Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Showing posts with label Subscription. Show all posts

Facebook Tests Paid Access for Sharing Multiple Links

 



Facebook is testing a new policy that places restrictions on how many external links certain users can include in their posts. The change, which is currently being trialled on a limited basis, introduces a monthly cap on link sharing unless users pay for a subscription.

Some users in the United Kingdom and the United States have received in-app notifications informing them that they will only be allowed to share a small number of links in Facebook posts without payment. To continue sharing links beyond that limit, users are offered a subscription priced at £9.99 per month.

Meta, the company that owns Facebook, has confirmed the test and described it as limited in scope. According to the company, the purpose is to assess whether the option to post a higher volume of link-based content provides additional value to users who choose to subscribe.

Industry observers say the experiment reflects Meta’s broader effort to generate revenue from more areas of its platforms. Social media analyst Matt Navarra said the move signals a shift toward monetising essential platform functions rather than optional extras.

He explained that the test is not primarily about identity verification. Instead, it places practical features that users rely on for visibility and reach behind a paid tier. In his view, Meta is now charging for what he describes as “survival features” rather than premium add-ons.

Meta already offers a paid service called Meta Verified, which provides subscribers on Facebook and Instagram with a blue verification badge, enhanced account support, and safeguards against impersonation. Navarra said that after attaching a price to these services, Meta now appears to be applying a similar approach to content distribution itself.

He noted that this includes the basic ability to direct users away from Facebook to external websites, a function that creators and businesses depend on to grow audiences, drive traffic, and promote services.

Navarra was among those who received a notification about the test. He said he was informed that from 16 December onward, he would only be able to include two links per month in Facebook posts unless he subscribed.

For creators and businesses, he said the message is clear. If Facebook plays a role in their audience growth or traffic strategy, that access may now require payment. He added that while platforms have been moving in this direction for some time, the policy makes it explicit.

The test comes as social media platforms increasingly encourage users to verify their accounts in exchange for added features or improved engagement. Platforms such as LinkedIn have also adopted similar models.

After acquiring Twitter in 2022, Elon Musk restructured the platform’s verification system, now known as X. Blue verification badges were made available only to paying users, who also received increased visibility in replies and recommendation feeds.

That approach proved controversial and resulted in regulatory scrutiny, including a fine imposed by European authorities in December. Despite the criticism, Meta later introduced a comparable paid verification model.

Meta has also announced plans to introduce a “community notes” system, similar to X, allowing users to flag potentially misleading posts. This follows reductions in traditional moderation and third-party fact-checking efforts.

According to Meta, the link-sharing test applies only to a selected group of users who operate Pages or use Facebook’s professional mode. These tools are widely used by creators and businesses to publish content and analyse audience engagement.

Navarra said the test highlights a difficult reality for creators. He argued that Facebook is becoming less reliable as a source of external traffic and is increasingly steering users away from treating the platform as a traffic engine.

He added that the experiment reinforces a long-standing pattern. Meta, he said, ultimately designs its systems to serve its own priorities first.

According to analysts, tests like this underline the risks of building a business that depends too heavily on a single platform. Changes to access, visibility, or pricing can occur with little warning, leaving creators and businesses vulnerable.

Meta has emphasized  that the policy remains a trial. However, the experiment illustrates how social media companies continue to reassess which core functions remain free and which are moving behind paywalls.

Fixed VoIP Numbers: Major Benefits and Disadvantages for Businesses

 





One other consideration a business would use to evaluate communications solutions would be the choice between a fixed VoIP number and non-fixed VoIP number. The former costs more money and is associated with complexities in the setting up process. It still possesses some benefits that an organisation needs to operate, however.

Advantages of Fixed VoIP Number


1. Trustworthiness

Tied to a physical address, the fixed VoIP number adds more credence to the business. As compared to the non-fixed VoIP numbers mainly targeted by scammers, fixed numbers are useful in the promotion of greater customer checks on the authenticity of the company, especially for those firms handling regulated sectors like finance, wherein building trust with customers can be very hard.


2. Security 

Fixed VoIP numbers guarantee security because they connect directly to a registered address. Non-fixed numbers are accessed from any internet connection; therefore, the chance of being misused rises. When dealing with sensitive information companies, the fixed VoIP number extra layer security is an added guarantee against such attacks as data breaches.


3. Easier Compliance with Regulations

As in other heavily regulated industries, including finance and healthcare, emergency response also relies on location data accuracy. Fixed VoIP numbers help businesses easily comply with all the requirements, making the cost of compliance low and administrative burdens low.


4. Business Professional Image

With a fixed VoIP number, it is easier to present a stable and established impression. A fixed number helps companies look less like a temporary operation. This can be particularly important for small businesses looking to establish authority and trust in their market.


5. Greater Control for Administrators

Fixed VoIP numbers can guarantee better control over caller IDs and databases over caller names to enable businesses to ensure that their identity is consistent on all calls. The need for maintaining a professional brand image and having precise control over how the business presents itself to clients and partners is very important.


6. Support for Emergency Services

Exact location is a must-have in emergencies. Fixed VoIP numbers provide accurate location information, and this makes it possible to have a quicker response time in cases of crises. This is missing for non-fixed numbers; therefore, fixed VoIP is very useful for industries whose data on location can be termed as a matter of life or death.


Drawbacks of Fixed VoIP Numbers


1. More Costly

Fixed VoIP numbers also require relatively high setup and subscription fees in addition to the expense of address verification for higher-security access. For companies catering to overseas clients, fixed VoIP numbers frequently translate to costlier long-distance calls-however, non-fixed numbers represent a saving grace.


2. Complex Porting Procedure

The transfer of a fixed VoIP number from one place to another can be quite hectic, especially for growing businesses and those changing locations. This is because the porting process is very slow, leaving behind the inflexibility required by the businesses in such cases.


3. Slower Setup

It takes more time to set up a fixed VoIP number as against the prompt setting up for non-fixed numbers. Verification of the physical address and more regulatory compliance requirements extend the time taken to set up, making it inconvenient for businesses that need to access immediately.


4. Geographic Limitations

The fixed VoIP numbers are directly associated with a specific location, hence quite limiting to access the business market. Some clients might be sceptical about communicating with a company that they view as "not local," which may hinder outreach and expansion in areas beyond the business's core location.


Selection Between Fixed and Non-Fixed VoIP Numbers


Depending on the priorities of the business, a fixed VoIP number can be selected. Organisations that require greater security, credibility, and adherence to regulations can invest in fixed VoIP numbers. When cost efficiency and flexibility top the list, then non-fixed numbers are a better option for them.


Over 50% of Twitter Staff are Sacked by Elon Musk


Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter, defended the decision on Saturday, claiming that there was 'no choice because the firm was losing millions of dollars daily. This comes amid a wave of widespread layoffs at Twitter around the world, including in India, and the outrage that followed.

Elon Musk made the decision to fire over 50% of the Twitter workers. After overnight limiting access to the company's headquarters and internal systems, employees were notified by email of their employment status.

To announce their departure, employees are tweeting using the hashtag #LoveWhereYouWorked and a saluting emoji. Elon justified the choice by claiming that the business was losing $4 million daily. Three months' worth of severance pay was provided to everyone who lost their jobs.

In contrast to a profit of $66 million during the same period last year, the corporation reported a net loss of $270 million for the second quarter that concluded on June 30, 2022. There are rumors that up to half of Twitter's 8,000 jobs could be eliminated. The website has trouble turning a profit. Making a dent in the salary cost is one method to solve the issue.

Simon Balmain, a senior community manager for Twitter in the UK, said that he had been signed out of both his work laptop and the Slack chat app, leading him to fear that he had been fired.

After already terminating some employees, several Twitter employees on Thursday night filed a class action complaint, according to CNN, alleging that Twitter violated the federal and California Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act).

According to the WARN Act, if a mass layoff "affects 50 or more employees at a single site of employment," the employer has to give 60 days written notice in advance. Additionally, Twitter has let go of the majority of its over 200 Indian staff. According to sources, the engineering, sales and marketing, and communications teams will all be affected".

Following Elon Musk's takeover of the social media company, Twitter founder Jack Dorsey finally spoke out about the widespread layoffs. He stated, " I realize many are angry with me. I own the responsibility for why everyone is in this situation: I grew the company size too quickly. I apologise for that.”

The cost-cutting comes in response to criticism of Twitter's efforts to collect money by putting up a proposal to charge $8 (£7) per month for a blue check-mark that says, "Verified."Those that pay could receive more promotion for their tweets and see fewer advertisements in addition to the verification badge.

Since a few years prior, Twitter has not turned a profit, and its monthly user base of around 300 million people has remained broadly stable. Experts cautioned that Twitter's ability to battle misinformation may be impacted by the dismissal of half of its workers, particularly with the US midterm elections set for next week.





Netflix Password-Sharing Crackdown will Roll Out Worldwide Early Next Year

 

After the fall in subscriber base in the first two quarters of this year, popular streaming platform Netflix will now charge an extra fee from users for sharing their passwords starting early next year. 

After allowing customers to transfer their profiles to new accounts, the streamer says it will start letting users create sub-accounts in line with its plans to “monetize account sharing” more widely. 

The streaming giant confirmed it will roll out the $6.99 / month ad-supported tier, called Basic, on November 3rd in the US, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Spain, and the UK. However, the company did not reveal how much subscribers will be charged for sharing their passwords with other users in India. 

Before implementing the password-sharing fee system, Netflix tested the scheme in Chile, Costa Rica, and Peru for about six months. This test established an account's primary residence as the "home" for the membership. 

If the service spotted streaming at any additional households for more than two weeks, it asked the user to set up a new account and pay for additional "homes". The company estimates more than 100 million people are currently using another household’s account worldwide. 

Subscription loss

Earlier this year in July, Netflix reported losing subscribers for the first time in over 10 years, with the firm’s subscriber count dipping by another 1.3 million in the US and Canada and 1 million worldwide last quarter. 

The company witnessed the highest growth when the pandemic hit in 2020 and people, stuck at home with limited option entertainment, flocked to monster hits like Squid game, and The Crown. It also pushed nearly all of Hollywood's significant media firms including Disney Plus, HBO Max, Peacock, Paramount Plus, and Apple TV Plus to pour billions of dollars into their streaming operations. 

But as the situation normalized, Netflix struggled to attract new subscribers and maintain the loyalty of existing members, especially as there were multiple streaming options and also the rising cost of living led to people cutting back. Now, feeling the heat of intensifying competition to hold onto the subscribers' attention, Netflix is pursuing strategies it had dismissed for years.