject to the stringent federal 42 CFR Part 2 privacy regulations that govern substance disorder treatment facilities, is still considered highly sensitive. Rose compared the compromised information to reproductive health records, mental health records, and data related to diseases like AIDS. 

RansomHub, the group behind the attack, has rapidly gained notoriety within the cybersecurity community since its emergence in February. The gang has claimed responsibility for several major hacks across the healthcare sector, including a June attack on the drugstore chain Rite Aid, which compromised the data of 2.2 million individuals. Security firm Rapid7 recently identified RansomHub as one of the most notable new ransomware groups, underscoring the growing threat it poses to organizations worldwide.

Shell Data Breach: Hacker Group 888 Claims Responsibility

 



A hacker group known as 888 has claimed responsibility for a data breach targeting Shell, the British multinational oil and gas company. The breach, allegedly impacting around 80,000 individuals across multiple countries, has raised significant concerns about data security within the organisation.

The compromised data includes sensitive information such as shopper codes, names, email addresses, mobile numbers, postcodes, site addresses, and transaction details. This information reportedly pertains to Australian users, specifically linked to transactions at Reddy Express (formerly Coles Express) locations in Australia. The hacker, using the pseudonym Kingpin, shared samples of the data on a popular hacking forum, indicating that the breach occurred in May 2024.

The breach affects individuals in several countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, France, India, Singapore, the Philippines, the Netherlands, Malaysia, and Canada. The extensive range of affected regions stresses upon the potential severity and widespread implications of the breach for Shell’s customers and stakeholders.

At present, there has been no official statement from Shell confirming the breach. The Cyber Express reached out to Shell for verification, but no response has been received. This lack of confirmation leaves the authenticity of the claims uncertain, though the potential risks to those involved are considerable.


This is not the first time Shell has faced cyberattacks. In the past, the company experienced a ransomware attack and a security incident involving Accellion’s File Transfer Appliance. These past events highlight the persistent threat cybercriminals pose to the energy sector.


In response to previous incidents, Shell emphasised its commitment to cybersecurity and data privacy. The company has initiated investigations into the recent claims and is working to address any potential risks. Shell has also engaged with relevant regulators and authorities to ensure compliance with data protection regulations and to mitigate the impact of any breaches.


The situation is still unfolding, and The Cyber Express continues to monitor the developments closely. 


The alleged Shell data breach by hacker group 888 serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities that even large multinational corporations face in the digital age. As investigations continue, the importance of robust cybersecurity measures and vigilant monitoring cannot be overstated.


Moroccan Cybercrime Group Storm-0539 Exploits Gift Card Systems with Advanced Phishing Attacks

 

A Morocco-based cybercrime group, Storm-0539, is making headlines for its sophisticated email and SMS phishing attacks aimed at stealing and reselling gift cards. Microsoft's latest Cyber Signals report reveals that this group is responsible for significant financial theft, with some companies losing up to $100,000 daily. 

First identified by Microsoft in December 2023, Storm-0539, also known as Atlas Lion, has been active since late 2021. The group employs social engineering techniques to harvest victims' credentials through adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) phishing pages. They exploit this access to register their own devices, bypass authentication, and maintain persistent access to create fraudulent gift cards. 

The group's attack strategy includes gaining covert access to cloud environments for extensive reconnaissance, targeting large retailers, luxury brands, and fast-food chains. They aim to redeem and sell gift cards on black markets or use money mules to cash out. This marks an evolution from their previous tactics of stealing payment card data via malware on point-of-sale (PoS) devices. 

Microsoft noted a 30% increase in Storm-0539's activities between March and May 2024, emphasizing their deep understanding of cloud systems to manipulate gift card issuance processes. In addition to stealing login credentials, Storm-0539 targets secure shell (SSH) passwords and keys, which are either sold or used for further attacks. The group uses internal company mailing lists to send phishing emails, enhancing their credibility and sets up new phishing websites by exploiting free trial or student accounts on cloud platforms. 

The FBI has warned about Storm-0539's smishing attacks on retail gift card departments, using sophisticated phishing kits to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA). The group's ability to adapt and pivot tactics after detection underscores their persistence and resourcefulness. Microsoft urges companies to monitor gift card portals closely and implement conditional access policies to strengthen security. They highlight the effectiveness of using additional identity-driven signals, such as IP address and device status, alongside MFA. 

Meanwhile, Enea researchers have identified broader criminal campaigns exploiting cloud storage services like Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage for SMS-based gift card scams. These scams use legitimate-looking URLs to bypass firewalls and redirect users to malicious websites that steal sensitive information. 

Storm-0539's operations exemplify the increasing sophistication of financially motivated cybercriminals, borrowing techniques from state-sponsored actors to remain undetected. As these threats evolve, robust cybersecurity measures and vigilant monitoring are crucial to protect sensitive information and financial assets.