Search This Blog
Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Labels

Footer About

Footer About

Labels

Load More
Trendy Right Now

Popular Posts

Showing posts with label data security. Show all posts
data security
AI Platform AI Security AI security flaw AI technology Critical security flaw Cyber Security data security

AI IDE Security Flaws Exposed: Over 30 Vulnerabilities Highlight Risks in Autonomous Coding Tools

 

More than 30 security weaknesses in various AI-powered IDEs have recently been uncovered, raising concerns as to how emerging automated development tools might unintentionally expose sensitive data or enable remote code execution. A collective set of vulnerabilities, referred to as IDEsaster, was termed by security researcher Ari Marzouk (MaccariTA), who found that such popular tools and extensions as Cursor, Windsurf, Zed.dev, Roo Code, GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and others were vulnerable to attack chains leveraging prompt injection and built-in functionalities of the IDEs. At least 24 of them have already received a CVE identifier, which speaks to their criticality. 

However, the most surprising takeaway, according to Marzouk, is how consistently the same attack patterns could be replicated across every AI IDE they examined. Most AI-assisted coding platforms, the researcher said, don't consider the underlying IDE tools within their security boundaries but rather treat long-standing features as inherently safe. But once autonomous AI agents can trigger them without user approval, the same trusted functions can be repurposed for leaking data or executing malicious commands. 

Generally, the core of each exploit chain starts with prompt injection techniques that allow an attacker to redirect the large language model's context and behavior. Once the context is compromised, an AI agent might automatically execute instructions, such as reading files, modifying configuration settings, or writing new data, without the explicit consent of the user. Various documented cases showed how these capabilities could eventually lead to sensitive information disclosure or full remote code execution on a developer's system. Some vulnerabilities relied on workspaces being configured for automatic approval of file writes; thus, in practice, an attacker influencing a prompt could trigger code-altering actions without any human interaction. 

Researchers also pointed out that prompt injection vectors may be obfuscated in non-obvious ways, such as invisible Unicode characters, poisoned context originating from Model Context Protocol servers, or malicious file references added by developers who may not suspect a thing. Wider concerns emerged when new weaknesses were identified in widely deployed AI development tools from major companies including OpenAI, Google, and GitHub. 

As autonomous coding agents see continued adoption in the enterprise, experts warn these findings demonstrate how AI tools significantly expand the attack surface of development workflows. Rein Daelman, a researcher at Aikido, said any repository leveraging AI for automation tasks-from pull request labeling to code recommendations-may be vulnerable to compromise, data theft, or supply chain manipulation. Marzouk added that the industry needs to adopt what he calls Secure for AI, meaning systems are designed with intentionality to resist the emerging risks tied to AI-powered automation, rather than predicated on software security assumptions.
Read more »
Hacker Groups
Cyber Attacks cybercrime gangs CyberSecurity Ransomware Attacks Data protection data security Data Theft Hacker Groups

Rhysida Ransomware Gang Claims Attack on Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office

 

The ransomware gang Rhysida has claimed responsibility for a cyberattack targeting the Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office in Oklahoma. The sheriff’s office publicly confirmed the incident on November 20, stating that parts of its internal systems were affected. However, key details of the breach remain limited as the investigation continues. 

Rhysida claims that sensitive information was extracted during the intrusion and that a ransom of nine bitcoin—about $787,000 at the time of the claim—has been demanded. To support its claim, the group released what it described as sample records taken from the sheriff’s office. The leaked material reportedly includes Social Security cards, criminal background checks, booking documents, court filings, mugshots, and medical information. 

Authorities have not yet confirmed whether the stolen data is authentic or how many individuals may be affected. It also remains unclear how the attackers gained access, whether systems remain compromised, or if the sheriff’s office intends to negotiate with the group. 

In a brief public statement, the agency reported that a “cybersecurity incident” had disrupted its network and that a full investigation was underway. The sheriff’s office emphasized that emergency response and daily law enforcement functions were continuing without interruption. A Facebook post associated with the announcement—later removed—reiterated that 911 services, patrol response, and public safety operations remained operational. County IT teams are still assessing the full extent of the attack. 

Rhysida is a relatively recent but increasingly active ransomware operation, first identified in May 2023. The group operates under a ransomware-as-a-service model, allowing affiliates to deploy its malware in exchange for a share of ransom proceeds. Rhysida’s typical method involves data theft followed by encryption, with the group demanding payment both to delete stolen files and to provide decryption keys. The group has now claimed responsibility for at least 246 ransomware attacks, nearly 100 of which have been confirmed by affected organizations. 

Government agencies continue to be frequent targets. In recent years, Rhysida has claimed attacks on the Maryland Department of Transportation and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, although both organizations reported refusing ransom demands. Broader data suggests the trend is escalating, with researchers documenting at least 72 confirmed ransomware attacks on U.S. government entities so far in 2025, affecting nearly 450,000 records. 

The average ransom demand across these incidents is estimated at $1.18 million. The Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office serves approximately 280,000 residents in Oklahoma and has around 200 employees. As the investigation remains active, officials say additional updates will be shared as more information becomes available.
Read more »
Personal Data
Android Spyware CISA Cyber Security Cyberattacks Data Hacking data security Hacking WhatsApp Mobile Spyware Personal Data

CISA Warns of Rising Targeted Spyware Campaigns Against Encrypted Messaging Users

 

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has issued an unusually direct warning regarding a series of active campaigns deploying advanced spyware against users of encrypted messaging platforms, including Signal and WhatsApp. According to the agency, these operations are being conducted by both state-backed actors and financially motivated threat groups, and their activity has broadened significantly throughout the year. The attacks now increasingly target politicians, government officials, military personnel, and other influential individuals across several regions. 

This advisory marks the first time CISA has publicly grouped together multiple operations that rely on commercial surveillance tools, remote-access malware, and sophisticated exploit chains capable of infiltrating secure communications without alerting the victim. The agency noted that the goal of these campaigns is often to hijack messaging accounts, exfiltrate private data, and sometimes obtain long-term access to devices for further exploitation. 

Researchers highlighted multiple operations demonstrating the scale and diversity of techniques. Russia-aligned groups reportedly misused Signal’s legitimate device-linking mechanism to silently take control of accounts. Android spyware families such as ProSpy and ToSpy were distributed through spoofed versions of well-known messaging apps in the UAE. Another campaign in Russia leveraged Telegram channels and phishing pages imitating WhatsApp, Google Photos, TikTok, and YouTube to spread the ClayRat malware. In more technically advanced incidents, attackers chained recently disclosed WhatsApp zero-day vulnerabilities to compromise fewer than 200 targeted users. Another operation, referred to as LANDFALL, used a Samsung vulnerability affecting devices in the Middle East. 

CISA stressed that these attacks are highly selective and aimed at individuals whose communications have geopolitical relevance. Officials described the activity as precision surveillance rather than broad collection. Analysts believe the increasing focus on encrypted platforms reflects a strategic shift as adversaries attempt to bypass the protections of end-to-end encryption by compromising the devices used to send and receive messages. 

The tactics used in these operations vary widely. Some rely on manipulated QR codes or impersonated apps, while others exploit previously unknown iOS and Android vulnerabilities requiring no user interaction. Experts warn that for individuals considered high-risk, standard cybersecurity practices may no longer be sufficient. 

CISA’s guidance urges those at risk to adopt stronger security measures, including hardware upgrades, phishing-resistant authentication, protected telecom accounts, and stricter device controls. The agency also recommends reliance on official app stores, frequent software updates, careful permission auditing, and enabling advanced device protections such as Lockdown Mode on iPhones or Google Play Protect on Android.  

Officials stated that the rapid increase in coordinated mobile surveillance operations reflects a global shift in espionage strategy. With encrypted messaging now central to sensitive communication, attackers are increasingly focused on compromising the endpoint rather than the encryption itself—a trend authorities expect to continue growing.
Read more »
Phishing Attacks
Cybernews data security malware Phishing Attacks

More Breaches, More Risks: Experts say Protect Your Data Now

 

As data breaches surge, experts warn consumers to guard personal information before it reaches the dark web With data breaches becoming almost routine, more consumers are being forced to confront the risks of having their personal information exposed online. 

A recent US News survey found that 44 percent of respondents had received notices for multiple breaches involving their personal data. For many people, it now feels like another familiar company announces a breach every few days. Once stolen, this information typically ends up on the dark web, where it becomes a valuable resource for hackers, scammers, and cybercriminals. Breaches are only one pathway for data to be leaked. 

Clicking phishing links, entering details in viral social media quizzes, or having a device compromised by malware can all provide criminals with access to personal information that later circulates on underground forums. 

Dr. Darren Williams, founder and CEO of data privacy and ransomware protection company BlackFog, says the presence of some personal data on the dark web does not mean consumers should surrender to the problem. According to him, there are steps that can reduce exposure and protect information that has not yet been compromised. 

Williams explains that criminals increasingly rely on AI to pull together stolen data into detailed information bundles called “fullz.” These files can include banking credentials, addresses, medical data, and social security numbers. Scammers use them to impersonate relatives, romantic partners, or trusted contacts in targeted fraud attempts. 

He notes that while highly individualized scams are less common, criminals tend to target groups of victims at scale using dark web data. To understand their level of exposure, experts recommend that consumers start by scanning the dark web for leaked credentials. 

Many password managers and personal data removal services now offer monitoring tools that track whether email addresses, usernames, or passwords have been posted online. Removing data once it appears on dark web marketplaces is extremely difficult, which is why privacy specialists advise minimizing personal information shared online. Williams says reducing digital footprints can make individuals less appealing to attackers. 

Personal data removal services can help scrub information from commercial data broker sites, which can number in the hundreds. Security specialists also emphasize the importance of preventing criminals from expanding access to personal devices or financial accounts. 

Recommended practices include enabling multi-factor authentication, using strong and unique passwords stored in a password manager, installing antivirus software, avoiding links from unknown senders, updating operating systems regularly, and using a VPN on public Wi-Fi. Identity theft protection platforms and credit monitoring services can offer an extra layer of defense and provide real-time alerts if suspicious activity occurs.
Read more »
Personal Data
CyberCrime Data Breach Data Leak Data Privacy Concerns Data Safety User Data data security Personal Data

WhatsApp Enumeration Flaw Exposes Data of 3.5 Billion Users in Massive Scraping Incident

 

Security researchers in Austria uncovered a significant privacy vulnerability in WhatsApp that enabled them to collect the personal details of more than 3.5 billion registered users, an exposure they believe may be the largest publicly documented data leak to date. The issue stems from a long-standing feature that allows users to search WhatsApp accounts by entering phone numbers. While meant for convenience, the function can be exploited to automatically compile profiles at scale. 

Using phone numbers generated with a custom tool built on Google’s libphonenumber system, the research team was able to query account details at an astonishing rate—more than 100 million accounts per hour. They reported exceeding 7,000 automated lookups per second without facing IP bans or meaningful rate-limiting measures. Their findings indicate that WhatsApp’s registered user base is larger than previously disclosed, contradicting the platform’s statement that it serves “over two billion” users globally. 

The scraped records included phone numbers, account names, profile photos, and, in some cases, personal text attached to accounts. Over half of the identified users had public profile images, and a substantial portion contained identifiable human faces. About 29 percent included text descriptions, which researchers noted could reveal sensitive personal information such as sexuality, political affiliation, drug use, professional identities, or links to other platforms—including LinkedIn and dating apps.  
The study also revealed that millions of accounts belonged to phone numbers registered in countries where WhatsApp is restricted or banned, including China, Myanmar, and North Korea. Researchers warn that such exposure could put users in those regions at risk of government monitoring, penalties, or arrest. 

Beyond state-level dangers, experts stress that the harvested dataset could be misused by cybercriminals conducting targeted phishing campaigns, fraudulent messaging schemes, robocalling, and identity-based scams. The team emphasized that the persistence of phone numbers poses an ongoing risk: half of the numbers leaked during Facebook’s large-scale 2021 data scraping incident were still active in WhatsApp’s ecosystem. 

Meta confirmed receiving the researchers’ disclosure through its bug bounty process. The company stated that it has since deployed updated anti-scraping defenses and thanked the researchers for responsibly deleting collected data. According to WhatsApp engineering leadership, the vulnerability did not expose private messages or encrypted content. 

The researchers validated Meta’s claim, noting that the original enumeration method is now blocked. However, they highlighted that verifying security completeness remains difficult and emphasized the nearly year-long delay between initial reporting and effective remediation.  
Whether this incident triggers systemic scrutiny or remains an isolated cautionary case, it underscores a critical reality: even services built around encryption can expose sensitive user metadata, creating new avenues for surveillance and exploitation.
Read more »
Hacker attack
Cyber Attacks Cybersecurity Breach Data Breaches Data Leaked data security Defaced Website Hacked Hacker attack

Russian-Linked Surveillance Tech Firm Protei Hacked, Website Defaced and Data Published

 

A telecommunications technology provider with ties to Russian surveillance infrastructure has reportedly suffered a major cybersecurity breach. The company, Protei, which builds systems used by telecom providers to monitor online activity and restrict access to websites and platforms, had its website defaced and internal data stolen, according to information reviewed by TechCrunch. The firm originally operated from Russia but is now based in Jordan and supplies technology to clients across multiple regions, including the Middle East, Europe, Africa, Mexico, Kazakhstan and Pakistan. 

Protei develops a range of systems used by telecom operators, including conferencing platforms and connectivity services. However, the company is most widely associated with deep packet inspection (DPI) tools and network filtering technologies — software commonly used in countries where governments impose strict controls on online information flow and communication. These systems allow network providers to inspect traffic patterns, identify specific services or websites and enforce blocks or restrictions. 

It remains uncertain exactly when the intrusion occurred, but archived pages from the Wayback Machine indicate the public defacement took place on November 8. The altered site contained a short message referencing the firm’s involvement in DPI technology and surveillance infrastructure. Although the webpage was restored quickly, the attackers reportedly extracted approximately 182 gigabytes of data from Protei’s systems, including email archives dating back several years. 

A copy of the exposed files was later supplied to Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoSecrets), an organization known for cataloging leaked data from governments, law enforcement agencies and companies operating in surveillance or censorship markets. DDoSecrets confirmed receiving the dataset and made it available to researchers and journalists. 

Prior to publication, TechCrunch reached out to Protei leadership for clarification. Mohammad Jalal, who oversees the company’s Jordan branch, did not initially respond. After publication, he issued an email claiming the company is not connected to Russia and stating that Protei had no confirmed knowledge of unauthorized data extraction from its servers. 

The message left by the hacker suggested an ideological motive rather than a financial one. The wording referenced SORM — Russia’s lawful interception framework that enables intelligence agencies to access telecommunications data. Protei’s network filtering and DPI tools are believed to complement SORM deployments in regions where governments restrict digital freedoms. 

Reports from research organizations have previously linked Protei technology to censorship infrastructure. In 2023, Citizen Lab documented exchanges suggesting that Iranian telecommunications companies sought Protei’s systems to log network activity and block access to selected websites. Documents reviewed by the group indicated the company’s ability to deploy population-level filtering and targeted restrictions. 

The breach adds to growing scrutiny surrounding technology vendors supplying surveillance capabilities internationally, especially in environments where privacy protections and freedom of expression remain vulnerable.
Read more »
personal data leak
Customer Data Customer Data Exposed Data Breach Data exposed data security leaked sensitive data personal data leak

DoorDash Data Breach Exposes Customer Information in October 2025 Incident

 

DoorDash has informed its customers that the company experienced a security incident in late October, marking yet another breach for the food delivery platform. According to details first reported by BleepingComputer, DoorDash has begun emailing users to disclose that on October 25, 2025, an unauthorized individual infiltrated parts of its internal systems and accessed selected customer contact information. The type of data exposed varied from person to person but involved key personal details. In its notification email, the company confirmed that names, physical addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses were among the information viewed by the intruder. While financial data does not appear to have been compromised, the collection of exposed fields still carries significant risk because such details can easily be reused in phishing, impersonation, and other forms of social engineering attacks. 

DoorDash stated that the root cause of the breach was a social engineering scam targeting an employee, which ultimately allowed the attacker to obtain credentials and slip past internal safeguards. As soon as the company recognized unusual activity, its security team revoked the unauthorized access, launched a broader investigation, and contacted law enforcement to support further review. However, the company did not specify how many individuals may have been affected. What is clear is that the impacted group includes customers, delivery drivers (known as Dashers), and merchants. Considering DoorDash reported roughly 7 million contractors in 2023, nearly 600,000 partner merchants in 2024, and more than 42 million active users, the number of people touched by the incident could be extensive. 

This latest breach adds to a concerning pattern for the company, which was previously affected by two significant incidents in 2019 and 2022. The 2019 attack exposed information belonging to approximately 5 million customers, Dashers, and merchants, while the 2022 event stemmed from the same campaign that targeted communications provider Twilio. These recurring issues highlight how attractive large consumer platforms remain to cybercriminals. 

For users, the most important step after any data exposure is to immediately update account passwords and ensure they are strong, unique, and not reused across services. A password manager can simplify this process and reduce risk over time. Enabling multi-factor authentication on DoorDash and other critical accounts adds an extra security barrier that often stops attackers even if credentials are stolen. Because personal details were accessed, users should stay alert for phishing messages that may imitate DoorDash or reference suspicious orders. These tactics are common after breaches and can easily lure people into clicking harmful links or providing additional sensitive information. 

Customers may also benefit from using reputable identity theft protection services that monitor financial activity and personal data for signs of misuse. While no single step can eliminate the consequences of a breach, proactive monitoring and cautious digital habits can significantly reduce the likelihood of further harm.
Read more »
monitoring
Apple Apple ID Cyber Privacy Cyber Security Data Safety data security Digital Privacy enhanced user privacy monitoring

Apple’s Digital ID Tool Sparks Privacy Debate Despite Promised Security

 

Apple’s newly introduced Digital ID feature has quickly ignited a divide among users and cybersecurity professionals, with reactions ranging from excitement to deep skepticism. Announced earlier this week, the feature gives U.S. iPhone owners a way to present their passport directly from Apple Wallet at Transportation Security Administration checkpoints across more than 250 airports nationwide. Designed to replace the need for physical identity documents at select travel touchpoints, the rollout marks a major step in Apple’s broader effort to make digital credentials mainstream. But the move has sparked conversations about how willing society should be to entrust critical identity information to smartphones. 

On one side are supporters who welcome the convenience of leaving physical IDs at home, believing Apple’s security infrastructure offers a safer and more streamlined travel experience. On the other side are privacy advocates who fear that such technology could pave the way for increased surveillance and data misuse, especially if government agencies gain new avenues to track citizens. These concerns mirror wider debates already unfolding in regions like the United Kingdom and the European Union, where national and bloc-wide digital identity programs have faced opposition from civil liberties organizations. 

Apple states that its Digital ID system relies on advanced encryption and on-device storage to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access. Unlike cloud-based sharing models, Apple notes that passport data will remain confined to the user’s iPhone, and only the minimal information necessary for verification will be transmitted during identification checks. Authentication through Face ID or Touch ID is required to access the ID, aiming to ensure that no one else can view or alter the data. Apple has emphasized that it does not gain access to passport details and claims its design prioritizes privacy at every stage. 

Despite these assurances, cybersecurity experts and digital rights advocates are unconvinced. Jason Bassler, co-founder of The Free Thought Project, argued publicly that increasing reliance on smartphone-based identity tools could normalize a culture of compromised privacy dressed up as convenience. He warned that once the public becomes comfortable with digital credentials, resistance to broader forms of monitoring may fade. Other specialists, such as Swiss security researcher Jean-Paul Donner, note that iPhone security is not impenetrable, and both hackers and law enforcement have previously circumvented device protections. 

Major organizations like the ACLU, EFF, and CDT have also called for strict safeguards, insisting that identity systems must be designed to prevent authorities from tracking when or where identification is used. They argue that without explicit structural barriers to surveillance, the technology could be exploited in ways that undermine civil liberties. 

Whether Apple can fully guarantee the safety and independence of digital identity data remains an open question. As adoption expands and security is tested in practice, the debate over convenience versus privacy is unlikely to go away anytime soon. TechRadar is continuing to consult industry experts and will provide updates as more insights emerge.
Read more »
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)