Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Threat Intelligence. Show all posts
Threat Intelligence
AI Phishing Threats Cyber Awareness Cybercrime Prevention cybersecurity trends Data protection Digital Deception email security Online Safety Technology Threat Intelligence

AI Tools Make Phishing Attacks Harder to Detect, Survey Warns


 

Despite the ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats, the phishing method remains the leading avenue for data breaches in the years to come. However, in 2025, the phishing method has undergone a dangerous transformation. 

What used to be a crude attempt to deceive has now evolved into an extremely sophisticated operation backed by artificial intelligence, transforming once into an espionage. Traditionally, malicious actors are using poorly worded, grammatically incorrect, and inaccurate messages to spread their malicious messages; now, however, they are deploying systems based on generative AI, such as GPT-4 and its successors, to craft emails that are eerily authentic, contextually aware, and meticulously tailored to each target.

Cybercriminals are increasingly using artificial intelligence to orchestrate highly targeted phishing campaigns, creating communications that look like legitimate correspondence with near-perfect precision, which has been sounded alarming by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation. According to FBI Special Agent Robert Tripp, these tactics can result in a devastating financial loss, a damaged reputation, or even a compromise of sensitive data. 

By the end of 2024, the rise of artificial intelligence-driven phishing had become no longer just another subtle trend, but a real reality that no one could deny. According to cybersecurity analysts, phishing activity has increased by 1,265 percent over the last three years, as a direct result of the adoption of generative AI tools. In their view, traditional email filters and security protocols, which were once effective against conventional scams, are increasingly being outmanoeuvred by AI-enhanced deceptions. 

Artificial intelligence-generated phishing has been elevated to become the most dominant email-borne threat of 2025, eclipsing even ransomware and insider risks because of its sophistication and scale. There is no doubt that organisations throughout the world are facing a fundamental change in how digital defence works, which means that complacency is not an option. 

Artificial intelligence has fundamentally altered the anatomy of phishing, transforming it from a scattershot strategy to an alarmingly precise and comprehensive threat. According to experts, adversaries now exploit artificial intelligence to amplify their scale, sophistication, and success rates by utilising AI, rather than just automating attacks.

As AI has enabled criminals to create messages that mimic human tone, context, and intent, the line between legitimate communication and deception is increasingly blurred. The cybersecurity analyst emphasises that to survive in this evolving world, security teams and decision-makers need to maintain constant vigilance, urging them to include AI-awareness in workforce training and defensive strategies. This new threat is manifested in the increased frequency of polymorphic phishing attacks. It is becoming increasingly difficult for users to detect phishing emails due to their enhanced AI automation capabilities. 

By automating the process of creating phishing emails, attackers are able to generate thousands of variants, each with slight changes to the subject line, sender details, or message structure. In the year 2024, according to recent research, 76 per cent of phishing attacks had at least one polymorphic trait, and more than half of them originated from compromised accounts, and about a quarter relied on fraudulent domains. 

Acanto alters URLs in real time and resends modified messages in real time if initial attempts fail to stimulate engagement, making such attacks even more complicated. AI-enhanced schemes can be extremely adaptable, which makes traditional security filters and static defences insufficient when they are compared to these schemes. Thus, organisations must evolve their security countermeasures to keep up with this rapidly evolving threat landscape. 

An alarming reality has been revealed in a recent global survey: the majority of individuals are still having difficulty distinguishing between phishing attempts generated by artificial intelligence and genuine messages.

According to a study by the Centre for Human Development, only 46 per cent of respondents correctly recognised a simulated phishing email crafted by artificial intelligence. The remaining 54 per cent either assumed it was real or acknowledged uncertainty about it, emphasising the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in impersonating legitimate communications now. 

Several age groups showed relatively consistent levels of awareness, with Gen Z (45%), millennials (47%), Generation X (46%) and baby boomers (46%) performing almost identically. In this era of artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced social engineering, it is crucial to note that no generation is more susceptible to being deceived than the others. 

While most of the participants acknowledged that artificial intelligence has become a tool for deceiving users online, the study demonstrated that awareness is not enough to prevent compromise, since the study found that awareness alone cannot prevent compromise. The same group was presented with a legitimate, human-written corporate email, and only 30 per cent of them correctly identified it as authentic. This is a sign that digital trust is slipping and that people are relying on instinct rather than factual evidence. 

The study was conducted by Talker Research as part of the Global State of Authentication Survey for Yubico, conducted on behalf of Yubico. During Cybersecurity Awareness Month this October, Talker Research collected insights from users throughout the U.S., the U.K., Australia, India, Japan, Singapore, France, Germany, and Sweden in order to gather insights from users across those regions. 

As a result of the findings, it is clear that users are vulnerable to increasingly artificial intelligence-driven threats. A survey conducted by the National Institute for Health found that nearly four in ten people (44%) had interacted with phishing messages within the past year by clicking links or opening attachments, and 1 per cent had done so within the past week. 

The younger generations seem to be more susceptible to phishing content, with Gen Z (62%) and millennials (51%) reporting significantly higher levels of engagement than the Gen X generation (33%) or the baby boom generation (23%). It continues to be email that is the most prevalent attack vector, accounting for 51 per cent of incidents, followed by text messages (27%) and social media messages (20%). 

There was a lot of discussion as to why people fell victim to these messages, with many citing their convincing nature and their similarities to genuine corporate correspondence, demonstrating that even the most technologically advanced individuals struggle to keep up with the sophistication of artificial intelligence-driven deception.

Although AI-driven scams are becoming increasingly sophisticated, cybersecurity experts point out that families do not have to give up on protecting themselves. It is important to take some simple, proactive actions to prevent risk from occurring. Experts advise that if any unexpected or alarming messages are received, you should pause before responding and verify the source by calling back from a trusted number, rather than the number you receive in the communication. 

Family "safe words" can also help confirm authenticity during times of emergency and help prevent emotional manipulation when needed. In addition, individuals can be more aware of red flags, such as urgent demands for action, pressure to share personal information, or inconsistencies in tone and detail, in order to identify deception better. 

Additionally, businesses must be aware of emerging threats like deepfakes, which are often indicated by subtle signs like mismatched audio, unnatural facial movements, or inconsistent visual details. Technology can play a crucial role in ensuring that digital security is well-maintained as well as fortified. 

It is a fact that Bitdefender offers a comprehensive approach to family protection by detecting and blocking fraudulent content before it gets to users by using a multi-layered security suite. Through email scam detection, malicious link filtering, and artificial intelligence-driven tools like Bitdefender Scamio and Link Checker, the platform is able to protect users across a broad range of channels, all of which are used by scammers. 

It is for mobile users, especially users of Android phones, that Bitdefender has integrated a number of call-blocking features within its application. These capabilities provide an additional layer of defence against attacks such as robocalls and impersonation schemes, which are frequently used by fraudsters targeting American homes. 

In Bitdefender's family plans, users have the chance to secure all their devices under a unified umbrella, combining privacy, identity monitoring, and scam prevention into a seamless, easily manageable solution in a seamless manner. As people move into an era where digital deception has become increasingly human-like, effective security is about much more than just blocking malware. 

It's about preserving trust across all interactions, no matter what. In the future, as artificial intelligence continues to influence phishing, it will become increasingly difficult for people to distinguish between the deception of phishing and its own authenticity of the phishing, which will require a shift from reactive defence to proactive digital resilience. 

The experts stress that not only advanced technology, but also a culture of continuous awareness, is needed to fight AI-driven social engineering. Employees need to be educated regularly about security issues that mirror real-world situations, so they can become more aware of potential phishing attacks before they click on them. As well, individuals should utilise multi-factor authentication, password managers and verified communication channels to safeguard both personal and professional information. 

On a broader level, government, cybersecurity vendors, and digital platforms must collaborate in order to create a shared framework that allows them to identify and report AI-enhanced scams as soon as they occur in order to prevent them from spreading.

Even though AI has certainly enhanced the arsenal of cybercriminals, it has also demonstrated the ability of AI to strengthen defence systems—such as adaptive threat intelligence, behavioural analytics, and automated response systems—as well. People must remain vigilant, educated, and innovative in this new digital battleground. 

There is no doubt that the challenge people face is to seize the potential of AI not to deceive people, but to protect them instead-and to leverage the power of digital trust to make our security systems of tomorrow even more powerful.
Read more »
zero Day vulnerability
Cyber Security Firewall Scanning GlobalProtect GreyNoise Network Security Palo Alto Networks PAN OS Threat Intelligence zero Day vulnerability

Spike in Login Portal Scans Puts Palo Alto Networks on Alert


 

The Palo Alto Networks login portals have seen a dramatic surge in suspicious scanning activity over the past month, a development that has caught the attention of the cybersecurity community. Evidence suggests that threat actors are trying to coordinate reconnaissance efforts aimed at the Palo Alto Networks login portals. 

A new report from cybersecurity intelligence firm GreyNoise revealed that Palo Alto Networks' GlobalProtect and PAN-OS interfaces saw an increase in scanning volumes of over 500%, which marks a sharp departure from the usual pattern for such scanning. In the last week of October, the firm recorded more than 1,285 unique IP addresses attempting to probe these systems - a sharp rise from the typical daily average of fewer than 200 that occurs on a regular basis. 

Approximately 80% of this activity was attributed to IP addresses in the United States, with additional clusters originating from IP addresses in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Canada, and Russia. Moreover, separate TLS fingerprints indicated that there were organised scanning clusters that were heavily oriented towards United States targets as well as Pakistani targets. 

A GreyNoise analyst classifies 91% of the observed IP addresses as suspicious, while the remaining 7% are suspected to be malicious, indicating this may represent an early phase of targeted reconnaissance or exploitation attempts against Palo Alto Networks' infrastructure that is widely deployed. 

A GreyNoise analysis revealed that a large portion of the scanning traffic originated from U.S. IP addresses, with smaller but noteworthy clusters originating from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Canada, and Russia, indicating the traffic originated primarily from the United States. Using TLS fingerprints, research identified distinct activity clusters – targeting foand cusing o and focusing on Pakistani systems, focusing, overlapping fingerprints, suggesting infrastructure or coordination. 

Ninety per cent of the IP addresses involved in the campaign were deemed suspicious, while another seven per cent were flagged as malicious by the firm. It has been observed that most scanning activity has been directed towards emulated Palo Alto Networks profiles, including GlobalProtect and PAN-OS, indicating that the probes were likely to be intentional and are the product of open-source scanning tools or attackers who are conducting reconnaissance efforts to identify vulnerable Palo Alto devices. 

According to GreyNoise, heightened scanning activity can often be detected before zero-day or zero-n-day vulnerabilities are exploited, acting as a warning to potential offensive operations well in advance. A similar pattern was observed earlier this year, as a spike in Cisco ASA scans followed shortly thereafter by the disclosure and exploitation of a critical zero-day vulnerability in that product line, which was a warning of potential offensive operations. 

Although the timing and scale of the current Palo Alto scans are cause for concern, researchers have clarified that the available evidence suggests a weak correlation with any known or emerging exploit activity at this point in the Palo Alto network ecosystem. Palo Alto Networks' GlobalProtect platform is the core of its next-generation firewall ecosystem, allowing organisations to implement consistent policies for threat prevention and security across remote endpoints, regardless of whether or not the endpoints are connected to a virtual network. 

GlobalProtect portals are critical management tools that enable administrators to customize VPN settings, distribute security agents, and oversee endpoint connectivity within enterprise networks by allowing them to configure VPN settings, distribute security agents, and manage endpoint connectivity. Due to its function and visibility on the Internet, the portal is considered a high-value target for attackers looking to access sensitive data. 

According to experts, firewalls, VPNs, and other edge-facing technologies are among the most attractive security tools for attackers because they act as gateways between internal corporate environments and the open internet as a whole. These systems, by necessity, are available online to support remote operations, but are inadvertently exposing themselves to extensive reconnaissance and scanning efforts as a result. 

A few weeks earlier, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released a warning indicating that Palo Alto Networks would be actively exploited if it were to exploit a zero-day authentication bypass vulnerability in the company's PAN-OS software. This has increased Palo Alto Networks' appeal to cyber adversaries. As with other cyber threats, similar trends have been observed across the entire industry. 

For example, Cisco Talos disclosed last year that two zero-day flaws in Cisco firewall appliances were exploited by a state-backed threat actor to conduct an espionage campaign coordinated with Cisco. These risks highlight the persistence of the threats vendors are facing when it comes to edge security infrastructure vendors.

Among experts in the field of cybersecurity, it is very important to recognise that recent spikes in scanning activity targeting Palo Alto Networks' PAN-OS GlobalProtect gateways highlight a long-standing principle of cybersecurity: there is always a vulnerability in software. According to Boris Cipot, Senior Security Engineer at Black Duck, no matter how sophisticated a piece of software is, security vulnerabilities will inevitably arise at some point, whether due to programming oversight or the introduction of vulnerabilities by third-party open-source components. 

According to him, the real test is not whether a vulnerability exists but how swiftly the affected vendor releases a fix and how quickly the users apply the fix. The Palo Alto Networks spokesperson told me that while most Palo Alto Networks customers have probably patched their systems in response to recent advisories, attackers continue to hunt for devices that are not patched or poorly maintained, hoping that they can exploit those that are not well secured. 

Among Cipot's recommendations are to perform timely patching, follow vendor-recommended mitigations when patches are not available, and restrict management interfaces to trusted internal networks, which, he says, is also one of the most fundamental practices. 

The report also recommends that organisations use continuous log monitoring, conduct regular security audits, and analyse open-source components to identify vulnerabilities as early as possible in the lifecycle. A Salt Security director, Eric Schwake, who is responsible for cybersecurity strategy, expressed the concerns of these people by pointing out that the pattern of scans, which span nearly 24,000 unique IP addresses, demonstrates the persistence of threat actors in attempting to gain unauthorised access to data. 

While perimeter security, such as firewalls and VPNs, is still crucial, it should not be viewed as impenetrable, according to Schwake. As a result, he recommended organisations adopt a multi-layered security approach integrating API security governance, robust authentication mechanisms, and behavioural threat detection in order to detect abnormal login attempts as well as other malicious activities immediately in real time, as opposed to just relying on a single approach. 

Also, it was recommended that users be trained in user awareness, and multifactor authentication (MFA) should be enforced in order to reduce the risk of credential compromise and strengthen the overall cyber resilience of organisations. A GreyNoise security research team has noted unusual scanning activity directed at Palo Alto Networks’ PAN-OS GlobalProtect gateways for a number of years. 

In April 2025, the cybersecurity intelligence firm spotted another wave of suspicious login probes, resulting in Palo Alto Networks advising its customers to make sure that their systems are running the latest software versions and to apply all patches available to them. There are several patterns in GreyNoise’s Early Warning Signals report from July 2025 that support the company’s renewed warning. Among those patterns are large-scale spikes in malicious scanning, brute-force attempts, or exploit probing, which often follow a new CVE being disclosed within six weeks of the spike in those activities.

A similar pattern appeared to occur in early September 2025 when GreyNoise detected an increase in suspicious network scans targeting Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) devices - traced back to late August. A total of 25,100 IP addresses were involved in the initial wave, primarily located in Brazil, Argentina, and the United States, with most originating from Brazil. 

Researchers at Palo Alto Networks have discovered what appears to be an alarming rise in the number of scanning sessions available on the Internet targeting a critical flaw in the software Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect, identified as CVE-2024-3400. There is a high-severity vulnerability that affects one of the most widely deployed enterprise firewall solutions, allowing the creation of arbitrary files that can be weaponised in order to execute root privilege-based commands on the operating system.

By exploiting such vulnerabilities, attackers are able to gain complete control over affected devices, potentially resulting in the theft of sensitive data, the compromise of critical network functions, and even the disruption of critical network functions. In the last few weeks, analysts have noticed a significant increase in the probing attempts of this exploit, suggesting that threat actors have been actively incorporating it into their attack arsenals. 

The fact that GlobalProtect serves as a gateway to the internet in many corporate environments increases the risks associated with the flaw, which is remote and unauthenticated. A surge of malicious reconnaissance, according to analysts, could be the precursor to coordinated intrusion campaigns. This makes it imperative that organizations implement security patches as soon as possible, enforce access restrictions, and strengthen monitoring mechanisms across all perimeter defenses, as well as implement security patches as soon as possible.

Only weeks after the discovery of one of the exploitable zero-day vulnerabilities in its ASA products (CVE-2025-20333), Cisco confirmed that the other zero-day vulnerability in the same product (CVE-2025-2020362) was actively exploited, enabling advanced malware strains such as RayInitiator and LINE VIPER to be deployed in real-world attacks. 

In accordance with the data supplied by the Shadowserver Foundation, over 45,000 Cisco ASA and Firepower Threat Defence instances in the world, including more than 20,000 in the United States, remain susceptible to these vulnerabilities. It is evident that organisations reliant on perimeter security technologies face escalating threats and are faced with an ongoing challenge of timely patch adoption, as well as the escalating risks associated with them. 

This latest surge in scanning activity serves as yet another reminder that cyber threats are constantly evolving, and that is why maintaining vigilance, visibility, and velocity is so crucial in terms of defence against them. As reconnaissance efforts become more sophisticated and automated, organisations have to take more proactive steps - both in terms of integrating threat intelligence, continuously monitoring, and managing attack surfaces in order to remain effective. 

This cannot be done solely through vendor patches. It is imperative to combine endpoint hardening, strict access controls, timely updates, and intelligence anomaly detection based on behavioural analytics in order to strengthen network resilience today. It is also important for security teams to minimise the exposure of interfaces, and wherever possible, to shield them behind zero-trust architectures that validate every connection attempt with a zero-trust strategy. 

The use of regular penetration testing, as well as active participation in information-sharing communities, can make it much easier to detect early warning signs before adversaries gain traction. The attackers are ultimately playing the long game, as can be seen by the recurring campaigns against Palo Alto Networks and Cisco infrastructure – scanning for vulnerabilities, waiting for them to emerge, and then attacking when they become complacent. Defenders' edge lies, therefore, in staying informed, staying updated, and staying ahead of the curve: staying informed and staying updated.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
Cyber Attacks Division NATO Russia-Ukraine War Threat Intelligence

NATO Rift Widens Over Response to Russian Cyber Threats

 

NATO is confronting significant internal divisions on how to handle the intensifying wave of Russian cyberattacks, which expose rifts in alliance strategy and threaten the alliance’s coherence and overall deterrence posture. 

As Russia increasingly targets NATO states’ critical infrastructure, governmental functions, and even military networks, debate has raged within the alliance as to how forcefully to respond, and under what terms, to hostile state-sponsored cyber activities.

Deepening divisions 

A core challenge for NATO is divergent national approaches to what constitutes an act of cyber aggression warranting collective response. Some member states—particularly those along Russia’s borders in the Baltics, as well as Poland—are calling for robust measures, including invoking Article 4 (consultative action in response to threats), and even considering proportional offensive cyber operations against Russian state targets. 

These nations see repeated Russian provocations, from cyber to airspace incursions, as clear tests of alliance resolve that demand a stiff and highly visible response.

However, other countries, such as France and Germany, worry about the risks of escalation and advocate a more cautious, defensive posture, preferring extensive evidence gathering, attribution efforts, and diplomatic engagement before considering retaliatory action. 

They argue frequent consultations or aggressive stances could water down NATO’s deterrent signal or trigger dangerous unintended escalation. This split produces tactical uncertainty and delays, potentially emboldening adversaries and hampering a unified alliance front.

Policy stalemate and its consequences

These diverging approaches are mirrored in ongoing arguments about when and how to use NATO’s cyber capabilities offensively versus limiting the alliance to defensive postures or coordinated resilience initiatives. 

While some strategists press for disruptive cyber operations or overt information warfare campaigns targeting Russia, consensus is lacking due to legal concerns, worries about thresholds for collective defense, and varying levels of national cyber capacity and risk appetite.

Strategic implications

Analysts warn that Russia’s overt cyber and hybrid threats are, in part, designed to exploit and widen these strategic rifts, stymying meaningful joint response and putting both NATO's credibility and European security at risk. Persistent internal divisions leave NATO vulnerable, raising pressure for the alliance to develop a clearer, more decisive policy on cyber deterrence and response.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
Business Security Cl0p Cyber Security Google Mandiant Ransom Threat Intelligence

Google Warns of Cl0p Extortion Campaign Against Oracle E-Business Users

 

Google Mandiant and the Google Threat Intelligence Group are tracking a suspected extortion campaign by the Cl0p ransomware group targeting executives with claims of stealing Oracle E-Business Suite data. 

The hackers have demanded ransoms reaching up to $50 million, with cybersecurity firm Halcyon reporting multiple seven and eight-figure ransom demands in recent days. The group claims to have breached Oracle's E-Business Suite, which manages core operations including financial, supply chain, and customer relationship management functions.

Modus operandi 

The attackers reportedly hacked user emails and exploited Oracle E-Business Suite's default password reset functionality to steal valid credentials. This technique bypassed single sign-on protections due to the lack of multi-factor authentication on local Oracle accounts. At least one company has confirmed that data from their Oracle systems was stolen, according to sources familiar with the matter. The hackers provided proof of compromise to victims, including screenshots and file trees.

This activity began on or before September 29, 2025, though Mandiant experts remain in early investigation stages and have not yet substantiated all claims made by the group. Charles Carmakal, Mandiant's CTO, described the operation as a high-volume email campaign launched from hundreds of compromised accounts. Initial analysis confirms at least one compromised account previously associated with FIN11, a long-running financially motivated threat group known for deploying ransomware and engaging in extortion.

Threat actor background 

Since August 2020, FIN11 has targeted organizations across multiple industries including defense, energy, finance, healthcare, legal, pharmaceutical, telecommunications, technology, and transportation. The group is believed to operate from Commonwealth of Independent States countries, with Russian-language file metadata found in their malware code. In 2020, Mandiant observed FIN11 hackers using spear-phishing messages to distribute a malware downloader called FRIENDSPEAK.

An email address in the extortion notes ties to a Cl0p affiliate and includes Cl0p site contacts, though Google lacks definitive proof to confirm the attackers' claims. The malicious emails contain contact information verified as publicly listed on the Cl0p data leak site, strongly suggesting association with Cl0p and leveraging their brand recognition. Cl0p has launched major attacks in recent years exploiting zero-day flaws in popular software including Accellion, SolarWinds, Fortra GoAnywhere, and MOVEit.

Security recommendations

Oracle confirmed the investigation on October 3, 2025, stating that attacks potentially relate to critical vulnerabilities disclosed in their July 2025 Critical Patch Update. The company strongly encouraged customers to review the July update and patch their systems for protection. Mandiant researchers recommend investigating environments for indicators of compromise associated with Cl0p operations.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
Business Security Cyber Incident Response Cyber Security Mandiant Investigation Threat Intelligence

Cyber Incident Response Needs Dynamic Command Structure Instead of Static Guidelines

 

The SolarWinds cyberattack, which impacted over 18,000 entities, revealed that many organizations respond to breaches with disorganized, makeshift command centers. 

Kevin Mandia, CEO of Mandiant, recognized the 2020 attack on his own firm as the work of Russia's SVR, noting the attackers' sophistication and professionalism. He and other experts argue that with increasing regulatory pressure and reputational risk, this reactive approach is no longer adequate. Effective incident response requires a pre-established infrastructure for rapid action and collaboration among legal, technical, and executive teams. 

Cybersecurity experts observe that attackers often show more discipline and coordination than the companies they target. Many businesses have contacts ready but lack a systematic strategy for managing the fallout of a breach, such as regulatory filings, legal risks, and customer notifications. 

Anderson Lunsford, CEO of the incident response firm BreachRx, notes that dealing with regulators and auditors can often prove more difficult than managing the technical aspects of the breach itself. This lack of organization puts defending companies at a significant disadvantage. 

Traditional training methods like tabletop exercises are criticized as being insufficient for real-world scenarios. Lunsford describes them as theoretical discussions that fail to account for the pressure and dispersion of teams during an actual crisis. A common oversight is the lack of clear guidelines for escalating an incident to the CEO or board. Mandia himself was not informed of the breach at his own company for several days because the threshold for escalation was too high and the response team was focused on containment rather than communication. 

To address these shortcomings, a shift from static response plans to a proactive, automated framework is necessary. Modern solutions can automate action plans based on the specific incident and legal jurisdiction, creating secure communication channels for legal, risk, and executive teams. This approach aids operational efficiency and protects the organization and its leaders from regulatory fines and lawsuits. With over 200 global regulations and increasing personal accountability for executives, this has become a critical governance issue. 

Finally, the mindset around cybersecurity must shift: breaches are inevitable business risks, not rare disasters. Executives must proactively prepare, regularly practice realistic scenarios, and coordinate across all functions. The capacity to respond quickly and cohesively—treating cybersecurity as a core leadership responsibility—will distinguish organizations that endure minor setbacks from those that suffer major scandals. The takeaway is clear: success in cybersecurity incident response depends on preparation, practice, and viewing the challenge as a fundamental aspect of modern leadership.
Read more »
World Leaks
Armenia Cyber Security Hunters International RaaS Group Threat Intelligence World Leaks

'Hunters International' RaaS Outfit Shuts Down Its Operation

 

Hunters International, a ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) outfit, shut down operations and will provide free decryptors to victims seeking to restore their data without paying a ransom. 

"After careful consideration and in light of recent developments, we have decided to close the Hunters International project. This decision was not made lightly, and we recognize the impact it has on the organizations we have interacted with," the ransomware outfit notes in a statement published on its dark web.

"As a gesture of goodwill and to assist those affected by our previous activities, we are offering free decryption software to all companies that have been impacted by our ransomware. Our goal is to ensure that you can recover your encrypted data without the burden of paying ransoms.”

The attackers also erased all entries from the extortion platform and stated that firms whose systems were encrypted in Hunters International ransomware assaults can access decryption tools and recovery guidance from the gang's official website. 

While the ransomware group does not specify what "recent developments" it alludes to, the latest development follows a November 17 statement stating that Hunters International will soon cease operations due to growing law enforcement scrutiny and diminishing profitability. 

In April, threat intelligence firm Group-IB also disclosed that Hunters International had started a new extortion-only operation dubbed "World Leaks" and was rebranding with plans to zero in on data theft and extortion-only attacks. 

Group-IB stated at the time that "World Leaks operates as an extortion-only group using a custom-built exfiltration tool, in contrast to Hunters International, which combined encryption with extortion." The new tool seems to be an improved version of the Storage Software exfiltration tool that Hunters International's ransomware affiliates used. 

Due to code similarities, security researchers and ransomware specialists identified Hunters International, which surfaced in late 2023, as a potential rebranding of Hive. The malware from the ransomware group supports x64, x86, and ARM architectures and targets a variety of platforms, including Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, SunOS, and ESXi (VMware servers). 

Hunters International has attacked businesses of all sizes over the last two years, demanding ransoms ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the size of the compromised organisation. The ransomware group has claimed credit for around 300 attacks worldwide, making it one of the most active ransomware campaigns in recent years. 

The ransomware outfit has claimed several notable victims, including the United States Marshals Service, the Japanese optical firm Hoya, Tata Technologies, the North American car dealership AutoCanada, the United States Navy contractor Austal USA, and Integris Health, Oklahoma's largest non-profit healthcare network.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
Business Security Cyber Security Email Bombing Microsoft Office 365 Threat Intelligence

Office 365's Microsoft Defender Now Thwarts Email Bombing Assaults

 

Microsoft claims that the cloud-based email security suite Defender for Office 365 can now automatically detect and prevent email bombing attacks. 

Defender for Office 365 (previously known as Office 365 Advanced Threat Protection or Office 365 ATP) guards organisations working in high-risk industries and dealing with sophisticated attackers from malicious threats delivered via email messages, links, or collaboration tools.

"We're introducing a new detection capability in Microsoft Defender for Office 365 to help protect your organization from a growing threat known as email bombing," Redmond notes in a Microsoft 365 message center update. "This form of abuse floods mailboxes with high volumes of email to obscure important messages or overwhelm systems. The new 'Mail Bombing' detection will automatically identify and block these attacks, helping security teams maintain visibility into real threats.”

In late June 2025, the new 'Mail Bombing' feature began to roll out, and by late July, it should be available to all organisations. All messages detected as being a part of a mail bombing operation will be automatically routed to the Junk folder, require no manual configuration, and be toggled on by default. 

Security operations analysts and administrators can now employ Mail Bombing as a new detection type in Threat Explorer, the Email entity page, the Email summary panel, and Advanced Hunting, the company announced over the weekend.

By leveraging specialised cybercrime services that can send a high number of emails or by subscribing to several newsletters, attackers can use mail bombing operations to bombard their targets' email inboxes with thousands or tens of thousands of messages in a matter of minutes.

In the majority of cases, the perpetrators' ultimate goal is to overwhelm email security systems as part of social engineering schemes, creating the way for malware or ransomware operations that can aid in the exfiltration of sensitive data from victims' compromised devices. 

Email bombing has been used in attacks by cybercrime and ransomware outfits for more than a year. It all started with the BlackBasta gang, who employed this approach to flood their victims' mailboxes with emails just minutes before beginning their attacks.

In order to deceive overwhelmed staff members into allowing remote access to their devices via AnyDesk or the integrated Windows Quick Assist application, they would follow up with voice phishing cold calls, pretending to be their IT support teams. Before unleashing ransomware payloads, the attackers would proceed laterally through corporate networks after penetrating their systems and deploying a variety of malicious tools and malware implants.
Read more »
Threat Landscape
Business Security Cyber Security Ransomware attack Threat Intelligence Threat Landscape

Understanding the Dynamic threat Landscape of Ransomware Attacks

 

The constant expansion of cyber threats, particularly malware and ransomware, necessitates our undivided attention. Our defence strategy must evolve in tandem with the threats. So far this year, ransomware has targeted Frederick Health Medical Group, Co-op Supermarkets, and Marks & Spencer. 

This meant that critical data got into the wrong hands, supply networks were interrupted, and online transactions were halted. Almost 400,000 PCs were attacked with Lumma Stealer malware, a ClickFix malware version went viral, and a new spyware dubbed 'LOSTKEYS' appeared.

The threat landscape is always evolving, making traditional security methods ineffective. Effective protection methods are not only useful; they are also required to protect against severe data loss, financial damage, and reputational impact that these attacks can cause. Understanding the nature of these enemies is a critical first step towards developing strong defences. 

Ransomware: An ongoing and profitable menace 

Ransomware deserves special attention. It encrypts data and demands payment for its release, frequently spreading through phishing or software weaknesses. More complex ransomware variations take data before encrypting it, combining the threat with blackmail. The effects of ransomware include:

Data loss: May be permanent without backups. 

Financial costs: Includes ransom, restoration, and penalties 

Reputational damage: If publicly exposed, trust is lost. 

Ransomware's profitability makes it particularly tenacious. It does not just impact huge companies; small firms, healthcare systems, and educational institutions are all common targets. Its ease of deployment and high return on investment continue to attract cybercriminals, resulting in more aggressive campaigns.

Ransomware attacks increasingly frequently use "double extortion," in which attackers exfiltrate data before encrypting it. Victims confront two threats: inaccessible data and public exposure. This strategy not only enhances the chance of ransom payment, but also raises the stakes for organisations who are already battling to recover.

Challenges

Malware and ransomware are challenging to detect due to evasive strategies. Attackers are getting more creative, using legitimate administrative tools, zero-day vulnerabilities, and social engineering to get around defences. A multi-layered security approach that includes behavioural detection, endpoint hardening, and regular system updates is necessary to defend against these threats.

In the end, protecting against malware and ransomware involves more than just technology; it also involves mentality. Professionals in cybersecurity need to be knowledgeable, proactive, and flexible. The defenders must adapt to the ever-changing threats.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence Business Security Cyber Security SOC Threat Intelligence

Best Practices for SOC Threat Intelligence Integration

 

As cyber threats become more complex and widespread, Security Operations Centres (SOCs) increasingly rely on threat intelligence to transform their defensive methods from reactive to proactive. Integrating Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) into SOC procedures has become critical for organisations seeking to anticipate attacks, prioritise warnings, and respond accurately to incidents.

This transition is being driven by the increasing frequency of cyberattacks, particularly in sectors such as manufacturing and finance. Adversaries use old systems and heterogeneous work settings to spread ransomware, phishing attacks, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). 

Importance of threat intelligence in modern SOCs

Threat intelligence provides SOCs with contextualised data on new threats, attacker strategies, and vulnerabilities. SOC teams can discover patterns and predict possible attack vectors by analysing indications of compromise (IOCs), tactics, methods, and procedures (TTPs), and campaign-specific information. 

For example, the MITRE ATT&CK framework has become a key tool for mapping adversary behaviours, allowing SOCs to practice attacks and improve detection techniques. According to a recent industry research, organisations that integrated CTI into their Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems reduced mean dwell time, during which attackers went undetected, by 78%. 

Accelerating the response to incidents 

Threat intelligence allows SOCs to move from human triage to automated response workflows. Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms run pre-defined playbooks for typical attack scenarios such as phishing and ransomware. When a multinational retailer automated IOC blocklisting, reaction times were cut from hours to seconds, preventing potential breaches and data exfiltration.

Furthermore, threat intelligence sharing consortiums, such as sector-specific Information Sharing and Analysis Centres (ISACs), enable organisations to pool anonymised data. This partnership has effectively disrupted cross-industry efforts, including a recent ransomware attack on healthcare providers. 

Proactive threat hunting

Advanced SOCs are taking a proactive approach, performing regular threat hunts based on intelligence-led hypotheses. Using adversary playbooks and dark web monitoring, analysts find stealthy threats that avoid traditional detection. A technology firm's SOC team recently discovered a supply chain threat by linking vendor vulnerabilities to dark web conversation about a planned hack.

Purple team exercises—simulated attacks incorporating red and blue team tactics—have also gained popularity. These drills, based on real-world threat data, assess SOC readiness for advanced persistent threats. Organisations who perform quarterly purple team exercises report a 60% increase in incident control rates. 

AI SOCs future 

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to transform threat intelligence. Natural language processing (NLP) technologies can now extract TTPs from unstructured threat data and generate SIEM detection rules automatically. 

During beta testing, these technologies cut rule creation time from days to minutes. Collaborative defence models are also emerging. National and multinational programs, such as INTERPOL's Global Cybercrime Program, help to facilitate cross-border intelligence exchange.

A recent operation involving 12 countries successfully removed a botnet responsible for $200 million in financial fraud, demonstrating the potential of collective defence.
Read more »
zero-click
Mobile Security Spyware Threat Intelligence User Privacy Whatsapp Leak zero-click

Here's How to Safeguard Your Smartphone Against Zero-Click Attacks

 

Spyware tools have been discovered on the phones of politicians, journalists, and activists on numerous occasions over the past decade. This has prompted worries regarding the lack of protections in the tech industry and an unprecedented expansion of spyware technologies. 

Meta's WhatsApp recently stated that it has detected a hacking campaign aimed at roughly ninety users, the majority of whom were journalists and civil society activists from two dozen countries. 

According to a WhatsApp representative, the attack was carried out by the Israeli spyware company Paragon Solutions, which is now controlled by the Florida-based private equity firm AE Industrial Partners. Graphite, Paragon's spyware, infiltrated WhatsApp groups by sending them a malicious PDF attachment. It can access and read messages from encrypted apps such as WhatsApp and Signal without the user's knowledge. 

What is a zero-click attack? 

A zero-click attack, such as the one on WhatsApp, compromises a device without requiring any user activity. Unlike phishing or one-click attacks, which rely on clicking a malicious link or opening an attachment, zero-click leverages a security flaw to stealthily gain complete access after the device has been infected. 

"In the case of graphite, via WhatsApp, some kind of payload, like a PDF or an image, [was sent to the victims' devices] and the underlying processes that receive and handle those packages have vulnerabilities that the attackers exploit [to] infect the phone,” Rocky Cole, co-founder of mobile threat protection company iVerify, noted.

While reports do not indicate "whether graphite can engage in privilege escalation [vulnerability] and operate outside WhatsApp or even move into the iOS kernel itself, we do know from our own detections and other work with customers, that privilege escalation via WhatsApp in order to gain kernel access is indeed possible," Cole added. 

The iVerify team believes that the malicious attacks are "potentially more widespread" than the 90 individuals who were reported to have been infected by graphite because they have discovered cases where a number of WhatsApp crashes on [mobile] devices [they're] monitoring with iVerify have seemed to be malicious in nature.

While the WhatsApp hack primarily targeted civil society activists, Cole believes mobile spyware is a rising threat to everyone since mobile exploitation is more pervasive than many people realise. Moreover, the outcome is an emerging ecosystem around mobile spyware development and an increasing number of VC-backed mobile spyware companies are under pressure to become viable organisations. This eventually increases marketing competition for spyware merchants and lowers barriers that might normally deter these attacks. 

Mitigation tips

Cole recommends users to treat their phones as computers. Just as you use best practices to safeguard traditional endpoints like laptops from exploitation and compromise, you should do the same for phones. This includes rebooting your phone on a daily basis because most of these exploits remain in memory rather than files, and rebooting your phone should theoretically wipe out the malware as well, he said. 

If you have an Apple device, you can also enable Lockdown Mode. As indicated by Cole, "lockdown mode has the effect of reducing some functionality of internet-facing applications [which can] in some ways reduce the attack surface to some degree."

Ultimately, the only way to properly safeguard oneself from zero-click capabilities is to address the underlying flaws. Cole emphasised that only Apple, Google, and app developers may do so. "So as an end user, it's critically important that when a new security patch is available, you apply it as soon as you possibly can," the researcher added.
Read more »
Windows
Cloud Microsoft Password Technology Threat Intelligence Windows

Microsoft Alerts Users About Password-spraying Attack

Microsoft Alerts Users About Password-spraying Attack

Microsoft alerts users about password-spraying attacks

Microsoft has warned users about a new password-spraying attack by a hacking group Storm-1977 that targets cloud users. The Microsoft Threat Intelligence team reported a new warning after discovering threat actors are abusing unsecured workload identities to access restricted resources. 

According to Microsoft, “Container technology has become essential for modern application development and deployment. It's a critical component for over 90% of cloud-native organizations, facilitating swift, reliable, and flexible processes that drive digital transformation.” 

Hackers use adoption-as-a-service

Research says 51% of such workload identities have been inactive for one year, which is why attackers are exploiting this attack surface. The report highlights the “adoption of containers-as-a-service among organizations rises.” According to Microsoft, it continues to look out for unique security dangers that affect “containerized environments.” 

The password-spraying attack targeted a command line interface tool “AzureChecker” to download AES-encrypted data which revealed the list of password-spray targets after it was decoded. To make things worse, the “threat actor then used the information from both files and posted the credentials to the target tenants for validation.”

The attack allowed the Storm-1977 hackers to leverage a guest account to make a compromised subscription resource group and over 200 containers that were used for crypto mining. 

Mitigating password-spraying attacks

The solution to the problem of password spraying attacks is eliminating passwords. It can be done by moving towards passkeys, a lot of people are already doing that. 

Microsoft has suggested these steps to mitigate the issue

  • Use strong authentication while putting sensitive interfaces to the internet. 
  • Use strong verification methods for the Kubernetes API to stop hackers from getting access to the cluster even when valid credentials like kubeconfig are obtained.  
  • Don’t use the read-only endpoint of Kubelet on port 10255, which doesn’t need verification. 

Modify the Kubernetes role-based access controls for every user and service account to only retain permissions that are required. 

According to Microsoft, “Recent updates to Microsoft Defender for Cloud enhance its container security capabilities from development to runtime. Defender for Cloud now offers enhanced discovery, providing agentless visibility into Kubernetes environments, tracking containers, pods, and applications.” These updates upgrade security via continuous granular scanning. 

Read more »
War Plans
Cyber Security Data Leak Pentagon Head Signal Threat Intelligence War Plans

Pentagon Director Hegseth Revealed Key Yemen War Plans in Second Signal Chat, Source Claims

 

In a chat group that included his wife, brother, and personal attorney, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth provided specifics of a strike on Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis in March, a person familiar with the situation told Reuters earlier this week. 

Hegseth's use of an unclassified messaging system to share extremely sensitive security details is called into question by the disclosure of a second Signal chat. This comes at a particularly sensitive time for him, as senior officials were removed from the Pentagon last week as part of an internal leak investigation. 

In the second chat, Hegseth shared details of the attack, which were similar to those revealed last month by The Atlantic magazine after its editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was accidentally included in a separate chat on the Signal app, in an embarrassing incident involving all of President Donald Trump's most senior national security officials.

The individual familiar with the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, stated that the second chat, which comprised around a dozen people, was set up during his confirmation process to discuss administrative concerns rather than real military planning. According to the insider, the chat included details about the air attack schedule. 

Jennifer, Hegseth's wife and a former Fox News producer, has attended classified meetings with foreign military counterparts, according to photographs released by the Pentagon. During a meeting with his British colleague at the Pentagon in March, Hegseth's wife was found sitting behind him. Hegseth's brother serves as a Department of Homeland Security liaison to the Pentagon.

The Trump administration has aggressively pursued leaks, which Hegseth has warmly supported in the Pentagon. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said, without evidence, that the media was "enthusiastically taking the grievances of disgruntled former employees as the sole sources for their article.” 

Hegeseth'S tumultuous moment 

Democratic lawmakers stated Hegseth could no longer continue in his position. "We keep learning how Pete Hegseth put lives at risk," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a post to X. "But Trump is still too weak to fire him. Pete Hegseth must be fired.”

Senator Tammy Duckworth, an Iraq War veteran who was severely injured in combat in 2004, stated that Hegseth "must resign in disgrace.” 

The latest disclosure comes just days after Dan Caldwell, one of Hegseth's top aides, was taken from the Pentagon after being identified during an investigation into leaks at the Department of Defence. Although Caldwell is not as well-known as other senior Pentagon officials, he has played an important role for Hegseth and was chosen the Pentagon's point of contact by the Secretary during the first Signal chat.
Read more »
Viral Tend
Barbie Doll Trend Cyber Security Generative AI Threat Intelligence User Privacy Viral Tend

Security Analysts Express Concerns Over AI-Generated Doll Trend

 

If you've been scrolling through social media recently, you've probably seen a lot of... dolls. There are dolls all over X and on Facebook feeds. Instagram? Dolls. TikTok?

You guessed it: dolls, as well as doll-making techniques. There are even dolls on LinkedIn, undoubtedly the most serious and least entertaining member of the club. You can refer to it as the Barbie AI treatment or the Barbie box trend. If Barbie isn't your thing, you can try AI action figures, action figure starter packs, or the ChatGPT action figure fad. However, regardless of the hashtag, dolls appear to be everywhere. 

And, while they share some similarities (boxes and packaging resembling Mattel's Barbie, personality-driven accessories, a plastic-looking smile), they're all as unique as the people who post them, with the exception of one key common feature: they're not real. 

In the emerging trend, users are using generative AI tools like ChatGPT to envision themselves as dolls or action figures, complete with accessories. It has proven quite popular, and not just among influencers.

Politicians, celebrities, and major brands have all joined in. Journalists covering the trend have created images of themselves with cameras and microphones (albeit this journalist won't put you through that). Users have created renditions of almost every well-known figure, including billionaire Elon Musk and actress and singer Ariana Grande. 

The Verge, a tech media outlet, claims that it started on LinkedIn, a professional social networking site that was well-liked by marketers seeking interaction. Because of this, a lot of the dolls you see try to advertise a company or business. (Think, "social media marketer doll," or even "SEO manager doll." ) 

Privacy concerns

From a social perspective, the popularity of the doll-generating trend isn't surprising at all, according to Matthew Guzdial, an assistant professor of computing science at the University of Alberta.

"This is the kind of internet trend we've had since we've had social media. Maybe it used to be things like a forwarded email or a quiz where you'd share the results," Guzdial noted. 

But as with any AI trend, there are some concerns over its data use. Generative AI in general poses substantial data privacy challenges. As the Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (Stanford HAI) points out, data privacy concerns and the internet are nothing new, but AI is so "data-hungry" that it magnifies the risk. 

Safety tips 

As we have seen, one of the major risks of participating in viral AI trends is the potential for your conversation history to be compromised by unauthorised or malicious parties. To stay safe, researchers recommend taking the following steps: 

Protect your account: This includes enabling 2FA, creating secure and unique passwords for each service, and avoiding logging in to shared computers.

Minimise the real data you give to the AI model: Fornés suggests using nicknames or other data instead. You should also consider utilising a different ID solely for interactions with AI models.

Use the tool cautiously and properly: When feasible, use the AI model in incognito mode and without activating the history or conversational memory functions.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
Black Basta Cyber Security Data Leak Ransomware Outfit Threat Intelligence

Black Basta: Exposing the Ransomware Outfit Through Leaked Chat Logs

 

The cybersecurity sector experienced an extraordinary breach in February 2025 that revealed the inner workings of the well-known ransomware gang Black Basta. 

Trustwave SpiderLabs researchers have now taken an in-depth look at the disclosed contents, which explain how the gang thinks and operates, including discussions about tactics and the effectiveness of various attack tools. Even going so far as to debate the ethical and legal implications of targeting Ascension Health. 

The messages were initially posted to MEGA before being reuploaded straight to Telegram on February 11 by the online identity ExploitWhispers. The JSON-based dataset contained over 190,000 messages allegedly sent by group members between September 18, 2023 and September 28, 2024. 

This data dump provides rare insight into the group's infrastructure, tactics, and internal decision-making procedures, providing obvious links to the infamous Conti leaks of 2022. The leak does not provide every information about the group's inner workings, but it does provide a rare glimpse inside one of the most financially successful ransomware organisations in recent years. 

The dataset reveals Black Basta's internal workflows, decision-making processes, and team dynamics, providing an unfiltered view of how one of the most active ransomware gangs functions behind the scenes, with parallels to the infamous Conti leaks. Black Basta has been operating since 2022. 

The outfit normally keeps a low profile while carrying out its operations, which target organisations in a variety of sectors and demand millions in ransom payments. The messages demonstrate members' remarkable autonomy and ingenuity in adjusting fast to changing security situations. The leak revealed Black Basta's reliance on social engineering tactics. While traditional phishing efforts are still common, they can take a more personable approach in some cases. 

The chat logs provide greater insight into Black Basta's strategic approach to vulnerability exploitation. The group actively seeks common and unique vulnerabilities, acquiring zero-day exploits to gain a competitive advantage. 

Its weaponization policy reveals a deliberate effort to increase the impact of its attacks, with Cobalt Strike frequently deployed for command and control operations. Notably, Black Basta created a custom proxy architecture dubbed "Coba PROXY" to manage massive amounts of C2 traffic, which improved both stealth and resilience. Beyond its technological expertise, the leak provides insight into Black Basta's negotiation strategies. 

The gang uses aggressive l and psychologically manipulative tactics to coerce victims into paying ransoms. Strategic delays and coercive rhetoric are standard tactics used to extract the maximum financial return. Even more alarming is its growth into previously off-limits targets, such as CIS-based financial institutions.

While the immediate impact of the breach is unknown, the disclosure of Black Basta's inner workings provides a unique chance for cybersecurity specialists to adapt and respond. Understanding its methodology promotes the creation of more effective defensive strategies, hence increasing resilience to future ransomware assaults.
Read more »
Threat Intelligence
AI AI Tool Data Privacy Technology Threat Intelligence

AI and Privacy – Issues and Challenges

 

Artificial intelligence is changing cybersecurity and digital privacy. It promises better security but also raises concerns about ethical boundaries, data exploitation, and spying. From facial recognition software to predictive crime prevention, customers are left wondering where to draw the line between safety and overreach as AI-driven systems become more and more integrated into daily life.

The same artificial intelligence (AI) tools that aid in spotting online threats, optimising security procedures, and stopping fraud can also be used for intrusive data collecting, behavioural tracking, and mass spying. The use of AI-powered surveillance in corporate data mining, law enforcement profiling, and government tracking has drawn criticism in recent years. AI runs the potential of undermining rather than defending basic rights in the absence of clear regulations and transparency. 

AI and data ethics

Despite encouraging developments, there are numerous instances of AI-driven inventions going awry, which raise serious questions. A face recognition business called Clearview AI amassed one of the largest facial recognition databases in the world by illegally scraping billions of photos from social media. Clearview's technology was employed by governments and law enforcement organisations across the globe, leading to legal action and regulatory action about mass surveillance. 

The UK Department for Work and Pensions used an AI system to detect welfare fraud. An internal investigation suggested that the system disproportionately targeted people based on their age, handicap, marital status, and country. This prejudice resulted in certain groups being unfairly picked for fraud investigations, raising questions about discrimination and the ethical use of artificial intelligence in public services. Despite earlier guarantees of impartiality, the findings have fuelled calls for increased openness and supervision in government AI use. 

Regulations and consumer protection

The ethical use of AI is being regulated by governments worldwide, with a number of significant regulations having an immediate impact on consumers. The AI Act of the European Union, which is scheduled to go into force in 2025, divides AI applications into risk categories. 

Strict regulations will be applied to high-risk technology, like biometric surveillance and facial recognition, to guarantee transparency and moral deployment. The EU's commitment to responsible AI governance is further reinforced by the possibility of severe sanctions for non compliant companies. 

Individuals in the United States have more control over their personal data according to California's Consumer Privacy Act. Consumers have the right to know what information firms gather about them, to seek its erasure, and to opt out of data sales. This rule adds an important layer of privacy protection in an era where AI-powered data processing is becoming more common. 

The White House has recently introduced the AI Bill of Rights, a framework aimed at encouraging responsible AI practices. While not legally enforceable, it emphasises the need of privacy, transparency, and algorithmic fairness, pointing to a larger push for ethical AI development in policy making.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)