Search This Blog

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Showing posts with label alternative messaging apps. Show all posts

Google Backs Messaging Layer Security for Enhanced Privacy and Interoperability

 

In 2023, Google pledged its support for Messaging Layer Security (MLS), a protocol designed to provide practical interoperability across various messaging services while scaling efficiently to accommodate large groups. This move marks a significant step towards enhancing security and privacy across platforms. Although Google has not officially announced the timeline for adopting MLS, references to the standard have been found in a recent Google Messages build, suggesting that its implementation might be on the horizon. 

To appreciate the significance of MLS, it is essential to understand the basics of end-to-end encryption (E2EE). E2EE ensures secure communication by preventing unauthorized entities, such as hackers and internet service providers (ISPs), from accessing data. In asymmetric or public key encryption, both parties possess a public and a private key. The public key is available to anyone and is used to encrypt messages, while the private key, which is much harder to crack, is used to decrypt them. 

Despite its advantages in providing privacy, security, and data integrity, E2EE has its shortcomings. If security is compromised at either the sender’s or receiver’s end, malicious actors can intercept the public key, allowing them to eavesdrop on conversations or impersonate one of the parties. Additionally, E2EE does not conceal metadata, which can be exploited to gather information about the communication. Messaging Layer Security (MLS) is a standard proposed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) that offers enhanced security for communication groups, ranging from small to large sizes. 
While popular messaging services typically use E2EE for one-on-one chats, group chats present a unique challenge. MLS addresses this by using sender keys over secure channels to provide forward secrecy, meaning that the theft of a single key does not compromise the rest of the data. The protocol is based on asynchronous ratcheting trees (ART), which enable group members to derive and update shared keys. This tree structure approach ensures forward secrecy, post-compromise security, scalability, and message integrity, even as group sizes increase.  

Google Messages, the default messaging app on most Android phones, currently uses Rich Communication Services (RCS) to offer features like encrypted chats, read receipts, high-resolution media sharing, typing indicators, and emoji reactions. Although the Universal Profile version used by Google Messages does not support E2EE, it uses the Signal Protocol as a workaround for security. Recent APK teardowns of Google Messages have revealed code snippets mentioning MLS, hinting that Google might incorporate this feature in future updates. 

If MLS becomes the default security layer in Google Messages, it will significantly enhance the app’s security and interoperability. Google’s adoption of MLS could set a precedent for other messaging services, promoting better interoperability and security across communication apps. This move might also influence how Apple integrates RCS in iOS. With iOS 18 set to support the RCS Universal Profile 2.4 for messaging without E2EE, Apple may need to consider adopting MLS to stay competitive in offering secure communication. 

As Google prepares to implement MLS, we can expect a push towards standardizing communication protocols. Google Messages already offers features like auto spam detection, photomojis, and cross-device compatibility, making it a robust choice for staying connected. Should MLS be integrated, users can look forward to even more secure and private messaging experiences.

Seure Messaging Apps: A Safer Alternative to SMS for Enhanced Privacy and Cybersecurity

 

The Short Messaging Service (SMS) has been a fundamental part of mobile communication since the 1990s when it was introduced on cellular networks globally. 

Despite the rise of Internet Protocol-based messaging services with the advent of smartphones, SMS continues to see widespread use. However, this persistence raises concerns about its safety and privacy implications.

Reasons Why SMS Is Not Secure

1. Lack of End-to-End Encryption

SMS lacks end-to-end encryption, with messages typically transmitted in plain text. This leaves them vulnerable to interception by anyone with the necessary expertise. Even if a mobile carrier employs encryption, it's often a weak and outdated algorithm applied only during transit.

2. Dependence on Outdated Technology

SMS relies on Signaling System No. 7 (SS7), a set of signalling protocols developed in the 1970s. This aging technology is highly insecure and susceptible to various cyberattacks. Instances of hackers exploiting SS7 vulnerabilities for malicious purposes have been recorded.

3. Government Access to SMS

SS7 security holes have not been adequately addressed, potentially due to government interest in monitoring citizens. This raises concerns about governments having the ability to read SMS messages. In the U.S., law enforcement can access messages older than 180 days without a warrant, despite efforts to change this.

4. Carrier Storage of Messages

Carriers retain SMS messages for a defined period, and metadata is stored even longer. While laws and policies aim to prevent unauthorized access, breaches can still occur, potentially compromising user privacy.

5. Irreversible Nature of SMS Messages

Once sent, SMS messages cannot be retracted. They persist on the recipient's device indefinitely, unless manually deleted. This lack of control raises concerns about the potential exposure of sensitive information in cases of phone compromise or hacking.

Several secure messaging apps provide safer alternatives to SMS:

1. Signal
 
Signal is a leading secure messaging app known for its robust end-to-end encryption, ensuring only intended recipients can access messages. Developed by the non-profit Signal Foundation, it prioritizes user privacy and does not collect personal data.

2. Telegram

Telegram offers a solid alternative to SMS. While messages are not end-to-end encrypted by default, users can enable Secret Chats for enhanced security. This feature prevents forwarding and limits access to messages, photos, videos, and documents.

3. WhatsApp

Despite its affiliation with Meta, WhatsApp is a popular alternative with billions of active users. It employs end-to-end encryption for message security, surpassing the safety provided by SMS. It's available on major platforms and is widely used among contacts.

In conclusion, SMS is not a recommended option for individuals concerned about personal cybersecurity and privacy. While it offers convenience, its security shortcomings are significant. 

Secure messaging apps with end-to-end encryption are superior alternatives, providing a higher level of protection for sensitive communications. If using SMS is unavoidable, caution and additional security measures are advised to safeguard information.