A new Android banking malware dubbed Sturnus can hack interactions from entirety via encrypted messaging networks like Signal, WhatsApp, and Telegram, as well as take complete control of the device.
While still under growth, the virus is fully functional and has been programmed to target accounts at various financial institutions across Europe by employing "region-specific overlay templates."
Sturnus uses a combination of plaintext, RSA, and AES-encrypted communication with the command-and-control (C2) server, making it a more sophisticated threat than existing Android malware families.
Sturnus may steal messages from secure messaging apps after the decryption step by recording the content from the device screen, according to a research from online fraud prevention and threat intelligence agency Threatfabric. The malware can also collect banking account details using HTML overlays and offers support for complete, real-time access through VNC session.
The researchers haven't found how the malware is disseminated but they assume that malvertising or direct communications are plausible approaches. Upon deployment, the malware connects to the C2 network to register the target via a cryptographic transaction.
For instructions and data exfiltration, it creates an encrypted HTTPS connection; for real-time VNC operations and live monitoring, it creates an AES-encrypted WebSocket channel. Sturnus can begin reading text on the screen, record the victim's inputs, view the UI structure, identify program launches, press buttons, scroll, inject text, and traverse the phone by abusing the Accessibility services on the device.
To get full command of the system, Sturnus gets Android Device Administrator credentials, which let it keep tabs of password changes and attempts to unlock and lock the device remotely. The malware also tries to stop the user from disabling its privileges or deleting it from the device. Sturnus uses its permissions to identify message content, inputted text, contact names, and conversation contents when the user accesses WhatsApp, Telegram, or Signal.
The mega-messenger from Meta is allegedly collecting user data to generate ad money, according to recent attacks on WhatsApp. WhatsApp strongly opposes these fresh accusations, but it didn't help that a message of its own appeared to imply the same.
There are two prominent origins of the recent attacks. Few experts are as well-known as Elon Musk, particularly when it occurs on X, the platform he owns. Musk asserted on the Joe Rogan Experience that "WhatsApp knows enough about what you're texting to know what ads to show you." "That is a serious security flaw."
These so-called "hooks for advertising" are typically thought to rely on metadata, which includes information on who messages whom, when, and how frequently, as well as other information from other sources that is included in a user's profile.
The message content itself is shielded by end-to-end encryption, which is the default setting for all 3 billion WhatsApp users. Signal's open-source encryption protocol, which the Meta platform adopted and modified for its own use, is the foundation of WhatsApp's security. So, in light of these new attacks, do you suddenly need to stop using WhatsApp?
In reality, WhatsApp's content is completely encrypted. There has never been any proof that Meta, WhatsApp, or anybody else can read the content itself. However, the platform you are utilizing is controlled by Meta, and it is aware of your identity. It does gather information on how you use the platform.
Additionally, it shares information with Meta so that it can "show relevant offers/ads." Signal has a small portion of WhatsApp's user base, but it does not gather metadata in the same manner. Think about using Signal instead for sensitive content. Steer clear of Telegram since it is not end-to-end encrypted and RCS because it is not yet cross-platform encrypted.
Remember that end-to-end encryption only safeguards your data while it is in transit. It has no effect on the security of your content on the device. I can read all of your messages, whether or not they are end-to-end encrypted, if I have control over your iPhone or Android.
Meta’s Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook have once again been flagged as the most privacy-violating social media apps. According to Incogni’s Social Media Privacy Ranking report 2025, Meta and TikTok are at the bottom of the list. Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) has also received poor rankings in various categories, but has done better than Meta in a few categories.
The report analyzed 15 of the most widely used social media platforms globally, measuring them against 14 privacy criteria organized into six different categories: AI data use, user control, ease of access, regulatory transgressions, transparency, and data collection. The research methodology focused on how an average user could understand and control privacy policies.
Discord, Pinterest, and Quora have done best in the 2025 ranking. Discord is placed first, thanks to its stance on not giving user data for training of AI models. Pinterest ranks second, thanks to its strong user options and fewer regulatory penalties. Quora came third thanks to its limited user data collection.
But the Meta platforms were penalized strongly in various categories. Facebook was penalized for frequent regulatory fines, such as GDPR rules in Europe, and penalties in the US and other regions. Instagram and WhatsApp received heavy penalties due to policies allowing the collection of sensitive personal data, such as sexual orientation and health. X faced penalties for vast data collection
X was penalized for vast data collection and privacy fines from the past, but it still ranked above Meta and TikTok in some categories. X was among the easiest platforms to delete accounts from, and also provided information to government organizations at was lower rate than other platforms. Yet, X allows user data to be trained for AI models, which has impacted its overall privacy score.
“One of the core principles motivating Incogni’s research here is the idea that consent to have personal information gathered and processed has to be properly informed to be valid and meaningful. It’s research like this that arms users with not only the facts but also the tools to inform their choices,” Incogni said in its blog.
On 12 September, the EU Council will share its final assessment of the Danish version of what is known as “Chat Control.” The proposal has faced strong backlash, as it aims to introduce new mandates for all messaging apps based in Europe to scan users’ chats, including encrypted ones.
Belgium and the Czech Republic are now opposing the proposed law, with the former calling it "a monster that invades your privacy and cannot be tamed." The other countries that have opposed the bill so far include Poland, Austria, and the Netherlands.
But the list of supporters is longer, including important member states: Ireland, Cyprus, Spain, Sweden, France, Lithuania, Italy, and Ireland.
Germany may consider abstaining from voting. This weakens the Danish mandate.
Initially proposed in 2022, the Chat Control Proposal is now close to becoming an act. The vote will take place on 14 October 2025. Currently, the majority of member states are in support. If successful, it will mean that the EU can scan chats of users by October 2025, even the encrypted ones.
The debate is around encryption provisions- apps like Signal, WhatsApp, ProtonMail, etc., use encryption to maintain user privacy and prevent chats from unauthorized access.
If the proposed bill is passed, the files and things you share through these apps can be scanned to check for any CSAM materials. However, military and government accounts are exempt from scanning. This can damage user privacy and data security.
Although the proposal ensures that encryption will be “protected fully,” which promotes cybersecurity, tech experts and digital rights activists have warned that scanning can’t be done without compromising encryption. This can also expose users to cyberattacks by threat actors.
WhatsApp may face a ban in Russia as the Kremlin seeks to exert greater control over the online sphere. This blog explains about Max and what is likely to happen in Russia with the new changes.
The app was launched in March 2025. It has features similar to those of WhatsApp and Telegram. Max supports business accounts while also trying to become more than just a messaging app. "Friends, hello! I recently downloaded the Max app. And you know what, I was just amazed," said Russian influencer and singer Instasamka in a promotional video.
Max is promoted as a digital “super app”- a single platform for government and commercial services. The Russian bank has already started using a digital banking platform for customers to book via the travel wing of e-commerce giant Ozon.
Russia’s portal for public services, “Gosuslugi,” will be launched in 2026 with added access to the Central Bank’s Fast Payment System. “Several Asian countries have national or quasi-official messengers: China’s WeChat, Japan’s Line, South Korea’s KakaoTalk, Vietnam’s Zalo, and India’s Sandes,” according to the BBC.
Russian media has termed the app as “the Russian WeChat,” hinting at the Chinese state-backed application that is known as a tool of social control. Max is yet to prove its potential. According to VK, a million people have registered already. Both VK and Telegram have monthly Russian users of around 100 million, according to MediaScope. The app has mixed reviews. It currently has a 4.2 rating on the App Store and 2.4 on Google Play.
According to BBC, “Max is owned by a firm called “Communication Platform,” located in the same Moscow business center as VK. Russian business paper Vedomosti has reported that the two companies are affiliated. VK is ultimately controlled by state energy giant Gazprom.”
Global cybersecurity experts are raising serious concerns over the newly identified cyber threat known as Data Splicing Attacks, which poses a significant threat to thousands of businesses worldwide. It seems that even the most advanced Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tools that are currently being used are unable to stop the sophisticated data exfiltration technique.
A user can manipulate sensitive information directly within the browser, enabling the attacker to split, encrypt or encode it into smaller fragments that will remain undetected by conventional security measures because they can manipulate data directly within the browser. By fragmenting the data pieces, they circumvent the detection logic of both Endpoint Protection Platforms (EPP) and network-based tools, only to be reassembled seamlessly outside the network environment in which they were found.
As a further contributing factor to the threat, malicious actors are using alternatives to standard communication protocols, such as grpc and Webrtc, and commonly used encrypted messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp and Telegram, as a means of exfiltrating data. As a result of these channels, attackers can obscure their activities and evade traditional SSL inspection mechanisms, making it much more difficult to detect and respond to them.
An important shift in the threat landscape has taken place with the introduction of Data Splicing Attacks, which require immediate attention from both enterprises and cybersecurity professionals. Data exfiltration, a growing concern within the cybersecurity industry, refers to the act of transferring, stealing, or removing a specific amount of data from a computer, server, or mobile phone without authorisation.
Several methods can be used to perform this type of cyberattack, including a variety of cyberattacks such as data leakage, data theft, and information extrusion. The kind of security breach posed by this type of company poses a serious threat to the company, since it can result in significant financial losses, disruptions to operations, and irreparable damage to their reputation. This lack of adequate safeguarding of sensitive information under such threats emphasises the importance of developing effective data protection strategies.
There are two primary means by which data can be exfiltrated from an organisation's network: external attacks and insider threats. Cybercriminals infiltrate an organisation's network by deploying malware that targets connected devices, which can be the result of a cybercriminal attack. A compromised device can serve as a gateway to broader network exploitation once compromised.
Some types of malware are designed to spread across corporate networks in search of and extracting confidential information, while others remain dormant for extended periods, eschewing detection and quietly collecting, exfiltrating, and exchanging data in small, incremental amounts as it grows. As well as insider threats, internal threats can be equally dangerous in stealing data.
A malicious insider, such as a disgruntled employee, may be responsible for the theft of proprietary data, often transferring it to private email accounts or external cloud storage services for personal gain. Furthermore, employees may inadvertently expose sensitive information to external parties due to negligent behaviour, resulting in the disclosure of sensitive information to outside parties.
The insider-related incidents that take place at a company underscore the importance of robust monitoring, employee training, and data loss prevention (DLP) to safeguard the company's assets from outside threats. As a rule, there are many ways in which data exfiltration can be executed, usually by exploiting technological vulnerabilities, poor security practices, or human error in order to carry out the exfiltration.
When threat actors attempt to steal sensitive data from corporate environments, they use sophisticated methods without raising suspicion or setting off security alarms, to do so covertly. For organisations that wish to improve their security posture and reduce the risk of data loss, they must understand the most common tactics used in data exfiltration.
Infiltrating a system using malware is one of the most prevalent methods, as it is malicious software that is intentionally installed to compromise it. When malware is installed, it can scan a device for valuable data like customer records, financial data, or intellectual property, and send that information to an external server controlled by the attacker, which makes the process stealthy, as malware is often designed to mask its activity to evade detection by a company.
Data exfiltration is often accompanied by trojans, keyloggers, and ransomware, each of which is capable of operating undetected within a corporate network for extended periods. A similar method, phishing, relies on social engineering to trick users into revealing their login information or downloading malicious files. A cybercriminal can trick employees into granting them access to internal systems by craftily crafting convincing emails or creating false login pages.
When attackers gain access to a network, they can easily move across the network laterally and gain access to sensitive information. Phishing attacks are particularly dangerous because they rely heavily on human error to exploit human error, bypassing even the most sophisticated technological safeguards. The insider threat represents a challenging aspect of an organisation.
It can involve malicious insiders, such as employees or contractors, who deliberately leak or sell confidential information for monetary, strategic, or personal gain. As an example, insiders can also compromise data security unintentionally by mishandling sensitive data, sending information to incorrect recipients, or using insecure devices, without realising it. No matter what the intent of an insider threat is, it can be very difficult to detect and prevent it, especially when organisations do not have comprehensive monitoring and security controls in place.
Lastly, network misconfigurations are a great source of entry for attackers that requires little effort. When an internal system is compromised, it can be exploited by an attacker to gain unauthorised access by exploiting vulnerabilities such as poorly configured firewalls, exposed ports, and unsecured APIS. Once the attacker is inside, he or she can navigate the network by bypassing the traditional security mechanisms to locate and steal valuable information.
Often, these misconfigurations don't become apparent until a breach has already occurred, so it is very important to conduct continuous security audits and vulnerability assessments. In order to safeguard critical information assets better, organizations must understand these methods so that they may be able to anticipate threats and implement targeted countermeasures. Increasingly, web browsers have become an integral part of workplace productivity, creating a significant threat surface for data leaks.
As more than 60% of enterprise data is now stored on cloud-based platforms and is accessed primarily through browsers, ensuring browser-level security has become an extremely important concern. However, many existing security solutions have fallen short in addressing this challenge as recent research has revealed. It is very hard for proxy-based protections incorporated into enterprise browsers to identify sophisticated threats because they lack visibility.
Nevertheless, these solutions are not capable of understanding user interactions, monitoring changes to the Document Object Model (DOM), or accessing deeper browser context, which makes them easily exploitable to attackers. The traditional Data Loss Prevention (DLP) systems on endpoints are also not without limitations. As a result of their dependence on browser-exposed APIs, they are unable to determine the identity of the user, track browser extensions, or control the flow of encrypted content in the browser.
The constraints are creating a blind spot, which is increasingly being exploited by insider threats and advanced persistent attacks as a result of these constraints. It is especially problematic that these attacks are so adaptable; adversaries can develop new variants with very little coding effort, which will further widen the gap between modern threats and outdated security infrastructure, as well as allowing adversaries to build new variants that bypass existing defences.
A new toolkit developed specifically for reproducing the mechanics of these emerging data splicing attacks has been developed by researchers to address this growing concern. The tool has been developed to respond to this growing concern. It is designed for security teams, red teams, and vendors to test and evaluate their current defences in a realistic threat environment rigorously to determine whether their current defences are adequate.
It is the objective of Angry Magpie to help companies discover hidden vulnerabilities by simulating advanced browser-based attack vectors in order to evaluate how resilient their DLP strategies are. It is becoming increasingly apparent that enterprises need a paradigm shift in their approach to browser security, emphasizing proactive assessment and continuous adaptation in order to deal with rapidly changing cyber threats in the future.
As data splicing attacks have become increasingly prevalent and current security solutions have become increasingly limited, enterprise cybersecurity is at a critical inflexion point. As browser-based work environments become the norm and cloud dependency becomes more prevalent, traditional Data Loss Prevention strategies need to evolve both in scope and sophistication, as well as in scale. As organisations, we need to move away from legacy solutions that do not offer visibility, context, or adaptability that are necessary for detecting and mitigating modern data exfiltration techniques.
For cybersecurity professionals to remain competitive in the future, they must adopt a proactive and threat-informed defence strategy that includes continuous monitoring, advanced browser security controls, and regular stress testing of their systems through tools such as Angry Magpie. By taking this approach, organisations can identify and close vulnerabilities before they become exploitable, as well as ensure that there is a culture of security awareness throughout the workforce to minimise human error and insider threats.
Security infrastructures must keep up with the rapidly growing threats and innovations in cyberspace as well to maintain a competitive advantage. Businesses need to acknowledge and commit to modern, dynamic defence mechanisms to increase their resilience and ensure the integrity of their most valuable digital assets is better protected as a result of emerging threats.